Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout22-529 BlaumPHONE: 717-783-1610 TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 To the Requester: Eugene J. Blaum Dear Mr. Blaum: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FINANCE BUILDING 613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309 HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400 FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806 WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov ADVICE OF COUNSEL August 4, 2022 22-529 This responds to your letter dated July 23, 2022, by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission"), seeking guidance as to the issues presented below: Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et SeMc ., would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon employment of an Assistant to the District Executive (Administrative Officer 4) following termination of service with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ("PennDOT"). Facts: You request an advisory from the Commission based upon submitted facts, the material portion of which may be fairly summarized as follows. You are currently employed as an Assistant to the District Executive (Administrative Officer 4) with PennDOT in Engineering District 6 ("District 6") in King of Prussia, PA. You have submitted a copy of your official PennDOT position description, which document is incorporated herein by reference. It is noted that said position description lists your j ob as Administrative Officer 4 (job code 08660). Prior to moving into your current position, you served as the Assistant Press Secretary in District 6 for twenty years and as the Community Relations Coordinator in District 6 for nine years. Blaum, 22-529 August 4, 2022 Page 2 You state that you expect to retire on October 15, 2022, after thirty-five years of service with the department. You seek guidance as to whether you might pursue employment with another governmental agency or an engineering firm. Based upon the above submitted facts, you seek guidance as to the following questions: (1) Whether you would be permitted to take a position with an engineering firm in southeastern Pennsylvania that is involved in transportation -related business with PennDOT and/or PennDOT District 6, and if so whether there would be restrictions on the type of work you can perform as it relates to PennDOT. (2) Whether there would be restrictions on the work you can perform if it involves PennDOT and/or PennDOT District 6 if you take a position with a municipality, county, a private business, or an organization not affiliated with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (i.e., a utility company). (3) Whether you would be permitted to attend social gatherings held by, at or for PennDOT District 6 employees should you work for an organization that does business with PennDOT. (4) Whether you would be permitted to speak with work friends and associates in District 6 about non -transportation subjects should you work for an organization that does business with PennDOT. (5) Whether you are permitted to attend an official PennDOT event (i.e., news conference), should you work for an organization that does business with PennDOT. (6) Whether you would be restricted as to your communications with department staff if you work with a company that is not transportation oriented and does no business with PennDOT. (7) Whether PennDOT staff are permitted to call you with questions or requests for information based on your institutional knowledge should you work for an organization that does business with PennDOT. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. Blaum, 22-529 August 4, 2022 Page 3 As an employee of PennDOT District 6, you would be considered a "public employee" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa. C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. This conclusion is based upon the position description and the job classification specifications, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicate clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official action of a non -ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the following: contracting, procurement; administering or monitoring grants or subsidies; planning or zoning; inspecting; licensing; regulating; auditing; or other activity(ies) where the economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person. Consequently, upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. Sections 1103(a) and 11030) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted activities (g) Former official or employee. No former public official or public employee shall represent a ep rson, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(g) (Emphasis added). The following terms related to Section 1103(g) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. Blaum, 22-529 August 4, 2022 Page 4 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The term "Person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other businesses. It also includes the former public employee himself, Confidential Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007. The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in aM activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; 3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich, Opinion 89 -005. Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official/public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012. However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion 95-011. A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for, the new employer. Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, Opinion 90-009-R. Blaum, 22-529 August 4, 2022 Page 5 The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been associated upon termination of your employment with PennDOT would be PennDOT in its entirety, including but not limited to District 6-0. Therefore, for the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of "persons" before PennDOT. Having set forth the restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, your specific inquiries shall be addressed. Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from accepting employment with an engineering firm, private business, governmental body, etc., however, during the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from providing services to PennDOT as such would necessarily involve prohibited representation before PennDOT. Additionally, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from the following activity if employed by an organization that does business with PennDOT: (1) attending social gatherings or official events held by, and on -site at, any PennDOT district, (2) speaking to former colleagues and associates about non -transportation subjects, and (3) receiving communications and requests for information based on your institutional knowledge. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct. Conclusion: As an employee of PennDOT District 6, you would be considered a "public employee" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa. C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. Upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act. The former governmental body would be PennDOT in its entirety, including but not limited to Engineering District 6. For the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of a "person" before PennDOT. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from accepting employment with an engineering firm, private business, governmental body, etc., however, during the first year following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit you from providing services to PennDOT as such would necessarily involve prohibited representation before PennDOT. Additionally, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would not prohibit you from the following activities if employed by an organization that does business with PennDOT: (1) attending social Blaim,22-529 August 4, 2022 Page 6 gatherings or official events held by, and on -site at, any PennDOT district, (2) speaking to former colleagues and associates about non -transportation subjects, and (3) receiving communications and requests for information based on your institutional knowledge. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Respectfully, Bridget K. Guilfoyle Chief Counsel