Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-542 ConfidentialADVICE OF COUNSEL May 12, 2004 04 -542 Re: Former Public Official; Section 1103(g); Former Board Member; Authority; Purchasing Property From Authority. This responds to your letter received on April 12, 2004, by which you requested confidential advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Ha.GS. § 1101 et seq., presents any restrictions upon a former authority board member with regard to purchasing property from the authority. Facts: You are currently an elected Commissioner of A County. The A County booarr of Commissioners is a three member board responsible for operating the County government. Prior to taking office as a County Commissioner, you served as an appointed member of the Board of Directors of the B Authority, a non - profit organization that promotes economic development in A County by providing low interest loans and other assistance to businesses in A County. The Authority Board Members are appointed by the County Commissioners. You resigned from the Authority Board on [date]. are interested in acquiring from the B Authority a parcel of real property including a vacant building located on the property (hereinafter referred to as the 'Property "). While the B Authority is the deed holder to the Property, a private individual is the Property's beneficial owner. The B Authority acquired the Property in order to provide a low interest loan to the beneficial owner's predecessor in a pre - [year] transaction. Prior to the passage of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986, it was necessary for the B Authority and other economic development authorities to become the deed holder to property in order to take advantage of certain tax benefits when low interest loans and other financial assistance were provided. The B Authority leased the Property back to the beneficial owner, and the current beneficial owner assumed the lease. Because the B Authority is tax exempt, the lease included a provision stating that the beneficial owner would make payment to the B Authority in lieu of taxes and the B Authority would pass the payment in lieu of taxes on to the taxing bodies so that those taxing bodies would not lose any revenue as a result of the property being titled in the B Authority's name. A County is one of the taxing bodies involved. You state that the building that is located on the parcel of real property has been vacant for a number of Confidential Advice 04 -542 May 12, 2004 Page 2 years and the beneficial owner has not made payment to the B Authority in lieu of taxes. You state that the amount of outstanding taxes is [dollar amount]. You state that although the A County Tax Claim Bureau is currently listing the above amount as a lien against the Property, it appears that it has no authority to lien the Property or foreclose upon it because the B Authority is tax exempt. The B Authority is interested in transferring the Property to a new owner so that it can be developed. The beneficial owner is also interested in a sale of the property to be relieved from any obligation for payment in lieu of taxes. You state that A County and the other taxing bodies would benefit from a transfer to a party that is not tax exempt. You propose to purchase the Property for an amount that would be agreed to by the Authority and the beneficial owner. You state that the amount would not exceed [dollar amount]. You further state that such amount would be paid over a period of time per an arms length agreement bearing interest. You ask whether the proposed transaction would transgress the Ethics Act. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107 (11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. In the former capacity as a Member of the Board of Directors of the B Authority, you would be considered a capacity official" subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. Consequently, upon termination of public service, you became a "former public official" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official /public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official /public employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before "the governmental body with which he has been associated ": § 1103. Restricted activities (g) Former official or employee. - -No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated one year after he leaves that body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added). The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or Confidential Advice 04 -542 May 12, 2004 Page 3 contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other businesses. It also includes the former public employee - himself, Confidential Opinion, 93 -005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95 -007. The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official /public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89 -005. Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even though the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of public service. Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However, if such a pre- existing contract does not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95 -011. A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official /public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former public official /public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official /public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official /public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official /public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official /public employee had influence or Confidential Advice 04 -542 May 12, 2004 Page 4 control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R. The governmental body with which you were associated upon termination of public service is the B Authority in its entirety. Therefore, for the first year after termination of service with the B Authority, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of "persons" before the B Authority. Having set forth the general restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, your specific inquiry shall now be addressed. As to the question of whether Section 1103(g) would, for the first year following your resignation from the B Authority, preclude you from entering into a contract to purchase the Property from the B Authority, you have not provided any specifics as to the transaction, particularly, with respect to the extent of the Authority's involvement or role. Therefore, only the following general guidance may be given. The Commission has held that Section 3(g)/1103(g) of the Ethics Act precludes a public official /public employee ee from contracting with his former governmental body during the one -year period restricted activity. See, Confidential Opinion, 93 -005; Confidential Opinion, 97 -007; Confidential Opinion737 -008. See, also, McLaughlin, Advice of Counsel, 01 -520. Therefore, to the extent your coH&ict would constitute prohibited "representation" as delineated above, you would transgress Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. Examples of conduct that would constitute prohibited "representation' include contracting with the B Authority, interacting with the B Authority, submitting written documents containing your name to the B Authority, or engaging in negotiations with the B Authority as to the purchase price or other substantive matters. However, you would not transgress Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act if the B Authority, as merely a holder of legal title, would only perform the perfunctory function of transferring legal title, and all of your interactions, negotiations, or contacts would be with the beneficial owner of the Property rather than the B Authority. Where the B Authority would essentially be a straw party to the transaction, you could purchase the Property without running afoul of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. Based upon the facts which have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the applicability of Section 1103(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /public employee and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation, or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: In the former capacity as a Member of the Board of Directors of the B Authority, you would be considered a "public official" as defined in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act'), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Upon termination of service with the B Authority, you became a "former public official" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The former governmental body is the B Authority in its entirety. As to the question of whether Section 1103(g) would, for the first year following your resignation from the B Authority, preclude you from entering into a contract to purchase the Property from the B Authority, you have not provided any specifics as to Confidential Advice 04 -542 May 12, 2004 Page 5 the transaction, particularly, with respect to the extent of the Authority's involvement or role. Therefore, only the following general guidance may be given. To the extent your conduct would constitute prohibited "representation" as delineated above, you would transgress Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. However, if the B Authority, as merely a holder of legal title, would only perform the perfunctory function of transferring legal title, and all of your interactions, negotiations, or contacts would be with the beneficial owner of the Property ather than the B Authority, you would not run afoul of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Act would require that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed by no later than May 1 of the year after termination of service. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel