Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-575 BairE. Kenneth Bair, 11 1171 Landisburg Road Landisburg, PA 17040 Dear Mr. Bair: ADVICE OF COUNSEL July 30, 2003 03 -575 Re: Conflict; Public Official; Self- employed; Sole Proprietor; School Director; Contract; Piano; Tuning; Repair. This responds to your letter of July 7, 2003, by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Ha.G.S. § 1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a school director as to providing piano tuning services to the school district. Facts: As a self - employed, sole proprietor, business owner dealing with piano tunservice to individuals, religious organizations, non - profit organizations and public and private schools, you have been servicing the West Perry School District (School District) since 1976. You charge a flat rate for tuning, which includes a service call fee and time for the tuning, an hourly rate for repair or regulation of the piano action and list price charges for necessary parts and accessories. In that you set your rates on a county basis, Perry County has the lowest fee since you are a resident. You have higher rates in Dauphin, Cumberland, Juniata, Northumberland, Snyder and Schuylkill counties because of the extra travel distance. You also service pianos in the Greenwood School District and the Newport School District, both of which are in Perry County and charge the same fee for servicing pianos in those districts as in the School District. There is no contract for servicing the pianos in any of the school districts. Beginning in December of each school year, you send a letter to each music teacher in each school district requesting the fee per piano for the next fiscal school year. Because all school districts work within a budget, each teacher has the option to accept or reject your fees according to the number of tunings needed per iano. You consistently charge one dollar ($1.00) more for tuning per piano to school districts over the flat rate simply because you are precluded from adding extra charges for any unforeseen repair or regulation. You absorb the extra time into the slightly higher fee. Bair 03 -575 July 30, 2003 Page 2 In the last two plus years, you have attended most of the School District Board meetings and believe you could contribute to the board. Before filing a petition for the primary election ballot in the spring of 2003, you obtained a copy of an Advice of Counsel dated October 16, 2002, to Jeff Bruening, Councilman of Stewartstown Borough but did not write for any advice on your own behalf. You believe that the Advice was pertinent to your situation being a possible elected school director and also providing piano services to the School District. You ran in the primary election as a cross - filing candidate with three other cross - filing candidates for two positions and won one of the positions. On July 1, 2003, when you received Purchase Orders from the School District for servicing pianos in the 2003 -2004 fiscal year, a statement was typed on each Purchase Order that all tunings had to be completed prior to November 30, 2003. You asked the Business Manager why the deadline was added. The manager responded that both she and the district solicitor believed that there would be a conflict of interest if you continued as a vendor after you became a member of the Board for the School District. You have enclosed copies of one of the Purchase Orders and a request for fee adjustment to a teacher, which are incorporated by reference. Your calendar year income from the School District for the last three years has been $783.50 in 2000; $922.50 in 2001; and $495.00 in 2002. You note that the number of pianos being serviced in the School District is 12 while the number of tuning /service calls in the school year was 13. Because a conflict of interest issue has been raised, you seek clarification of your contemplated position on the School Board vis -a -vis your vendor position. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. If elected to the position of School Director for West Perry School District, you would be a public official as that term is defined in the Ethics Act, and hence you would be subject to the provisions of that Act. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides: § 1103. Restricted activities (a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a). The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or Bair 03 -575 July 30, 2003 Page 3 employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self - employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f). Bair 03 -575 July 30, 2003 Page 4 Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official /public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Pursuant to Section 1103(f), an "open and public process" includes: (1) prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility; (2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be able to prepare and present an application or proposal; (3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered; and (4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also requires that the public official /employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(j). In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official /employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or supervisor. Bair 03 -575 July 30, 2003 Page 5 In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Mlakar, Advice 91- 523 -S. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act prohibits a public official /public employee from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/ public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to your inquiry, it is noted that Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act pertaining to conflicts of interest does not prohibit public officials /public employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /public employee may not use the authority of his public position - -or confidential information obtained by being in that position- -for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. Examples of conduct that would be prohibited under Section 1103(a) would include: (1) the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action, Metrick, Order 1037; (2) the use of governmental facilities, such as governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research materials, or other property, or the use of governmental personnel, to conduct private business activities, Freind, Order 800; Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public official /public employee is associated in his private capacity, Gorman, Order 1041, or private client(s). Miller, Opinion 89 -024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92 -010. If elected School Director, you would generally have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act as to matters that would financially benefit yourself, a member of your immediate family, a business with which you or a member of your immediate family is associated, or business client(s). You would specifically have a conflict of interest as to matters pertaining to your piano tuning services for the School District, such as the payment of invoices involving your services or the issuance of any checks payable to yourself /your business. In each instance of a conflict, you would be required to abstain and to observe the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. With respect to Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, since you provide tuning services on an as needed basis without any contract setting terms or the duration of the arrangement, therefore, in each instance that the service would be less than $500, this Section would have no application. However, if any contract would arise that would be $500 or more, then the restrictions of Section 1103(f) would apply. Although such contracting would not be prohibited under the Ethics Act provided the requirements of Section 1103(a), 1103(f), and 1103(j) would be satisfied, a problem could exist under the Public School Code of 1949 as amended ( "Public School Code "). It is administratively noted that the Public School Code, provides in pertinent part: § 3 -324. Not to be employed by or do business with district; exceptions (a) No school director shall, during the term for which he was elected or appointed, as a private person engaged [sic] in any business transaction with the school district in which he is elected or appointed, be employed in any capacity by the school district in which he is elected or appointed, or receive from such school district any pay for Bair 03 -575 July 30, 2003 Page 6 services rendered to the district except as provided in this act: Provided, That one who has served as a school director for two consecutive terms, of six years each, may be elected to the position of attorney or solicitor for the board of which he was a member by the unanimous vote of all the other members of the board, and, after resigning his office as school director, shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as solicitor as the board of school directors may determine: Provided, however, That a school director may be appointed to the position of secretary to the board of a school district of the second class, of which he was a member during the term for which he was elected or appointed upon the unanimous consent of all the other members of the board after resigning his office as school director, and he shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as secretary as the board of school directors shall determine: And provided further, That one who has served as a school director may, after resigning from office as a school director, be elected to the position of teacher by the board of which he was a member by a vote of at least two - thirds of all other members of the board and shall be entitled to receive such pay for his services as a teacher as the board of school directors may lawfully determine. (c) It shall not be a violation of this section for a school district to contract for the purchase of goods or services from a business with which a school director is associated to the extent permitted by and in compliance with 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 11 (relating to ethics standards and financial disclosure). 24 P.S. § 3- 324(a), (c). In that the Public School Code may impose restrictions upon your ability to provide such services to the School District, it is suggested that you seek legal advice in this regard. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: If elected to the position of School Director for West Perry School is ri�c would be a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. If elected School Director, you would generally have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act as to matters that would financially benefit yourself, a member of your immediate family, a business with which you or a member of your immediate family is associated, or business client(s). You would specifically have a conflict of interest as to matters pertaining to your piano tuning services with the School District, such as the payment of invoices involving your services or the issuance of any checks payable to yourself /your business. In each instance of a conflict, you would be required to abstain and to observe the disclosure requirements of Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act. Bair 03 -575 July 30, 2003 Page 7 Although such contracting would not be prohibited under the Ethics Act provided the requirements of Section 1103(a), 1103(f), and 1103(j) would be satisfied, a problem could exist under the Public School Code of 1949, as amended, ( "Public School Code "), and therefore, it is suggested that you seek legal advice in that regard. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel