HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-542 Apessos - Elwee
PHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 304
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
July 6, 2026
To the Requesters:
George D. Apessos, Esquire, Counsel
Lydia C. Grose, Vice President Office Executive
Michael Baker International, Inc.
26-542
Dear Mr. Apessos and Ms. Grose:
This responds to Mr. Apletter received June 22, 2026,
received June 29, 2026, by which an advisory was requested from the Pennsylvania State Ethics
Commission (Commission), seeking guidance as to the issue presented below:
Issue:
Whether the -
1103(g) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (Ethics Act), 65 Pa.C.S. §
1103(g), would apply to impose restrictions upon an individual with regard to providing
staff augmentation services to Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
-time employee of Michael Baker International, Inc.
-time pensioner with
SEPTA.
Brief Answer: NO. Upon review of the submitted facts, as a part-time pensioner with
Act. Consequently, the post-employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act
are not applicable to the individual and would not impose restrictions upon him with regard
to providing staff augmentation services to SEPTA as a part-time employee of MBI.
Facts:
Apessos/Grose, 26-542
July 6, 2026
Page 2
Y
based upon submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows.
In April 2025, Mr. McElwee retired from his full-time employment with SEPTA. In May
2025, Mr. McElwee returned to employment with SEPTA as a part-time pensioner to provide
construction management support for the City Hall Program and related transit projects. Mr.
McElwee provided services to SEPTA through April 2026, when SEPTA decided not to renew his
part-time pensioner position.
have a formal job description for his part-time pensioner position with SEPTA. Ms. Grose further
states that Mr. McElwee provided the following description of his duties in that position:
through April 2026, I have been supporting staff to help move
forward the multi-project, City Hall Program, with embedded
projects such as the Broad Street Subway City Hall Reverse
Signaling Project, the City Hall Underpinning Project and the City
Hall ADA Improvement Project. These projects are multi-
disciplined, interrelated, and have a legacy of planning and design
spanning over 20 years which I have had a key roll, specifically as
the BSS Reverse Signal project ramps up and moves into
construction. I have been providing support to the C&S Department
by being a resource of existing knowledge and project background
to ensure that this essential phase meets the overall objective of the
City Hall Program.
Over the years I have also established important working
relationships with external stakeholders such as the City Hall
maintenance groups and the Center City District which I continued
to maintain and pass on to staff. My critical and specific knowledge
of the overlapping ownership of City Hall complex and the
delineation of responsibilities between entities, which has taken
years to develop is essential as we complete design of the
Underpinning Project. In addition to the City Hall Project, I have
assisted staff and provided information and history to projects that
are moving into construction. 11th Street Station, 19th Street
Station, 37th Street Station projects, projects associated with
preparing for the 2026 and projects within the 69th and Bridge Street
Complexes are several of the projects I provided staff with guidance,
1
advice and history
leveraging his existing knowledge and professional background in the relevant areas. Ms. Grose
1
Email from Lydia C. Grose, Vice President Executive Office, Michael Baker International, Inc., to Martin W.
Harter, Deputy Chief Counsel, Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission (June 29, 2026, at 4:45 p.m. EST).
Apessos/Grose, 26-542
July 6, 2026
Page 3
further states that Mr. McElwee did not participate in advancing any approvals or decisions
regarding internal or external stakeholders and that his assistance was limited to providing
guidance and context that did not influence or lead to any official actions.
MBI is considering hiring Mr. McElwee as a part-
GEC Construction Management contract with SEPTA.
The question that is presented by your advisory request is whether Mr. McElwee became
-time pensioner in May 2025
and consequently became subject to the one-year post employment restrictions of Section 1103(g)
of the Ethics Act when he ceased providing services to SEPTA in April 2026.
Discussion:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65
Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the
requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has
submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does
it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully
disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory
only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
The post-employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act apply only to former
public officials/public employees:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee.--No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised
or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body
with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that
body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g).
The Ethics Act defines the term public employee as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
Public employee. Any individual employed by the
Commonwealth or a political subdivision who is responsible for
taking or recommending official action of a nonministerial nature
with regard to:
(1) contracting or procurement;
(2) administering or monitoring grants or subsidies;
Apessos/Grose, 26-542
July 6, 2026
Page 4
(3) planning or zoning;
(4) inspecting, licensing, regulating or auditing any
person; or
(5) any other activity where the official action has an
economic impact of greater than a de minimis nature
on the interests of any person.
The term shall not include individuals who are employed by this
Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof in teaching as
distinguished from administrative duties.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
The Regulations of the State Ethics Commission similarly define the term public
employee and set forth the following additional criteria:
(ii) The following criteria will be used, in part, to determine whether
an individual is within the definition of public employe:
(A) The individual normally performs his responsibility in the field
without onsite supervision.
(B) The individual is the immediate supervisor of a person who
normally performs his responsibility in the field without
onsite supervision.
(C) The individual is the supervisor of a highest level field
office.
(D) The individual has the authority to make final decisions.
(E) The individual has the authority to forward or stop
recommendations from being sent to the person or body with
the authority to make final decisions.
(F) The individual prepares or supervises the preparation of final
recommendations.
(G) The individual makes final technical recommendations.
(H) The individuals recommendations or actions are an inherent
and recurring part of his position.
(I) The individuals recommendations or actions affect
organizations other than his own organization.
Apessos/Grose, 26-542
July 6, 2026
Page 5
(iii) The term does not include individuals who are employed by the
Commonwealth or a political subdivision of the Commonwealth in
teaching as distinguished from administrative duties.
(iv) Persons in the following positions are generally considered public
employes:
(A) Executive and special directors or assistants reporting
directly to the agency head or governing body.
(B) Commonwealth bureau directors, division chiefs or heads of
equivalent organization elements and other governmental
body department heads.
(C) Staff attorneys engaged in representing the department,
agency or other governmental bodies.
(D) Engineers, managers and secretary-treasurers acting as
managers, police chiefs, chief clerks, chief purchasing
agents, grant and contract managers, administrative officers,
housing and building inspectors, investigators, auditors,
sewer enforcement officers and zoning officers in all
governmental bodies.
(E) Court administrators, assistants for fiscal affairs and
deputies for the minor judiciary.
(F) School superintendents, assistant superintendents, school
business managers and principals.
(G) Persons who report directly to heads of executive, legislative
and independent agencies, boards and commissions except
clerical personnel.
(v) Persons in the following positions are generally not considered
public employes:
(A) City clerks, other clerical staff, road masters, secretaries,
police officers, maintenance workers, construction workers,
equipment operators and recreation directors.
(B) Law clerks, court criers, court reporters, probation officers,
security guards and writ servers.
(C) School teachers and clerks of the schools.
51 Pa. Code § 11.1.
Apessos/Grose, 26-542
July 6, 2026
Page 6
The following terms are relevant to your inquiry and are defined in the Ethics Act as
follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
Ministerial action. An action that a person performs in a
prescribed manner in obedience to the mandate of legal authority,
the desirability of the action being taken.
Nonministerial actions. An action in which the person
exercises his own judgment as to the desirability of the action taken.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Status as a public employee subject to the Ethics Act is determined by an objective test.
regulatory criteria to the powers and duties of the position itself. Typically, the powers and duties
of the position are established by objective sources that define the position, such as the job
description, job classification specifications, and organizational chart. The objective test considers
what an individual has the authority to do in a given position based upon these objective sources,
rather than the variable functions that the individual may actually perform in the position. See,
Phillips v. State Ethics Commission, 470 A.2d 659 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984); Eiben, Opinion 04-002;
Shienvold, Opinion 04-001; Shearer, Opinion 03-011. The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
has directed that
coverage under the Ethics Act be construed broadly and that exclusions under the Ethics Act be
construed narrowly. See, Quaglia v. State Ethics Commission, 986 A.2d 974 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010),
amended by, 2010 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 8 (Pa. Cmwlth. January 5, 2010), allocatur denied, 607
Pa. 708, 4 A.3d 1056 (2010); Phillips, supra.
authority to take or recommend official action of a nonministerial nature. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Likewise, the regulatory criteria for determining status as a public employee, as set forth in 51 Pa.
Code § 11.1
decisions but also individuals with authority to forward or stop recommendations from being sent
to final decision-makers; individuals who prepare or supervise the preparation of final
recommendations; individuals who make final technical recommendations; and individuals whose
recommendations are an inherent and recurring part of their positions. See, e.g., Reese/Gilliland,
Opinion 05-005.
Conclusion:
In applying the definition of "public employee" and the related regulatory criteria to the
submitted facts as to the duties of Mr. former position, the necessary conclusion is that
in his capacity as a part-time pensioner with SEPTA, Mr. McElwee was not a "public employee"
as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. Based upon an objective review, Mr. McElwee was not
Apessos/Grose, 26-542
July 6, 2026
Page 7
responsible for taking or recommending official action of a nonministerial nature with regard to
Because the duties and responsibilities of Mr. McElweeformer position did not bring
him
the Ethics Act is not applicable to him during the first year following termination of his service as
a part-time pensioner with SEPTA. Accordingly, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not
restrict Mr. McElwee from providing staff augmentation services to SEPTA as a part-time
employee of MBI.
The only provision of the Ethics Act that applies to Mr. McElwee is Section 1103(b), which
applies to everyone. Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person
shall offer or give to a public official/public employee anything of monetary value and no public
official/public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official/public employee
would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that
there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to
the question presented.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act;
the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Act has not been considered.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any
other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel