Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-562 Schultz, IIIADVICE OF COUNSEL July 7, 2005 Emil O. Schultz III, President Schultz Installation and Service Company, Inc. 1077 Mars Evans -City Road P.O. Box 896 Mars, PA 16046 05 -562 Re: Conflict; Public Official; School Director; Business With Which Associated; School District; Pre - existing Contracts With School District; Business Relationship; Client. Dear Mr. Schultz: This responds to your letter of June 6, 2005 by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a school director who has an ownership interest in a private business that has pre- existing contracts with the school district. Facts: You are on the Democratic ticket for the fall election for School Director of the Mars Area School District ( "School District "). You seek an advisory as to a pre- existing contract that the School District has with a private business in which you have an ownership interest. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. Each year, the School District awards a "control contract" for the maintenance of the controls in all the School District's buildings. The control contract is for profession[al] skill /personal service, and is awarded annually for the non - guaranteed sum of $45,000 to $50,000. You have a 37.5% stockholder interest in Schultz Installation and Service Company, Inc. ( "SISC "), a commercial HVAC sales and service company. SISC has done business with the School District for approximately 14 years, primarily servicing the controls in all of the School District's buildings. SISC's service cost to the School District is $55 per hour less 10% on materials on an as needed basis. SISC provides all the preventative maintenance on the controls, heating, air conditioning equipment, Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 2 pumps, and other associated equipment. In addition to the foregoing, in emergency situations, SISC repairs equipment that is not part of the normal contract such as kitchen freezers, deep fryers, hot water heaters, domestic pumps, or any other equipment that would prevent the School District from proceeding with normal operations. SISC has bid on School District projects such as additions, alterations, and new buildings as both a mechanical contractor and a control contractor. You state that these types of projects are open to all bidders and are awarded to the lowest bidder. Recently, SISC bid on a School District project as a mechanical contractor and a control contractor for an auditorium addition. Out of eight other bidders, SISC was the lowest bidder. The School District awarded the contract to SISC in the amount of approximately $989,000. The project was completed in October 2004. SISC also bid on a mechanical contract and a control contract for the installation of the Mars Primary School air conditioning contract and controls. SISC was the lowest bidder for the control contract which was in the amount of approximately $90,000, but was not the lowest bidder for the mechanical contract. In addition to servicing the School District, SISC also does business with 12 other schools and colleges, 20 hospitals including V.A. hospitals, prisons, mental health institutions, nursing homes, and private organizations. Based upon the foregoing facts, you seek an advisory from the State Ethics Commission as to your prospective conduct as a School Director relative to your ownership interest in SISC and its business relationship with the School District. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. If you would win the election for School Director, you would, upon assuming office, become a "public official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act, and hence you would be subject to the provisions of that Act. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides: § 1103. Restricted activities (a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a). The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 3 his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self - employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. "Financial interest." Any financial interest in a legal entity engaged in business for profit which comprises more than 5% of the equity of the business or more than 5% of the assets of the economic interest in indebtedness. "Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real property. The term shall not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political subdivision as one party and a public official or public employee as the other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary, wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in consideration of his current public employment with the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. 65 Pa. C. S. § 1102. In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 4 (f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. 65 Pa. C. S. § 1103(f). Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official /public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an "open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Pursuant to Section 1103(f), an "open and public process" includes: (1) prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility; (2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be able to prepare and present an application or proposal; (3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered; and (4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official /employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 5 meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa. C. S. § 1103(j). In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official/ employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or supervisor. In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion 02 -005. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, it is noted that Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act does not prohibit public officials /public employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /public employee may not use the authority of his public position - -or confidential information obtained by being in that position - -for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. Examples of conduct that would be prohibited under Section 1103(a) would include: (1) the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action, Metrick, Order 1037; (2) the use of governmental facilities, such as governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research materials, or other property, or the use of governmental personnel, to conduct private business activities, Freind, Order 800; Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public official /public employee is associated in his private capacity Gorman, Order 1041; Rembold, Order 1303; Wilcox, Order 1306), or private customer(s)/client(s) (Miller, Opinion 89 -024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92 -010). In Kannebecker, supra, the State Ethics Commission determined that a township supervisor, who in his private capacity was an attorney, would have a conflict of interest as to matters before the township involving ongoing clients or client(s) for whom he was on retainer, even if he would not represent such client(s) as to the matter pending before the township. The Commission determined that as a general rule, a conflict would not exist as to former client(s), but that under certain circumstances, a conflict could exist as to former client(s) depending upon factors such as the number of prior representations of the given client and the period of time over which such occurred. The Commission has also held that a reasonable and legitimate expectation that a business relationship will form may support a finding of a conflict of interest. Amato, Opinion 89 -002. In the instant matter, SISC would be considered a business with which you are associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would generally have a Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 6 conflict of interest in your public capacity as a School Director in matters that would financially impact you, SISC, or private customer(s) /client(s). You would specifically have a conflict of interest in matters relating to any contract(s) between SISC and the School District and any votes to approve the payment of invoices submitted by SISC under said contract(s). Further, you would have a conflict of interest in matters involving SISC's private customers /clients, which include other schools and colleges, hospitals, prisons, mental health institutions, nursing homes, and private organizations. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from participating and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. As a general rule, a conflict would not exist as to former customer(s)/client(s), but under certain circumstances, a conflict could exist as to former customer(s)/client(s) depending upon factors such as the number of prior business transactions involving the given customer /client and the period of time over which such occurred. You are further advised that the de minimis exclusion to the definition of "conflict" or "conflict of interest" precludes a finding of conflict of interest as to an action having a de minimis (insignificant) economic impact. See, Kolb, Order 1322; Schweinsburg, Order 900. The Commission has determined the applicability of the de minimis exclusion on a case -by -case basis, considering all relevant circumstances. In the past, the Commission has found amounts ranging from $2 to approximately $400 to be de minimis. Therefore, you are advised that you would not have a conflict of interest as to a customer /client from which you would receive only a de minimis (insignificant) financial benefit. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. See, Bixler v. State Ethics Commission, 847 A.2d 785 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004). For a customer /client involved in multiple transactions, the aggregate financial benefit received from such transactions should be considered in order to determine whether the de minimis exclusion would be applicable. With respect to Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, it would appear from the submitted facts that SISC is currently under contract with the School District on one or more projects. Given that such contract(s) were entered into prior to your possible election to the School Board, Section 1103(f) would have no application. However, if SISC and the School District would renew the contract(s) or enter into new ones during your tenure as a School Director, such contract(s), if over $500, would be subject to the restrictions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act. Under Section 1103(f), in your capacity as a public official, you would be prohibited from having any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract(s). Parenthetically, although the contracting in question would not be prohibited under the Ethics Act provided the requirements of Sections 1103(a), 1103(f), and 1103(j) are satisfied, a problem may exist as to such contracting under the Public School Code of 1949 as amended ( "Public School Code "). It is administratively noted that the Public School Code, provides in pertinent part: § 3 -324. Not to be employed by or do business with district; exceptions (a) No school director shall, during the term for which he was elected or appointed, as a private person engaged [sic] in any business transaction with the school district in which he is elected or appointed, be employed in any capacity by the school district in which he is elected or appointed, or receive from such school district any pay for services rendered to the district except as provided in this act: Provided, That one who has served as a school director for two consecutive terms, of six years each, may be elected Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 7 to the position of attorney or solicitor for the board of which he was a member by the unanimous vote of all the other members of the board, and, after resigning his office as school director, shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as solicitor as the board of school directors may determine: Provided, however, That a school director may be appointed to the position of secretary to the board of a school district of the second class, of which he was a member during the term for which he was elected or appointed upon the unanimous consent of all the other members of the board after resigning his office as school director, and he shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as secretary as the board of school directors shall determine: And provided further, That one who has served as a school director may, after resigning from office as a school director, be elected to the position of teacher by the board of which he was a member by a vote of at least two - thirds of all other members of the board and shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as a teacher as the board of school directors may lawfully determine. (c) It shall not be a violation of this section for a school district to contract for the purchase of goods or services from a business with which a school director is associated to the extent permitted by and in compliance with 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 11 (relating to ethics standards and financial disclosure). 24 P.S. § 3- 324(a), (c). The State Ethics Commission does not have the statutory jurisdiction to interpret the Public School Code. Therefore, it is suggested that you seek legal advice as to its applicability. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: If you would win the election for School Director of the Mars Area School District ( "School District "), you would, upon assuming office, become a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Schultz Installation and Service Company, Inc. ( "SISC" ) would be considered a business with which you are associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would generally have a conflict of interest in your public capacity as a School Director in matters that would financially impact you, SISC, or private customer(s) /client(s). You would specifically have a conflict of interest in matters relating to any contract(s) between SISC and the School District and any votes to approve the payment of invoices submitted by SISC under said contract(s). Further, you would have a conflict of interest in matters involving SISC's private customers /clients, which include other schools and colleges, hospitals, prisons, mental health institutions, nursing homes, and private organizations. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from participating and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would not have application as to contract(s) that were entered into by SISC and the School District prior to your possible election to the School Board. However, if SISC and the School District would Schultz, 05 -562 July 7, 2005 Page 8 renew the contract(s) or enter into new ones during your tenure as a School Director, such contract(s), if over $500, would be subject to the restrictions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act. Under Section 1103(f), in your capacity as a public official, you would be prohibited from having any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract(s). Given the possible applicability of the Public School Code of 1949 as amended, it is suggested that you seek legal advice in this regard. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel