Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-516 ArcuriPHONE: 717-783-1610 TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 To the Requester: James D. Arcuri, Jr. Dear Mr. Arcuri: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FINANCE BUILDING 613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 304 HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400 ADVICE OF COUNEL March 5, 2026 FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806 WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov 26-516 This responds to your letter received February 27, 2026, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission"), seeking guidance as to the issue presented below: Issue: Whether, following termination of your employment as a Construction Regional Director with the Pennsylvania Department of General Services ("DGS"), the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et sec ., would impose restrictions upon you with regard to providing fee -based consulting services to contractors and design professionals on the use of a cloud -based document management system utilized by DGS. Brief Answer: The post -termination of service/employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from providing the aforesaid consulting services subject to the condition that in so doing, you would not engage in any activities that would involve "representing" a "person" before your "former governmental body," DGS, during the first year following termination of your employment with DGS. Facts: You request an advisory from the Commission based upon submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as follows. Arcuri,26-516 March 5, 2026 Page 2 You are scheduled to retire from your employment as a Construction Regional Director with the Bureau of Capital Projects Construction, Capital Area Region within DGS. You have submitted a copy of your official Commonwealth position description, which document is incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the job classification specifications for the position of Construction Regional Director, DGS (job code 10750) has been obtained and is also incorporated herein by reference. In your position, you supervise a staff of twenty that manages construction and renovation projects for DGS. DGS uses a cloud -based document management system named "Trimble Unity Construct" ("the System"). DGS does not provide training on the use of the System to contractors and design professionals. Many contractors and design professionals that perform work for DGS struggle to use the System effectively, which can cause delays in construction progress and payments, create a contentious work environment for project stakeholders, and negatively influence customer satisfaction with projects. Following your retirement, you would like to offer fee -based consulting services on the use of the System to contractors and design professionals that perform work for DGS. Your proposed consulting role would be to provide instruction and training on the use of the System and would not involve entering contract data, document, or process items into the System. You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon you during the first year following termination of your Commonwealth employment. In particular, you ask whether you would be permitted to provide the aforesaid fee -based consulting services to contractors and design professionals that perform work for DGS. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevantto the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. The post -employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act apply to former public officials/public employees. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official/public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official/public employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before "the governmental body with which he has been associated": § 1103. Restricted activities (g) Former official or employee. --No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body Arcuri,26-516 March 5, 2026 Page 3 with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added). The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other businesses. It also includes the former public official/public employee himself, Confidential Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007. The term "represent" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in a� activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89-005. Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official/public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012. However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee Arcuri,26-516 March 5, 2026 Page 4 worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95-011. A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for, the new employer. Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R. Conclusion: As a Construction Regional Director with DGS, you are a public employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Consequently, upon termination of your employment with DGS, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been associated upon termination of your employment with DGS would be DGS in its entirety, including the Bureau of Capital Projects Construction, Capitol Area Region. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your employment with DGS, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict you from "representing" a "person" including but not limited to yourself or new employer before DGS. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from providing fee -based consulting services on the use of the System to contractors and design professionals that perform work for DGS as long as in so doing, you would not engage in any activity that would involve prohibited representation before DGS. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. Arcuri, 26-516 March 5, 2026 Page 5 This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Respectfully, Bridget K. Guilfoyle Chief Counsel