HomeMy WebLinkAbout21-001 Hursh44
PHONE: 717-783-1610 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION FACSIME: 717-787-0806
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936 FINANCE BUILDING WEBsrm www..elh[ps,pg.gov
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBUR G, PA 17120-0400
OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
Before: Nicholas A. Colafella, Chair
Mark R. Corrigan, Vice Chair
Roger Nick
Melanie DePalma
Michael A. Schwartz,
Shelley Y. Simms
DATE DECIDED: 9/15/21
DATE MAILED: 9/16/21
To the Requester:
Yvonne Llewellyn Hursh
Counsel
Joint State Government Commission
Room 108-FinanceBuilding
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Dear Attorney Hursh:
This Opinion is issued in response to your letter dated June 7, 2021, by which you requested
a ruling from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission") concerning the issue
identified below.
1. ISSUE:
Whether a Member of the Pennsylvania Election Law Advisory Board (ELAB) would be
considered a "public official" subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (the "Ethics
Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et�aN., and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa. Code §
I LI et seq., and particularly, the requirements for filing Statements of Financial Interests.
Hursh, 21-001
September 16, 2021
Page 2
II. FACTUAL BASIS FOR DETERMINATION:
You request an Opinion from this Commission as to whether a Member of the Pennsylvania
Election Law Advisory Board (FLAB) would be considered a "public official" subject to the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Act (the "Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations
of the State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa. Code § 11.1 et seq., and particularly, the requirements for
filing Statements of Financial Interests.
Act 12 of 2020 (25 Pa. Stat. Ann. §3150.22) created the Pennsylvania Election Law Advisory
Board (FLAB) within the Joint State Government Commission (JSGC). The Board is composed of
appointees from the General Assembly leadership and eighteen members appointed by Governor
Wolf. Members serve in an advisory capacity, receive no compensation, but are entitled to
reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Several of the gubernatorial appointees have contacted staff at the Joint State Government
Commission inquiring how they should respond to requests from the Office of Administration
notifying them that they have failed to file required financial disclosures (Statement of Financial
Interests). Within your letter requesting a ruling from the Commission, you acknowledge that Act
12 reads, in pertinent part:
Section 1302-E(f) Transparency and ethics. —
The board shall be subject to the following laws:
(1) The act of July 19, 1957 (P.L.1017, No.451), known as the
State Adverse Interest Act.
(2) The act of October 4, 1978 (P.L.883, No.170), referred to as
the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law.
(3) The act of February 14, 2008 (P.L.6, No.3), known as the
Right -to -Know Law.
(4) 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 7 (relating to open meetings).
25 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 3150.22 (Act 2020-12 (S.B. 422)).
You suggest that the plain meaning of this provision is "clearly to require the board to follow
the Commonwealth's standard transparency and ethic laws, as applied to volunteer members of
advisory boards and commissions" and further note that the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act
(65 Pa.C.S.§ 1101 et seq.) exempts "members of advisory boards that have no authority to expend
public funds other than reimbursement for personal expenses or to otherwise exercise the power of
the State or any political subdivision thereof," from the requirement to file an annual Statement of
Financial Interest. Additionally, you submit both the Governor's Code of Conduct, Executive Order
1980-18 (as amended) and Management Directive 205.10 Amended, Financial Disclosures Required
by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1101-1113, similarly exempt non-
Hursh, 2 1 -001
September 16, 2021
Page 3
paid advisory board members from the financial disclosure filing requirements.
You close by stating that some of the FLAB Members also hold paid positions in local
political subdivisions, and you do not claim that those Members are exempt from the filing
requirements related to their local positions, but do believe that in their capacity as Members of the
FLAB they are not required to file Statement of Financial Interests with JSGC nor is JSGC required
to maintain such financial disclosures.
By letter dated August 11, 2021, you were notified of the date, time and location of the
public meeting at which your request would be considered.
III. DISCUSSION:
It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65
Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), Opinions are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the
requester has submitted. In issuing a ruling based upon the facts that the requester has submitted,
this Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate
as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all
material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An Opinion only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all material facts.
The term "public official" is defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Public official." Any person elected by the public or elected
or appointed by a governmental body or an appointed official in the
executive, legislative or judicial branch of this Commonwealth or any
political subdivision thereof, provided that it shall not include
members ofadviso1y. boards that have no authority to expend public
funds other than reimbursement for personal ex ense or to otherwise
exercise the power of the State or any political subdivision thereof.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102 (emphasis added).
The first portion of the Ethics Act's definition of the term "public official" provides that a
public official is a "person" (defined to include, inter alia, an individual, business, corporation or
firm, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102) which is: (1) elected by the public; (2) elected or appointed by a
governmental body; or (3) an appointed official in the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or a political subdivision of the Commonwealth. Muscalus,
Opinion 02-007. When the first portion of the definition is met, status as a public official subject to
the Ethics Act is established, unless the exception for members of purely advisory boards lacking
authority to expend public funds, other than reimbursement for personal expense, is applicable.
Eiben, Opinion 04-002.
Hursh, 21-001
September 16, 2021
Page 4
The fact that Members of the ELAB are appointed by the General Assembly and the
Governor satisfies the first portion of the definition. It is acknowledged that the definition of "public
official" excludes "members of advisory boards that have no authority to expend public funds other
than reimbursement for personal expense or to otherwise exercise the power of the State or any
political subdivision thereof." A review of the duties and responsibilities of the ELAB tend to
support and confirm its "advisory" status. Specifically, Act 2020-12 reads in pertinent part:
(c) Duties. The board shall have the following duties:
(1) Study this act and identify statutory language to repeal,
modify or update.
(2) Collaborate with other agencies and political subdivisions of
the Commonwealth to study election -related issues.
(3) Study the development of new election technology and voting
machines.
(4) Evaluate and make recommendations on:
(i) improving the electoral process in this
Commonwealth by amending this act or through
regulations promulgated by the Department of State;
and
(ii) implementing best practices identified to ensure the
integrity and efficiency of the electoral process in this
Commonwealth.
(5) By the end of each fiscal year, publish extensive and detailed
findings on the Joint State Government Commission's
publicly accessible Internet website and make them available
in electronic format to the Office of the Governor and
members of the General Assembly.
25 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 3150.22.
The foregoing does not, however, end the Commission's analysis of the question. In
rendering an Opinion, the Commission would be remiss if it did not consider the Rules of Statutory
Construction and its effect on the application of the exclusionary language contained within the
definition of "public official." To that extent:
When the words of a statute are clear and free from all ambiguity, the
letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its
spirit.
Hursh, 2 1 -001
September 16, 2021
Page 5
1 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1921.
A plain reading of Act 2020-12 clearly states that the FLAB shall be subject to the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §1101 et sea.:
Section 1302-E(o Transparency and ethics.
The board shall be subject to the following laws:
(2) The act of October 4, 1978 (P.L.883, No.170), referred to as
the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. ►
25 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 3150.22 (Act 2020-12 (S.B. 422)).
Rules of Statutory Construction state that when the "words of a statute are clear and free
from all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit." 1
Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1921. A plain reading of 2020 Act 12 unequivocally confirms that the
Legislature intended for Members of the ELAB to be subject to the Ethics Act, even as an "advisory
board." In as much as "advisory boards" are otherwise not subject to the jurisdiction of the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Act, the intentional inclusion of same within 2020 Act 12 is clearly a
mandate that the ELAB be bound by the provisions of the Ethics Act,
The Rules of Statutory Construction provide additional guidance, stating that:
In ascertaining the intention of the General Assembly in the
enactment of a statute, the following presumptions, among others,
may be used;
(1) That the General Assembly does not intend a result that
is absurd, impossible of execution or unreasonable.
(2) That the General Assembly intends the entire statute to
be effective and certain.
(3) That the General Assembly does not intend to violate
the Constitution of the United States or of this
Commonwealth.
1 It is submitted that a typographical error occurred concerning 2020 Act 12 citing to "The act of October 4, 1978
(P.L.883, No.170)" as opposed to "The Pennsylvania Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et
SeMc . (Act 1998-93 (S.B. 254), P.L. 729, § 1, approved Oct. 15, 1998)". Regardless, the provision remains effective
pursuant 1 Pa.C.S. §1937.
Hursh, 21-001
September 16, 2021
Page 6
(4) That when a court of last resort has construed the
language used in a statute, the General Assembly in
subsequent statutes on the same subject matter intends
the same construction to be placed upon such language.
(5) That the General Assembly intends to favor the public
interest as against any private interest.
1 Pa.C.S. § 1922.
The letter requesting this Opinion suggests that "the [ELAB is to] follow the
Commonwealth's standard transparency and ethic laws, as applied to volunteer members of advisory
boards and commissions" but be excluded from filing Statement of Financial Interests; such an
application would result in an absurd and unreasonable result. The filing of Statements of Financial
Interests promotes transparency and openness in government, clearly the intent of the Legislature.
To exempt the filing requirement, when the entirety of the Ethics Act would otherwise apply, is
absurd and unreasonable.
Additionally, subjecting ELAB Members to only the restricted activities portion of the Ethics
Act and exempting them from the filing requirements, results in only a portion of the Ethics Act
being applied. It is the intent of the Legislature that an entire statute be effective and certain. By
specifying ELAB Members shall be subject to the Ethics Act, the Legislature intended they be
subject to the entirety of the Ethics Act - including the requirement to file Statement of Financial
Interests.
Lastly, the Legislature intends "to favor the public interest as against any private interest." 1
Pa.C.S. § 1922. Coverage under the Ethics Act is to be construed broadly and exclusions under the
Ethics Act are to be construed narrowly. See, Quaglia v. State Ethics Commission, 986 A.2d 974
(Pa. Cmwlth. 2010), amended by, 2010 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 8 (Pa. Cmwlth. January 5, 2010),
allocatur denied, 607 Pa. 708, 4 A.3d 1056 (2010); Phillips v. State Ethics Commission, 470 A.2d
659 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984). Application of the entire Ethics Act - particularly when directed by statute
—only furthers the purpose of the Ethics Act, "to strengthen the faith and confidence of the people of
this Commonwealth in their government. " 65 Pa.C.S.§1101.1.
IV. CONCLUSION:
Based upon the above, it is the Opinion of this Commission that Members of the
Pennsylvania Election Law Advisory Board (ELAB) are "public officials" subject to the provisions
of the Ethics Act and the Regulations of this Commission, and in particular, the requirements for
filing Statements of Financial Interests pursuant to the Ethics Act.
The propriety of the proposed course of conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act.
1 jju , 21-001
September 16, 2021
Page 7
Pursuant to Section 1107(10) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1107(10), the person who acts
in good faith on this Opinion issued to him shall not be subject to criminal or civil penalties for so
acting provided the material facts are as stated in the request.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
By the Commission,
p6e-"
Nicholas A. Colafeil
Chair