HomeMy WebLinkAbout23-511 FreimuthPHONE: 717-783-1610
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
FINANCE BUILDING
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
February 9, 2023
To the Requester:
Andrew R. Freimuth, Esquire
Dear Mr. Freimuth:
23-511
This responds to your letter dated January 23, 2023, by which you requested an advisory
from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission"), seeking guidance as to the
issues presented below:
Issues:
(1) Whether, pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act
("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), an individual serving as a Member of the Board of
the Redevelopment Authority of Montgomery County ("Authority") would have a conflict
of interest with regard to participating in discussions or votes of the Authority Board
pertaining to the Authority's award of an agreement/contract for the administration of grant
funds for housing projects, if a non-profit corporation with which the individual is
employed would submit a proposal to the Authority to administer the grant funds.
BriefAnswer: YES. If the individual's employer would submit a proposal to the Authority
to administer the grant funds, the individual would have a conflict of interest under Section
1103(a) of the Ethics Act with regard to participating in discussions or votes of the
Authority Board pertaining to the Authority's award of an agreement/contract to administer
the grant funds.
(2) Whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon the individual, as
an Authority Board Member or as an employee (i.e., executive director) of the non-profit
corporation, with regard to overseeing work performed by the non-profit corporation under
an agreement/contract between the non-profit corporation and the Authority for the
administration of the grant funds.
Freimuth123-511
February 9, 2023
Page 2
Brief Answer: YES. Pursuant to Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act (pertaining to
contracting), in her public capacity as a Member of the Authority Board, the individual
would be prohibited from having any supervisory or overall responsibility for the
implementation of an agreement/contract between the non-profit corporation and the
Authority for the administration of the grant funds. The Ethics Act would not prohibit the
individual, in her private capacity as the executive director of the non-profit corporation,
from overseeing work performed by the non-profit corporation under such an
agreement/contract.
Facts:
You have been authorized by Judith M. Memberg ("Ms. Memberg") to request an advisory
from the Commission on her behalf. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as
follows.
Ms. Memberg is a Member and Secretary of the Authority Board. The Authority was
organized by Montgomery County ("County"), Pennsylvania pursuant to the Urban
Redevelopment Law, 35 P.S. § 1701 et sec for the purpose of assisting the County's townships
and boroughs in stimulating economic revitalization and aiding in the provision of affordable
housing through applications to state and federal sources.
The Authority is holding repaid loan funds from Pennsylvania's Communities of
Opportunity grant program (the "Grant Funds"), and it has received authorization from the
Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development ("DCED") to repurpose and
use the Grant Funds for housing projects in Pottstown Borough. In order to determine an
appropriate disposition of the Grant Funds, the Authority plans to issue a request for proposals
("RFP") seeking qualified candidates to administer the use of the Grant Funds for specific housing
programs in Pottstown Borough. An agreement/contract between the successful proposer and the
Authority for the administration of the Grant Funds will be required. It is anticipated that a
percentage of the total Grant Funds will be paid to the successful proposer as compensation for the
costs and expenses of administering the Grant Funds.
In a private capacity, Ms. Memberg is employed as the Executive Director of Genesis
Housing Corporation ("Genesis"), which is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation. Genesis is a
community housing development corporation that rehabilitates homes, improves and stabilizes
neighborhoods by reducing blighting influences, and provides counseling services on housing and
financial issues for potential homebuyers in Montgomery County and the surrounding counties.
Because Genesis has experience in administering housing -related grant programs and in
administering housing programs in Pottstown Borough, it is anticipated that Genesis will submit a
proposal to the Authority to administer the Grant Funds in accordance with the RFP.
Ms. Memberg, as a Member of the Authority Board, has not participated in the preparation
of the RFP, and she did not attend the Authority Board meeting at which the RFP was authorized.
You state that if Genesis would submit a proposal in response to the RFP, Ms. Memberg, as a
Member of the Authority Board, would not participate in any discussions regarding the review of
proposals received, and she would abstain from voting on the award of any agreement/contract to
Genesis. Ms. Memberg would not participate in the administration and enforcement of any
agreement/contract awarded to Genesis.
Freimuth123-511
February 9, 2023
Page 3
In her capacity as the Executive Director of Genesis, Ms. Memberg would have ultimate
responsibility for preparing and submitting a proposal in response to the RFP and for any
communications necessary for clarification of the RFP process. If the agreement/contract would
be awarded to Genesis, Ms. Memberg would be responsible for preparing and providing reports to
the Authority as required for appropriate reporting to DCED to demonstrate that Genesis complied
with the agreement/contract and disposed of the Grant Funds in accordance with its proposal and
the agreement/contract. Ms. Memberg's compensation as the Executive Director of Genesis would
not be affected by the award of an agreement/contract to Genesis.
Based upon the above submitted facts, the questions that are presented by your advisory
request are: (1) if Genesis would submit a proposal to the Authority to administer the Grant Funds,
whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon Ms. Memberg with regard
to participating in discussions or votes of the Authority Board pertaining to the award of an
agreement/contract to administer the Grant Funds; and (2) whether the Ethics Act would impose
prohibitions or restrictions upon Ms. Memberg, as an Authority Board Member or as the Executive
Director of Genesis, with regard to overseeing work performed by Genesis under an
agreement/contract with the Authority for the administration of the Grant Funds.
Discussion:
Pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10),
(11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted.
An advisory opinion only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all
material facts. In issuing an advisory opinion, the Commission does not engage in an independent
investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to acts that have not been submitted. It is the
burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S.
§§ 1107(10), (11).
Sections 1103(a) and 11030) of the Ethics Act provide:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. -- No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of
interest.
0) Voting conflict. -- Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any
law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure
shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in
the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a
matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from
voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and
disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written
memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that
whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on
Freimuth123-511
February 9, 2023
Page 4
a matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section
makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if
disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a
three -member governing body of a political subdivision, where one
member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest
and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to
vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided
herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), 11030).
The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary
benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic
impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public employee, a
member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual power
provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the
performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular
public office or position of public employment.
"Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization,
self-employed individual, holding company, joint stock company,
receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit.
"Business with which he is associated." Any business in
which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Freimuth123-511
February 9, 2023
Page 5
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to conflict of interest, restricts public officials
and public employees in their public capacities, not their private capacities. Subject to the statutory
exclusions to the Ethics Act's definition of the term "conflict" or "conflict of interest" (i.e., the "de
minimis exclusion" or the "class/subclass exclusion"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102, a public official/public
employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office or confidential information
received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary (financial) benefit of the public
official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which
he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The definition of the term "business" as set forth in the Ethics Act includes a non-profit
corporation. Rendell v. State Ethics Commission, 603 Pa. 292, 983 A.2d 708 (2009).
The use of authority of office is not limited merely to voting but extends to any use of
authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying
for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809. In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public
official/public employee would be required to abstain from participation, which would include
voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 11030) of the Ethics Act would be
applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 11030) of the Ethics Act would
have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict.
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to contracting, provides as follows:
(f) Contract. --No public official or public employee or his
spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or
child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or
more with the governmental body with which the public official or
public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or
more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the
governmental body with which the public official or public
employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded
through an open and public process, including prior public notice
and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and
contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public
employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility
for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any
contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be
voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is
commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or
subcontract.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f).
The term "contract" is defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the
acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political
Freimuth123-511
February 9, 2023
Page 6
subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials,
equipment, land or other personal or real property. The term shall
not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political
subdivision as one parry and a public official or public employee as
the other parry, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary,
wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in
consideration of his current public employment with the
Commonwealth or a political subdivision.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body
permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official/public employee, his
spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise
appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has
been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section
1103(f) requires that an "open and public process" be observed as to the contract with the
governmental body. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also provides that the public official/public
employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or
administration of the contract with the governmental body.
Conclusion:
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised as
follows.
As a Member of the Authority Board, Ms. Memberg is a public official subject to the
provisions of the Ethics Act. Genesis is a business with which Ms. Memberg is associated in her
capacity as an employee (Executive Director). In her capacity as a Member of the Authority Board,
Ms. Memberg generally would have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act
in matters that would financially impact her or Genesis.
If Genesis would submit a proposal to the Authority to administer the Grant Funds, Ms.
Memberg would have a conflict of interest with regard to participating in discussions or votes of
the Authority Board pertaining to the award of an agreement/contract to administer the Grant
Funds. In each instance of a conflict of interest, Ms. Memberg would be required to abstain from
participation, which would include voting unless one of the statutory exceptions of Section 11030)
of the Ethics Act would be applicable. Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section
11030) of the Ethics Act would have to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict.
The restrictions and requirements of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would have to be
observed as to any agreement/contract between Genesis and the Authority for the administration
of the Grant Funds. (See, Kistler v. State Ethics Commission, 610 Pa. 516, 22 A.3d 223 (2011),
regarding the requirements for an "open and public process.") In pertinent part, Section 1103(f)
of the Ethics Act would prohibit Ms. Memberg, in her public capacity as a Member of the
Authority Board, from having any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation of
an agreement/contract awarded to Genesis by the Authority for the administration of the Grant
Funds. The Ethics Act would not prohibit Ms. Memberg, in her private capacity as the Executive
Freimuth, 23-511
February 9, 2023
Page 7
Director of Genesis, from overseeing work performed by Genesis under such an
agreement/contract.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the
applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than
the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics
Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Urban Redevelopment Law.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice of Counsel is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct
in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the
material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you
may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX
transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30)
days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Respectfully,
Bridget K. Guilfoyle
Chief Counsel