HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-563 PaulovichTed Paulovich
124 Yost Drive
Tarentum, PA 15084
Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; Board Member; Joint Sanitary Authority;
Participation in Authority Term Life Insurance Program At Own Expense.
Dear Mr. Paulovich:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
May 30, 2002
02 -563
This responds to your letter of April 26, 2002, by which you requested advice
from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
1a. =S. § 1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a board member of
a joint sanitary authority as to participating in the authority term life insurance program
at the board member's own expense.
Facts: You are a board member of the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority
btu T ority "). You ask whether you may participate in the Authority Term Life Insurance
P rogram at your own expense.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11)
of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § §1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor
based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in
an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have
not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the
material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. § §1107(10), (11). An advisory only
affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material
facts.
As a board member of the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority ( "Authority "),
you are a public official as that term is defined in the Ethics Act, and hence you are
subject to the provisions of that Act.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
Paulovich, 02 -563
May 30, 2002
Page 2
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include
an action having a de minimis economic impact or which
affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or
other group which includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
§1103. Restricted activities
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
Paulovich, 02 -563
May 30, 2002
Page 3
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(j).
In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official/
employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both
orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes or supervisor.
In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the
governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the
abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the
disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Mlakar, Advice 91- 523 -S.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, pursuant
to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from
using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public
official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
As to the question you have posed, the Commission has considered the issue of
participation by public officials in municipal health insurance group plans at their own
expense. See, Domalakes, Opinion 85 -010; Keiter, Opinion 90 -004; Dawson, Opinion
97 -003. Afthiugh the Commission has ruled iTat a public official may participate at his
own expense in a municipal health insurance plan, the Commission also determined
that the public official cannot use the authority of office in obtaining his own coverage.
Thus, the public official could not participate in any action of the municipal body to make
such coverage available to himself /herself. See, Dawson, supra:
Unlike the Tax Collectors in the Opinions cited above,
who would play no official role in the governmental body's
decision as to whether to allow them to participate in its
insurance coverage, a Borough Solicitor ordinarily would
play a role in advising Borough Council in such matters.
Since it would be your own participation in the insurance
coverage that would be at issue, you would have a clear
conflict of interest in matters involving your participation in
the Borough's health insurance coverage. You would
therefore be required to abstain fully from such matters and
to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 3(j) set forth
above.
Id. at 5.
Conditioned upon your abstention as Borough
Solicitor and your satisfaction of the Section 3(j) disclosure
requirements as to matters involving your participation in the
Borough's health insurance coverage, if the Borough Council
were to authorize your participation in Manor Borough's
health insurance coverage at your own expense, such
participation would not transgress Section 3(a) of the Ethics
Law. Since the Borough Council would be making the
decision as to whether you could participate, without any
involvement by you as Solicitor, you would not be using the
authority of your office so that that particular element of a
Section 3(a) violation would be lacking.
Paulovich, 02 -563
May 30, 2002
Page 4
Therefore, in your case, as long as you in your capacity as a board member do
not use the authority of your office to provide for your own participation in the Authority's
Term Life Insurance Program, as for example, where such action would be taken by the
Authority with your abstention, then you may participate at your own expense in that
Program.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of
the respective municipal code.
Conclusion: As a board member for the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary
Authority ( "Authority "), you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. As long as
you in your capacity as a board member do not use the authority of your office to
provide for your own participation in the Authority's Term Life Insurance Program, then
you may participate at your own expense in that Program. Lastly, the propriety of the
proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 -787 -0806. Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel