HomeMy WebLinkAbout22-009 ConfidentialPHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
Before: Nicholas A. Colafella, Chair
Mark R. Corrigan, Vice Chair
Roger Nick
Melanie DePalma
Michael A. Schwartz
Shelley Y. Simms
DATE DECIDED: 4/21/22
DATE MAILED: 4/22/22
To the Requester:
22-009
This Opinion is issued in response to your letter dated April 1, 2022, by which you
requested a confidential advisory from this Commission.
I. ISSUE:
Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et
seq., would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon a Member of the Pennsylvania General
Assembly (the "State Legislator") specifically a Member of the [CHAMBER] who will be
leaving public office on [DATE 1], with regard to:
(1) Entering into an employment contract with a [TYPE OF ENTITY] prior to [DATE
1 ], for employment that would begin on [DATE 2];
(2) Performing the duties of his public position as a State Legislator during the time
period between the execution of an employment contract with the [TYPE OF
ENTITY] and [DATE 1]; or
(3) Performing work for the [TYPE OF ENTITY] following [DATE 1].
IL FACTUAL BASIS FOR DETERMINATION:
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 2
You have been authorized by the Honorable [NAME OF STATE LEGISLATOR] (the
"State Legislator"), who is a Member of the [CHAMBER], to request a confidential advisory from
this Commission on his behalf. You have submitted facts that may be fairly summarized as
follows.
The State Legislator was elected to represent the residents of the [LEGISLATIVE
DISTRICT], which covers all of [COUNTY] and portions of [COUNTY]. The State Legislator
recently [PERFORMED A CERTAIN ACTIVITY], and he will be leaving his public office on
[DATE 1].
The State Legislator is pursuing opportunities for employment, but he will not begin any
employment nor be compensated in any way in any employment position until [A CERTAIN
POINT IN TIME]. At this time, the State Legislator is being recruited for a [TYPE OF
POSITION] ([THE POSITION]) with a [TYPE OF ENTITY] ([THE ENTITY]). The State
Legislator has not received a formal offer of employment from [THE ENTITY]. It is anticipated
that [THE ENTITY] will complete its hiring process and make a contract offer to the successful
candidate for [THE POSITION] prior to [DATE 2].
The State Legislator has not been involved in his official capacity in any matters related to
[THE ENTITY] and [THE ENTITY] has not contacted the State Legislator's office since
[THE ENTITY] began its search for a candidate for [THE POSITION]. While [THE ENTITY] is
considering the State Legislator for employment, the State Legislator will recuse himself from any
matter before the [CHAMBER] that would be related to [THE ENTITY]. If [THE ENTITY]
selects the State Legislator as the successful candidate for [THE POSITION], the State Legislator
will not perform any services on behalf of nor receive any compensation from [THE ENTITY]
until [DATE 2], when his employment with [THE ENTITY] would begin.
If the State Legislator would become employed in [THE POSITION], his job duties might
involve contact with the [CHAMBER] regarding legislative matters, including but not limited to
providing funding to [THE ENTITY] through state grants or direct appropriations. However, the
State Legislator acknowledges that for a one-year period following his departure from the
[CHAMBER], he would be precluded from appearing before the [CHAMBER] on behalf of [THE
ENTITY] or otherwise representing [THE ENTITY] before the [CHAMBER].
Based upon the above submitted facts, you pose the following questions:
(1) Whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon the
State Legislator with regard to entering into an employment contract with [THE
ENTITY] prior to [DATE 1 ], for employment that would begin on [DATE 2];
(2) Whether the Ethics Act would impose any prohibitions or restrictions upon the
State Legislator with regard to performing the duties of his public position as a State
Legislator during the time period between the execution of an employment contract
with [THE ENTITY] and [DATE 1]; and
(3) Whether the Ethics Act would impose any restrictions upon the State Legislator
with regard to performing work for [THE ENTITY] following [DATE 1].
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 3
By letter dated April 4, 2022, you were notified of the date, time and location of the
executive meeting at which your request would be considered.
III. DISCUSSION:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65
Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the
requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has
submitted, this Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does
it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully
disclose all material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only
affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all material facts.
As a Member of the [CHAMBER], the State Legislator is a public official subject to the
provisions of the Ethics Act.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. --No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of
interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms related to Section 1103(a) are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary
benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic
impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public employee, a
member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual power
provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the
performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 4
public office or position of public employment.
"Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother or
sister.
"Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization,
self-employed individual, holding company, joint stock company,
receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit.
"Business with which he is associated." Any business in
which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
Subject to the statutory exclusions to the Ethics Act's definition of the term "conflict" or
"conflict of interest," 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102, pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public
official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office/employment or
confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary
benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
Per the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Kistler v. State Ethics Commission, 610
Pa. 516, 22 A.3d 223 (2011), in order to violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public
official/public employee:
... must act in such a way as to put his [office/public position] to the
purpose of obtaining for himself a private pecuniary benefit. Such
directed action implies awareness on the part of the [public
official/public employee] of the potential pecuniary benefit as well
as the motivation to obtain that benefit for himself.
Kistler, supra, 610 Pa. at 523, 22 A.3d at 227. To violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a
public official/public employee "must be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for
himself, his family, or his business, and then must take action in the form of one or more specific
steps to attain that benefit." Id., 610 Pa. at 528, 22 A.3d at 231.
The post -termination restrictions of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act apply to former
public officials/public employees. While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public
official/public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former
public official/public employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before "the governmental
body with which he has been associated":
§ 1103. Restricted activities
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 5
(g) Former official or employee. --No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised
or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body
with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that
body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any
activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal
appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former
public official or public employee.
"Person." A business, governmental body, individual,
corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club
or other organization or group of persons.
"Governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated." The governmental
body within State government or a political subdivision by which
the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which
the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected
and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
The term "person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and other
businesses. It also includes the former public official/public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95-007.
The term "represent" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in
aM activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the
former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract
proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official/public employee;
(4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a
person; (5) lobbying; and (6) acting to make known to the former governmental body the
representation of, or work for, a new employer. Popovich, Opinion 89-005; Edlev, Opinion 17-
002; Confidential Opinion, 17-007; Valentine, Opinion 20-003.
Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal,
document, or bid (if submitted to, or reviewed by, the former governmental body) constitutes an
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 6
attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 1103(g) also generally prohibits the
inclusion of the name of a former public official/public employee on invoices submitted by his
new employer to the former governmental body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that
existed prior to termination of service with such governmental body. Shay, Opinion 91-012.
However, if such a pre-existing contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee
worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by
the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster, Opinion
95-011.
A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents
presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public official/public employee
may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The former
public official/public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance
before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not
be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude
making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information
which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence
the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or
work for, the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with regard to
representation before his former governmental body. The former public official/public employee
is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental
body with which a public official/public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the
particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official/public
employee had influence or control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of
House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Shart�, Opinion 90-009-R.
Having set forth the above general principles, you are advised as follows.
The Ethics Act would not prohibit the State Legislator from entering into an employment
contract with [THE ENTITY] prior to [DATE I], for employment that would begin on [DATE 2].
At such times as the State Legislator would have an employment contract with [THE
ENTITY], the State Legislator could have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act in matters before the [CHAMBER] involving [THE ENTITY] if such matters would
financially impact the State Legislator, a member of his immediate family, or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. However, to the extent the activities
of a state legislator relate to "legislative actions" (introducing, considering, debating, voting,
enacting, adopting, or approving legislation), they are constitutionally controlled and are exempt
from the purview of the Ethics Act and this Commission. Confidential Opinion, 05-002; Corrigan,
Opinion 87-001. As for other actions, the State Legislator would not transgress Section 1103(a)
of the Ethics Act unless: (1) he would be consciously aware of a private pecuniary benefit for
himself, a member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated; and (2) his action would constitute one or more specific steps to
attain that benefit. See, Kistler, supra.
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 7
Upon termination of the State Legislator's service with the [CHAMBER], the State
Legislator would become a "former public official" subject to the provisions of Section 1103(g)
of the Ethics Act. The governmental body with which the State Legislator would be deemed to
have been associated upon termination of his service with the [CHAMBER] would be the
[CHAMBER] in its entirety. Therefore, for the first year following termination of the State
Legislator's service with the [CHAMBER], Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and
restrict the State Legislator from engaging in any activity that would involve "representation" of a
"person" before the [CHAMBER]. In particular, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit
the State Legislator from performing any job duties as an employee of [THE ENTITY] that would
involve prohibited representation before the [CHAMBER] as delineated above.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the
applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than
the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics
Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the Legislative Code of Ethics, 46 P.S. § 143.1 et s�Mc.,
or the [REDACTED].
IV. CONCLUSION:
As a Member of the Pennsylvania General Assembly specifically a Member of the
[CHAMBER] the Honorable [NAME OF STATE LEGISLATOR] (the "State Legislator") is a
public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics
Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et sec. The Ethics Act would not prohibit the State Legislator from
entering into an employment contract with a [TYPE OF ENTITY] ([THE ENTITY]) for a [TYPE
OF POSITION] prior to [DATE I], for employment that would begin on [DATE 2].
At such times as the State Legislator would have an employment contract with [THE
ENTITY], the State Legislator could have a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act in matters before the [CHAMBER] involving [THE ENTITY] if such matters would
financially impact the State Legislator, a member of his immediate family, or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. However, to the extent the activities
of a state legislator relate to "legislative actions" (introducing, considering, debating, voting,
enacting, adopting, or approving legislation), they are constitutionally controlled and are exempt
from the purview of the Ethics Act and this Commission. As for other actions, the State Legislator
would not transgress Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act unless: (1) he would be consciously aware
of a private pecuniary benefit for himself, a member of his immediate family, or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family is associated; and (2) his action would constitute
one or more specific steps to attain that benefit.
Upon termination of the State Legislator's service with the [CHAMBER], the State
Legislator would become a "former public official" subject to the provisions of Section 1103(g)
of the Ethics Act. The governmental body with which the State Legislator would be deemed to
have been associated upon termination of his service with the [CHAMBER] would be the
[CHAMBER] in its entirety. Therefore, for the first year following termination of the State
Legislator's service with the [CHAMBER], Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and
restrict the State Legislator from engaging in any activity that would involve "representation" of a
"person" before the [CHAMBER]. In particular, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would prohibit
Confidential Opinion, 22-009
April 22, 2022
Page 8
the State Legislator from performing any job duties as an employee of [THE ENTITY] that would
involve prohibited representation before the [CHAMBER] as delineated above.
Pursuant to Section 1107(10) of the Ethics Act, the person who acts in good faith on this
Opinion issued to him shall not be subject to criminal or civil penalties for so acting provided the
material facts are as stated in the request.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
By the Commission,
Nicholas A. Colafella.
Chair