Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-021 MottoDominick Motto, Esquire 306 Central Building 101 South Mercer Street New Castle, PA 16101 Dear Mr. Motto: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 May 21, 1980 OPINION OF THE COMMISSION #80 -021 In your letter of March 26, 1980, you requested, as solicitor for the New Castle Area School District, an advisory opinion from the State Ethics Commission relative to a Mrs. Donna Donati, an elected School Director of the District. You explained that Mrs. Donati was elected in November of 1979 and assumed the position of School Director in December 1979. You further explained that the School District has regularly done business with the Donati Music Company, a sole proprietorship owned by Mrs. Donati's husband. You specifically requested an opinion as to whether continued business transactions between the District and the Donati Music Company created a conflict of interest prohibited by Act 170. As an elected school director, Mrs. Donati is a "public official" as that term is used in Act 170. Section 3(a) of the Act provides that no public official shall use his public office to "obtain financial gain . . , for . . . a member of his immediate family. . . ." Section 3(c) of the Act prohibits a "public official" or a member of his immediate family from entering into "any contract valued at $500.00 or more with a governmental body unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process. . ." It is the Commission's opinion that Act 170 requires Mrs. Donati to abstain from participating in School District matters concerning her husband's music business. It is the Commission's further opinion that if the School District desires to enter into a contract valued at $500.00 or more, with the Donati Music Company, said contract must be awarded through an open and public process including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded." Dominick Motto, Esquire May 21, 1980 Page 2 Pursuant to Section 7(9)(i), this opinion is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiatied by the Commision, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. PJS /rdp This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. PAUL J. Chairma cc: Michael Meyers Governor's Office of legislative Relations 7th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120