HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-546 EbertsRonald C. Eberts, Jr.
20 Wheatfield Drive
Carlisle, PA 17013
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
May 24, 2005
05 -546
Re: Former Public Employee or Official; Section 1103(g); Environmental Protection
Compliance Specialist; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Dear Mr. Eberts:
This responds to your letter of April 25, 2005, by which you requested advice
from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. § 1101 et seq., presents any restrictions upon employment of an Environmental
Protection Compliance Specialist following termination of service with the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection.
Facts: As an Environmental Protection Compliance Specialist for the Department
of Environmental Protection ( "DEP "), you seek an advisory from the State Ethics
Commission regarding the post - employment restrictions under the Ethics Act. You
have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows.
You state that your current job responsibilities primarily include taking any
enforcement actions necessary with respect to DEP's Chapters 102 (Erosion & Sediment
Control) and 105 (Dam Safety & Waterway Management) Programs. For example, if a
residential or commercial development site is not in compliance, any of the 15 County
Conservation Districts or DEP's Water Management Staff could refer the case or site to
you to initiate an enforcement action. Such action would typically lead to an informal
meeting, followed by an executed agreement and civil penalties. You state that you
currently do not review any permit applications. The majority of your time is spent on
bringing sites into compliance with the rules and regulations found in Chapter 102 and
105, the Clean Stream Law, and the Dam Safety and Encroachments Act. You have
submitted a copy of your job description, which is incorporated herein by reference.
You have been offered a job from a local builder /developer who often submits
Chapter 102 and 105 permits to DEP for review and approval. The builder /developer
frequently has in -house pre- construction meetings with DEP or the respective County
Conservation District. The County Conservation District, through a delegation agreement
Eberts, 05 -546
May 24, 2005
Page 2
with DEP, is required to conduct inspections of these sites and follow -up inspections as
needed. On rare occasions, DEP may initiate an enforcement action against the builder/
developer.
Based upon the foregoing facts, you ask what the terms, "represent" and
"governmental body" mean. You also ask whether, during the one year period, you may
interact with DEP employees, other governmental agencies or the County Conservation
District offices and personnel by engaging in face to face meetings, making telephone
calls, or sending faxes or e- mails.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As an Environmental Protection Compliance Specialist for the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection, you would be considered a "public employee"
subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65
Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. This conclusion is based upon the job description,
which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that the power exists to
take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to one or more
of the following: contracting; procurement; planning; inspecting; administering or
monitoring grants; leasing; regulating; auditing; or other activities where the economic
impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person.
Consequently, upon termination of public service, you would become a "former
public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act.
While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official /public employee
from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official /public
employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before the governmental body with
which he has been associated ":
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee. - -No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the
governmental body with which he has been associated for
one year after he leaves that body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the
Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in
any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and
submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or
Eberts, 05 -546
May 24, 2005
Page 3
contain the name of a former public official or public
employee.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership,
committee, club or other organization or group of persons.
"Governmental body with which a public official
or public employee is or has been associated." The
governmental body within State government or a political
subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has
been employed or to which the public official or employee is
or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and
offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa. C. S. § 1102.
The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and
other businesses. It also includes the former public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion, 93 -005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95 -007.
The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of
any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal
appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence;
(3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of
the former public official /public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the
former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying.
Popovich, Opinion 89 -005.
Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a
proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental
body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section
1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official/
public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental
body, even though the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of
public service. Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However, if such a pre - existing contract does
not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former
public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the
agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95 -011.
A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any
documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former ublic
official /public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former
governmental body. The former public official /public employee may also counsel any
person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once
again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former
governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general
informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is
available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly
influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the
representation of, or work for the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official /public employee with
regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/
public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities.
However, the "governmental body with which a public official /public employee is or has
been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other
governmental body where the public official /public employee had influence or control
Eberts, 05 -546
May 24, 2005
Page 4
but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No.
15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R.
The governmental body with which you would be associated upon termination of
public service would be DEP in its entirety. Therefore, for the first year after termination
of service with DEP, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict
"representation" of "persons" before the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection.
Having set forth the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, you are
advised that the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from accepting employment with the
builder /developer. However, to the extent your responsibilities in your new position
would require you to interact with DEP in a manner that would constitute prohibited
"representation," your performance of such activities would be contrary to Section
1103(g) of the Ethics Act. Specific examples of prohibited "representation' before your
former governmental body, DEP, would include, but would not be limited to, engaging in
face to face meetings with DEP, making telephone calls, or sending faxes or e-mails to
DEP. The 1103(g) restrictions would not apply to restrict your conduct before
governmental agencies other than DEP or any of the County Conservation Districts, as
such entities would not constitute your former governmental body.
Based upon the facts which have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the
applicability of Section 1103(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no
use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a)
of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the
Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /public employee
and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value
based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public
official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these
provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression
thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation, or other
code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As an Environmental Protection Compliance Specialist with the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ( "DEP "), you would be
considered a "public employee" as defined in the Public Official and Employee Ethics
Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Upon termination of service with DEP, you
would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act.
The former governmental body would be DEP in its entirety.
The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. The
propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Act would
require that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed by no later than May 1 of the year
after termination of service.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Eberts, 05 -546
May 24, 2005
Page 5
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel