HomeMy WebLinkAbout24-576 Davis
PHONE: 717-783-1610
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 9, 2024
To the Requester:
Jason M. Davis
24-576
Dear Mr. Davis:
This responds to your letter received November 25, 2024, by which you requested an
advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission (“Commission”), seeking guidance as
to the issue presented below:
Issue:
Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et
seq., would impose restrictions upon you with regard to working for an investment manager
or other type of entity that does business with the Public School Employees’ Retirement
System (“PSERS”) following termination of your service as a Member of the PSERS Board
of Trustees.
Brief Answer: YES. During the first year following termination of your service as a
Member of the PSERS Board of Trustees, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply
and restrict you from engaging in any activity that would involve “representation” of a
“person” — including but not limited to a new employer such as an investment manager
or other type of entity — before your “former governmental body,” the PSERS Board of
Trustees.
Facts:
Yourequest an advisory from the Commission based upon submitted facts that may be
fairly summarized as follows.
You are a Member of the PSERS Board of Trustees. You are looking to move from your
current career as a teacher to a different career field, and if you do so, you will no longer be able
to serve on the PSERS Board of Trustees. You have interviewed for a position as an Income
Davis, 24-576
December 9, 2024
Page 2
Maintenance Caseworker in Westmoreland County, and you will soon learn whether you will be
offered the position. You have also been approached by a firm named “McMorgan and Company”
with respect to working as the firm’s public funds representative. The firm is seeking a relationship
with PSERS. You are not involved in any PSERS activities related to the firm’s efforts to establish
a relationship with PSERS.
You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or restrictions
upon you with regard to working for an investment manager or other type of entity that does
business with PSERS following termination of your service as a Member of the PSERS Board of
Trustees. In particular, you ask whether you would be permitted to talk to staff, offer deals, or
make presentations before the PSERS Board of Trustees.
Discussion:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65
Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the
requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has
submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does
it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully
disclose all of the materialfacts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory
only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
The post-employment restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act apply to former
public officials/public employees. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public
official/public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former
public official/public employee with regard to “representing” a “person” before “the governmental
body with which he has been associated”:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee.--No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised
or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body
with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that
body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms “represent,” “person,” and “governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated” are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
“Represent.” To act on behalf of any other person in any
activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal
appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former
public official or public employee.
Davis, 24-576
December 9, 2024
Page 3
“Person.” A business, governmental body, individual,
corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club
or other organization or group of persons.
“Governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated.” The governmental
body within State government or a political subdivision by which
the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which
the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected
and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
The term “person” is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other
businesses. It also includes the former public official/public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007.
The term “represent” is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in
any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the
former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee;
(4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a
person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89-005.
Listing one’s name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an
attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the
inclusion of the name of a former public official/public employee on invoices submitted by his
new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that
existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012.
However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee
worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by
the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion
95-011.
A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents
presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee
may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former
public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person’s appearance
before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not
be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude
making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information
which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence
the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or
work for, the new employer.
Davis, 24-576
December 9, 2024
Page 4
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to
representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee
is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the “governmental
body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated” is not limited to the
particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public
employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of
House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R.
Conclusion:
As a Member of the PSERS Board of Trustees, you are a “public official” subject to the
Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa.
Code § 11.1. Consequently, upon termination of your service as a Member of the PSERS Board
of Trustees, you would become a “former public official” subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics
Act. The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been associated upon
termination of your service as a Member of the PSERS Board of Trustees would be the PSERS
Board of Trustees in its entirety. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your service
as a Member of the PSERS Board of Trustees, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and
restrict you from representing a “person” — including but not limited to a new employer — before
your former governmental body, the PSERS Board of Trustees. The restrictions as to
representation outlined above must be followed.
You are advised that Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from
accepting employment with McMorgan and Company or an investment manager or other type of
entity that does business with PSERS. However, during the first year following termination of
your service with PSERS, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from performing
any job duties for your new employer that would involve prohibited representation of your new
employer before the PSERS Board of Trustees. Section 1103(g) would prohibit you from talking
to staff, offering deals, or making presentations before the PSERS Board of Trustees as such
activities would constitute prohibited representation of your new employer before your former
governmental body.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act;
the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Act has not been considered.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any
other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually receivedat the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
Davis,24-576
December 9, 2024
Page 5
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel