HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-566 SchuckmanEarl W. Schuckman
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Shrewsbury Township
12341 Susquehanna Trail South
Glen Rock, PA 17327 -9067
Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; Chairman; Board; Supervisor; Second Class
Township; Simultaneous Service; Planning Commission; Compensation Check
Signing; Reimbursement; Mileage.
Dear Mr. Schuckman:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 24, 2004
04 -566
This responds to your letter of May 20, 2004, by which you requested advice
from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
1a. =S. § 1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a township
supervisor co- signing township checks payable to himself, receiving compensation for
serving on the township planning commission and receiving reimbursement consisting
of mileage for attending meetings or alternatively mileage for all activities other than
planning commission or board of supervisors meetings.
Facts: As Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, you request an advisory as to
the following specific inquiries:
1. Whether you would transgress the Ethics Act if you would sign a check that
would be payable to yourself, including a Supervisor paycheck (as opposed to a
Township employee paycheck), given that two supervisors and the Treasurer must sign
all Township checks;
2. Whether under the Pennsylvania Municipal Planning Code ( "MPC "), you may
receive compensation for sitting on the Planning Commission.
As to your second question, you state that other supervisors believe that the
Township Auditors may set the compensation for supervisors who are on the Planning
Commission. You further state:
Schuckman, 04 -566
June 24, 2004
Page 2
The problem seems to be with what is an 'elected or appointed officer'.
Following in [sic] the referenced section in the MPC.
Section 202. Planning Commission. If the governing body of any
municipality shall elect to create a planning commission, such commission
shall have not less than three nor more than nine members. Except for
elected or appointed officers or employees of the municipality, members of
the commission may receive compensation in an amount fixed by the
governing body. Compensation shall not exceed the rate of compensation
authorized to be paid to members of the governing body. Without
exception, members of the planning commission may be reimbursed for
necessary and reasonable expenses. However, elected or appointed
officers or employees of the municipality shall not, by reason of
membership thereon, forfeit the right to exercise the powers, perform the
duties or receive the compensations of the municipal offices held by them
during such membership.
Request letter of May 20, 2004; and
3. What would be considered a reasonable expense for which you may seek
reimbursement.
As to your third question, you state the following two views: (1) all mileage
including the miles driven from home to the Township office for all meetings should be
reimbursed; or (2) mileage to everything other than planning commission or supervisors
meetings at the Township office should be reimbursed.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107 (10) and 1107(11) of the
i - 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based
upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the
facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As a Township Supervisor, you are a public official as that term is defined in the
Ethics Act, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that Act.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
Schuckman, 04 -566
June 24, 2004
Page 3
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no
person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public
official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee
would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to
imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(j).
Schuckman, 04 -566
June 24, 2004
Page 4
In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official/
employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both
orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes or supervisor.
In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the
governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the
abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the
disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion 02 -005.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, pursuant
to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from
using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/
public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which
he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
With respect to your first question, you would generally have a conflict of interest
as to signing Township checks payable to yourself. The action of signing your own
checks would constitute a use of authority of office. See, Juliante, Order 809. The use
of authority of office would result in a private pecuniary benefit to yourself so that all the
elements for a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would exist.
There is an exception to the above general rule involving fixed or predetermined
payments as to which there are no disputes. See, Krushinski, Order 168. In such
instances, the public official may participate in fapproval /check issuance process.
For example, as to your checks as an elected official, the amount of compensation is
set forth in the Second Class Township Code (Code) (53 P.S. §65606). Hence, you
may co -sign checks payable to you for your compensation as an elected supervisor. As
noted above, such is not the case for payments you receive as a town�shi emplo ewe
where the payments, which typically depend upon the hours worked may not be fixed
but are subject to review.
Your second question the issue is whether you may receive compensation for
serving on the Planning Commission which was created under the MPC. The question
of whether you may receive compensation turns upon whether there is an authorization
in law for a supervisor to serve on a planning commission and receive compensation for
such service. In this regard, the Code provides in part:
§ 65403. Supervisors
(b) Except as otherwise provided in this act, no supervisor
shall at the same time hold any other elective or appointive
township office or position. Nothing in this subsection shall
prohibit a supervisor from being a member of a township
planning commission created under the act of July 31, 1968
(P.L. 805, No. 247), known as the "Pennsylvania Municipalities
Planning Code"
53 P.S. §65403(b)
Although it is clear under the Code that you may simultaneously serve as a
member of a planning commission created under the MPC, it is unclear whether you
may receive compensation. The Code states:
§ 65606. Compensation of supervisors
(a) The compensation of supervisors, when employed as
roadmasters, laborers, secretary, treasurer, assistant
Schuckman, 04 -566
June 24, 2004
Page 5
secretary, assistant treasurer or in any employe capacity not
otherwise prohibited by this or any other act, shall be
determined by the board of auditors, at an hourly, daily,
weekly, semi - monthly or monthly basis, which shall be
comparable to compensation paid in the locality for similar
services.
53 P.S. §65606(a)
There is no specific language in the Code which directs auditors to approve
compensation for supervisors who serve on planning commissions. The absence of
such specific language might suggest that there is no authorization and hence no right
to receive such compensation. However, this issue will remain unresolved until such
time as a court of final jurisdiction determines whether supervisors who serve as
planning commissioners may receive compensation for holding such positions.
As to your third inquiry regarding receiving mileage reimbursement, the Code
provides as follows:
§65606. Compensation of supervisors
(a) The board of supervisors may establish a mileage
allowance, under the act of July 20, 1979 (P.L. 156, No. 51),
referred to as the Uniform Mileage Fee Law, to be paid to
officers and employes for the use of a personal vehicle when
required and actually used for authorized township business.
No supervisor may receive compensation as an employe for
attending a meeting of the board of supervisors. (Emphasis
added)
Id.
There are other Code provisions related to mileage. See, 53 P.S. §§66402(g)(1),
66401(c)(1), 65607(4). The above quoted language seems to suggest that mileage
reimbursement entitlement is quite restrictive both as to the individuals as well as the
circumstances. However, as noted above, a resolution of such issues will not occur
until such time as the courts make a ruling interpreting such provisions.
In short, a public official /public employee may only receive such compensation,
benefits and other entitlements as provided in law. If so authorized in law, the public
official /public employee may receive such benefits consistent with the Ethics Act.
Contrariwise, if such pecuniary benefits are not authorized in law, then the receipt of
such financial benefits by the public official /public employee through his position would
be a use of authority of office to obtain a private pecuniary benefit in contravention of
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Where the determination involves provisions of the
laws other than the Ethics Act and where those laws contain provisions which are
unclear as to whether there is a legal entitlement to such pecuniary benefits, it will be for
the courts to interpret such legal provisions.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As a Chairman of the Shrewsbury Township Board of Supervisors,
you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee
Ethics Act ("Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act you would generally have a conflict oT interest as to signing Township checks
Schuckman, 04 -566
June 24, 2004
Page 6
payable to yourself. There is an exception to the general rule involving fixed or
predetermined payments as to which there are no disputes. In such instances, the
public official may participate in the approval /check issuance process.
Although under the Second Class Township Code you may simultaneously serve
as a member of a planning commission created under the Municipal Planning Code, it is
unclear whether you may receive compensation. There is no specific language in the
Code which directs auditors to approve compensation for supervisors who serve on
planning commissions. The issue remains unresolved until such time as a court of final
jurisdiction determines whether supervisors who serve as planning commissioners may
receive compensation for holding such positions.
As to mileage reimbursement entitlement, the Code is quite restrictive both as to
the individuals as well as the circumstances. A resolution of mileage reimbursement
entitlement will not occur until such time as the courts make a ruling interpreting such
provisions.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel