HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-594STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 1, 1992
Mr. Michael Kennedy 92 -594
Deputy Executive Director /Marketing
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
P.O. Box 8531
Harrisburg, PA 17105
Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Deputy Executive Director/
Marketing, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Use of Authority
of Office /Employment or Confidential Information, Business
with which Associated, Clients.
Dear Mr. Kennedy:
This responds to your letter of April 27, 1992, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
presents any prohibition or restrictions upon the Deputy Executive
Director /Marketing for the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission who is
also a shareholder, director and Chief Executive Officer of a
private corporation, where the private corporation is formulating
a business relationship and may contract with another private
company that may do business with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and /or other governmental
agencies.
Facts: As the Deputy Executive Director /Marketing for the
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission ( "PTC "), you request an advisory
from the State Ethics Commission. You state that from 1985 to
1988, you were the Director of Housing and Development for the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in which position you were responsible
for a wide range of programs including the regulation of the
manufactured housing industry in Pennsylvania. In 1988, you were
employed by the PTC as the Deputy Executive Director of Marketing.
In this position you are responsible for public information, public
relations, traveler services and business development (trucking,
land use, advertising). In 1990, you were involved in the
formation of a Pennsylvania corporation named International Housing
Technology, Inc. ( "IHT ") The expressed intent of said ?company was
to introduce new materials and technologies to the manufactured
housing industry. You are a Director on the Board and own twenty
percent of the stock. You also serve as Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Michael Kennedy
June 1, 1992
Page 2
with the primary responsibility for contractually obligating IHT.
A business relationship is being formulated between IHT and
General Electric Company ( "GE "), acting through its GE Silicones
( "GES ") operation. The business relationship would allow IHT to
act as a sales agent for specific GES products to the manufactured
housing industry. This business relationship may also include some
form of a technology disclosure agreement.
You state that in your capacity as Deputy Executive Director/
Marketing for the PTC, you do not have any responsibility for
purchasing of materials or products and to your knowledge have not
requested any GE product or service. GES has expressed a concern
that your involvement with IHT and the PTC might limit or restrict
the ability of GE to do business, as a contractor, vendor,
subcontractor, or on any other. basis, with the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, the PTC, or any other governmental agency in
Pennsylvania.
You state that if your request is approved, you will abstain
in your position at the PTC from being involved in any decision
involving GE and GES.
You pose the following specific inquiries:
1. Whether your employment with the PTC would preclude your
acting as a shareholder, director and Chief Executive
Officer of IHT;
2. Whether your employment with. the PTC and your involvement
with IHT would preclude or present a conflict of interest
in executing a. contract with GE; and
3. Whether the ability of GE to do business in any capacity
directly or indirectly, with any ;:agency of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, would be restricted or
limited in any way or would require any filings or
disclosures, if any contract is executed between GE and
IHT while you serve as a Board member, stock holder and
Chief Executive. Officer?
Discussion: As Deputy Executive Director /Marketing for the
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission ( "PTC "), you are a public employee
as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are
subject to the provisions of that law.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities,
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
Mr. Michael Kennedy.
June 1, 1992
Page 3
The following terms are defined in the .Ethics Lao as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest. Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, -a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
it business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
"Business with which- he is associated."
Any business in which the person or a member
of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a
financial interest.
"Financial- interest." .Any financial
interest in -a legal entity engaged in business
for profit which comprises more than 5% of the
equity of the business or more than 5% of the
assets of the economic interest in
indebtedness.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influeinced.thereby. Reference is
made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has
been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law provides as follows:
Mr. Michael Kennedy
June 1, 1993
Page 4
Section . Restricted activities
Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of
Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation,
order or ordinance, the following procedure
shall be employed. Any public official or
public .employee, who in the discharge of his
official duties, would be required to vote on
a matter that would result in a conflict of .
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior
to the vote being taken, publicly announce and
disclose the nature of his interest as a
public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting at which the vote is
taken, provided that whenever a governing body
would be unable to take any action on a matter
before it because the number of members of the
body required to abstain from voting under the
provisions of this section makes the majority
or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as
otherwise provided herein. In the case of a
three - member governing body of a political
subdivision, where one member has abstained
from voting as a result of a conflict of
interest, and the remaining two members of the
governing body have cast opposing votes, the
member who has abstained shall be permitted to
vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is
made as otherwise provided herein. ,
If a conflict exists, Section 3(j) requires the public
official /employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the
abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a
written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes or supervisor.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
three narrow and specific inquiries which you have raised, each
inquiry shall be addressed seriatim.
With regard to your first specific inquiry, you ask whether
gout position with PTC would preclude your acting as a shareholder,
director and Chief Executive Officer of IHT.. It must initially be
noted that to the extent that you are already so serving in these
capacities, you are requesting an advisory as to past conduct which
would be beyond the scope of an advisory,. However, to the extent
that you are seeking an advisory as to your prospective continued
service in each of the above capacities, your question will be
addressed.
Mr. Michael Kennedy
June 1, 1992
Page 5
Pursuant to Section 3(a) of the =`Ethics a public
official /public employee is prohibited from using the authority of
public office /employment or confidential ` information received by
holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of
the public official /public employee himself, any member of his
immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. It is noted that Section 3(a) of
the Ethics Law does not prohibit public officials /employees from
outside business activities or employment; however, the public
official /employee may not use the authority of office for the
advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit` or that of a
business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. A
public official /employee must exercise caution so that his private
business activities do not conflict with his public duties.
Crisci, Opinion 89 -013. Thus, 'a public official /employee could not
perform private business using governmental facilities or
personnel. In particular, the governmental telephones, postage,
staff, equipment, research materials, personnel or any other
property could not be used as a means, in whole or part, to carry
out private business activities. In addition, the public
official /employee could not during government working hours,
solicit or promote such business activity. Pancoe, supra.
Similarly, Section 3(a) would expressly prohibit the use of
confidential information received by holding public office/
employment for such a prohibited private pecuniary benefit.
In the event that your private employer or business and /or its
clients has a matter pending before your governmental body or if
you as part of such official duties must participate, review or
pass upon that matter, a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89-
024. In those instances, it will be necessary that you be removed
from that process.
In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law
would require not only that you abstain from participation but also
file a written memorandum to that effect with'the person
the minutes or your supervisor.`
In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following:
1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business in
a private capacity;
2. utilization of confidential information gained through
public position;
3. participating in discussions, reviews, or recommendations
on matters which relate to the business /private employer which may
come before the governmental body and in such cases publicly
announcing the relationship or advising the supervisor as well as
filing a written memorandum as per the requirements of Section .3 (j")
of the Ethics Law. Brooks Opinion 89 -023.
Thus, the Ethics Law would not preclude your proposed_cgn4uct
Mr. Michael Kennedy
June 1, 1992
Page 6
of acting as a shareholder, Director and Chief Executive Officer of
IHT while serving as the Deputy Executive Director /Marketing for
the PTC, subject to the above restrictions and qualifications.
Turning to your second specific inquiry, you ask whether your
position with the PTC and your involvement with IHT would preclude
or present a conflict of interest in executing a contract with the
General Electric company. It is unclear from your question whether
you are referring to contracting between GE and the PTC or between
GE and IHT. Therefore each scenario will be discussed.
As to contracting between IHT and GE, you are advised that
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does not apply to restrict private
companies, but rather applies to restrict the conduct of public
officials /public employees in their public capacities. On the
other hand, as to any proposed contracts between the PTC and GE,
you would have a conflict of interest in such matters which may
come before you in your public capacity if IHT has a business
relationship and /or contracts with GE and /or its subsidiaries.
This conclusion is based upon the Commission's decision in Miller
supra. As noted in Miller, Opinion 89 -024, matters which come
before a public official /public employee involving his private
business or private clients place the public official /public
employee in a situation where he is faced with - conflicting
interests. In his private capacity, his duties are to the private
firm and its clients, while in his capacity as a public
official /public employee, his primary duty is to act in the best
interests of the governmental body with the duty being owed to the
public rather than.to private clients. 11.; see also, Brooks,
Opinion 89 -023. In each instance of a conflict of interest you
would be required to abstain from any participation of any nature
whatsoever and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section
3(j) as set forth above.
Turning to your third and final specific inquiry, you ask
whether the Ethics Law would impose any restrictions or limitations
upon the ability of GE to do business with any agency of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or would require any filings or
disclosures, if any contract is executed between GE and IHT while
you serve as a board member, stockholder and Chief Executive
Officer. As noted above, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not
apply to restrict the conduct of GE, but rather, would apply to
restrict your conduct in your capacity as a public employee.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code,
ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the
Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed
herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct.
Conclusion: As the Deputy Executive Director /Marketing for the
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission ( "PTC "), you are a public employee
sublecA to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of. the
Mr. Michael Kennedy
June 1, 1992
Page.7
Ethics aW would not preclude you from outside employment /business
activity subject to the restrictions and qualifications as noted
above. In the event that the employer /business and /or any of its
clients has matters pending before your governmental body, then you
could not participate in that matter and the disclosure
requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as outlined above
must be satisfied.; Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct
has only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commisa..on, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission
review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be
issued. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be received at
the Commission within 15 days of the date of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa. Code 52.12.
Sincerely,
iL qfi
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel
•