HomeMy WebLinkAbout25-516 George
PHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 11, 2025
To the Requester:
Joshua George
25-516
Dear Mr. George:
This responds to your submission received March 25, 2025, by which you requested an
advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission (“Commission”), seeking guidance as
to the issue presented below:
Issue:
Whetherthe Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101,
et seq., would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon an individual serving as a member
of a township zoning hearing board, who in a private capacity is employed with a
consulting engineering firm that has a project involved inproceedings before the township
zoning hearing board, with regard to presenting testimony about the consulting engineering
firm’s project at a meeting of the township zoning hearing board.
Brief Answer: The Ethics Act would not prohibit the individual, in his private capacity as
an employee of the consulting engineering firm, from presenting testimony about the
consulting engineering firm’s project at a meeting of the township zoning hearing board.
However, in his capacity as a member of the township zoning hearing board, the individual
generally would have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act with
regard to participating in matters pertaining to the consulting engineering firm’s project.
Facts:
You request an advisory from the Commission based upon the following submitted facts.
George, 25-516
April 11, 2025
Page 2
You are a Member of the Spring Garden Township Zoning Hearing Board (“Township
Zoning Hearing Board”). In a private capacity, you are employed with a consulting engineering
firm named “Landworks Civil Design, LLC” (“the Firm”) that has a project involved in
proceedings before the Township Zoning Hearing Board. You state that as a Member of the
Township Zoning Hearing Board, you will recuse yourself from any participation in matters
related to the Firm’s project.
You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would permit you, in your private capacity
as an employee of the Firm, to present testimony about the Firm’s project at a meeting of the
Township Zoning Hearing Board.
Discussion:
Pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10),
(11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted.
In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does
not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have
not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all material facts relevant
to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the
requester has truthfully disclosed all material facts.
Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a)Conflict of interest.--No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of
interest.
(j) Voting conflict. --Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any
law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure
shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in
the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a
matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from
voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and
disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written
memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that
whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on
a matter before it because the number of membersof the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section
makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if
disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein.In the case of a
three-member governing body of a political subdivision, where one
George,25-516
April 11, 2025
Page 3
member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest
and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to
vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided
herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), 1103(j).
The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
“Conflict” or “conflict of interest.” Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary
benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic
impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public employee, a
member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
“Authority of office or employment.”The actual power
provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the
performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular
public office or position of public employment.
“Business.” Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization,
self-employed individual, holding company, joint stock company,
receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit.
“Business with which he is associated.”Any business in
which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Subject to the statutory exclusions to the Ethics Act’s definition of the term “conflict” or
“conflict of interest” (i.e., the “de minimis exclusion” and the “class/subclass exclusion”),65
Pa.C.S. § 1102, a public official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public
office or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private
pecuniary (financial) benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his
George, 25-516
April 11, 2025
Page 4
immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting but extends to any use of authority of
office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a particular
result. Juliante, Order 809.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public official/public employee would be
required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory
exceptions of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure
requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting
conflict.
Conclusion:
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised as
follows.
As a Member of the Township Zoning Hearing Board, you are a public official subject to
the provisions of the Ethics Act. The Firm is a business with which you are associated in your
capacity as an employee. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you generally would have
a conflict of interest in matters before the Township Zoning Hearing Board that would financially
impact you or the Firm.
Because Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to conflict of interest, imposes
restrictions upon you in your public capacity as a Member of the Township Zoning Hearing Board
rather than upon you in your private capacity as a Firm employee, Section 1103(a) would not
prohibit you from presenting testimony about the Firm’s project at a meeting of the Township
Zoning Hearing Board. However, as a Member of the Township Zoning Hearing Board, you
generally would have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act with regard to
participating in or voting on matters pertaining to the Firm’s project.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from
participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 1103(j)
of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section
1103(j) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any
other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
George, 25-516
April 11, 2025
Page 5
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually receivedat the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel