Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-623 ReaJess Fosselman Treasurer Logisys 5132 Kylock Road Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 Dear Mr. Fosselman: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL November 6, 1997 97 -623 Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(g); Department of Labor and Industry; Bureau of Management Information Services; Computer Systems Analyst 4. This responds to your letter of October 9, 1997 by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employe Ethics Law presents any restrictions upon employment of a Computer Systems Analyst 4 following termination of service with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Management Information Services. Facts: As the Treasurer of Logisys, Inc. and on behalf of Ronnie Rea (Rea), you request an advisory from the State Ethics Commission. Rea has retired from his position as a Computer Systems Analyst 4 (CSA4) with the Department of Labor and Industry (L &I), Bureau of Management Information Services (BMIS). Logisys is executing several purchase orders from L &i regarding Year 2000 software conversion and is interested in hiring Rea. Rea would work on an as- required basis on a job under your current contract with L &I. Before offering a job to Rea, you would like an advisory regarding any potential conflicts of interest for Rea. Copies of the job description and organizational chart for Rea's former position have been obtained from L &I, which documents are incorporated herein by reference. Discussion: In the former capacity as a Computer Systems Analyst 4 (CSA4) with the Department of Labor and Industry (L &I), Bureau of Management Information Services (BMIS), Ronnie Rea (Rea) would be considered a "public employee" subject to the Public Official and Employe Ethics Law ( "Ethics Law ") and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa.Code §11.1. This conclusion is based upon the job description, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the following: contracting; procurement; planning; inspecting; administering or monitoring grants; leasing; Fosselman /Rea, 97 -623 November 6, 1997 Page 2 regulating; auditing; or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person. Consequently, upon termination of public service, Rea became a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the Public Official and Employe Ethics Law. While Section 3(g) does not prohibit a former public official /public employee from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official /public employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before "the governmental body with which he has been associated ": Section 3. Restricted activities. (g) No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 P.S. §403(g) (Emphasis added). The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. 65 P.S. §402. The term "Person" is very broadly defined. It includes the former public employee himself, Confidential Opinion 93 -005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95 -007. Fosselman /Rea, 97 -623 November 6, 1997 Page 3 The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence; (3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official /public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. P000vich, Opinion 89 -005. Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 3(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even though the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of public service, Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However, if such a pre- existing contract does not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams /Webster Opinion 95- 011 A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the public official /public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former governmental body. The public official /public employee may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental body. The Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude making general informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. Section 3(g) only restricts the former public official /public employee with regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public official /public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official /public employee is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or other governmental body where the public official /public employee had influence or control but ex to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli Opinion No. 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R. The governmental body with which Rea has been associated upon termination of public service is L &I in its entirety, including but not limited to BMIS. Therefore, for the first year after termination of Rea's service with L &I, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and restrict "representation" of "persons" before L &I. Turning to your specific inquiry as to whether the proposed hiring of Rea by Logisys to work on its current contract with L &I would present a conflict of interest for Rea, the facts which you have submitted do not delineate with specificity the particular duties that would be involved with the proposed employment position. Therefore, you are advised that to the extent Rea could perform the functions of such Fosselman /ReR, 97 -623 November 6, 1997 Page 4 position without transgressing the prohibitions of Section 3(g) as set forth above, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would not preclude him from working for Logisys on the said contract with L &I. However, if the proposed position with Logisys would require Rea to work at L &I, interact with L &I staff, and the like, as a practical matter, it would be impossible for Rea to fulfill the duties of such a position without transgressing Section 3(g). Based upon the facts which have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the applicability of Section 3(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law. Further, you are advised that Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /public employee and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct. Conclusion: In the former capacity as a Computer Systems Analyst 4 (CSA4) with the Department of Labor and Industry (L &I), Bureau of Management Information Services (BMIS), Ronnie Rea (Rea) would be considered a `public employee" as defined in the Ethics Law. Upon termination of service with L &I, Rea became a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law. The former governmental body is L &I in its entirety, including but not limited to BMIS. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Law would require that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed by no later than May 1 of the year after termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Fosselman /Rea, 97 -623 November 6, 1997 Page 5 Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. cerely, incent J. opko Chief Counsel v�c�'