Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-561 DoyleDear Mr. Doyle: ADVICE OF COUNSEL May 30, 2006 Michael J. Doyle, Branch Manager Excalibur Insurance Management Services, Inc. US Steel Tower 600 Grant Street Suite 4606 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 06 -561 This responds to your letter of April 25, 2006, by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would present any prohibition or restrictions upon a borough council member who, in his private capacity, is a licensed insurance agent and employee of an insurance company, with regard to conducting insurance business with the borough he serves as a council member. Facts: As a Council Member for Plum Borough ( "Borough "), you seek an advisory from the State Ethics Commission based upon the following submitted facts. In your private capacity, you are a licensed insurance agent and a Branch Manager of Excalibur Insurance Management Services, Inc. You have been asked to consider submitting a quote to provide insurance to the Borough when the Borough's insurance contract comes up for renewal. You state that you are an employee of the insurance company that you would be using. You state that if you would submit a quote to the Borough and the Borough would award the insurance contract to your employer, you would not accept a commission from your employer as you would simply be providing a service to the Borough taxpayers. You further state that you would abstain from the vote to award the contract. Seeking to avoid any issue of impropriety, you request an advisory under the Ethics Act based upon the foregoing submitted facts. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based Doyle, 06 -561 May 30, 2006 Page 2 upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As a Borough Council Member, you are a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted Activities (a) Conflict of interest. —No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j) Voting conflict. —Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j). The following terms pertaining to conflicts of interest under the Ethics Act are defined as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general Doyle, 06 -561 May 30, 2006 Page 3 public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self - employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. 65 Pa. C. S. § 1102. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Subject to certain voting conflict exceptions, Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act requires a public official /public employee with a conflict of interest to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or supervisor. In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and Doyle, 06 -561 May 30, 2006 Page 4 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f). contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. The term "contract" is defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real property. The term shall not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political subdivision as one party and a public official or public employee as the other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary, wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in consideration of his current public employment with the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official /public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an "open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Pursuant to Section 1103(f), an "open and public process" includes: (1) prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility; (2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be able to prepare and present an application or proposal; (3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered; and (4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official /employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised that Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act does not prohibit public officials /public employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /public employee may employee use the authority of his public position - or confidential information obtained by being in that position - for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. Examples of conduct that would be prohibited under Section 1103(a) would include: (1) the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action, Doyle, 06 -561 May 30, 2006 Page 5 Metrick, Order No. 1037; (2) the use of governmental facilities, such as governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research materials, or other property, or the use of governmental personnel, to conduct private business activities, Freind, Order No. 800; Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public official /public employee is associated in his private capacity or private client(s). Miller, Opinion 89 -024; Kannebecker, Opinion No. 92 -010. A reasonable and legitimate expectation that a business relationship will form may also support a finding of a conflict of interest. Amato, Opinion No. 89 -002; Garner, Opinion No. 93 -004; Snyder, Order No. 979 -2, affirmed Snyder v. SEC, 686 A.2d 843 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996), alloc. den., No. 0029 M.D. Allocatur Docket 1997 (Pa. December 22, 1997). In each instance of a conflict of interest, the public official /public employee must abstain from participation in his public capacity and observe the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) as set forth above. The abstention requirement is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any use of authority of office. In Juliante, Order 809, the Commission recognized that the use of authority of office as defined in the Ethics Act includes, for example, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a particular result. In considering the above, it is clear that the insurance company that employs you is a business with which you are associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would generally have a conflict of interest in matters before Borough Council that would financially benefit yourself, a member of your immediate family, your employer, or private client(s). See, Miller, supra; Kannebecker, supra. Although the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from bidding on the contract to provide insurance to the Borough, in your public capacity you would have a conflict of interest as a Borough Council Member in matters pertaining to the Borough's insurance. In each instance of a conflict, you would be required to abstain fully and to observe the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. The abstention requirement would extend beyond voting to include any use of authority of office. For example, you could not participate in matters such as drawing up the contract specifications or reviewing or selecting bids or proposals. In addition, the Ethics Act would prohibit you from using the authority of your public position or confidential information accessed or received as a result of being a Borough Council Member to effectuate a private pecuniary benefit to your employer through a detriment to a business competitor. See, Pepper, Opinion 87 -008. The requirements of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed whenever applicable. Parenthetically, although the contracting in question would not be prohibited under the Ethics Act provided the requirements of Sections 1103(a), 1103(f), and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be satisfied, a problem could exist as to such contracting under the Borough Code. It is administratively noted that the Borough Code provides in pertinent part: § 46404. Penalty for personal interest in contracts or purchases Except as otherwise provided in this act, no borough official either elected or appointed, who knows or who by the exercise of reasonable diligence could know, shall be interested to any appreciable degree either directly or indirectly in any purchase made or contract entered into or expenditure of money made by the borough or relating to the business of the borough, involving the expenditure by the Doyle, 06 -561 May 30, 2006 Page 6 borough of more than one thousand dollars ($1000) in any calendar year, but this limitation shall not apply to cases where such officer or appointee of the borough is an employe of the person, firm or corporation to which the money is to be paid in a capacity with no possible influence on the transaction, and in which he cannot be possibly benefited thereby either financially or otherwise. But in the case of a member of council or mayor, if he knows that he is within the exception just mentioned he shall so inform council and shall refrain from voting on the expenditure or any ordinance relating thereto, and shall in no manner participate therein. Any official or appointee who shall knowingly violate the provisions of this section shall be subject to surcharge to the extent of the damage shown to be thereby sustained by the borough and to ouster from office, and shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1000), or not exceeding one hundred eighty days' imprisonment, or both. 53 P.S. § 46404. Because this Advice may not determine whether such contracting would be prohibited by the above quoted provision of the Borough Code, it is suggested that you seek legal advice in that regard. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: As a Council Member for Plum Borough ( "Borough "), you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. The insurance company that employs you is a business with which you are associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would generally have a conflict of interest in matters before Borough Council that would financially benefit yourself, a member of your immediate family, your employer, or private client(s). Although the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from bidding on the contract to provide insurance to the Borough, in your public capacity you would have a conflict of interest as a Borough Council Member in matters pertaining to the Borough's insurance. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain and observe the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. The Ethics Act would prohibit you from using the authority of your public position or confidential information accessed or received as a result of being a Borough Council Member to effectuate a private pecuniary benefit to your employer through a detriment to a business competitor. The requirements of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed whenever applicable. Although the contracting in question would not be prohibited under the Ethics Act provided the requirements of Sections 1103(a), 1103(f), and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be satisfied, a problem could exist as to such contracting under the Borough Code, and therefore, it is suggested that you seek legal advice as to the applicability of the Borough Code. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. Doyle, 06 -561 May 30, 2006 Page 7 This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel