HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-544 KrugClinton James Krug
219 Gordon Street
DuBoistown, PA 17702
Dear Mr. Krug:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 13, 2007
07 -544
This responds to your letter dated April 26, 2007, by which you requested advice
from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would present any prohibitions or restrictions upon the
requester, an Air Pollution Control Engineer 11 for the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection ( "DEP "), with regard to purchasing shares of stock in a
company presently assigned to him for review and oversight if: (1) said company would
be reassigned to another DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer for review and oversight;
and (2) the requester would no longer be involved in his official capacity in anything
pertaining to said company.
Facts: As an Air Pollution Control Engineer 11 with DEP, you request an advisory
from the State Ethics Commission based upon facts that may be fairly summarized as
follows.
You have been employed by DEP for approximately 20 months. You have
submitted a copy of your DEP job description and organizational chart, which
documents are incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the job classification
specifications for your position (job code 14010) has also been obtained and is
incorporated herein by reference.
In your position, you perform duties relative to various businesses assigned to
you, including one particular company (hereinafter referred to as the Company "). As to
the Company, you have conducted engineering reviews, approved the installation and
operation of certain manufacturing equipment, and informed the Company of various
restrictions (regulations) pertaining to the installation and operation of said equipment.
You have also required the Company to perform stack testing on some of the new
equipment to verify that the equipment was not exhausting excessive amounts of air
pollutants into the atmosphere.
Krug, 07 -544
June 13, 2007
Page 2
You state that you have not yet issued any of the Company's air quality operating
permits. However, because the Company is assigned to you, you will be responsible for
the issuance of such permits and the performance of other duties relative to the
Company as provided in your DEP job description.
Although you currently do not own any shares of stock in the Company, you are
considering purchasing shares of stock in the Company. You state that the DEP
Environmental Group Manager could reassign the Company to any of five other Air
Pollution Control Engineers.
You seek advice as to whether you would be permitted to purchase stock in the
Company without being subject to any type of disciplinary action (including civil,
criminal, or any other type of disciplinary action), if: (1) the Company would be
reassigned to another DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer; and (2) you would no longer
be involved in your official capacity with anything pertaining to the Company.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11)
of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As an Air Pollution Control Engineer II for DEP, you are a public employee
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. This conclusion is based upon the job
description and job classification specifications, which when reviewed on an objective
basis, indicate clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official action of a
non - ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the following: contracting;
procurement; planning; inspecting; administering or monitoring grants; leasing;
regulating; auditing; or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de
minimis on the interests of another person.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
Krug, 07 -544
June 13, 2007
Page 3
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
"Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association,
organization, self - employed individual, holding company,
joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity
organized for profit.
"Business with which he is associated." Any
business in which the person or a member of the person's
immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or
has a financial interest.
"Financial interest." Any financial interest in a legal
entity engaged in business for profit which comprises more
than 5% of the equity of the business or more than 5% of the
assets of the economic interest in indebtedness.
65 Pa. C. S. § 1102.
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to improper influence,
provide as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(b) Seeking improper influence. —No person shall
offer or give to a public official, public employee or nominee
or candidate for public office or a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he is associated, anything of
monetary value, including a gift, loan, political contribution,
reward or promise of future employment based on the
offeror's or donor's understanding that the vote, official
action or judgment of the public official or public employee or
nominee or candidate for public office would be influenced
thereby.
(c) Accepting improper influence. —No public
official, public employee or nominee or candidate for public
office shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value,
including a gift, loan, political contribution, reward or promise
of future employment, based on any understanding of that
public official, public employee or nominee that the vote,
official action or judgment of the public official or public
Krug, 07 -544
June 13, 2007
Page 4
employee or nominee or candidate for public office would be
influenced thereby.
65 Pa. C. S. §§ 1103(b), (c).
Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person
shall offer to a public employee anything of monetary value and no public employee
shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the
vote, official action, or judgment of the public employee would be influenced thereby.
Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will
be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question
presented.
Having established the above general principles, your specific inquiry shall be
addressed.
The facts that you have submitted do not enable a conclusive determination as to
whether your proposed purchase of stock in the Company would cause you to run afoul
of the Ethics Act. This is because the submitted facts do not reveal: your reasons for
wanting to purchase stock from the Company; how you learned of the availability of
such stock; any confidential information to which you have had access in your public
position that would relate to your desire to purchase stock in the Company; whether
such stock would be purchased in the stock market or privately; the terms at which such
stock would be purchased; your relationship, if any, with the principals /managers of the
Company; whether any actions that you took while being assigned to the Company
served as an inducement for purchasing stock; and any protections that would be in
place to ensure that confidential information received by another Air Pollution Control
Engineer who would assume your role as to the Company would not be accessible by
you.
Based upon the limited submitted facts, you are advised as follows.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act prohibits a public official /public employee from
using the authority of the public position or confidential information accessed by being in
the public position for a private pecuniary benefit.
Purchasing stock in the Company through the stock market at terms available to
the general public would not constitute a use of the authority of your public position for a
private pecuniary benefit contrary to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Purchasing
stock in the Company privately or at terms not available to the general public could form
the basis for a transgression of Section 1103(b) or Section 1103(c) of the Ethics Act if
the transaction would be based upon an improper understanding as to your official
action or judgment as a DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer 11.
Purchasing or selling stock in the Company based upon public information that
would become available to you at the same time and in the same manner as it would
become available to the general public would not constitute a use of confidential
information for a private pecuniary benefit contrary to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act.
Purchasing or selling stock in the Company based upon confidential information
accessed as a result of being a DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer 11 could form the
basis for a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Purchasing or
selling stock in the Company based upon information to which you would have access
prior to the general public could form the basis for a conflict of interest under Section
1103(a) of the Ethics Act. See, Riley, Opinion 00 -008, wherein the Commission held
that a county warrant enforcement bureau administrator who, by virtue of his public
employment, would have direct and immediate access to information pertaining to all
outstanding warrants in that county, giving him a financial advantage over others in
Krug, 07 -544
June 13, 2007
Page 5
serving county warrants, would have a conflict of interest and hence, could not serve
county warrants as a deputy constable for compensation.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act. It is recommended that you consult with an attorney to
ensure compliance with other state and federal laws and regulations as well as the
Governor's Code of Conduct.
Conclusion: As an Air Pollution Control Engineer 11 for the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection ( "DEP "), you are a public employee subject to
the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. §
1101 et seq. In response to your inquiry of whether the Ethics Act would present any
prohibitions or restrictions upon you with regard to purchasing shares of stock in a
company (the "Company ") presently assigned to you as a DEP Air Pollution Control
Engineer 11 for review and oversight if: (1) the Company would be reassigned to another
DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer for review and oversight; and (2) you would no
longer be involved in your official capacity in anything pertaining to the Company, you
are advised as follows. Purchasing stock in the Company through the stock market at
terms available to the general public would not constitute a use of the authority of your
public position for a private pecuniary benefit contrary to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act. Purchasing stock in the Company privately or at terms not available to the general
public could form the basis for a transgression of Section 1103(b) or Section 1103(c) of
the Ethics Act if the transaction would be based upon an improper understanding as to
your official action or judgment as a DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer 11. Purchasing
or selling stock in the Company based upon public information that would become
available to you at the same time and in the same manner as it would become available
to the general public would not constitute a use of confidential information for a private
pecuniary benefit contrary to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Purchasing or selling
stock in the Company based upon confidential information accessed as a result of being
a DEP Air Pollution Control Engineer 11 could form the basis for a conflict of interest
under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Purchasing or selling stock in the Company
based upon information to which you would have access prior to the general public
could form the basis for a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act. It is recommended that you consult with an attorney to ensure compliance
with other state and federal laws and regulations as well as the Governor's Code of
Conduct.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
Krug, 07 -544
June 13, 2007
Page 6
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel