Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-040 LloydMr. William R. Lloyd, Jr. 645 East Main Street Somerset, PA 15501 I STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 August 20, 1980 OPINION OF THE COMMISSION 80 -040 Dear Mr. Lloyd: In your letter of July 7, 1980, you requested an advisory opinion from the State Ethics Commission as to the applicability of Act 170 § 3(e) to you in your capacity as a former afministra- tive law judge for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. Section 3(e) states that: No former official or public employee shall represent a person with or without compensation on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. In your letter you explain that until January 11, 1980 you served as a part -time administrative law judge for the Public Utility Commission. You state further that you are presently a candidate for the State Legislature from Somerset County. At this time you desire to register your opposition to a recent service cutback by a motor carrier which is the subject of Public Utility Commission regulation. You inquire of the Commission as to (1) whether you may write to the Public Utility Commission to protest certain Utility action; (2) whether you may file a formal complaint with the Public Utility Commission; and, (3) whether you would be able to participate in any Public Utility Commisiion hearing which results from either your letter, the protests of others, or a formal complaint filed by you or another. 'The Commission finds that part -time administrative law judges, serving before January 11, 1980, were paid on a payroll, basis after submitting time sheets to tthePublicwUttility Commission. It is the practice of the Public Utility Commission to treat persons performing such services as employees and to withhold social security and other taxes from said wage payment. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Commission that a part -time William R. Lloyd, Jr. August 20, 1980 Page 2 administrative law judge is a public employee under Act 170, and Section 3(e) of the Act is applicable. As a former employee of the Public Utility Commission you may not represent any person on any matter before the respective Commission for a period of one year after your leaving their employment. You may, however,'' in your individual capacity, write to the Public Utility Commission to comment upon a matter within their jurisdiction. You may individually file a formal complaint with the Public Utility Commission so long as you do not represent another person in that complaint; and finally, you may, to the extent granted by the Public Utility Commission, participate as an individual in any public hearing including testifying in your own behalf. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(i) this Opinion is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance of the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. PJS /nia cc: Public Utility Commission Susan M. Shanaman, Chairman PAUL J . /S,M ITH Chairmal UPDATE: A Commonwealth Court ruling (434 A.2d 1327) on similiar factual circumstances should be reviewed. Former Commonwealth employees or officials who are attorneys may practice law before the governmental body with which he /she has been associated regardless of the Section 3(e) (one year) prohibition. The court ruling did not specificially address this particular opinion, but the factual circumstances may be applied to it. This Common- wealth Court opinion was affirmed, without further opinion by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.