HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-561 ConfidentialPHONE: 717-783-1610
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936
To the Requester:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
FINANCE BUILDING
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 304
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
September 3, 2026
26-561
This responds to your letter dated August 24, 2026, by which you requested a confidential
advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission"), seeking guidance as
to the general issue presented below:
Issue:
Facts:
Whether the "revolving door" restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Public Official and
Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g), would prohibit you from
accepting a position with a private company that does work for the [Political Subdivision]
and other clients following termination of your employment as the [Position] of the
[Political Subdivision Department].
Brief Answer: Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from accepting a
position with a private company that does work for the [Political Subdivision] and other
clients following termination of your employment with the [Political Subdivision].
However, during the first year following termination of your [Political Subdivision]
employment, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict you from engaging
in any activity that would involve "representing" a "person" including but not limited
to a new employer such as the private company before your "former governmental
body," the [Political Subdivision Department].
You request a confidential advisory from the Commission based upon submitted facts that
may be fairly summarized as follows.
Confidential Advice, 26-561
September 3, 2026
Page 2
You are currently employed as the [Position] of the [Political Subdivision Department].
You have served in numerous roles in the [Political Subdivision] government during your career.
You state that you are now at your retirement age and that the nature of your work has created a
very technical skill set and has limited your opportunities for post -retirement employment in your
geographic area. You further state that in most cases, entities that you would consider to be
potential employers do work under contract for the [Political Subdivision].
You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or restrictions
upon you with regard to performing work for a new employer following your retirement from your
employment as the [Position] of the [Political Subdivision Department]. In particular, you pose
the following questions:
(1) Would you be in violation of the Ethics Act if, following your retirement, you
immediately began employment as an hourly or salaried employee with a private
company that has a contract with the [Political Subdivision], where:
(a) You would not represent the private company before the [Political
Subdivision Governing Body];
(b) You would not be an officer, principal, or shareholder of the private
company;
(c) You would not participate in the negotiation of any contracts between the
private company and the [Political Subdivision];
(d) When you would be assigned to do [Political Subdivision] work, you would
perform work that is already an obligation of the private company under
existing contracts with the [Political Subdivision]; and
(e) No commissions or incentives related to any [Political Subdivision]
contracts would be provided to you;
(2) Under the above facts, would you be permitted to begin employment with the
private company immediately upon your retirement in any/all of the following
scenarios:
(a) You would not perform any work for the [Political Subdivision] and would
be involved only in working on projects for other clients;
(b) You would perform occasional work for the [Political Subdivision] but also
would be assigned to perform work for other clients; or
(c) You would be assigned to do work solely for the [Political Subdivision];
(3) In scenario (2)(a) above, would it alter the answer if your position with the private
company would require you to be [In a Certain Status] for [Certain Work] for all
Confidential Advice, 26-561
September 3, 2026
Page 3
clients of the private company, including the [Political Subdivision], and in that
[Type of Roll], you would perform after-hours work for the [Political Subdivision]
until you could be relieved by another employee during normal business hours;
(4) Would there be any limitations upon your employment with a private company that
is a subcontractor to another private company that has a contractual relationship
with the [Political Subdivision];
(5) Irrespective of any answers as to the above, would there be any limitations on your
assigned work with a private company, including work for the [Political
Subdivision], after one full year following your retirement from your [Political
Subdivision] employment; and
(6) "Is there any time period on the applicability of your responses to this inquiry
(assuming no change in the Ethics Act)? More simply, can your opinion be relied
on a year after its receipt? 5 years? Etc.?" August 24, 2026, Advisory Request
Letter, at 2.
Discussion:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65
Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the
requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has
submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does
it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully
disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory
only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
The post -employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act apply to former
public officials/public employees. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public
official/public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former
public official/public employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before "the governmental
body with which he has been associated":
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee. --No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised
or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body
with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that
body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
Confidential Advice, 26-561
September 3, 2026
Page 4
§ 1102. Definitions
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any
activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal
appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former
public official or public employee.
"Person." A business, governmental body, individual,
corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club
or other organization or group of persons.
"Governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated." The governmental
body within State government or a political subdivision by which
the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which
the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected
and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other
businesses. It also includes the former public official/public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007.
The term "represent" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in
aM activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the
former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee;
(4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a
person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89-005.
During the one-year period of applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, Section
1103(g) generally would prohibit a former public official/public employee from contracting with
the former governmental body (see, Shaub, Order 1242; Confidential Opinion, 97-008;
Confidential Opinion, 93-005) or providing consulting services constituting representation before
the former governmental body (see, Claycomb, Opinion 14-004; Schrempf Opinion 13-004).
Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an
attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the
inclusion of the name of a former public official/public employee on invoices submitted by his
new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that
existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012.
However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee
worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by
Confidential Advice, 26-561
September 3, 2026
Page 5
the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion
95-011.
A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents
presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee
may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former
public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance
before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not
be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude
making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information
which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence
the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or
work for, the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to
representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee
is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental
body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the
particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public
employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of
House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R.
Conclusion:
As the [Position] of the [Political Subdivision Department], you are a "public employee"
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Consequently, upon termination of your [Political
Subdivision] employment, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section
1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been
associated upon termination of your [Political Subdivision] employment would be the [Political
Subdivision Department] in its entirety. For the first year following termination of your [Political
Subdivision] employment, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict you from
"representing" a "person" including but not limited to a new employer before the [Political
Subdivision Department]. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed.
Your specific questions shall now be addressed.
In response to your first, second, and third questions, you are advised as follows. Section
1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from retiring from your [Political Subdivision]
employment and beginning employment immediately thereafter as an hourly or salaried employee
with a private company that has a contract with the [Political Subdivision]. However, during the
first year following the termination of your [Political Subdivision] employment, Section 1103(g)
would prohibit you from performing any work as an employee of the private company that would
involve prohibited representation before the [Political Subdivision Department] as delineated
above. Section 1103(g) would not prohibit you from representing the private company before
[Political Subdivision] governmental bodies, agencies, or departments other than the [Political
Subdivision Department] or any clients other than the [Political Subdivision Department].
Confidential Advice, 26-561
September 3, 2026
Page 6
Although you question in part whether you would be permitted to do or perform work for
the [Political Subdivision] under certain circumstances, the submitted facts do not clearly indicate
whether the proposed work would involve solely the [Political Subdivision Department] or could
involve some other part or parts of the [Political Subdivision] government. Therefore, this
advisory is necessarily limited to providing the following general guidance regarding your
proposed performance of work for the [Political Subdivision].
Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from performing work for the
[Political Subdivision] as an employee of the private company if such work would involve
prohibited representation before the [Political Subdivision Department]. Section 1103(g) would
not prohibit you from performing work for the [Political Subdivision] as an employee of the private
company where such work would not involve prohibited representation before the [Political
Subdivision Department]. To the extent that your position with the private company would require
you to be [In a Certain Status] for after-hours [Type of Work] for all clients of the private company,
including the [Political Subdivision], Section 1103(g) would prohibit you from performing after-
hours work for the [Political Subdivision] if such work would involve prohibited representation
before the [Political Subdivision Department].
With regard to your fourth question, you are advised that Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act
would prohibityou from performing any job duties as an employee of a subcontractor to a business
that has a contractual relationship with the [Political Subdivision] that would involve prohibited
representation before the [Political Subdivision Department].
In response to your fifth question, you are advised that Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act
would not apply to restrict you from performing any job duties for a private company or other
employer after the expiration of a full one-year period following your retirement from the [Political
Subdivision].
In response to your sixth question, you are advised that the Ethics Act does not limit the
length of time that an advisory opinion remains effective. Therefore, this Advice of Counsel may
be relied upon indefinitely.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act;
the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Act has not been considered.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any
other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Confidential Advice, 26-561
September 3, 2026
Page 7
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
LD
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel