HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-008 GaskillMr. Ronald L. Gaskill
Eastern United States Agricultural
and Food Export Council, Inc.
1424 Chestnut Street
Fifth Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Dear Mr. Gaskill:
I. Issue:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
Before: Robert W. Brown, Chair
Dennis C. Harrington, Vice Chair
James M. Howley
Daneen E. Reese
Roy W. Wilt
Austin M. Lee
James P. Gallagher
DATE DECIDED: August 23, 1991
DATE MAILED: September 3, 1991
91 -008
RE: Conflict, Public Employee, Former Public Employee, Executive
Level Employee, Bureau Director, Department of Agriculture,
Representation, Eastern United States Agriculture and Food Export
Council, Inc., Executive Director, Employment
This Opinion is issued in response to your letter of request
dated June 14, 1991.
Whether under the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
any prohibitions or restrictions are applicable to a Bureau
Director of the Department of Agriculture who resigns and assumes
private employment as Executive Director of the Eastern United
States Agriculture and Food Export Council, Inc., the "regular
membership" of which Council is comprised of the Departments of
Agriculture of ten northeastern states including Pennsylvania,
with the heads of said Departments of Agriculture or their
designees serving as the Board of Trustees.
II. Factual Basis for Determination:
As the Executive Director of the Eastern United States
Agriculture and Food Export Council, Inc. (EUSAFEC), you request
an advisory Opinion as to the impact of the Ethics Law upon your
activities in your new position. You were employed by the
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture as Director of the Bureau
of Market Development until May 10, 1991. At that time, with
three years and nine months service, you resigned to accept your
current position with EUSAFEC. You acknowledge that in your
former position as a Bureau Director with the Pennsylvania
Department of Agriculture, you were an "executive -level state
employee" as defined under the Ethics Law. After noting that you
were issued an Advice of Counsel (No. 90 -592) on an unrelated
matter, you inquire as to what activities would be considered
restricted for you as a former public employee relative to
interacting with the governmental agency by which you were
formerly employed. You have submitted a job description for your
position as Executive Director with EUSAFEC; the EUSAFEC By -Laws
as amended July 18, 1976; and a copy of EUSAFEC's Certificate of
Incorporation, which documents are incorporated herein by
reference.
The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) administers
an International Trade Program within its Bureau of Market
Development. The Program provides consultation with Pennsylvania
agriculture and food businesses to help them learn about and
experience export trade. In conducting the International Trade
Program, PDA has access to programs offered by the Foreign
Agriculture Service (FAS) of the United States Department of
Agriculture. The PDA accesses some of these programs directly
from FAS and others through EUSAFEC which is a private non-
profit industrial trade corporation. The FAS programs offered by
EUSAFEC to its member states cannot be accessed by the states in
any other way.
As noted EUSAFEC has ten "regular members" which are
the Departments of Agriculture of the ten participating
states, one of which is PDA. However, according to Article
I of the Incorporated By -Laws, other state Departments of
Agriculture may be admitted to "regular membership" upon
application and an affirmative two - thirds vote of the total
Board of Trustees of EUSAFEC. Furthermore, "associate
membership" is open to non - governmental entities including
"individuals, companies, cooperatives, and organizations who
have an interest in the exporting of agricultural
commodities, foods, and kindred products." By -Laws,
Article I, Section 3. Such associate members are admitted
by an affirmative vote of two - thirds of the total Board of
Trustees. Only regular members have the right to vote on
policy matters, By -Laws, Article I, Section 6, but it would
appear that associate members also have the right to develop
and participate in council - approved and sponsored projects
and to attend any meeting. Id., Article V.
The Secretaries /Commissioners from the member state
Departments of Agriculture form the Board of Trustees of EUSAFEC
which is the governing body. The Board has primary decision
making responsibility for the policies of the organization
and is supplemented by a Program Committee that advises the
Board and EUSAFEC staff on program operations. You state
that the Committee consists of marketing directors from each
member state Department of Agriculture, but Article IV,
Section 2 of the By -Laws states that the Program Committee
may also consist of associate members. Nevertheless, you
state that the said Committee is only advisory in nature.
The EUSAFEC staff consists of the Executive Director and two
other marketing and business specialists. The Executive Director
reports directly to the Board and has supervisory responsibility
over all EUSAFEC staff. However, the Executive Director also has
the responsibility of interacting regularly with the Board
Members including the Secretary of PDA, and with state marketing
staff including staff of PDA's International Trade Division.
Further responsibilities of the Executive Director include
providing information about EUSAFEC business matters,
recommending organization and program actions, implementing board
actions and policies, working with state marketing staffs to
implement EUSAFEC programs and other items normally associated
with the responsibilities of an international trade development
organization. Lastly, the Executive Director represents EUSAFEC
to the FAS.
EUSAFEC receives annual dues by each member state and the
rate is set by the Board. The EUSAFEC staff send invoices to
each state to collect the dues once a year which is usually the
only funding provided by member states to EUSAFEC with the
remainder coming from FAS and private businesses using EUSAFEC
programs.
After noting that you recently assumed the responsibilities
of Executive Director of EUSAFEC, you advise that you maintain
regular contact with and represent the interests of EUSAFEC to
the Secretary of PDA in his position as a EUSAFEC Board Member.
In addition you maintain regular contact with the international
trade staff of PDA and work to implement EUSAFEC programs through
state marketing staffs. You suggest that your interactions are
not in the nature of a lobbying activity and would not in your
view violate the public trust. You conclude by requesting our
opinion on this matter.
III. Discussion:
As the Director for the Bureau of Market Development for the
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, you were a "public
employee" and an "executive -level state employee" as those terms
are defined under the Ethics Law. Upon termination of public
service, you became a former public employee subject to the
provisions of Section 3(g) of the Public Official and Employee
Ethics Law. As an executive -level state employee you would also
be subject to the restrictions of Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law
which provides as follows:
Section 3. Restricted Activities
(i) No former executive -level State
employee may for a period of two years from the
time that he terminates his State employment be
employed by, receive compensation from, assist or
act in a representative capacity for a business or
corporation that he actively participates in
recruiting to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or
that he actively participated in inducing to open
a new plant, facility or branch in the
Commonwealth or that he actively participated in
inducing to expand an existent plant or facility
within the Commonwealth, provided that the above
prohibition shall be invoked only when the
recruitment or inducement is accomplished by a
grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or
loan of money from the Commonwealth to the
business or corporation recruited or induced to
expand.
Since under the proffered facts it does not appear that
there was any recruitment or inducement on your part as to a
grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money
from the Commonwealth to EUSAFEC, this provision of the Ethics
Law would not have application and hence will not be discussed.
Turning to Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law, this provision
provides:
Section 3. Restricted activities
(g) No former public official or public
employee shall represent a person, with promised
or actual compensation, on any matter before the
governmental body with which he has been
associated for one year after he leaves that body.
In order to answer your request, we must determine the
governmental body with which you were associated while
working with the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. We
will then consider the prohibitions associated with the
definitional term "represent," followed by an application of
the law to your situation.
The term "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated" is
defined under the Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions
"Governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been
associated." The governmental body within State
government or a political subdivision by which the
public official or employee is or has been
employed or to which the public official or
employee is or has been appointed or elected and
subdivisions and offices within that governmental
body.
We must conclude that the governmental body with which you
were associated upon termination of public service would be the
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture including but not limited
to the Bureau of Market Development. The foregoing conclusion is
based upon the language of the Ethics Law and the legislative
intent as set forth in the Legislative Journal of the House, 1989
session, No. 15 at 290, 291.
It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the
definition of the term "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated." It was
the specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above
term so that it was not merely limited to the area where a public
official /employee had influence or control but extended to the
entire governmental body with which the public official /employee
was associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the
legislative debate relative to the amendatory language for the
above term:
We sought to make particularly clear that when we
are prohibiting for 1 year that revolving -door kind of
conduct, we are dealing not only with a particular
subdivision of an agency or a local government but the
entire unit...
Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290,
291.
Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to
ascertain and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under
1 Pa. C.S.A. 1901, it is clear that the governmental body with
which you were associated is the Pennsylvania Department of
Agriculture.
The foregoing is also consistent with the prior precedent of
this Commission. See Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90-
009-R.
Therefore within a period of one year after the termination
of your public service on May 10, 1991, Section 3(g) of the
Ethics Law would restrict you from representing a person upon any
matter before your former governmental body. Parenthetically the
requirement that the representation be for promised or actual
compensation would clearly apply in this case since you are
compensated for your duties as Executive Director of EUSAFEC.
Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section
3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear
before agencies or entities other than with respect to the former
governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on
the type of employment in which a person may engage, following
departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however,
that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with
financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The
intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's
public employment he must act consistently with the public trust
and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should
not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector,
officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer,
treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his
association with his former governmental body.
In respect to the one year representation, the Ethics Law
defines "Represent" as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other
person in any activity which includes, but is not
limited to, the following: personal appearances,
negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or
contract proposals which are signed by or contain
the name of a former public official or public
employee.
In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under
the Ethics Law:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association, firm,
partnership, committee, club or other organization
or group of persons.
This Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also
interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of
the Ethics Law to prohibit:
1. Personal appearances before the former governmental
body or bodies, including,.,but not limited to,
negotiations or renegotiations in general or as to
contracts;
2. Attempts to influence;
3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are
signed or contain the name of the former public
official /employee;
4. Participating in any matters before the former
governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person;
5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any
person or employer before the former governmental body
in relation to legislation, regulations, etc.
This Commission has also held that listing one's name as the
person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former
governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former
governmental body. Therefore, within the first year after
termination of service, you should not engage in the type of
activity outlined above.
You may, assist in the preparation of any documents
presented to PDA so long as you are not identified as the
preparer. You may also counsel any person regarding that
person's appearance before PDA. Once again, however, the
activity in this respect should not be revealed to PDA. Of
course, any ban under the Ethics Law would not prohibit or
preclude the making of general informational inquiries of PDA to
secure information which is available to the general public.
This must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the
former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body
the representation of, or work for the new employer.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law
provide in part that no person shall offer to a public
official /employee and no public official /employee shall solicit
or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference
is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there
has or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
In the instant situation, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law
would not impose any restrictions upon you in your dealings with
the nine regular member states or their Secretaries /Commissioners
other than PDA since those nine states and their respective
representatives are not your former governmental body. However,
as to PDA and its personnel, including but not limited to the
Secretary of Agriculture and the personnel on the International
Trade Staff, your activities as Executive Director of EUSAFEC
which you designate as a private non - profit international trade
organization, would in our view be literally considered as
representing a person before your former governmental body, PDA.
A reading of Section 3(g) and the definitions contained in the
Ethics Law compel the above result. In particular you are a
former public employee. In addition EUSAFEC is a "person" as
defined in the Ethics Law since it is an organization. Further,
although you indicate that you have regular contact and represent
EUSAFEC before the Secretary of PDA, such activity does
constitute representation under our Act since you would be acting
on behalf of EUSAFEC in any activity. Therefore, Section 3(g)
compels us to conclude that you may not engage in any such
contacts with PDA, its Secretary or International Trade Staff.
The foregoing does not preclude you from dealing with the PDA
Secretary of Agriculture when he is sitting in his capacity as a
member of the Board of Trustees of EUSAFEC. However, you cannot
as Executive Director of EUSAFEC represent EUSAFEC by making
contacts to PDA, its Secretary, International Trade Staff or
other employees of that department. In addition, you must
observe the above strictures which are outlined as to a former
public employee and the governmental body with which he was
associated.
We realize that the above restrictions of Section 3(g)
create a dilemma for you in dealing with PDA, one of the ten
regular member states of EUSAFEC. You should have contacted this
Commission prior to accepting the position as you did in Gaskill,
Advice 90 -592. Since you have accepted the position of EUSAFEC
Executive Director, you will have to make necessary arrangements
as to comply with the restrictions of Section 3(g) outlined
above.
We do recognize the inherent worthwhile purpose of EUSAFEC
but we do not have the latitude to ignore the requirements of
Section 3(g) of our Act as legislated by the General Assembly of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Accordingly, we must conclude
that as a former public employee, you would be precluded from
representing EUSAFEC before your former governmental body, PDA,
for a period of one year after termination of public service.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law.
IV. Conclusion:
The former Director of the Bureau of Market Development
within the Department of Agriculture was an "executive -level
state employee" and a "public employee" under the Ethics Law.
Upon termination of public service, the Bureau Director became a
former public employee subject to the restrictions of Section
3(g) of the Ethics Law. The former public employee is restricted
for a period of one year after termination of service from
representing any person, including his new employer which is a
private non - profit international trade organization, before his
former governmental body, the Pennsylvania Department of
Agriculture.
Pursuant to Section 7(10), the person who acts in good faith
on this opinion issued to him shall not be subject to criminal or
civil penalties for so acting provided the material facts are as
stated in the request.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, any person may request the Commission to reconsider
its Opinion. The reconsideration request must be received at
this Commission within fifteen days of the mailing date of this
Opinion. The person requesting reconsideration should present a
detailed explanation setting forth the reasons why the Opinion
requires reconsideration.
By the Commission,
Dennis C. H
Vice Chair
rrington