HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-518 DelBianco
PHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 304
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
March 31, 2026
To the Requester:
Brendan DelBianco
26-518
Dear Mr.DelBianco:
This responds to your letter dated March 3, 2026, received March 11, 2026, by which you
requested anadvisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission (“Commission”), seeking
guidance as to the general issue presented below:
Issue:
Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et
seq., would impose restrictions upon you with regard to performing work for a new
employer following termination of your employment as aTransportation Construction
Manager (Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor) with the Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation (“PennDOT”).
Brief Answer: YES. During the first year following termination of your employment with
PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict youfrom engaging
in any activity that would involve “representing” a “person” — including but not limited
to your new employer — before your “former governmental body,” PennDOT.
Facts:
Yourequest an advisory from the Commission based upon submitted facts that may be
fairly summarized as follows.
Until March 2026, you were employed with PennDOT as a Transportation Construction
Manager (Senior Civil Engineer Supervisor) in Engineering District 11-0. In your role with
DelBianco,26-518
March 31, 2026
Page 2
PennDOT, you were responsible for overseeing transportation construction projects, and your
duties included contract administration, coordinating with contractors and consultants,
construction oversight, and ensuring compliance with applicable specifications and regulations.
You worked only on state transportation infrastructure projects administered through PennDOT.
You have accepted employment with an ironworking company, Amelie Construction &
Supply, LLC(“the Company”), as a Project Manager/Estimator. This position will involve
estimation, coordination, and management of structural steel and ironwork projects. The
Company’s work may include projects involving bridges, public buildings, or other types of
infrastructure owned by cities or other municipalities.
You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or restrictions
upon you with regard to performing work for the Company during the first year following
termination of your employment with PennDOT. In particular, you pose the following questions:
(1) Whether you would be permitted to perform estimating, project management, or
supervisory services on projects involving cities or other municipal entities where
such projects would not be administered by PennDOT or another Commonwealth
agency;
(2) Whether any restrictions imposed upon you would apply to projects funded,
administered, or overseen by municipal governments where you had no personal or
official involvement with such projects during your Commonwealth employment;
and
(3) Whether there would be any restrictions imposed upon you with regard to
interacting with PennDOT or other Commonwealth agencies during the applicable
post-employment period.
Discussion:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65
Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the
requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has
submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does
it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully
disclose all of the materialfacts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory
only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
The post-employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act apply to former
public officials/public employees. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public
official/public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former
public official/public employee with regard to “representing” a “person” before “the governmental
body with which he has been associated”:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
DelBianco,26-518
March 31, 2026
Page 3
(g) Former official or employee.--No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised
or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body
with which he has been associatedfor one year after he leaves that
body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms “represent,” “person,” and “governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated” are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
“Represent.” To act on behalf of any other person in any
activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal
appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former
public official or public employee.
“Person.” A business, governmental body, individual,
corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club
or other organization or group of persons.
“Governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated.” The governmental
body within State government or a political subdivision by which
the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which
the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected
and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
The term “person” is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other
businesses. It also includes the former public official/public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007.
The term “represent”is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in
any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the
former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee;
(4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a
person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89-005.
Listing one’s name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an
attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the
inclusion of the name of a former public official/public employee on invoices submitted by his
DelBianco,26-518
March 31, 2026
Page 4
new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that
existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012.
However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee
worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by
the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion
95-011.
A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents
presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee
may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former
public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person’s appearance
before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not
be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude
making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information
which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence
the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or
work for, the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to
representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee
is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the “governmental
body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated” is not limited to the
particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public
employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of
House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R.
Conclusion:
In your former capacity as a Transportation Construction Manager (Senior Civil Engineer
Supervisor) with PennDOT, you were a public employee subject to the provisionsof the Ethics
Act. Consequently, upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you became a “former
public employee” subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The governmental body with which
you are deemed to have been associated upon termination of your employment with PennDOT is
PennDOT in its entirety, including Engineering District 11-0.For the first year following
termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply
and restrict you from “representing” a “person”—including but not limited toyour new employer,
the Company—before PennDOT. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be
followed.
During the one-year period of applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, you would
be prohibited from interacting with PennDOT and its staff in any manner that would constitute
representing the Company before PennDOT. Section 1103(g) would not impose any restrictions
upon you with regard to interacting with any other Commonwealth agency. Subject to the
condition that you would not engage in any activity that would involve prohibited representation
before PennDOT, Section 1103(g) would not prohibit you from: (1) performing estimating, project
management, or supervisory services on projects involving cities or other municipal entities where
such projects would not be administered by PennDOT or another Commonwealth agency; or (2)
DelBianco,26-518
March 31, 2026
Page 5
working on projects funded, administered, or overseen by municipal governments where you had
no personal or official involvement with such projects during your Commonwealth employment.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act;
the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Act has not been considered.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any
other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually receivedat the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel