Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-003 WittTO: RE: FACTS: DISCUSSION: CONCLUSION: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 Edward A. Witt, Esquire 1305 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 January 17, 1980 OPI NUMBER 80 -003 Duties of a Borough Solicitor On November 13, 1979, Edward A. Witt, Solicitor for the Boroughs of Crafton, Munhall & Thornburg, wrote this Commission requesting advice on several matters which are being covered by regulation. One question, however, requires the Commission to issue an opinion: Is the State Ethics Act self executing, that is, can the solicitor advise the Borough Secretary not to accept the oath of office? The issue before the Commission is whether the Act itself is "self executing ?" A provision of an Act or a constitution is considered "self executing" if it needs no further legislation to enforce it. Commonwealth ex rel. Crow v. Smitto, 343 Pa. 446 at 448. Thus, a constitutional provision which prohibits a person from holding state office while also holding a federal office is self executing. Crow, supra. On the other hand, a constitutional provision that the legs is ature shall pass laws to prohibit the sale of lottery or gift enterprise tickets is not self executing unless the appli- cable legislation is passed. State ex rel. Stafford v. Fox -Great Falls Theatre Corp., 132 P.2d 789,699,700,114 Mont. 52. It is the opinion of the Commission that Section 4(d) of the State Ethics Act is "self executing," and that it needs no further legislation or regulation from the Commission to make it valid and effective. Edward A. Witt January 17, 1980 Page 2 such. PJS:alf-3 One of the responsibilities of a solicitor is to advise his client, the governmental body, what its legal responsibilities are in a given fact situation. A solicitor, therefore, may advise his municipality client that the State Ethics Act prohibits offi- cials or public employees from continuing in their office or posi- tion unless the disclosure requirements of the State Ethics Act are complied with. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(i), this opinion is a complete de- fense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any civil or criminal pro ceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as UL J. SM'T Chairman;