HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-555 RackleyW. John Rackley, Esquire
McNees, Autenreith, Rackley & Walker
345 Commerce Street
Beaver, PA 15009
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 23, 2005
05 -555
Re: Simultaneous Service, Chairman of County Agricultural Land Preservation Board
and Administrator of the Board's Agricultural Land Preservation Program.
Dear Mr. Rackley:
This responds to your letters of May 13 and 20, 2005, by which you requested
advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., imposes any prohibition or restrictions upon a chairman of a
county agricultural preservation board ( "board ") from simultaneously serving or being
employed as an administrator of the board's agricultural land preservation program.
Facts: As Solicitor for the Beaver County Agricultural Land Preservation Board
( "Board "), you request an advisory on behalf of Joseph E. Petrella, Jr. ( "Petrella ") based
upon the following submitted facts.
Petrella serves as Chairman of the Board, which is composed of nine members. As
Board Chairman, Petrella's responsibilities primarily include scheduling and overseeing
Board meetings and voting on Board matters. Petrella has served as Board Chairman for
approximately eight years.
In addition to serving as Board Chairman, Petrella has performed services for the
Board, such as farm inspections, for which he has received an hourly wage. Petrella has
also performed the functions of Administrator of the Board's agricultural easement program
over the past eight years, although other individuals have actually held the job title. The
most recent Administrator was the Chairman of the Beaver County Planning Commission
who resigned in January 2005.
The question you pose is whether Petrella may simultaneously serve as Board
Chairman and Administrator. You state that no other Board member or any other person is
presently willing to serve as Administrator. You have submitted a copy of the job
description for the position of Administrator of the Beaver County Agricultural Land
Preservation Program, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Rackley /Petrella, 05 -555
June 23, 2005
Page 2
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the
Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the
facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been
submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts
relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense
to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
It is further initially noted that, pursuant to the same aforesaid Sections of the Ethics
Act, an opinion /advice may be given only as to prospective (future) conduct. If the activity
in question has already occurred, the Commission may not issue an opinion /advice but any
person may then submit a signed and sworn complaint, which will be investigated by the
Commission if there are allegations of Ethics Act violations by a person who is subject to
the Ethics Act. To the extent you have inquired as to conduct that has already occurred,
such past conduct may not be addressed in the context of an advisory opinion. However,
to the extent you have inquired as to future conduct, your inquiry may, and shall be
addressed.
As Chairman of the Beaver County Agricultural Land Preservation Board ( "Board "),
Joseph E. Petrella, Jr. ( "Petrella ") is a "public official" as that term is defined in the Ethics
Act and hence Petrella is subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51
Pa. Code § 11.1.
Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide:
§ 1103. Restricted Activities
(a) Conflict of interest. —No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of
interest.
(j) Voting conflict. —Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by
any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with
the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter
before it because the number of members of the body required
to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section
makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if
disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the
case of a three - member governing body of a political
subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as
a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members
of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member
who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie
vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein.
Rackley /Petrella, 05 -555
June 23, 2005
Page 3
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j).
The following terms pertaining to conflicts of interest under the Ethics Act are
defined as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family
or a business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated. The term does not include an action
having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the
same degree a class consisting of the general public or a
subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group
which includes the public official or public employee, a
member of his immediate family or a business with which he or
a member of his immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the question of simultaneous
service, it is initially noted that the General Assembly has the constitutional power to
declare by law which offices are incompatible. Pa. Const. Art. 6, § 2. In this regard, it is
noted that you have not provided any information regarding the applicable enabling
statute. In the absence of additional facts, you are generally advised that if the enabling
statute prohibits a Board member from also being an employee of the Board, Petrella
would have a conflict of interest in simultaneously serving in the two positions in question.
However, if serving on the Board and serving as a Board employee is not contrary to the
enabling statute, Petrella would not have a conflict of interest as to such simultaneous
service.
Turning to the question of conflict of interest, pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the
Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public
office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for
the private pecuniary benefit of the public official /public employee himself, a member of his
immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated. Assuming the Board is responsible for the hiring or appointment of the
Administrator, Petrella as a Board Member, would have a conflict of interest and could not
participate in matters regarding the compensated position of Administrator. For example,
Petrella could not participate in his own appointment /employment as Administrator or vote
to set or increase his salary as Administrator or participate in any matter concerning his
conduct or duties as Administrator. In each instance of a conflict of interest, Petrella would
be required to abstain and to fully satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of
the Ethics Act.
Where simultaneous service would place the public official /public employee in a
continual state of conflict, such as where in one position he would be accounting to himself
in another position on a continual basis, there would be an inherent conflict. (See,
McCain, Opinion 02 -009). Where an inherent conflict would exist, it would appear to be
Rackley /Petrella, 05 -555
June 23, 2005
Page 4
impossible, as a practical matter, for the public official /public employee to function in the
conflicting positions without running afoul of Section 1103(a).
Absent a statutorily - declared incompatibility or an inherent conflict under Section
1103(a), the Ethics Act would not preclude an individual from simultaneously serving in
more than one position, but in each instance of a conflict of interest, the individual would
be required to abstain and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) as set
forth above.
In this case, based upon the facts which have been submitted, there does not
appear to be an inherent conflict that would preclude simultaneous service as Chairman of
the Beaver County Agricultural Land Preservation Board and Administrator of the Beaver
County Agricultural Land Preservation Program. Consequently, such simultaneous service
would be permitted within the parameters of Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) provided such
service is not contrary to law as per the enabling legislation or judicial precedents.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As Chairman of the Beaver County Agricultural Land Preservation Board
( "Board "), Joseph E. Petrella, Jr. ( "Petrella ") is a "public official" subject to the provisions
of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq.,
Petrella may, consistent with Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, simultaneously serve in the
positions of Board Chairman and Administrator of the Beaver County Agricultural Land
Preservation Program, subject to the restrictions, conditions and qualifications set forth
above, and provided such service is not contrary to law as per the enabling legislation or
judicial precedents. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed course of conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement
proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other
civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A
personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a
formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at
the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa.Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission
by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the
Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the
appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel