HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-051 GoldenGregg H. S. Golden
Deputy Attorney General',
Department of Justice
16th Floor, Strawberry Sq.
Harrisburg, PA 17120
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
• December 3, 1980
OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
80 -051
RE: Non- profit Corporation, Use of Official Title
Dear Mr. Golden:
I. Issue:
You request a clarification on the following questions:
1. To what extent can you actively participate in the
solicitation of funds, using you name and official
title to promote the interests of the non - profit
educational corporation for which you serve as
Corporate Secretary?
2. May this participation include communication with
Pennsylvania universities, colleges, and community
colleges?
II. Factual Basis for Determination:
You currently serve as a Deputy Attorney General in the
Litigation Division of the Office of Civil Law, Department
of Justice. You also serve as a member of the Board of
Trustees and as Corporate Secretary for a non - profit educa-
tional corporation. You do not receive any salary or
compensation for the'time and effort that you devote to the
interests of this nonprofit educational corporation. Your
expenses are not even reimbursed by this corporation although
certain officers of the corporation are reimbursed for
significant travel and business expenses if they devote a
large part of their time to the corporate affairs. The non-
profit corporation referred to subsists entirely on fees
charged to the students who utilize its services and on
contributions of money, labor, and equipment.
Gregg H. S. Golden
December 3, 1980
Page 2
The non - profit educational corporation is undertaking
a significant expansion effort in that it will attempt to
increase the number of participating students and schools
and to raise funds from private enterprises and charitable
foundations. You have been asked to participate in this
solicitation effort through personal appearances and /or
contacts and by written communications, utilizing your name
and official title. You will receive no personal payment,
benefit, etc. from your participation.
III. Applicable Law:
The most pertinent provisions of the Ethics Act to be
reviewed are Sections 1 and 3(a). These are repeated below:
"Section 1, Purpose. The Legislation
hereby declares that public office is
a public trust and that any effort to
realize personal financial gain through
public office other than compensation
provided by law is a violation of that
trust. In order to strengthen the
faith and confidence of the people of
the State in their government, the
Legislature further declares that the
people have a right to be assured that
the financial interests of holders of
or candidates for public office present
neither a conflict nor the appearance of
a conflict with the public trust.
Because public confidence in govern-
ment can best be, sustained by assuring
the people of the impartiality and
honesty of public officials, this act
shall be liberally construed to promote
complete disclosure." 65 P.S. 401.
"Section 3(a). No public official or
public employee shall use his public
office or any confidential information
received through his holding public
office to obtain''financial gain other
than compensation provided by law for
himself, a member of his immediate
family, or a business with which he is
associated." 65 P.S. 403(a).
Gregg H. S. Golden
December 3, 1980
Page 3
IV. Discussion:
There is no dispute or doubt that you are a "public
employee" as that term is used in the Ethics Act. Thus, the
Commission must address the basic question of whether the
use of your name and official title in the written solicita-
tion efforts of the non - profit educational corporation
constitutes either a conflict of interest with your public
office or employment or en appearance of such a conflict of
interest.
The Commission views the above question as the out-
standing issue in this case since it is clear that you may
participate actively in the solicitation efforts, including
attending luncheons, contact with Pennsylvania universities,
colleges, and community colleges, and other similar activi-
ties conducted in person. The impact, however, of your use
of your name and official title in written solicitation
materials, such as letters or other types of correspondence
is of prime concern.
Specifically, it is without doubt that your use of your
title will be of some benefit to the educational corporation
in cuestion. You indicate yourself that using your title
may lend credibility and legitimacy to the corporation and
its programs. However, the Commission perceives that there
is little potential that inclusion of your official title on
written solicitation materials would result in personal gain
for yourself. Thus, using your name and title on solicita-
tion material and even on other data not specifically or
originally developed for solicitation purposes in your case,
is not prohibited.
However, the Commission notes that it is difficult to
distinguish the use of your official .title (Deputy Attorney
General) for the laudable aims of the education corporation
in question from, for example, a circumstance in which a
high -level political or public official would use his
official title to endorse or solicit materials for an
organization which is under his administrative control, for
example, or for an organization not of . such a laudable
nature as the one with which you are associated.
Gregg H. S. Golden
December 3, 1980
Page 4
Recognizing this, the Commission, while allowing you to
use your official title without violating the provisions of
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act does not foreclose the possi-
bility that another public employee /official might, under
different factual circumstances, be precluded from using his
name and title. Circumstances may exist under which the
Commission might find that use of one's public office, by
use of one's official title, must be prohibited in order to
avoid an appearance of 'a conflict of interest as descibed in
the Ethics Act.
We find that in your case the use of your official
title in personal contact, on data designed or not designed
for solicitation does not violate Act 170. As you know, you
may not use the offices, or, for example, the stationery of
the Department of Justice in these solicitation efforts.
V. Conclusion:
As a "public employee" you must avoid even the appear-
ance of a conflict of interest. However, we conclude that
in the circumstances you describe, you may allow your name
and official title to be used on written material which
would be utilized to solicit funds for a non- profit educa-
tional corporation or other material prepared by or for this
corporation.
You may engage in personal contact including contact which
would be designed to raise funds for this non - profit educational
corporation. You are not prohibited from using your name
and /or title in these personal appearances. Finally, you may
contact and communicate with Pennsylvania universities,
colleges, and community colleges in person or through written
solicitations. The Commission specifically limits this
ruling to you in your position with Department of Justice
and the facts surrounding your. request.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(i), this opinion is a complete
defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the
Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any civil
or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed
Gregg H. S. Golden
December 3, 1980
Page 5
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts
complained of in reliance on the advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available
as such.
PJS /rdp
PAUL J. SMITH
Chairmy