HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-520 OswaldRichard Oswald
107 Janet Street
Beaver Falls, PA 15010
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
March 10, 2004
04 -520
Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; School Director; Independent Contractor;
Compensated Services at Extracurricular /Sporting Events; Activity Fund.
Dear Mr. Oswald:
This responds to your letters of January 28, 2004, and February 6, 2004, by
which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Ha.GS. § 1101 et seq., would impose any prohibition or restrictions upon a school
director with regard to providing compensated services at extracurricular /sporting
events if: (1) the services would be provided in the capacity of an independent
contractor; and (2) the compensation would be paid from an athletic activity fund
generated directly from gate receipts from school district sporting events.
Facts: As a School Director for the Blackhawk School District ( "School District "),
you seek an advisory from the State Ethics Commission based upon the following
submitted facts.
You were previously employed as a teacher for the School District. For over
thirty years, you received training in selling and collecting tickets, running the
scoreboard /clocks, and announcing at various athletic events at the varsity, junior
varsity, ninth grade, and middle school levels. In the past, you were compensated for
providing such services. Now that you have retired from teaching and have become a
School Director, a question has arisen as to whether you may continue to receive
compensation for providing such services at extracurricular /sporting events.
You state that you would perform the services as an "independent contractor,"
but that there would be no contract. You state that you would deal directly with the
Blackhawk Athletic Department. You would be paid upon the completion of each task,
and your compensation would come from the Blackhawk Athletic Activity Fund (the
"Fund. ") You describe the Fund as an "independent activity fund," yet you state that the
fund is generated directly from gate receipts from various varsity level sporting events.
Further, you state that the Fund is controlled by the Blackhawk Athletic Director and is
Oswald, 04 -520
Marchl0, 2004
Page 2
subject to annual audits by the state. Two signatures are required on all checks issued
from the Fund, and a quarterly financial report is provided to the School Board.
Based upon the foregoing facts, you ask whether the proposed payment
arrangement would be permissible under the Ethics Act.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11)
of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor
based upon the facts that the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
In the instant matter, some of the facts that have been submitted are
inconsistent. You state that you seek to provide services as an independent contractor,
yet you assert that there will be no contract. You describe the Fund as an "independent
activity fund," yet you provide facts as to the monies in the Fund and control over the
Fund that suggest it is a School District Fund. Given the inconsistencies in the facts
that you have submitted, the analysis of your inquiry under the Ethics Act must include
certain conditions detailed below.
As a School Director, you are a public official subject to the provisions of the
Ethics Act.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms pertaining to conflicts of interest are defined in the Ethics Act
as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
Oswald, 04 -520
Marchl0, 2004
Page 3
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
"Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the
acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a
political subdivision of consulting or other services or of
supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real
property. The term shall not mean an agreement or
arrangement between the State or political subdivision as
one party and a public official or public employee as the
other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary,
wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in
consideration of his current public employment with the
Commonwealth or a political subdivision.
"Political subdivision." Any county, city, borough,
incorporated town, township, school district, vocational
school, county institution district, and any authority, entity or
body organized by the aforementioned.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no
person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public
official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee
would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to
imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or
his spouse or child or any business in which the person or
his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract
valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with
which the public official or public employee is associated or
any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person
who has been awarded a contract with the governmental
body with which the public official or public employee is
associated, unless the contract has been awarded through
an open and public process, including prior public notice and
subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and
contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or
public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall
responsibility for the implementation or administration of the
contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of
this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent
jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the
making of the contract or subcontract.
Oswald, 04 -520
Marchl0, 2004
Page 4
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f).
Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental
body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official /public
employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is
associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or
subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the
governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an
open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the governmental body.
Pursuant to Section 1103(f), an "open and public process" includes:
(1) prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility;
(2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be
able to prepare and present an application or proposal;
(3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered; and
(4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted.
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official /employee
may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or
administration of the contract with the governmental body.
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(j).
In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official/
employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both
Oswald, 04 -520
Marchl0, 2004
Page 5
orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes or supervisor. In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of
the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the
abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the
disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Pavlovic, Opinion 02 -005.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to your inquiry, it is noted that
one of the essential elements for a violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act
(pertaining to conflicts of interest) is a use of the authority of the public position or
confidential information received by being in the public position. Under the facts that you
have submitted, there is no indication that you would be taking any action as a School
Director to secure the proposed work. Therefore, the fact that you would perform the
proposed services would not, in and of itself, transgress Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act.
However, you would generally have a conflict of interest in your capacity as a
School Director in matters pertaining to the Blackhawk Athletic Director, who per the
submitted facts, would be in a position to determine to what extent you would provide
the proposed compensated services. The basis for the conflict would be that as a
School Director, you would exercise authority over the Blackhawk Athletic Director as a
School District employee, while the Blackhawk Athletic Director would exercise authority
over you as to the proposed services. For the reasons enunciated by the Commission
in Bassi, Opinion 86- 007 -R, Woodrinq, Opinion 90 -001, and Elisco, Opinion 00 -003,
such a reciprocal arrangement would generally result in a conflict of interest for you
under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act in matters pertaining to the Blackhawk Athletic
Director.
Additionally, you would have a conflict of interest in your capacity as a School
Director in matters pertaining to your provision of the proposed services, such as any
approval by the School Board of payments issued to you.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully and
to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. The abstention
requirement is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any use of authority of office. In
Juliante, Order 809, the Commission recognized that the use of authority of office as
defined in the Ethics Act includes, for example, discussing, conferring with others, and
lobbying for a particular result.
With respect to Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, you have asserted that there
would be no contract for your proposed services, and that the Fund from which you
would be paid is an "independent activity fund." Nevertheless, it would appear from the
submitted facts that contracting would occur, even if such contract(s) would not be in
writing, and that you would be paid with School District funds. Therefore, you are
advised that Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be observed if applicable.
Finally, you are cautioned that although the proposed provision of services would
not be prohibited by the Ethics Act conditioned upon your conformity with the
requirements of Sections 1103(a) and 11030), and 1103(f) to the extent applicable, a
problem could exist as to such contracting under the Public School Code of 1949 as
amended ( "Public School Code ").
It is administratively noted that the Public School Code, provides in pertinent part:
§ 3 - 324. Not to be employed by or do business with district; exceptions
(a) No school director shall, during the term for which
he was elected or appointed, as a private person engaged
[sic] in any business transaction with the school district in
Oswald, 04 -520
Marchl0, 2004
Page 6
which he is elected or appointed, be employed in any
capacity by the school district in which he is elected or
appointed, or receive from such school district any pay for
services rendered to the district except as provided in this
act: Provided, That one who has served as a school director
for two consecutive terms, of six years each, may be elected
to the position of attorney or solicitor for the board of which
he was a member by the unanimous vote of all the other
members of the board, and, after resigning his office as
school director, shall be entitled to receive such pay for his
services as solicitor as the board of school directors may
determine: Provided, however, That a school director may
be appointed to the position of secretary to the board of a
school district of the second class, of which he was a
member during the term for which he was elected or
appointed upon the unanimous consent of all the other
members of the board after resigning his office as school
director, and he shall be entitled to receive such pay for his
services as secretary as the board of school directors shall
determine: And provided further, That one who has served
as a school director may, after resigning from office as a
school director, be elected to the position of teacher by the
board of which he was a member by a vote of at least two -
thirds of all other members of the board and shall be entitled
to receive such pay for his services as a teacher as the
board of school directors may lawfully determine.
(c) It shall not be a violation of this section for a
school district to contract for the purchase of goods or
services from a business with which a school director is
associated to the extent permitted by and in compliance with
65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 11 (relating to ethics standards and financial
disclosure).
24 P.S. § 3- 324(a), (c).
The State Ethics Commission does not have the statutory jurisdiction to interpret
the Public School Code. Therefore, it is suggested that you seek legal advice as to its
applicability.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of
the Public School Code.
Conclusion: As a School Director for the Blackhawk School District ( "School
District "), you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and
Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Your proposed provision
of compensated services at extracurricular /sporting events where: (1) the services
would be provided in the capacity of an independent contractor; and (2) the
compensation would be paid from an athletic activity fund generated directly from gate
receipts from School District sporting events, would not be prohibited by the Ethics Act
conditioned upon your conformity with the requirements of Sections 1103(a) and
1103(1), and 1103(f) to the extent applicable. You would generally have a conflict of
interest in your capacity as a School Director in matters pertaining to the Blackhawk
Oswald, 04 -520
Marchl0, 2004
Page 7
Athletic Director, who would be in a position to determine to what extent you would
provide the proposed compensated services. You would have a conflict of interest in
your capacity as a School Director in matters pertaining to your provision of the
proposed services, such as any approval by the School Board of payments issued to
you. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain fully and
to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. Since a
problem could exist as to such contracting under the Public School Code of 1949 as
amended ( "Public School Code "), it is suggested that you seek legal advice in that
regard.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 -787 -0806. Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel