Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-529 WernerSara A. Werner 9500 Glendale Road Pittsburgh, PA 15235 Dear Ms. Werner: ADVICE OF COUNSEL April 13, 2004 04 -529 Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; School Director; Immediate Family; Son; Business With Which Associated; Contract; Vote; Bid. This responds to your letter received on March 15, 2004, by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a school director with regard to voting o approve a bid submitted by a company for which the school director s son serves as an executive officer. Facts: You are currently a School Director for the Penn Hills School District ( "School District "). On March 9, 2004, the Board of Directors will vote to approve a bid that was submitted by a company for which your son serves as an executive officer. You state that you will abstain from this vote given your son's position with the company. You ask whether there is any other position that you should take if the company for which your son serves as an executive officer win a bid again. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1'107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As a School Director, you are a public official as that term is defined in the Ethics Act, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that Act. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides: Werner, 04 -529 April 13, 2004 Page 2 § 1103. Restricted activities (a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a). The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother or sister. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self - employed individual, holding company, stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. "Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real property. The term shall not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political subdivision as one party and a public official or public employee as the other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary, wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in consideration of his current public employment with the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Werner, 04 -529 April 13, 2004 Page 3 In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f). Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official /public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Pursuant to Section 1103(f), an "open and public process" includes: (1) prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility; (2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be able to prepare and present an application or proposal; (3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered; and (4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official /employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities Werner, 04 -529 April 13, 2004 Page 4 (j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(j). In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official/ employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or supervisor. In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion 02 -005. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/ public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Your son is a member of your "immediate family" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. Further, the company for which your son serves as an executive officer is a business with which your son is associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a ) of the Ethics Act, you would generally have a conflict of interest as to matters before you that would financially benefit yourself, your son, or the company for which your son serves as an executive officer. Given that a conflict of interest is established based upon the same statutorily - delineated relationships whether as to a public official /public employee or his immediate family member, you are advised that you would also have a conflict of interest as to clients of the company for which your son serves as an executive officer. Miller, Opinion No. 89- 024; Kannebecker, Opinion No. 92 -010. As to the specific question you have posed, in instances where the company for which your son serves as an executive officer would submit a bid to the School District, you would have a conflict as to reviewing or selecting the bids or proposals, and voting to Werner, 04 -529 April 13, 2004 Page 5 approve the contract. A conflict would exist even as to action to eliminate competitor(s), where such action would assure or increase the possibility that the School District would award the contract to that company. See, Pepper, Opinion 87 -008. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. Parenthetically, although the contracting in question would not be prohibited under the Ethics Act provided the requirements of Sections 1103(a), 1103(f), and 1103(j) are satisfied, a problem may exist as to such contracting under the Public School Code of 1949 as amended ( "Public School Code "). It is administratively noted that the Public School Code, provides in pertinent part: § 3 -324. Not to be employed by or do business with district; exceptions (a) No school director shall, during the term for which he was elected or appointed, as a private person engaged [sic] in any business transaction with the school district in which he is elected or appointed, be employed in any capacity by the school district in which he is elected or appointed, or receive from such school district any pay for services rendered to the district except as provided in this act: Provided, That one who has served as a school director for two consecutive terms, of six years each, may be elected to the position of attorney or solicitor for the board of which he was a member by the unanimous vote of all the other members of the board, and, after resigning his office as school director, shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as solicitor as the board of school directors may determine: Provided, however, That a school director may be appointed to the position of secretary to the board of a school district of the second class, of which he was a member during the term for which he was elected or appointed upon the unanimous consent of all the other members of the board after resigning his office as school director, and he shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as secretary as the board of school directors shall determine: And provided further, That one who has served as a school director may, after resigning from office as a school director, be elected to the position of teacher by the board of which he was a member by a vote of at least two - thirds of all other members of the board and shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as a teacher as the board of school directors may lawfully determine. (c) It shall not be a violation of this section for a school district to contract for the purchase of goods or services from a business with which a school director is associated to the extent permitted by and in compliance with 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 11 (relating to ethics standards and financial disclosure). 24 P.S. § 3- 324(a), (c). Werner, 04 -529 April 13, 2004 Page 6 The State Ethics Commission does not have the statutory jurisdiction to interpret the Public School Code. Therefore, it is suggested that you seek legal advice as to its applicability. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: As a School Director for the Penn Hills School District ( "School District "), you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Your son is a member of your immediate family. The company for which your son serves as an executive officer is a business with which your son is associated. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you would generally have a conflict of interest as to matters before you that would financially benefit yourself, your son, or the compan y for which your son serves as an executive officer. You would also have a conflict of interest as to clients of the company for which your son serves as an executive officer. In instances where that company would submit a bid to the School District, you would have a conflict as to reviewing or selecting the bids or proposals, and voting to ap rove the contract. A conflict would exist even as to action to eliminate competitor s), where such action would assure or increase the possibility that the School District would award that contract to the company. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. Since a problem could exist as to such contracting under the Public School Code of 1949 as amended ("Public School Code "), it is suggested that you seek legal advice in that regard. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 -787 -0806. Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel