Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout26-502 BoswellPHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806 TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethicr..pagov 613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 304 HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400 ADVICE OF COUNSEL January 13, 2026 To the Requester: Sherry Boswell Dear Ms. Boswell: 26-502 This responds to your letter dated January 2, 2026, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission"), seeking guidance as to the issue presented below: Issue• Whether, as a Member of Council for Industry Borough (`Borough"), you would have a conflict of interest -under Section 1103(a) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), with regard to participating in negotiations or votes pertaining to a new labor contract between the Borough and the union representing the Borough's two Road Department workers, one of whom is your son-in-law. Brief Ansiver: NO. Because your son-in-law is not a member of your "immediate family" as that term is defined by the Ethics Act, you would not have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act with regard to participating in negotiations or votes pertaining to a new labor contract between the Borough and the union representing your son-in-law and the other Borough Road Department worker. Facts: The Borough is located in Beaver County, Pennsylvania. The Borough Road Department consists of two workers, one of whom is your son-in-law. Both of the Borough Road Department workers have voted to become part of a union. Contract negotiations with the union representing the Borough Road Department workers are scheduled to begin sometime in January 2026. To date you have been asked to leave two executive sessions of Borough Council pertaining to a labor contract based upon assertions that you could not be involved in the matter due to your son-in- law's employment with the Borough Road Department. Boswell, 26-502 January 13, 2026 Page 2 You ask whether the Ethics Act would permit you to participate in negotiations or votes pertaining to a new labor contract between the Borough and the union representing your son-in- law and the other Borough Road Department worker. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. Sections 1103(a) and 11030) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted activities (a) Conflict of interest. --No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. 0) Voting conflict. --Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three -member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), 0). Boswell, 26-502 January 13, 2026 Page 3 The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his inunediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother or sister. 65 Pa. C.S. § 1102. Subject to the statutory exclusions to the Ethics Act's definition of the term "conflict" or "conflict of Interest" (i.e., the "de minimis exclusion" and the "class/subclass exclusion"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102, a public official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary (financial) benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting but extends to any use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809. In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public official/public employee would be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 11030) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 11030) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict. Conclusion: Boswell, 26-502 January 13, 2026 Page 4 In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised as follows. As a Borough Council Member, you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you generally would have a conflict of interest in matters before Borough Council that would financially impact you, a member of your immediate family, or a business with which you or a member of your immediate family is associated. Your son-in-law is not a member of your "immediate family" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. Because your son-in-law is not a member of your immediate family, you would not have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act in matters before Borough Council that would financially impact him. Accordingly, you would not have a conflict of interest with regard to participating in negotiations or votes pertaining to a new labor contract between the Borough and the union representing your son-in-law and the other Borough Road Department worker, and therefore you would not be required to abstain from participating in those negotiations or votes. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Respectfully, F Bridget K. Guilfoyle Chief Counsel