HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-001 CONFIDENTIALOPINION OF THE COMMISSION
Before: Louis W. Fryman, Chair
John J. Bolger, Vice Chair
Donald M. McCurdy
Paul M. Henry
Raquel K. Bergen
Nicholas A. Colafella
DATE DECIDED: 2/23/06
DATE MAILED: 3/3/06
06 -001
Re: Conflict; Public Official; Commonwealth Agency A; C; Sale of Real Property
Owned by C in Private Capacity; Business Relationship.
This responds to your letter of February 2, 2006, by which you requested a
confidential advisory from the State Ethics Commission.
I. ISSUE:
Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. §
1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a C of Commonwealth
Agency A with regard to selling real estate to purchasers in a private transaction when
the purchasers have applied to participate in a loan program administered by another
Commonwealth agency and the C has no administrative authority over that loan
program.
II. FACTUAL BASIS FOR DETERMINATION:
As Chief Counsel for Commonwealth Agency A, you seek a confidential advisory
on behalf of B, C of Commonwealth Agency A. You have submitted facts that may be
fairly summarized as follows.
B is the owner of a certain tract of land and improvements thereon situate in
Township D, County E, Pennsylvania consisting of [number] acres and having an
address of [street address] (Property). The Property is a F with a G and [number] H's.
On [date], B entered into an Agreement of Sale for the Property with I
(Purchasers). You have submitted a copy of the Agreement of Sale, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
The Purchasers and B executed the Agreement of Sale providing B with a down
payment to secure the title. Subsequent to signing the Agreement of Sale, the
Purchasers applied for a loan from the Department of Community and Economic
Confidential Opinion, 06 -001
March 3, 2006
Page 2
Development (DCED) J Loan Program. You state that the Agreement of Sale was not
made contingent upon the Purchasers obtaining State funds or loans.
You make the following points with respect to the sale of the Property. First,
while B currently retains legal title until final closing of the transaction, equitable title to
the property currently resides with the Purchasers. Second, DCED administers the J
Loan Program on behalf of the Commonwealth Financing Authority (CFA), an
independent state agency. Third, as C of Commonwealth Agency A, B has no powers
or duties whatsoever with either DCED or CFA that might affect the review and /or
approval of the loan for which the Purchasers have applied. Fourth, neither B nor staff
of Commonwealth Agency A has the authority to participate in any way in DCED's
review of the subject application. Fifth, neither B nor staff of Commonwealth Agency A
has participated in any review of the subject application.
Based upon the foregoing facts, you pose the following specific inquiries:
1. Whether the Ethics Act would present any prohibitions or restrictions upon B with
respect to the sale of the Property to the Purchasers; and
2. Whether the Purchasers may apply for a loan under DCED's J Loan Program.
By letter dated February 3, 2006, you were notified of the date, time and location
of the executive meeting at which your request would be considered.
III. DISCUSSION:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics
Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon
the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts
that the requester has submitted, this Commission does not engage in an independent
investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted.
It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to
the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the
extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As C for Commonwealth Agency A, B is a public official as that term is defined in
the Ethics Act, and hence B is subject to the provisions of that Act.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
Confidential Opinion, 06 -001
March 3, 2006
Page 3
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no
person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public
official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee
would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to
imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(j).
In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official/
employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both
orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes or supervisor.
Confidential Opinion, 06 -001
March 3, 2006
Page 4
In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the
governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the
abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the
disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion 02 -005.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, pursuant
to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from
using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/
public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which
he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
In response to your first question, the Ethics Act would not present any
prohibition or restrictions upon B with regard to selling the Property to the Purchasers in
that B would be taking such action in a private capacity and not as a public official.
However, in B's public capacity as C for Commonwealth Agency A, he would have a
conflict of interest in participating in matters that would come before him that would
financially impact the Purchasers or the F that he is selling. This conclusion is
consistent with prior Commission rulings in which we have held that it is a conflict of
interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act for a public official /public employee to
use the authority of office or confidential information for the private pecuniary benefit of
an individual(s) with whom he has an ongoing business relationship. See, Miller,
Opinion 89 -024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92 -010. In any instance of a conflict of interest,
B would be required to abstain from participating and to fully satisfy the disclosure
requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act.
Your second question which asks whether the Purchasers may apply for a loan
under DCED's J Loan Program may not be addressed for the following two reasons.
First, this Commission may only address the conduct of those individuals who have
specifically given you their permission to submit your inquiry on their behalf. As to all
others, you are considered a third party without legal standing. Second, the question
posed is beyond the jurisdiction of this Commission.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the Governor's
Code of Conduct.
Conclusion: A C for Commonwealth Agency A is a public official subject to the
provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S.
1101 et seq. The Ethics Act would not present any prohibition or restrictions upon the C
with regard to selling real estate to purchasers in a private transaction in that the C
would be taking such action in a private capacity and not as a public official /public
employee. However, in the C's public capacity, he would have a conflict of interest in
participating in matters that would come before him that would financially impact the
purchasers with whom he has an ongoing business relationship or the F that he is
selling. In any instance of a conflict of interest, the C would be required to abstain from
participating and to fully satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the
Ethics Act. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(10), the person who acts in good faith on this Opinion
issued to him shall not be subject to criminal or civil penalties for so acting provided the
material facts are as stated in the request.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Confidential Opinion, 06 -001
March 3, 2006
Page 5
Finally, a party may request the Commission to reconsider its Opinion. The
reconsideration request must be received at this Commission within thirty days of the
mailing date of this Opinion. The party requesting reconsideration must include a
detailed explanation of the reasons as to why reconsideration should be granted in
conformity with 51 Pa. Code § 21.29(b).
By the Commission,
Louis W. Fryman
Chair