HomeMy WebLinkAbout23-516 Confidential
PHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
March 14, 2023
To the Requester:
23-516
This responds to your emails received February 14, 2023, and February 15, 2023, by which
you requested a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission
(“Commission”), seeking guidance as to the issue presented below:
Issue:
Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et
seq., would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon an individual employed as a \[Position\]
for the \[Governmental Body Within a Political Subdivision\] with regard to being appointed
to the board of a non-profit entity that owns land in the \[Political Subdivision\].
Brief Answer: NO. The Ethics Act would not prohibit the individual from being appointed
to the board of a non-profit entity that owns land in the \[Political Subdivision\]. However,
if the individual would become a member of the non-profit entity’s board, the non-profit
entity would be considered a business with which the individual is associated, and pursuant
to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, the individual generally would have a conflict of
interest in his public capacity as a \[Position\] in matters that would financially impact him
or the non-profit entity.
Facts:
You request a confidential advisory from the Commission based upon submitted facts that
may be fairly summarized as follows.
You are employed as a \[Position\] for the \[Governmental Body Within a Political
Subdivision\]. Your job duties as a \[Position\] include \[Performing Certain Activities\].
Confidential Advice, 23-516
March 14, 2023
Page 2
As part of your role as a \[Position\], you serve as a \[Sub-Position\]. In this capacity, you
\[Perform Additional Activities\].
A \[Public Official\] contacted you to ask about your interest in being appointed by him to
the board of a non-profit entity (the “Entity”). The Entity owns land in the \[Political Subdivision\]
and operates exclusively within a \[Certain Portion of the Political Subdivision\]. The Entity does
not own any land in the area for which you serve as a \[Sub-Position\]. You would not be
compensated for serving as a Member of the Entity’s Board.
Based upon the above submitted facts, you ask whether the Ethics Act would impose any
prohibitions or restrictions upon you with regard to being appointed to the Board of the Entity.
Discussion:
Pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10),
(11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted.
In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does
not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have
not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all material facts relevant
to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the
requester has truthfully disclosed all material facts.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. -- No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of
interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
“Conflict” or “conflict of interest.” Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary
benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic
impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public employee, a
Confidential Advice, 23-516
March 14, 2023
Page 3
member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
“Authority of office or employment.” The actual power
provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the
performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular
public office or position of public employment.
“Business.” Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization,
self-employed individual, holding company, joint stock company,
receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit.
“Business with which he is associated.” Any business in
which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Subject to the statutory exclusions to the Ethics Act’s definition of the term “conflict” or
“conflict of interest” (i.e., the de minimis exclusion and the class/subclass exclusion), 65 Pa.C.S.
§ 1102, a public official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office or
confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary
(financial) benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate
family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the definition of the term “business” as set
forth in the Ethics Act includes non-profit entities. Rendell v. State Ethics Commission, 603 Pa.
292, 983 A.2d 708.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, the public official/public employee would be
required to abstain from participation. The abstention requirement would extend to any use of
authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying
for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809.
Conclusion:
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised as
follows.
As a \[Position\], you are a public employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. The
Entity is a “business” as that term is defined by the Ethics Act. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act
would not prohibit you from being appointed to the Board of the Entity. However, if you would
become a Member of Entity’s Board, the Entity would be considered a business with which you
are associated, and pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, you generally would have a
conflict of interest in your public capacity as a \[Position\] in matters that would financially impact
Confidential Advice, 23-516
March 14, 2023
Page 4
you or the Entity. In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be required to abstain from
participation.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any
other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material
facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel