Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-537 LloydRobert S. Lloyd 56 Alexanders Court Newtown, PA 18940 ADVICE OF COUNSEL March 31, 2006 06 -537 Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; Township Supervisor; Business With Which Associated; Business Competitors. Dear Mr. Lloyd: This responds to your letter of March 1, 2006, by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., would present any prohibition or restrictions upon a Township Supervisor who in his private capacity is employed by Verizon, with regard to participating in matters involving Verizon or Verizon's business competitors. Facts: As a recently elected Supervisor of Wrightstown Township ( "Township "), you request an advisory from the State Ethics Commission based upon the following submitted facts. In your private capacity, you are employed by Verizon as Manager of Circuit Provisioning. You state that your job duties with Verizon include management of circuit design and testing and management of supervisors and specialists. You characterize your employment position as a "middle management" position. In your capacity as a Township Supervisor, you would often be called upon to review, deliberate and vote on land development issues that would include cell tower co- locations by Verizon and its competitors, as well as cable franchise agreements sought by Verizon and its competitors. You ask whether you would have a conflict of interest in participating and voting as to the foregoing matters given your employment with Verizon. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material Lloyd, 06 -537 March 31, 2006 Page 2 facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. It is further initially noted that, pursuant to the same aforesaid Sections of the Ethics Act, an opinion /advice may be given only as to prospective (future) conduct. If the activity in question has already occurred, the Commission may not issue an opinion /advice but any person may then submit a signed and sworn complaint, which will be investigated by the Commission if there are allegations of Ethics Act violations by a person who is subject to the Ethics Act. To the extent you have inquired as to conduct that has already occurred, such past conduct may not be addressed in the context of an advisory opinion. However, to the extent you have inquired as to future conduct, your inquiry may, and shall be addressed. As a Township Supervisor, you are a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted Activities (a) Conflict of interest. —No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j) Voting conflict. —Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j). The following terms pertaining to conflicts of interest under the Ethics Act are defined as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or Lloyd, 06 -537 March 31, 2006 Page 3 employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self - employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. 65 Pa. C. S. § 1102. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Subject to certain voting conflict exceptions, Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act requires a public official /public employee with a conflict of interest to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or supervisor. Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /public employee anything of monetary value and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with Lloyd, 06 -537 March 31, 2006 Page 4 which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. 65 Pa. C. S. § 1103(f). Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official /public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an "open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Pursuant to Section 1103(f), an "open and public process" includes: (1) prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility; (2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be able to prepare and present an application or proposal; (3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered; and (4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official /employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, your employer, Verizon, is a business with which you are associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would be prohibited from using the authority of your public office or confidential information accessed by being a Township Supervisor to financially benefit Verizon. See, e.g., Smith, Order 1147; cf., Schuckman, Advice 01- 594. You would also be prohibited from using the authority of office as a Township Supervisor to effectuate a detriment to Verizon's business competitors. See, Pepper, Opinion 87 -008. Having set forth the above parameters, you are further advised that land development issues or cable franchise agreements that would financially impact Verizon would generally present a conflict of interest for you. As to matters involving a business competitor of Verizon, you would be prohibited from using the authority of your office as a Township Supervisor to effectuate a detriment to such business competitor. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j). Lloyd, 06 -537 March 31, 2006 Page 5 The requirements and prohibitions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed when applicable. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Second Class Township Code. Conclusion: As a Supervisor for Wrightsville Township ( "Township "), you are a public official subject to the rovisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Your employer, Verizon, is a business with which you are associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would be prohibited from using the authority of your public office or confidential information accessed by being a Township Supervisor to financially benefit Verizon. You would also be prohibited from using the authority of office as a Township Supervisor to effectuate a detriment to Verizon's business competitors. Land development issues or cable franchise agreements that would financially impact Verizon would generally present a conflict of interest for you. As to matters involving a business competitor of Verizon, you would be prohibited from using the authority of your office as a Township Supervisor to effectuate a detriment to such business competitor. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j). The requirements and prohibitions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed when applicable. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel