HomeMy WebLinkAbout1195 BartholomewIn Re: Linda Bartholomew
File Docket:
X -ref:
Date Decided:
Date Mailed:
Before: Daneen E. Reese, Chair
Louis W. Fryman, Vice Chair
John J. Bolger
Frank M. Brown
Susan Mosites Bicket
Donald M. McCurdy
99- 018 -C2
Order No. 1195
5/15/01
5/30/01
This is a final adjudication of the State Ethics Commission.
Procedurally, the Investigative Division of the State Ethics Commission conducted
an investigation regarding a possible violation of the Public Official and Employee Ethics
Law, Act 9 of 1989, P.L. 26, 65 P.S. §401 et seq., by the above -named Respondent. At the
commencement of its investigation, the Investigative Division served upon Respondent
written notice of the specific allegation(s). Upon completion of its investigation, the
Investigative Division issued and served upon Respondent a Findings Report identified as
an "Investigative Complaint." An Answer was filed and a hearing was held. The record is
complete.
Effective December 15, 1998, Act 9 of 1989 was repealed and replaced by Chapter
11, Act 93 of 1998, which essentially repeats Act 9 of 1989 and provides for the completion
of pending matters under Act 93 of 1998.
This adjudication of the State Ethics Commission is issued under Act 93 of 1998
and will be made available as a public document thirty days after the mailing date noted
above. However, reconsideration may be requested. Any reconsideration request must be
received at this Commission within thirty days of the mailing date and must include a
detailed explanation of the reasons as to why reconsideration should be granted in
conformity with 51 Pa. Code §21.29(b). A request for reconsideration will not affect the
finality of this adjudication but will defer its public release pending action on the request by
the Commission.
The files in this case will remain confidential in accordance with Chapter 11 of Act
93 of 1998. Any person who violates confidentiality of the Ethics Law is guilty of a
misdemeanor subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than
one year. Confidentiality does not preclude discussing this case with an attorney at law.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 2
I. ALLEGATION:
That Linda Bartholomew, a public official in her capacity as a Director of the Forest -
Warren Counties Department of Human Services, violated the following provisions of the
State Ethics Act (Act 93 of 1998) when she used the authority of her office for the private
pecuniary benefit of a member of her immediate family and /or businesses with which a
member of her immediate family is associated by directing and approving that computer
and computer related purchases be made from computer companies employing her
daughter as a sales representative; and when she selected her daughter for a consultant
position for the Department of Human Services; and when she failed to file Statements of
Financial Interests for the calendar years 1995, 1996, and 1998.
Section 3. Restricted Activities
(a) No public official or public employee shall
engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. §1103(a).
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family
or a business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated. The term does not include an action
having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the
same degree a class consisting of the general public or a
subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group
which includes the public official or public employee, a
member of his immediate family or a business with which he or
a member of his immediate family is associated.
65 Pa.C.S. §1102.
Section 1104. Statement of financial interests required to be
filed.
(a) Public official or public employee. - -Each public
official of the Commonwealth shall file a statement of financial
interests for the preceding calendar year with the commission
no later than May 1 of each year that he holds such a position
and of the year after he leaves such a position. Each public
employee and public official of the Commonwealth shall file a
statement of financial interests for the preceding calendar year
with the department, agency, body or bureau in which he is
employed or to which he is appointed or elected no later than
May 1 of each year that he holds such a position and of the
year after he leaves such a position. Any other public
employee or public official shall file a statement of financial
interests with the governing authority of the political
subdivision by which he is employed or within which he is
appointed or elected no later than May 1 of each year that he
holds such a position and of the year after he leaves such a
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 3
position. Persons who are full -time or part -time solicitors for
political subdivisions are required to file under this section.
65 Pa. C. S. §1104(a).
II. FINDINGS:
A. Pleadings
1 The Investigative Division of the State Ethics Commission received information
alleging that Linda Bartholomew violated provisions of the State Ethics Act (Act 9 of
1989).
2. Upon review of the information the Investigative Division initiated a preliminary
inquiry on March 26, 1999.
3. The preliminary inquiry was completed within sixty days.
4. On May 20, 1999, a letter was forwarded to Linda Bartholomew by the Investigative
Division of the State Ethics Commission informing her that a complaint against her
was received by the Investigative Division and that full investigation was being
commenced.
a. Said letter was forwarded by certified mail, no. Z 377 194 601.
b. The domestic return receipt bore the signature of Alvan R. Bartholomew,
with a delivery date of May 22, 1999.
5. On August 12, 1999, the Executive Director of the State Ethics Commission filed an
application for a ninety day extension of time to complete the investigation.
6. The Commission issued an order on August 30, 1999, granting the ninety day
extension.
7. On October 22, 1999, the Executive Director of the State Ethics Commission filed
an application for a ninety day extension of time to complete the investigation.
8. The Commission issued an order on November 22, 1999, granting the ninety day
extension.
9. Periodic notice letters were forwarded to Linda Bartholomew in accordance with the
provisions of the Ethics Law advising her of the general status of the investigation.
10. The Investigative Complaint was mailed to the Respondent on May 12, 2000.
11. Linda J. Bartholomew was employed as the Director of the Forest - Warren County
Department of Human Services (DHS) from December 23, 1991, until February 16,
1999.
a. Bartholomew was the Acting DHS Director from October 1, 1991, until
December 23, 1991.
12. Bartholomew was previously employed with Children's Services of Warren County
until the early summer of 1979.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 4
13. Bartholomew held various positions during her tenure with Children's Services and
the Department of Human Services which included the following:
a. Caseworker.
b. Director of Day Care /Associate Director of Day Care.
c. Residential Program Director.
14. In 1979 the counties of Forest and Warren combined human services of each
county into one department known as the Forest - Warren Department of Human
Services (DHS).
15. The Department of Human Services is a governmental body formed to include all
branches of Human Services for both Forest and Warren Counties.
a. One director oversees associate directors of several programs.
16. A Governing Board composed of the three commissioners of both Forest and
Warren Counties oversees the Department of Human Services.
a. The Governing Board typically holds monthly meetings.
1. The DHS director typically attends Governing Board meetings.
b. The DHS director is to direct the preparation of and interpret budgets,
expenditure reports, and statistical information for monthly Governing Board
meetings.
c. The DHS director is to prepare a monthly director's report to the Governing
Board relating the activities of the agency.
17. Bartholomew's job description as Human Services Director included, in part, the
following duties:
a. Planning, organization, management, direction and administration of work of
the Department of Human Services.
1. Work is performed under the general direction of the six County
Commissioners of Forest and Warren Counties and reviewed for
adherence to established departmental, state, and federal policies
and procedures through conferences, written reports, and evaluation
of results obtained.
b. Direction of the preparation of annual service plans, budget estimates,
budgetary control, needs assessment, service coordination, and evaluation
efforts related to all programs via statistical analysis and other available
means.
c. Development of procedures and overall responsibility of all the funds coming
into the Department of Human Services from private, state, and federal
sources.
d. Direct work with the department lawyer in developing contracts for all
programs.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 5
18. The Governing Board does not typically approve purchases by the Department of
Human Services less than $10,000.
19. Purchases made for DHS are regulated by provisions of the county code for sixth
(Warren) and eighth (Forest) class counties.
a. Section 1801 of the County Code requires the county commissioners
contract for all services and personal property.
b. Section 1802 requires contracts or purchases in excess of $10,000 be made
from the lowest responsible bidder after due notice in a newspaper of
general circulation.
c. Section 1801(b) of the County Code provides that written or telephone price
quotations from at least three qualified and responsible contractors are to be
requested for all contracts that exceed four thousand ($4,000.00) but are
less than the amount requiring advertisement and competitive bidding, or in
lieu of price quotations, a memorandum is to be kept on file showing that
fewer than three qualified contractors exist in a market area within which it is
practicable to obtain quotations.
1. Written price quotations, written records of telephonic price
quotations and memoranda are to be maintained for a period of three
years.
20. DHS purchases must also be made within Department of Public Welfare regulations
which define allowable costs for reimbursement by DPW for fixed assets and
equipment.
21. County Code regulations need not be adhered to if the vendor from which
purchases are made is on the State Vendor Contract listing.
a. The State Vendor Contract is a listing of approved vendors who have
previously submitted bids to the state regarding purchases of items or
services and have been approved as vendors by the Pennsylvania
Department of General Services.
22. In the early 1990's, the Department of Human Services expanded computer
operations and began purchasing equipment in an effort to comply with state
mandates.
23. Computer equipment purchases increased in the mid- 1990's to enable the
Department of Human Services to participate in the AFCARS (Adoption and Foster
Care Analysis and Reporting System) program mandated by the state.
a. AFCARS was an interim program to be utilized until the state could
implement PACWIS (Pennsylvania Automated Child Welfare Information
System) in July 1999.
24. Purchasing guidelines, in regard to computers and related equipment, utilized by
the Department of Human Services included the following:
a. Conduction of a "needs assessment" based on state specifications, age of
existing equipment, new positions, etc., by the Management Information
Systems (MIS) staff.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 6
b. Completion of a purchase request or a Fixed Asset Purchase Request
(FAPR) by the Information Systems manager or a program assistant director.
1. Assets are considered Fixed Assets if they cost more than $300.00 to
$500.00 (depending on the program) and have a life expectancy of
more than one year.
c. Procurement of price quotes for said purchase(s) by the MIS staff.
d. Submittal to the DHS director for approval or denial.
e. Placement of the order by MIS staff after approval is given.
25. The Management Information Systems (MIS) staff is responsible for assessing the
computer and related equipment needs of the Department of Human Services.
a. Marlene Leidecker is the manager of the Information Systems staff.
1. Bartholomew is Leidecker's immediate supervisor.
b. Mark Irons is a Computer Operator I.
1. Leidecker is Irons' immediate supervisor.
c. The MIS staff is supervised by Linda Bartholomew.
26. Leidecker completes needs assessments regarding state mandated requirements
for the Department of Human Services.
27. Irons has completed needs assessments regarding repair and /or upgrading of
equipment for the Department of Human Services since his employment in 1994.
a. Leidecker completed this duty prior to Irons' employment.
28. Sherrie Flannery is the daughter of Linda Bartholomew.
a. Flannery married Michael S. Flannery (A.K.A. Shane Flannery) in December,
1996.
29. The Department of Human Services utilized a company known as Computerland,
5130 Peach Street, Erie, Pa, for computer and related equipment until 1997.
30. Flannery obtained a position as sales representative for Computerland on July 8,
1991.
a. Flannery's sales area included Warren, PA.
b. Flannery's starting salary was $1,500.00 per month plus "bonus commission
of 15% of gross margin less salary."
1. Computerland sales representatives do not receive commissions on
service calls performed.
c. Flannery's guaranteed salary increased to $1,750.00 per month on July 1,
1992, due to past performance.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 7
31. Sherrie Flannery was Mark Irons' contact at Computerland regarding sales.
a. Leidecker was the contact before Irons.
32. Irons placed one order with Computerland in which Flannery was not the sales
representative.
33. Leidecker was not satisfied with Computerland.
a. Leidecker expressed her displeasure with Computerland service to
Bartholomew on several occasions.
34. Flannery voluntarily resigned her employment with Computerland effective
November 7, 1997.
35. From July 1, 1994, through November 24, 1997, the Department of Human Services
purchased computers, related equipment, and services from Computerland totaling
$353,901.94 as indicated by individual program below:
Children and Youth Services of Warren County $ 55,371.50
Children and Youth Services of Forest County 34,197.50
Drug and Alcohol Program 3,308.50
Mental Health Program 32,275.00
Mental Retardation Program 60,892.57
Mega Waiver Program 15,549.88
Early Intervention Program 8,311.00
General Account 119,893.99
Family Preservation Program 11,537.00
FSSR 2,526.00
Total Expenditures $353,901.94
36. Sherrie Flannery was the sales representative on 85% of invoices issued (326 out
of 384) to the Department of Human Services for the purchase of computers and
related equipment.
a. Flannery was not the sales representative associated with invoices
regarding services calls.
37. From July 1994 through September 1997 the time period that Sherrie Flannery was
employed by Computerland, DHS made 79 computer related fixed assets purchases
from Computerland.
a. Seventy -two of the 79 Fixed Assets Purchase Orders
through Computerland.
38. Ninety -two (92) of the FAPR's placed through Computerland
with no other quotes being obtained.
Invoice No.
204
31331
31333
31334
Invoice Amount
$ 149.00
$ 179.00
$ 405.00
$2,419.00
Invoice Date
08/30/95
06/30/94
06/30/94
06/30/94
(91%) were placed
by DHS were done
Sales Rep.
SB*
SB
SB
SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 8
31335 $2,340.00 06/30/94 SB
31336 $2,240.00 06/30/94 SB
31340 $ 96.00 06/30/94 SB
31342 $2,799.00 06/30/94 SB
31337 $11,691.00 06/30/94 SB
31351 $2,036.00 06/30/94 SB
31493 $2,799.00 07/25/94 SB
31338 $ 410.00 06/30/94 SB
31341 $ 229.00 06/30/94 SB
31343 $ 149.00 06/30/94 SB
Invoice No. Invoice Amount Invoice Date Sales Rep.
31344 $ 149.00 06/30/94 SB
31567 $2,146.00 06/23/94 SB
31680 $2,686.00 06/23/94 SB
31599 $3,762.00 06/23/94 SB
31595 $ 295.00 06/30/94 SB
32039 $1,785.00 09/13/94 SB
32040 $2,756.00 09/13/94 SB
32041 $2,808.00 09/13/94 SB
32224 $2,805.00 09/28/94 SB
32288 $1,960.00 09/30/94 SB
32559 $ 275.00 10/25/94 SB
33204 $ 395.00 12/20/94 SB
34358 $ 211.00 03/21/95 SB
35383 $ 185.00 06/21/95 SB
35316 $ 410.00 06/14/95 SB
35314 $2,471.00 06/14/95 SB
36321 $2,605.00 09/29/95 SB
32560 $ 221.00 10/25/94 SB
32561 $ 149.00 10/25/94 SB
32709 $2,200.00 11/08/94 SB
32859 $ 378.00 11/21/94 SB
32814 $ 395.00 11/16/94 SB
33754 $1,596.00 01/31/95 SB
33756 $ 385.00 01/31/95 SB
33806 $1,170.00 02/03/95 SB
33940 $ 149.00 02/15/95 SB
34058 $1,470.00 02/27/95 SB
34435 $ 124.00 03/29/95 SB
34540 $ 170.00 04/05/95 SB
34812 $ 103.00 04/28/95 SB
35228 $ 325.00 06/06/95 SB
35142 $ 196.00 05/30/95 SB
35314 $2,471.00 06/14/95 SB
35393 $ 400.00 06/32/95 SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 9
35729 $1,300.00 06/28/95 SB
35730 $1,496.00 06/28/95 SB
36261 $ 149.00 09/26/95 SB
36446 $ 149.00 10/11/95
36522 $2,306.00 10/17/95 SB
36944 $ 724.00 12/08/95 SB
37431 $ 560.00 01/10/96 SB
38206 $1,330.00 03/19/96 SB
38375 $ 110.00 04/03/96 SB
38558 $4,178.00 04/23/96 SB
39024 $ 411.00 06/18/96 SB
Invoice No. Invoice Amount Invoice Date Sales Rep.
39075 $1,180.00 06/11/96 SB
39137 $3,380.00 06/18/96 SB
39138 $4,806.00 06/18/96 SB
39139 $ 970.00 06/18/96 SB
39177 $4,620.00 06/21/96 SB
39267 $2,746.00 06/28/96 SB
39303 $1,452.00 06/27/96 LS
39386 $ 434.00 06/27/96 LS
40692 $ 135.00 11/11/96 SB
41000 $ 168.00 12/11/96 SB
41919 $6,761.00 03/12/97 SB
42947 $ 258.00 06/19/97 SB
42948 $ 258.00 06/19/97 SB
42949 $ 258.00 06/19/97 SB
42950 $2,580.00 06/19/97 SB
42994 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
42995 $ 556.00 06/23/97 SB
42996 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
42997 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
42998 $ 556.00 06/23/97 SB
42999 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
43000 $ 556.00 06/23/97 SB
43001 $ 834.00 06/23/97 SB
43002 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
43003 $1,668.00 06/23/97 SB
43007 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
43008 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
43009 $ 278.00 06/23/97 SB
43025 $2,180.00 06/23/97 SB
43078 $2,422.00 06/27/97 SF **
43107 $2,425.00 06/30/97 SF
43234 $ 623.00 06/30/97 SF
43235 $ 623.00 06/30/97 SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 10
43238 $1,023.00 06/30/97 SF
43336 $ 280.00 06/27/97 SF
43983 $ 618.00 09/30/97 SF
Total $125,939.00
*Indicates Sherrie Bartholomew
* *Indicates Sherrie Flannery
a. Mark Irons did not always obtain or write quotes on the FAPR.
39. Sherrie Flannery was the sales representative on all but two of the FAPR's placed
with Computerland without quotes.
Invoice No. Amount
39303 $1,452.00
39386 $ 434.00
Total $1,886.00
40. Linda Bartholomew approved purchase orders, invoices and FAPR's related to all
these purchases from Computerland.
41. Computerland's profit percentage regarding sales to DHS totaled 14 %.
42. Flannery received $7,486.00 in commissions from Computerland as a direct result
of purchases made by DHS from July 1, 1994, through September 30, 1997, as
indicated below:
Computerland
Year Commission
1994 $1,600.00
1995 768.00
1996 2,287.00
1997 2,831.00
Total: $7,486.00
43. Flannery received no commission on sales occurring after September 30, 1997.
a. Flannery forfeited all commissions after September 30, 1997, upon resigning
from Computerland.
44. In her capacity as DHS Director, Bartholomew approved purchases and authorized
payments by initialing invoices, purchase orders and fixed asset purchase requests.
45. Bartholomew approved 82% (315 of 384) of all purchases made by DHS from
Computerland during the time that her daughter was employed as a sales
representative for Computerland.
a. This included purchases made through FAPR's.
46. Bartholomew's initials or signature approving Computerland invoices is present on
at least one form of supporting documentation as shown below:
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
*06859
31338
$410.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
*06859
31341
$229.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*06859
31343
$149.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
*06859
31344
$149.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
*06859
31350
$605.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*06859
31332
$81.00
06/30/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
-
SB
*06859
31335
$2,340.00
06/30/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
*07011
31597
$345.00
06/23/94
06/30/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*07011
31598
$28.00
06/23/94
06/30/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*07011
31595
$295.00
06/23/94
06/30/94
09/27/94
LJB
SB
07011
32039
$1,785.00
09/01/94
09/13/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
SB
07011
32040
$2,756.00
09/01/94
09/13/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
SB
07115
32041
$2,808.00
06/20/94
09/13/94
10/25/94
LJB
SB
07115
32224
$2,805.00
09/28/94
09/28/94
10/25/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*07172
31601
$106.00
06/30/94
06/30/94
11/09/94
LJB
SB
07172
32560
$221.00
10/25/94
10/25/94
11/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
07172
32288
$1,960.00
09/30/94
09/30/94
11/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
07172
32255
$117.00
09/30/94
09/30/94
11/09/94
LJB
LJB
-
SB
07265
32615
$4,210.00
10/31/94
10/31/94
12/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
07278
32709
$2,200.00
11/08/94
11/08/94
12/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
07492
32859
$378.00
11/21/94
11/21/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07492
33205
$958.00
12/20/94
12/20/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07492
33203
$72.00
12/20/94
12/20/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07492
32935
$27.00
11/29/94
11/29/94
01/25/95
LJB
SB
07493
33208
$565.00
12/20/94
12/20/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
-
MW
07493
33112
$77.50
12/12/94
12/12/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
-
CS
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 11
GENERAL ACCOUNT
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
07586
33754
$1,596.00
01/31/95
01/31/95
02/23/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07586
33756
$385.00
01/31/95
01/31/95
02/23/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
07586
33753
$85.00
01/24/95
01/31/95
02/23/95
LJB
SB
07586
33646
$22.95
01/24/95
01/24/95
02/23/95
LJB
LJB
CS
07617
33940
$149.00
02/15/95
02/15/95
02/23/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07617
33902
$27.50
02/13/95
02/13/95
02/23/95
LJB
LJB
-
EN
07707
34058
$1,470.00
02/27/95
02/27/95
03/27/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
07707
34147
$846.00
03/06/95
03/06/95
03/27/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07821
34440
$10.00
03/29/95
03/29/95
04/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07821
34434
$9.00
03/29/95
03/29/95
04/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08067
35229
$99.00
06/06/95
06/06/95
07/11/95
LJB
SB
08126
35228
$325.00
06/06/95
06/06/95
07/27/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08126
35142
$196.00
05/30/95
05/30/95
07/27/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
08126
35400
$82.00
06/22/95
06/22/95
07/27/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08126
35510
$195.00
06/30/95
06/30/95
07/27/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
08167
35745
$70.00
07/31/95
07/25/95
08/10/95
-
CS
08211
35729
$1,300.00
06/28/95
06/28/95
08/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08211
35730
$1,496.00
06/28/95
06/28/95
08/25/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
08211
106989
$108.00
06/28/95
06/30/95
08/25/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
08211
35609
$220.00
06/30/95
07/12/95
08/25/95
LJB
LJB
-
DO
08269
134
$82.00
08/11/95
08/15/95
09/12/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08350
199
$63.00
Illegible
08/30/95
10/10/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08350
35971
$27.50
-
08/25/95
10/10/95
-
-
CS
08414
36095
$110.00
09/29/95
09/08/95
10/24/95
LJB
LJB
-
DO
08486
36522
$2,306.00
10/20/95
10/17/95
11/10/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
08486
36554
$100.00
10/18/95
10/19/95
11/10/95
LJB
SB
08609
36878
$98.00
Illegible
11/16/95
12/12/95
LJB
SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 12
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
08609
36881
$263.00
Illegible
11/16/95
12/12/95
LJB
SB
10422
36944
$724.00
12/08/95
11/27/95
01/09/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
10470
37091
$260.00
12/11/95
12/11/95
01/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10470
37050
$55.00
12/11/95
12/06/95
01/25/96
LJB
LJB
-
EN
10470
37404
$90.00
12/15/95
01/08/96
01/25/96
LJB
BA
10470
37439
$446.00
12/28/95
01/10/96
01/25/96
LJB
SB
10470
37051
$130.00
12/11/95
12/06/95
01/25/96
LJB
LJB
-
CA
10470
37052
$58.52
12/11/95
12/06/95
01/25/96
LJB
LJB
-
EN
10470
37092
$70.00
12/11/95
12/11/95
01/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10470
37436
$196.00
01/09/96
01/10/96
01/25/96
LJB
SB
10470
37431
$560.00
01/09/96
01/10/96
01/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10470
37367
$12.00
01/04/96
01/05/96
01/25/96
SB
10598
37620
$66.00
01/19/96
01/24/96
02/26/96
CS
10598
37742
$197.00
01/30/96
02/06/96
02/26/96
SB
10655
37973
$57.00
01/25/96
02/26/96
03/12/96
LJB
SB
10706
36262
$20.00
-
09/26/96
03/26/96
LJB
-
SB
10751
38230
$220.00
03/05/96
03/20/96
04/09/96
LJB
SB
10751
38206
$1,330.00
03/14/96
03/19/96
04/09/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
10751
38211
$67.00
03/14/96
03/19/96
04/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10751
38207
$57.00
02/22/96
03/19/96
04/09/96
LJB
SB
10810
38375
$110.00
03/22/96
04/03/96
04/25/96
LJB
SB
10866
38557
$244.00
04/10/96
04/23/96
05/10/96
LJB
SB
10924
38558
$4,178.00
03/27/96
04/23/96
05/24/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10924
38613
$275.00
03/27/96
04/26/96
05/24/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10924
38612
$275.00
03/27/96
04/26/96
05/24/96
LJB
LJB
SB
10981
38830
$65.00
No Date
05/17/96
06/11/96
SB
11036
37829
$99.00
06/13/96
02/17/96
06/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 13
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
11036
38632
$110.00
04/29/96
04/29/96
06/25/96
LJB
-
SB
11036
38743
$10.00
-
05/09/96
06/25/96
LJB
-
SB
11036
38906
$235.00
06/04/96
05/20/96
06/25/96
LJB
LJB
-
SB
11036
38955
$552.00
06/10/96
05/31/96
06/25/96
LJB
SB
11036
39025
$49.00
06/13/96
06/07/96
06/25/96
SB
11036
39026
$105.00
05/24/96
06/07/96
06/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
11036
39060
$72.30
06/10/96
06/10/96
06/25/96
LJB
EN
11081
39010
$99.00
05/24/96
06/06/96
07/09/97
LJB
SB
11081
39118
$140.00
-
06/17/96
07/09/96
-
-
BA
11168
39349
$65.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
07/26/96
LJB
LJB
LS
11168
39450
$641.00
06/14/96
06/27/96
07/26/96
LJB
LS
11168
39109
$148.00
06/14/96
06/14/96
07/26/96
LJB
SB
11168
39028
$98.00
06/14/96
06/07/96
07/26/96
LJB
SB
11227
39514
$63.00
06/12/96
06/27/96
08/12/96
LJB
-
LS
11227
39515
$98.00
04/17/96
06/27/96
08/12/96
LJB
LS
11260
39303
$1,452.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
08/26/96
LJB
LJB
LS
11260
39447
$291.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
08/26/96
LJB
LJB
LS
11260
39448
$298.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
08/26/96
LJB
LJB
LS
11260
39644
$20.00
08/19/96
Illegible
08/26/96
SB
11260
39722
$596.00
04/17/96
08/14/96
08/26/96
LJB
SB
11318
39599A
$1,988.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
09/09/96
LJB
LJB
LS
11318
39530
$3,924.00
07/01/96
07/25/96
09/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
11318
39643
$138.00
07/29/96
08/06/96
09/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
11349
40036
$252.00
09/09/96
09/10/96
09/25/96
LJB
SB
11349
39264
$148.00
06/27/96
06/28/96
09/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
11349
39448
$298.00
-
06/27/96
09/25/96
LJB
-
-
LS
11507
40424
$138.00
10/09/96
10/15/96
11/13/96
SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 14
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
11507
40456
$240.00
10/07/96
10/17/96
11/13/96
SB
11507
40535
$145.00
10/17/96
10/24/96
11/13/96
SB
11595
40692
$135.00
11/04/96
11/11/96
12/11/96
SB
11689
41000
$168.00
11/13/96
12/11/96
01/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
11689
40999
$99.00
12/03/96
12/11/96
01/10/97
LJB
SB
11689
40997
$398.00
12/03/96
12/11/96
01/10/97
SB
11689
41199
$190.00
11/06/96
12/31/96
01/10/97
LJB
SB
11823
41371
$608.00
01/12/97
01/21/97
02/10/97
LJB
SB
11823
41370
$214.00
01/12/97
01/21/97
02/10/97
SB
11853
41455
$410.22
01/06/97
01/27/97
02/25/97
LJB
SB
11853
41483
$397.00
01/21/97
01/28/97
02/25/97
SB
11853
41546
$108.00
02/05/97
02/06/97
02/25/97
BA
11853
41566
$98.00
01/28/97
02/06/97
02/25/97
SB
11853
41568
$75.00
01/30/97
02/06/97
02/25/97
LJB
SB
11853
41567
$135.00
01/30/97
02/06/97
02/25/97
LJB
SB
11982
41716
$212.00
02/13/97
02/19/97
03/24/97
LJB
LJB
SB
11982
41657
$163.00
02/13/97
02/13/97
03/24/97
LJB
LJB
BA
11982
41917
$505.00
03/11/97
03/12/97
03/24/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
11982
41919
$6,761.00
03/11/97
03/12/97
03/24/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12038
41966
$20.00
03/11/97
03/17/97
04/10/97
SB
12038
41983
$1,889.00
03/07/97
03/18/97
04/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12038
41980
$218.00
03/07/97
03/18/97
04/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12038
42038
$630.00
03/20/97
03/21/97
04/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12038
42077
$196.00
03/21/97
03/27/97
04/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12038
42078
$777.00
04/02/97
03/27/97
04/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12150
42298
$264.00
04/09/97
04/16/97
05/13/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12150
42216
$1,590.00
04/01/97
04/02/97
05/13/97
LJB
LJB
SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 15
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
12225
42430
$540.00
04/29/97
04/29/97
05/27/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12225
42432
$159.00
04/11/97
04/29/97
05/27/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12225
42471
$188.00
04/29/97
05/05/97
05/27/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12274
42603
$132.00
05/09/97
05/16/97
06/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12355
42909
$20.00
06/16/97
06/16/97
06/24/97
SB
12488
43154
$130.00
-
07/08/97
07/28/97
-
-
-
12509
42513
$29.00
05/08/97
05/08/97
07/28/97
SB
12509
42734
$6,633.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42787
$390.00
05/30/97
06/05/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42735
$4,240.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42783
$260.00
05/30/97
06/05/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42736
$4,240.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42788
$260.00
05/30/97
06/05/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42741
$4,786.00
Unknown
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42789
$260.00
Unknown
06/05/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42747
$628.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42752
$55.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
DW
12509
42753
$55.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
DW
12509
42912
$82.00
05/30/97
06/16/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42928
$164.00
06/16/97
06/17/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42959
$510.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
42995
$556.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
43003
$1,668.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
43008
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
43018
$608.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
43019
$704.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
43021
$303.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 16
Check
#
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
12509
43023
$48.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
43024
$1,236.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
42998
$556.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12509
43074
$738.00
06/30/97
06/27/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
43076
$1,604.00
06/30/97
06/27/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
43107
$2,425.00
06/18/97
06/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
SF
12509
43114
$2,586.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
43115
$734.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12509
42910
$492.00
06/16/97
06/16/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12578
43077
$110.00
06/30/97
06/27/97
08/13/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12578
43159
$279.00
06/20/97
06/30/97
08/13/97
LJB
SF
12578
43155
$30.00
-
07/09/97
08/13/97
-
LF
12621
43157
$1,122.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12621
43151
$370.00
06/30/97
07/07/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12621
43332
$148.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12621
43333
$118.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12621
43370
$628.00
08/04/97
08/04/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
44086
$126.00
10/03/97
10/08/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
44116
$27.50
10/09/97
10/10/97
10/28/97
DIN
12899
43909
$158.00
Unknown
09/24/97
10/28/97
-
SF
12899
44078
$255.00
09/23/97
10/08/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
43234
$623.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
43236
$158.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
43238
$1,023.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
43237
$316.00
Unknown
06/30/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
43116
$97.00
05/30/97
06/30/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
12899
43583
$96.00
08/13/97
08/22/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 17
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
*06901
31331
$179.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/10/94
LJB
LJB
PR
SB
*06915
31599
$3,762.00
06/23/94
06/23/94
08/25/94
LJB
LJB
Sign.
SB
07008
31741
$27.50
08/16/94
08/16/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
-
CS
*07008
31600
$12.00
06/17/94
06/30/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
07211
32710
$144.00
11/08/94
11/08/94
12/01/94
LJB
LJB
SB
07841
34812
$103.00
04/28/95
04/28/95
06/26/95
LJB
LJB
SB
07946
35511
$200.00
06/30/95
06/30/95
07/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08068
35731
$275.00
06/28/95
06/28/95
08/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
08068
35513
$27.50
08/11/95
07/07/95
08/25/95
LJB
CS
08321
36294
$90.00
09/29/95
09/28/95
11/09/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
11050
37517
$90.00
01/05/96
01/16/96
01/26/96
LJB
SB
11051
37196
$399.00
12/08/95
12/19/95
01/26/96
LJB
SB
11052
37379
$95.00
12/28/95
01/05/96
01/26/96
LJB
SB
11106
37517
$90.00
01/05/96
01/16/96
02/12/96
LJB
SB
11322
38208
$130.00
02/27/96
03/19/96
04/10/96
LJB
SB
11815
39800
$5.00
-
08/26/96
-
SB
11884
39512
$2,348.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
09/10/96
LJB
LJB
LS
11911
40038
$50.00
09/09/96
09/10/96
09/24/96
SB
11911
40039
$283.00
09/13/96
09/10/96
09/24/96
LJB
LJB
SB
11988
40198
$50.00
09/09/96
09/24/96
10/25/96
SB
12047
40459
$57.00
10/15/96
10/17/96
11/12/96
SB
Check
Inv.
Invoice
P.O. Date
Inv. Date
Check
Inv.
P.O.
FAPR/
Sales
#
#
Amount
Date
Sign.
Sign.
PR
Rep.
Sign.
12899
43704
$894.00
08/19/97
09/05/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
13073
44226
$110.00
10/07/97
10/24/97
12/09/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 18
MENTAL HEALTH
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
12102
40428
$143.00
10/09/96
10/15/96
11/22/96
LJB
LJB
SB
12285
41200
$49.00
-
12/31/96
01/27/97
-
-
-
SB
12390
41521
$2,292.00
01/23/97
01/31/97
02/25/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12711
42289
$98.00
04/07/97
04/15/97
05/27/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12809
42641
$129.00
04/29/97
05/22/97
06/24/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42745
$16,960.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42782
$1,040.00
05/30/97
06/05/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
43000
$556.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42999
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42751
$55.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
DIN
12880
42965
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42964
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42961
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42963
$510.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12880
42960
$765.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
12881
43073
$492.00
06/30/97
06/27/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
12881
42969
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
13037
43160
$1,661.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
08/12/97
LJB
SF
13066
43423
$10.00
08/04/97
08/07/97
08/26/97
SF
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
01457
32561
$149.00
09/26/94
10/25/94
11/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
01471
32710
$144.00
11/08/94
11/08/94
12/08/94
LJB
LJB
-
SB
01497
32814
$395.00
11/16/94
11/16/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
01523
33942
$27.50
02/15/95
02/15/95
03/10/95
LJB
LJB
-
CS
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 19
DRUG & ALCOHOL
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
000411
36446
$149.00
09/29/95
10/11/95
10/24/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
001744
38209
$200.00
02/22/96
03/19/96
04/09/96
LJB
LJB
-
SB
001798
38907
$5.00
05/28/96
05/28/96
06/11/96
LJB
LJB
SB
001835
39076
$335.00
05/22/96
06/11/96
07/09/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
001865
39394
$298.00
06/10/96
06/27/96
07/25/96
LJB
LJB
LS
001890
39348
$358.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
07/26/96
LJB
LJB
LS
001890
39219
$434.00
06/14/96
06/25/96
07/26/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
001890
39351
$45.00
06/14/96
06/27/96
07/26/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
LS
001910
39513
$3,285.00
06/10/96
06/27/96
08/26/96
LJB
LJB
LS
001931
39676
$118.00
06/25/96
08/08/96
09/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
002006
40695
$130.00
11/04/96
11/11/96
12/10/96
SB
002098
41918
$352.00
03/11/97
03/12/97
03/24/97
LJB
LJB
SB
002229
43336
$280.00
06/20/97
06/30/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
002229
43078
$2,422.00
06/20/97
06/27/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
01528
33806
$1,170.00
02/01/95
02/03/95
03/10/95
LJB
LJB
SB
01537
34059
$160.00
02/27/95
02/27/95
03/27/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
01561
34435
$124.00
03/29/95
03/29/95
04/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
01686
36261
$149.00
09/29/95
09/26/95
10/24/95
LJB
LJB
SB
01723
36661
$221.00
10/30/95
10/30/95
12/12/95
LJB
LJB
SB
04189
39070
$149.00
03/22/96
06/11/96
07/09/96
LJB
SB
04235
39675
$259.00
07/29/96
08/08/96
09/10/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
04247
39931
$374.00
09/17/96
08/30/96
09/24/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
04567
44498
$59.00
11/24/97
11/24/97
12/22/97
LJB
-
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 20
EARLY INTERVENTION
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
*03716
31337
$11,691.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/10/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*03716
31334
$2,419.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/10/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*03716
31351
$2,036.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/10/94
LJB
LJB
SB
04568
35485
$19.00
06/29/95
06/29/95
08/01/95
CS
08233
39137
$3,380.00
06/05/96
06/18/96
07/01/96
LJB
SB
09185
42515
$98.00
04/16/97
05/08/97
05/27/97
LJB
SB
09337
42770
$285.00
05/30/97
06/04/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
09337
42911
$2,250.00
05/30/97
06/16/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
09337
42967
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
09337
43110
$677.00
05/30/97
06/30/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
002271
43703
$49.00
09/05/97
09/05/97
10/27/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 21
MEGA WAIVER
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
*10564
31333
$405.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
*10564
31336
$2,240.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
*10564
31340
$96.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*10564
31342
$2,799.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*10564
31337
$11,691.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*10564
31351
$2,036.00
06/27/94
06/30/94
08/09/94
LJB
LJB
SB
10596
31493
$2,799.00
06/30/94
07/25/94
08/11/94
LJB
SB
*10621
31567
$2,146.00
06/23/94
06/23/94
08/24/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*10621
31680
$2,686.00
06/23/94
06/23/94
08/24/94
LJB
SB
*10654
31599
$3,762.00
06/23/94
06/23/94
08/25/94
LJB
LJB
-
SB
*10752
31594
$795.00
06/17/94
06/30/94
09/27/94
LJB
LJB
SB
*10979
31596
$98.00
06/30/94
06/30/94
11/09/94
LJB
-
SB
11481
34357
$24.00
03/21/95
03/21/95
04/10/95
LJB
LJB
SB
11531
34540
$170.00
04/05/95
04/05/95
04/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
11531
34541
$24.00
04/05/95
04/05/95
04/25/95
SB
11793
35393
$400.00
06/15/95
06/21/95
07/11/95
LJB
SB
11869
35143
$178.00
05/30/95
05/30/95
07/26/95
LJB
LJB
SB
11869
35315
$368.00
06/14/95
06/14/95
07/26/95
LJB
LJB
SB
11869
35486
$89.00
06/29/95
06/29/95
07/26/95
LJB
LJB
SB
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
09401
43025
$2,180.00
06/10/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
09401
42950
$2,580.00
06/10/97
06/19/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SB
09645
44117
$25.00
10/22/97
10/10/97
10/28/97
HM
09645
43983
$618.00
09/04/97
09/30/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 22
MENTAL RETARDATION
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
11984
35732
$49.00
06/28/95
06/28/95
08/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
11984
060
$375.00
06/28/95
06/28/95
08/25/95
LJB
SB
12040
088
$100.00
07/24/95
08/08/95
09/12/95
LJB
SB
12188
204
$149.00
09/29/95
08/30/95
10/24/95
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
12188
36455
$27.50
-
10/12/95
10/24/95
-
-
MW
14837
37873
$200.00
02/08/96
02/16/96
03/12/96
LJB
CS
14931
38230
$220.00
03/05/96
03/20/96
04/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
14981
38373
$64.00
03/25/96
04/03/96
04/25/96
LJB
SB
15203
39027
$58.00
06/13/96
06/07/96
06/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
15203
39024
$411.00
06/03/96
06/07/96
06/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
15252
39138
$4,806.00
06/04 -05/96
06/18/96
07/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
15314
39267
$2,746.00
06/10/96
06/28/96
07/26/96
LJB
SB
15314
39394
$298.00
06/10/96
06/27/96
07/26/96
LJB
LS
15429
39697
$139.00
-
08/12/96
08/27/96
-
-
BA
15467
39642
$1,114.00
07/29/96
08/06/96
09/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
15505
40037
$57.00
09/13/96
09/10/96
09/24/96
LJB
SB
15732
40691
$283.00
11/13/96
11/11/96
12/10/96
SB
15902
41565
$275.00
01/28/97
02/06/97
02/25/97
SB
16085
42287
$556.00
01/20/97
04/15/97
04/25/97
LJB
LJB
SB
16085
42215
$50.00
03/21/97
04/08/97
04/25/97
LJB
LJB
SB
16293
42746
$12,720.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
16293
42785
$780.00
05/30/97
06/05/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
16293
43002
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
16293
43001
$834.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
16293
42957
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
SB
16293
42962
$765.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/11/97
LJB
SB
16363
43025
$2,180.00
06/10/97
06/23/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 23
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
004014
39075
$1,180.00
06/03/96
06/11/96
07/09/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
004014
39139
$970.00
06/03/96
06/18/96
07/09/96
LJB
LJB
SB
004028
39177
$4,620.00
06/05/96
06/21/96
07/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
004028
39386
$434.00
06/05/96
06/27/96
07/25/96
LJB
LJB
LS
004084
39599
$16,611.00
-
06/27/96
09/24/96
LJB
-
-
LS
004106
40268
$55.00
10/31/97
09/30/96
10/25/96
-
EN
004106
39798
$2,772.00
08/16/96
08/20/96
10/25/96
LJB
SB
004122
40460
$148.00
10/09/96
10/17/96
11/12/96
SB
004130
40425
$98.00
09/17/96
10/15/96
11/22/96
LJB
SB
004130
40539
$1,400.00
10/17/96
10/24/96
11/22/96
LJB
LJB
-
SB
004143
40697
$373.00
11/11/96
12/10/96
SB
004143
40696
$168.00
11/11/96
12/10/96
SB
004337
42733
$4,240.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
004337
43108
$1,741.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
004337
42958
$510.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
SB
004337
43022
$48.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
16363
42950
$2,580.00
06/10/97
06/19/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
16427
42968
$255.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
08/13/97
LJB
LJB
SB
16445
43334
$280.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
SF
16445
43189
$3,047.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
08/26/97
LJB
LJB
SF
16604
44118
$444.00
10/09/97
10/10/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
DW
16679
44308
$24.95
10/31/97
10/31/97
11/20/97
DW
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 24
FOREST COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
11198
32559
$275.00
10/25/94
10/25/94
11/09/94
Illegible
LJB
SB
11475
33204
$395.00
12/20/94
12/20/94
01/25/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
11844
34358
$211.00
03/21/95
03/21/95
04/10/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
12298
35383
$185.00
06/21/95
06/21/95
07/25/95
LJB
LJB
-
SB
12298
35316
$410.00
06/14/95
06/14/95
07/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
12298
35314
$2,471.00
06/14/95
06/14/95
07/25/95
LJB
LJB
SB
12798
36321
$2,605.00
09/29/95
09/29/95
11/09/95
LJB
LJB
SB
12829
36503
$1,677.00
09/28/95
09/28/95
11/27/95
LJB
-
SB
13714
37094
$260.00
12/08/95
12/11/95
01/09/96
LJB
SB
014669
39449
$777.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
08/26/96
LJB
LJB
LJB
LS
014738
39381
$6,139.00
06/27/96
06/27/96
09/10/96
LJB
LJB
LS
014738
39554
$50.00
07/29/96
07/29/96
09/10/96
LJB
LJB
SB
014783
39598
$12,722.00
-
06/27/96
09/24/96
LJB
-
-
LS
014874
39798
$2,772.00
08/16/96
08/20/96
10/25/96
LJB
LJB
SB
014874
40268
$55.00
09/23/96
09/30/96
10/25/96
-
EN
014874
40185
$439.00
09/19/96
09/23/96
10/25/96
LJB
SB
014950
40460
$148.00
10/09/96
10/17/96
11/12/96
SB
014950
40425
$98.00
09/17/96
10/15/96
11/12/96
LJB
SB
014998
40539
$1,400.00
10/17/96
10/24/96
11/22/96
LJB
LJB
SB
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
004337
42987
$576.00
06/19/97
06/20/97
07/11/97
LJB
SB
003932
38210
$370.00
-
03/19/96
04/09/96
-
-
-
SB
004373
42784
$260.00
-
06/05/97
08/12/97
-
-
-
SF
004393
43117
$255.00
-
06/30/97
09/25/97
-
-
-
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 25
WARREN COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
015087
40457
$365.00
10/11/96
10/17/96
12/10/96
SB
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 26
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
015087
40655
$98.00
10/11/96
11/07/96
12/10/96
SB
015087
40458
$100.00
09/25/96
09/27/96
12/10/96
SB
015087
40696
$168.00
11/06/96
11/11/96
12/10/96
SB
015571
40824
$118.00
11/20/96
11/21/96
04/09/97
LJB
LJB
SB
015833
42514
$410.00
04/16/97
05/08/97
06/10/97
LJB
SB
015833
42642
$10.00
05/22/97
05/22/97
06/10/97
SB
015978
42786
$910.00
05/30/97
06/05/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42744
$14,840.00
05/30/97
05/30/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42949
$258.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42948
$258.00
06/18/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42947
$258.00
06/18/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42970
$510.00
05/30/97
06/19/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42987
$576.00
06/19/97
06/20/97
07/10/97
LJB
SB
015978
43007
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
43022
$48.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
015978
42997
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42996
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
43009
$278.00
06/18/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
42994
$278.00
06/21/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SB
015978
43020
$1,882.00
05/30/97
06/23/97
07/10/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
016047
43049
$158.00
06/30/97
06/25/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
016047
43119
$629.00
05/30/97
06/30/97
07/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
016155
43072
$188.00
05/30/97
06/27/97
08/12/97
LJB
SF
016155
43158
$130.00
06/26/97
06/30/97
08/12/97
LJB
SF
016278
43235
$623.00
06/30/97
06/30/97
09/25/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
016404
43908
$230.00
09/24/97
09/24/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
JM
016404
44022
$292.00
09/29/97
09/29/97
10/28/97
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 27
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
849
41984
$ 2,259.00
-
03/18/97
04/10/97
-
-
-
SB
886
43075
$ 2,512.00
-
06/27/97
08/26/97
-
-
-
SF
886
43335
$ 280.00
-
07/30/97
08/26/97
-
-
-
SF
879
42966
$ 255.00
-
06/19/97
07/11/97
-
-
-
SF
879
43109
$ 431.00
-
06/30/97
07/11/97
-
-
-
SF
879
43071
$ 4,978.00
-
06/27/97
07/11/97
-
-
-
SF
879
42965
$ 255.00
-
06/19/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
-
SB
879
42745
$ 16,960.00
-
05/30/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
-
SB
879
42782
$ 1,040.00
-
06/05/97
07/11/97
LJB
LJB
-
SB
Check
#
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
237
41981
$ 2,000.00
-
03/18/97
04/10/97
-
-
-
SB
266
42433
$ 430.00
-
04/29/97
05/27/97
-
-
-
SB
314
43187
$ 96.00
-
07/14/97
09/25/97
-
-
-
SF
Check
Inv. #
Invoice
P.O.
Invoice
Check
Inv.
P.O.
FAPR/
Sales
#
Amount
Date
Date
Date
Sign.
Sign.
PR
Rep.
Sign.
016404
42987
$576.00
-
06/20/97
10/28/97
-
-
SB
016489
43910
$196.00
09/23/97
09/24/97
11/11/97
LJB
SF
016489
44118
$444.00
10/09/97
10/10/97
11/11/97
LJB
LJB
DIN
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 28
FAMILY PRESERVATION PROGRAM
F.S.S.R.
*Invoice dates indicate June as the month issued; however, Computerland sales
summaries indicate said sales credited to Flannery in July.
47. Since Sherrie Flannery left the employment of Computerland, DHS did not make
any additional purchases from Computerland up to at least the time that
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 29
Bartholomew left DHS.
48. Since November 6, 1997, Sherrie Flannery has been employed as a sales
representative with Western New York Computing Systems, Inc., (WNYC).
a. WNYC is a computer and computer equipment company based out of New
York state with an address of 1100 Pittsford - Victor Road, Pittsford, New
York.
b. Flannery's title is Corporate Account Representative.
1) Flannery's sales area includes Warren, PA.
49. WNYC employees are paid a guaranteed monthly salary.
a. Flannery's $2,000.00 draw is deducted from monthly commissions over
$2,000.00.
b. Commission checks are issued monthly for the proceeding month's sales.
c. WNYC employees do not receive commissions on sales with outstanding
balances.
50. WNYC sales representatives receive commission on service calls performed in their
sales area.
51. On or about November 14, 1997, Bartholomew met with Leidecker and informed her
that Flannery was switching companies.
52. Following her meeting with Bartholomew Leidecker informed her subordinate, Irons,
that future purchases were to be made from WNYC.
a. Contacts with WNYC by Irons for computers and computer related
purchases were with Sherrie Flannery.
53. On November 17, 1997, and November 18, 1997, eleven days after Flannery
started working for WNYC, Bartholomew approved purchases from WNYC totaling
$10,203.40.
54. Prior to November 1997, DHS had not made any purchases from WNYC.
a. WNYC had no local sales representative until November of 1997.
55. From November 6, 1997, through August 27, 1998, the Department of Human
Services purchased computers, related equipment, and services from WNYC
totaling a[sic]$363,162.86 as indicated by individual program below:
Children and Youth Services of Warren County
Children and Youth Services of Forest County
Drug and Alcohol Program
Mental Health Program
Mental Retardation Program
Mega Waiver Program
Early Intervention Program
$ 91,311.54
27, 863.14
152.00
45,600.25
35, 070.93
28,474.77
2,282.00
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 30
General Account
Total Expenditures
$ 132,408.23
$ 363,162.86
a. DHS currently has an outstanding balance of $10,562.00 with WNYC.
b. Shipping and handling charges of approximately $2,451.00 are accounted
for in the total figure.
56. During the period from November 6, 1997, through August 1998 DHS issued 61
fixed asset purchase orders for computer equipment and related fixed assets.
a. Fifty -nine of the 61 Fixed Assets Purchase Orders (97 %) were placed
through WNYC.
b. Sherrie Flannery was the WNYC sales representative for these purchases.
57. Linda Bartholomew approved the 59 fixed asset purchase orders made through
WNYC.
58. FAPR's were issued by DHS to make purchases from WNYC without soliciting
quotes from other companies.
Invoice No. Invoice Amount Invoice Date
104926 $ 9,849.60 11/24/97
104927 $16,655.40 11/24/97
8038 $ 2,519.00 02/27/98
8039 $ 4,380.00 02/27/98
8040 $ 2,295.00 02/27/98
13513 $ 643.00 04/21/98
21998 $ 9,044.00 07/27/98
22739 $10,914.00 06/30/98
Total $56,300.00
a. Mark Irons did not always obtain or write quotes on the FAPR.
59. DHS made purchases from WNYC using FAPR's where WNYC was permitted to
amend quotes to make them the low bidder.
Check Invoice Original Lowest Adjusted
No. No. WNYC Quote Orig. Quote WNYC Quote
4635 22738 $2,494.00 $2,180.00 $2,146.00
4643 21522 $2,494.00 $2,378.00 $2,236.00
17670 22736 $8,966.00 $8,878.55 $8,601.00
14047 22034 $2,846.00 $1,866.26 $1,823.00
60. All of the FAPR's and amended FAPR's to WNYC were approved by Linda
Bartholomew.
61. One FAPR was issued in which WNYC was utilized for the purchase of a battery
backup for a server in the amount of $455.00 with check no. 13527.
a. Flannery was employed by WNYC at this time.
b. Computerland's quote on the FAPR was $175.00.
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
013212
104891
$353.80
11/17/97
11/24/97
01/13/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013214
104926
$9,849.60
11/18/97
11/24/97
01/13/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013281
107692
$1,965.00
12/03/97
12/23/97
01/27/98
LJB
SF
013281
107440
$5,161.00
12/03/97
12/19/97
01/27/98
LJB
SF
013281
108196
$390.00
12/03/97
12/30/97
01/27/98
LJB
SF
013339
107772
$289.16
12/23/97
12/23/97
02/10/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013339
107003
$565.00
12/23/97
12/16/97
02/10/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013397
5444
$1,425.00
-
12/12/98
02/24/98
-
-
SF
013397
4767
$1,772.00
01/27/98
01/30/98
02/24/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013467
3238
$8,949.00
01/30/98
01/30/98
03/10/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013527
6309
$455.00
02/26/98
02/20/98
03/26/98
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 31
62. WNYC realized a profit in the amount of $64,143.00 from sales to DHS covering the
time period of November 6, 1997, through August 27, 1998.
a. WNYC's profit percentage regarding sales to DHS totaled 18 %.
63. WNYC did not do business with DHS prior to Sherrie Flannery's employment with
WNYC.
64. Flannery received $11,283.00 in commissions from WNYC as a direct result of
purchases made by DHS from November 6, 1997, through August 27, 1998, as
indicated below:
WNYC
Year Commission
1997 $ 2,127.00
1998 9,156.00
Total: $11,283.00
a. Flannery has not received commissions from WNYC on the outstanding
balance of $10,562.00 owed by DHS.
65. Bartholomew, as DHS Director, approved purchases and authorized payments to
WYNC by initialing invoices, purchase orders and fixed asset purchase requests.
66. Bartholomew's initials or signature approving WNYC invoices are present on at
least one form of supporting documentation for 96% of the contracts (107 of 112)
DHS entered into with WNYC.
GENERAL ACCOUNT
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
013527
6300
$1,776.00
02/12/98
02/20/98
03/26/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013530
7122
$98.00
03/12/98
02/26/98
04/01/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013530
7121
$98.00
03/12/98
02/26/98
04/01/98
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 32
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
013530
7120
$865.00
03/12/98
02/26/98
04/01/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013530
7119
$447.00
02/16/98
02/26/98
04/01/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013530
7123
$2,360.00
02/16/98
02/26/98
04/01/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013576
9873
$173.00
03/23/98
03/23/98
04/19/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013576
7697
$2,393.00
02/12/98
02/27/98
04/19/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013576
9986
$441.00
03/23/98
03/23/98
04/19/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
14125
$706.00
04/24/98
04/24/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
14122
$401.00
04/24/98
04/24/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
13513
$643.00
04/21/98
04/21/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
10976
$341.00
03/02/98
03/31/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
10867
$201.00
03/02/98
03/31/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
10977
$173.00
03/02/98
03/31/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
12681
$127.00
04/14/98
04/14/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
12875
$450.00
04/16/98
04/16/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
12933
$1,272.50
04/16/98
04/16/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
14123
$5,210.00
04/24/98
04/24/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
10308
$1,065.00
03/25/98
03/25/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013736
12692
$28,862.10
03/21/98
04/15/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013941
14798
$1,601.00
04/29/98
04/29/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
013941
15033
$2,820.00
04/07/98
04/30/98
06/25/98
LJB
SF
013941
15086
$397.50
04/30/98
04/30/98
06/25/98
LJB
SF
013941
15260
$223.00
04/28/98
04/30/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013941
16255
$522.00
04/28/98
05/14/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013941
16269
$412.00
05/15/98
05/14/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
SF
013941
16483
$3,122.50
04/07/98
05/14/98
06/25/98
LJB
SF
013941
17654
$2,694.00
05/22/98
05/22/98
06/25/98
LJB
SF
013941
17759
$511.48
04/28/98
05/22/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 33
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
013941
18039
$5,724.73
05/15/98
05/27/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
PR
SF
013941
19049
$301.00
05/21/98
05/31/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014023
21048
$1,425.00
06/18/98
06/18/98
07/13/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014023
20911
$1,487.00
06/18/98
06/18/98
07/13/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
20803
$296.00
06/12/98
06/18/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
20912
$180.00
06/18/98
06/18/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
21498
$2,258.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
21499
$4,516.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
21521
$1,435.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
22032
$2,779.00
06/14/98
06/29/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
22033
$92.00
06/19/98
06/29/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
22034
$1,823.00
06/15/98
06/29/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
22796
$304.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
22031
$823.00
06/16/98
06/29/98
07/21/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014047
23141
$2,560.00
-
07/03/98
07/21/98
-
-
SF
014075
21998
$9,044.00
06/17/98
06/29/98
07/27/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014075
22053
$586.00
06/11/98
06/29/98
07/27/98
LJB
LJB
SF
014075
22739
$10,914.00
06/17/98
06/30/98
07/22/98
LJB
LJB
SF
014148
24603
$506.00
07/17/98
07/21/98
08/11/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014148
22974
$1,907.00
06/29/98
06/30/98
08/11/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
014215
26590
$1,760.00
-
08/13/98
08/25/98
-
-
-
SF
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
P.O. Date
Invoice
Check
Inv.
P.O.
FAPR/
Sales
Amount
Date
Date
Sign.
Sign.
PR
Rep.
Sign.
13549
108177
$1,384.00
12/30/97
12/30/97
01/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
13549
105796
$1,110.00
12/30/97
11/28/97
01/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 34
MENTAL HEALTH
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
13703
4668
$2,292.00
01/30/98
01/30/98
02/24/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
13850
8041
$5,305.00
02/20/98
02/27/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
13861
10202
$2,076.00
03/25/98
03/25/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
13983
14124
$52.00
04/24/98
04/24/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
-
SF
14154
17764
$2,257.00
05/08/98
05/22/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
SF
14154
19184
$2,851.00
05/26/98
05/31/98
06/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
14327
21523
$15,799.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/11/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
14327
21500
$11,281.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/11/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
14384
25201
$296.25
08/06/98
07/24/98
08/25/98
LJB
LJB
SF
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
010070
10528
$1,990.00
03/27/98
03/27/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
010408
22797
$7,234.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
07/27/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
010408
22802
$7,234.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
07/27/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
P.O. Date
Invoice
Check
Inv.
P.O.
FAPR/
Sales
004689
12844
Amount
04/16/98
Date
Date
Sign.
Sign.
PR
Rep.
Sign.
002403
11357
$173.00
-
03/31/98
04/28/98
-
LJB
SF
002477
21503
$2,109.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/11/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
004689
12844
$152.00
04/16/98
04/16/98
05/14/98
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 35
DRUG AND ALCOHOL
EARLY INTERVENTION
MEGA WAIVER
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
16764
104890
$402.84
11/24/97
11/24/97
12/23/97
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17041
8038
$2,519.00
02/17/98
02/27/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17041
8039
$4,380.00
02/17/98
02/27/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17041
8040
$2,295.00
02/17/98
02/27/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
-
SF
17041
9987
$223.00
03/23/98
03/23/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17041
9988
$223.00
03/23/98
03/23/98
04/09/98
LJB
LJB
SF
17087
11485
$993.00
-
03/31/98
04/27/98
LJB
-
LJB
SF
17128
13984
$9,391.00
02/20/98
04/24/98
05/12/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17387
21502
$4,382.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17387
22036
$2,651.00
06/16/98
06/29/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17387
21505
$4,552.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
17453
22798
$5,065.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
08/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Check #
Inv.
#
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
004492
104926
$9,898.60
11/16/97
11/24/97
01/26/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
004511
4667
$2,360.00
01/30/98
01/30/98
02/23/98
LJB
LJB
SF
004523
3240
$14,388.00
01/30/98
01/30/98
03/10/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
004552
9922
$1,454.00
-
03/23/98
04/27/98
LJB
-
-
SF
004635
22738
$2,167.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
08/11/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
P.O.
Invoice
Check
Inv.
P.O.
FAPR/
Sales
Amount
Date
Date
Date
Sign.
Sign.
PR
Rep.
Sign.
010420
21502
$4,382.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
010420
22800
$7,234.00
06/30/98
06/30/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 36
MENTAL RETARDATION
FOREST COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O. Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
016769
104927
$16,655.40
11/18/97
11/24/97
01/13/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
016769
108178
$2,482.00
12/30/97
12/30/97
01/13/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
016795
107438
$15,510.00
12/03/97
12/19/97
01/27/98
LJB
SF
016795
107691
$5,895.00
12/03/97
12/23/97
01/27/98
LJB
SF
016795
108195
$1,170.00
12/03/97
12/30/97
01/27/98
LJB
SF
017018
3239
$9,527.00
01/30/98
01/30/98
03/10/98
LJB
LJB
SF
017471
16171
$10.00
o
PurNhase
Order
05/14/98
06/25/98
-
-
SF
017633
22052
$1,476.00
06/16/98
06/29/98
07/27/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017670
22736
$8,601.00
06/16/98
06/30/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017670
22737
$2,411.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017670
22035
$732.00
06/15/98
06/29/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017670
21993
$3,645.00
06/15/98
06/29/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017670
22799
$7,234.00
06/15/98
06/30/98
08/04/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017796
21501
$6,775.00
06/18/98
06/25/98
08/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017796
21522
$6,708.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
017796
24815
$1,455.00
07/17/98
07/21/98
08/25/98
LJB
LJB
SF
Check #
Inv. #
Invoice
Amount
P.O.
Date
Invoice
Date
Check
Date
Inv.
Sign.
P.O.
Sign.
FAPR/
PR
Sign.
Sales
Rep.
004643
21522
$6,708.00
06/15/98
06/25/98
08/25/98
LJB
LJB
LJB
SF
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 37
WARREN COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH
67. Sherrie Flannery received a financial gain of $18,769.00 as a result of commissions
paid from Computerland and WNYC regarding purchases made by DHS.
a. Computerland $ 7,486.00
b. WNYC $11,283.00
Total $18,769.00
68. The DHS Governing Board was aware of the need to purchase equipment due to
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 38
the upcoming managed care program and to make DHS Y2K compliant.
a. The Governing Board had no specific knowledge of expenditures made by
the Department of Human Services relating to computer and equipment
purchases.
69. The Governing Board did not approve any computer or computer equipment
purchases by the Department of Human Services.
a. Governing Board meeting minutes from July 1, 1994, through April 27, 1999,
confirm Bartholomew sought no approval from the Governing Board for
computer purchases.
70. From July 1, 1994, through August 27, 1998, DHS expended funds in the amount of
$717,065.00 for computers, related equipment, and services from companies
employing Bartholomew's daughter, Sherrie Flannery.
71. DHS has utilized the services of contract employees to assist with the
implementation of the computer operations.
a. Filling of contractual positions is the responsibility of the DHS director.
b. Sue Collins, DHS director prior to Bartholomew, removed the contractual
responsibility from the Human Resource Department and placed it with the
DHS director and the administrative assistant to the director.
1. This was done to ensure continuity among wages received by
contract workers.
72. As DHS director, Bartholomew was responsible for contractual hiring during her
tenure from December 23, 1991, through August 27, 1998.
73. The majority of positions filled in DHS are not contractual and are filled through
Civil Service.
a. Some positions are filled through the Personnel Department and are not
associated with Civil Service including maintenance positions.
74. Flannery was never formally interviewed by Leidecker prior to her hiring with DHS.
75. Bartholomew approved the hiring of Flannery for a contractual position with the
Department of Human Services on April 1, 1993, as a consultant with the
Information Systems Department.
a. The contract was effective from April 1, 1993, to June 30, 1993.
b. Leidecker set Flannery's rate of pay at $15.00 per hour.
1. The salary was subject to Bartholomew's approval.
76. Bartholomew signed the contract in her capacity as the DHS director approving the
hiring and salary.
77. Flannery began performing consulting /training activities on April 1, 1993.
a. Flannery worked under the direction of Leidecker.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 39
b. Flannery served in the consultant capacity until June
employed by Computerland and later WNYC.
78. Bartholomew, in her position as DHS director, renewed
contract annually.
Year
July 1993 -June 1994
July 1994 -June 1995
July 1995 -June 1996
July 1996 -June 1997
July 1997 -June 1998
a. No official vote of the Board is recorded.
Contract Signature
Linda J. Bartholomew
Linda J. Bartholomew
Linda J. Bartholomew
Linda J. Bartholomew
Linda J. Bartholomew
1998, while also being
Flannery's consultant
a. No subsequent approvals were given by the Governing Board to renew
Flannery's contract.
b. Bartholomew signed all of Flannery's contracts in her capacity as the DHS
director.
79. From July 1993 through June 1998, Flannery remained under the direction of
Leidecker.
a. Flannery's rate of pay remained constant at $15.00 per hour.
80. Averment 95 of the Investigative Complaint which was admitted by Bartholomew in
her Answer states: The hiring of Flannery into a contract position, as consultant,
was approved by the Governing Board in or around April 1994.
b. Flannery had already served for approximately one year on a contractual
basis with DHS prior to this approval."
a. In that the above is inconsistent with other evidence of record which shows
that the Governing Board never gave such an approval, the above averment
has been excluded as a Fact Finding.
81. Conditions were placed on the contract hiring of Flannery by the Governing Board.
a. Leidecker was to negotiate the rate of pay.
b. Leidecker was to supervise Flannery.
c. Leidecker was to communicate any problems, disciplinary or otherwise,
directly to the Governing Board.
d. Any expansion or changing of the contract required Governing Board
approval.
82. Flannery was issued a total of ten (10) checks by the Department of Human
Services for work completed and classes attended from July 1, 1994, through
September 11, 1997, in her capacity as a computer consultant, totaling $5,519.00
as detailed below:
Check #
Check Date
Time Frame
Hours
Worked
Check
Amount
7687
03/27/95
01/06/95-02/23/95
67
$1,005.00
8670
12/20/95
07/05/95 - 12/13/95
75.5
$1,132.50
10979
06/11/96
01/04/96-05/31/96
62
$930.00
11316
09/09/96
06/01/96-08/28/96
45
$675.00
11751
01/27/97
02/02/97 - 02/05/97
$113.85
11900
03/11/97
02/02/97 - 02/04/97
*
$137.08
11974
03/24/97
04/01/97 - 04/04/97
*
$113.85
12105
04/25/97
09/11/96-04/04/97
79
$1,185.00
12106
04/25/97
04/02/97 - 04/04/97
*
$143.20
12724
09/11/97
10/08/97- 10/10/97
*
$83.95
Total:
$5,519.43
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 40
*Indicates advance funds supplied for meals while attending classes /conferences. Also
accounts for mileage paid to Flannery.
a. Supporting documentation was submitted for hours charged and expenses
claimed.
b. Bartholomew approved payment of Check No. 12724 in the amount of
$83.35 issued to Flannery by signing Flannery's reimbursement form.
c. Leidecker approved payment of the remaining checks issued to Flannery by
signing Flannery's time summaries or reimbursement forms.
d. Checks issued to Flannery prior to January 1997 reference Flannery's
maiden name of Bartholomew.
83. Flannery was issued eight (8) checks by the Department of Human Services for
work completed and classes attended from April 1, 1993, through June 30, 1994, in
her capacity as a computer consultant, totaling approximately $4,256.00 [sic].
Check #
5558
5593
5787
5824
6085
6204
6418
6895
Check Date
06/25/93
07/13/93
09/09/93
09/24/93
12/09/93
01/25/93
04/11/94
08/25/94
Total:
Check Amount
$ 450.00
$ 120.00
$ 705.00
$ 191.25
$ 487.50
$ 712.50
$ 652.50
$ 937.50
$ 4,256.25
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 41
84. Services performed by Flannery are documented on time sheets as "consulting" and
"training."
85. Flannery is not currently employed on a contractual basis with DHS.
a. Flannery's contract was not renewed in 1998.
86. During the period that she was simultaneously employed by Computerland as a
sales representative and as a consultant to DHS, Flannery's supervisors were
unaware of this dual employment.
87. In or about the spring of 1994 Leidecker wanted to create a new position in MIS due
to the increased computer operations of the DHS.
a. Bartholomew was aware of Leidecker's desire for a new position.
b. Leidecker designed a job description and forwarded it to Civil Service for
review and approval.
c. The job description was returned by Civil Service with the title of Computer
Operator, Level I.
88. Leidecker requested approval of the new position from the Governing Board at the
next Governing Board meeting.
a. Leidecker typically attended Governing Board meetings at that time.
b. The Governing Board approved the new position.
89. The Governing Board did not approve hiring Flannery.
90. No qualified individuals appeared on the in county" Civil Service list.
a. Mark Irons was on the "out -of- county" Civil Service list.
b. Irons was interviewed by Leidecker.
c. Irons was subsequently hired by DHS.
91. During the regularly scheduled audit of the Warren County Children and Youth
Agency for fiscal year ending June 30, 1996, the Department of the Auditor General
received information regarding the computer purchasing practices of DHS from
Bartholomew's daughter without competitive bidding.
92. The Department of the Auditor General concluded that non - allowable expenditures
for computer purchases were being charged to both state and federal programs for
Forest and Warren County Children and Youth Agencies for fiscal year ending June
30, 1998.
a. State and federal government will not participate in reimbursement for non -
allowable expenditures.
b. The county governments will have to fund 100% of the non - allowable
expenses.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 42
93. At the time of the audits for fiscal year ending June 30, 1998, for Forest and Warren
County Children and Youth Agencies, the audit report concluded that applicable
adjustments would be made to reclassify the non - allowable expenditures to the
appropriate line items on the cost reports (Schedule CY370A).
a. The disallowance for the Forest County Children and Youth Agency was
$25,627.14 plus the audited portion allocated from the $130,648.23 in the
General Account.
b. The disallowance for the Warren County Children and Youth Agency was
$75,569.54 plus the audited portion allocated from the $130,648.23 in the
General Account.
94. The Warren County commissioners were informed of possible violations of
purchase procedure by DHS through correspondence from DHS Solicitor John
Altomare.
a. Said letter referenced possible violations of purchasing requirements by
Bartholomew.
95. The county commissioners obtained the services of Mike Polombo from the law firm
of Campbell, Durant, and Beatty as outside counsel.
a. Polombo recommended Bartholomew be placed on paid administrative leave
until an independent audit could be conducted.
96. Bartholomew was suspended with pay on August 27, 1998, as a result of this
recommendation.
97. Deloitte and Touche, LLP, Suite 250, Key Bank Tower, 50 Fountain Plaza, Buffalo,
New York 14202, completed an independent audit of purchases and purchasing
procedures of DHS covering the dates of July 1, 1996, through August 31, 1998.
a. Deloitte and Touche's audit revealed that purchasing requirements pursuant
to the County Code had not been followed.
98. Bartholomew was terminated as DHS Director by the Governing Board on February
16, 1999.
a. Bartholomew's Notice of Employee Separation documented the reason for
separation as "Violation of Company Rules or Policies."
99. Bartholomew's termination letter is dated February 16, 1999, and states the
following:
"Dear Ms. Bartholomew:
On February 16, 1999, the Forest /Warren Department of Human
Services Governing Board voted to terminate your employment.
You were discharged for irregularities involving the bidding and
procurement of contracts.
Please contact my office so that we may arrange a mutually
convenient time for you to obtain your personal affects.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 43
Sincerely,
Robert P. Williams
Chairman
Forest /Warren Department of Human Services"
100. As DHS Director, Bartholomew filed a Statement of Financial Interests for calendar
year 1997 on May 5, 1998.
B. Testimon
101. Marlene Leidecker is the Information Systems Director for the Department of
Human Services for Forrest /Warren County (DHS).
a. Leidecker's duties are to oversee an information system including statistics,
billing, computer hardware and software, payroll, computer purchases, and
supervision of other employees.
b. Leidecker supervises Mark Irons, DHS's Webmaster, who does research on
prices for computer systems and peripherals, and makes recommendations
as to purchases of such equipment.
c. DHS is subject to a Governing Board which is composed of the
commissioners from the two counties.
(1) The DHS Director reports directly to the Governing Board which
oversees the operations of DHS.
d. Bartholomew was the director of DHS from 1991 to 1997.
(1) There are Associate Directors for sub - departments under the
Director.
e. Leidecker's division was responsible for the acquisition of computers and
related equipment for DHS.
f. There was a process at DHS for the purchase of computers /peripherals.
(1) Need was determined based upon a review by Leidecker and Irons
with Associate Directors and Bartholomew as DHS Director.
(2) Bartholomew's approval was needed before purchases could be
made.
(3)
A fixed asset purchase request (FAPR) begins the actual process for
purchasing a fixed asset.
(a) Associate Directors typically fill out the FAPR's.
(b) Leidecker or Mark Irons filled out the FAPR's for computers.
(c) The DHS Director must sign off in the FAPR in order to
purchase an asset.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 44
g.
(3)
(d) Once an FAPR is approved by the DHS Director, a purchase
order number is assigned which is a request to a vendor for an
item.
(f)
(e) After an item would be ordered, it would be received with an
invoice that the DHS Director would sign as an approval for
payment.
The Director's approval is not needed for the purchase of
items under $100.
Bartholomew as DHS Director had an authoritative management style.
(1) Bartholomew did not like subordinates to question or challenge her
directions.
(2) After Bartholomew reprimanded Leidecker in front of staff, Leidecker
typically did not challenge Bartholomew.
There would be repercussions if Leidecker challenged Bartholomew.
h. Sherrie Flannery (Flannery) is Bartholomew's daughter.
(1) Flannery had an affiliation with a company selling computers and
related products.
Prior to 1990, very few computers were purchased by DHS.
j. Leidecker bought IBM computers which were at a state contract price from
Computerland.
(1) The first purchase of computers from Computerland occurred before
Flannery became affiliated with the company.
k. Leidecker bought computers from companies other than Computerland.
After the state required more automation in the `90's, DHS began to make
substantial computer purchases.
m. Leidecker was very dissatisfied with the service of Computerland which
became the prime vendor of computer equipment for DHS.
(1) The use of Computerland as the one computer vendor occurred after
Flannery became the sales representative for that company.
n. Mark Irons believed DHS could obtain equal computers for cheaper prices
outside of Computerland.
(1) When Leidecker asked Bartholomew about buying Dell Computers
which were $1,000 less per unit, were on the state vendor list, and
were rated number one, Bartholomew did not authorize the purchase.
(a) The computers were purchased from Computerland.
o. When a request was made by Leidecker to purchase software from a
company other than Computerland, Bartholomew disapproved the request
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 45
based upon their "understanding" which Leidecker considered as a direction
from Bartholomew to buy from Computerland.
(1) All software was purchased from Computerland after that discussion.
p. DHS stopped buying from Computerland and began buying from Western
New York Computing Systems, Incorporated (WNYCSI).
(1) This occurred right after Flannery left Computerland and became
affiliated with WNYCSI.
q.
(2) Bartholomew posed a rhetorical question to Leidecker if she
(Leidecker) had a problem with the change of vendors, given the
dissatisfaction with the service of Computerland.
(a) The problem with Computerland service was ongoing for
several years.
(b) Bartholomew had not delved into the service of Computerland
on prior occasions.
(c) Leidecker believed that she (Leidecker) had no discretion and
had to switch computer purchases to WNYCSI.
DHS had not purchased from WNYCSI prior to the time that Flannery
became affiliated with the company.
r. DHS stopped purchasing from Computerland after Flannery left that
company.
s. No consideration was given to switching DHS purchases to WNYCSI prior to
the time Flannery became associated with that company.
t. When Flannery was affiliated with Computerland, Leidecker believed she
had to buy DHS computers from that company.
u. DHS had a policy that the hiring of relatives had to go before the Governing
Board.
(1) The DHS Director would take the matter to the Board.
(2) Bartholomew was typically present at Governing Board meetings.
(3) Leidecker, who attended some Governing Board meetings, believes
that Bartholomew failed to mention that her daughter, Flannery,
worked for Computerland and then WNYCSI.
v. After Bartholomew had discussions with Leidecker about a new DHS
position to assist Leidecker, Bartholomew asked Leidecker to consider
Flannery for the position.
(1) In filling the position, Leidecker intended to consider Flannery.
(2) Leidecker believed that she had no discretion as to hiring Flannery.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 46
Bartholomew asked Leidecker to suggest Flannery for the position
before the Governing Board.
(4) This matter went to the Governing Board which advised Leidecker
that she could hire Flannery only after she exhausted all other
possibilities.
(3)
(5)
Mark Irons was hired to the position.
(a) At that time, a contractual relationship already existed between
DHS and Flannery.
w. In 1993, Bartholomew made a decision to enter a contractual relationship
between DHS and Flannery for Flannery to provide computer training to
DHS staff.
x. All computers ordered by DHS from Computerland and WNYCSI were
necessary purchases.
y. When Leidecker needed to buy IBM computers on state contract,
Computerland honored the pricing.
(1) The relationship between DHS and Computerland began in 1986 or
1987.
z. DHS made purchases from Computerland even before Flannery became
affiliated with that company.
aa. When DHS had a problem with Computerland's service, Flannery was
supportive of DHS.
bb. Flannery left Computerland to go to WNYCSI in late 1997.
cc. Leidecker was pleased that she would not have to buy from Computerland
after Flannery left the company to work for WNYCSI.
dd. There were no purchases by DHS from WNYCSI after Bartholomew was
terminated by DHS.
ee. The DHS Director did not have to sign a FAPR if she were on extended
leave.
ff. The contract between DHS and Flannery was for staff training.
gg. Leidecker knew that if Flannery left Computerland, DHS would follow where
Flannery would go based upon conversations with Bartholomew.
102. Leidecker was required by Bartholomew to make computer and related purchases
through Flannery when Flannery was employed at Computerland and then at
WNYCSI.
103. Mark Irons is a distributor network specialist for DHS.
a. Irons was initially hired as a Computer Operator I in 1994.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 47
(1) The duties for the position entailed monitoring the computers and
networks and purchasing computer equipment.
(2) Irons is still responsible for computer purchases.
(3) Leidecker was Irons' supervisor.
b. The process of purchasing computers for DHS would begin after Leidecker
informed Irons of a need for new computers.
c. Due to state mandates, DHS had to increase its proficiency which
necessitated an increase in computer purchases.
d. When there was a need to purchase computers at DHS, Irons would obtain
pricing from vendors.
(1) An FAPR would be completed by Irons or Leidecker.
(a) An FAPR for over $300 would have to be approved by the
DHS Director, Bartholomew.
A purchase could not be made unless the Director
approved the FAPR.
ii. On occasion, Director Bartholomew gave verbal
approvals followed by her signing at a later time.
(b) Irons would then buy the asset with a purchase order.
(c) When the asset is received, the accompanying invoice is given
to the DHS Director for signature.
(2) Irons never made a computer purchase that was not authorized by
the DHS Director.
e. For an item under $300 or software, a request for supplies would be used.
(1) Any such request for an item over $100 would need to have the
signature of the Director.
(a) An item between $50 and $100 would need the approval of an
associate director.
f. In June of 1994, Irons questioned purchasing computers from Computerland
due to better pricing through mail order from Dell or Gateway.
g.
(1) Irons was told by Leidecker to stay with Computerland.
(a) Flannery was the sales agent for Computerland.
(b) Purchases from Computerland had the Director's approval.
Irons happened to place an order with Computerland in late 1996 or early
1997 when Flannery was on vacation.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 48
(a) Bartholomew told Irons that he was to purchase only from
Flannery.
(b) Irons informed Bartholomew that the purchase was from
Computerland which was approved on the FAPR.
Bartholomew indicated that Irons should buy from
Flannery.
(c) The atmosphere in Bartholomew's office was stern.
(d) Irons knew that he was instructed by Bartholomew to buy only
from Flannery at Computerland.
h. Irons brought up the issue of computer pricing on more than one occasion.
(a) It was clear to Irons that Bartholomew meant Computerland
when she referred to standardizing with one vendor.
Irons prepared a FAPR for purchasing word processing software,
WordPerfect.
J.
(1) Sometime after the purchase was made, Irons was called to
Bartholomew's office.
(1) In meetings with Bartholomew, she would respond that they would
continue to standardize with one vendor.
(1) Irons did not include Computerland because he could buy
WordPerfect cheaper elsewhere.
(a) Even though Irons told Bartholomew that he could get
WordPerfect cheaper from another vendor, Bartholomew told
Irons that they were to standardize under one vendor.
Irons bought WordPerfect from Computerland.
(2) When Irons prepared a FAPR for other software, Bartholomew asked
him why the purchase could not be from Computerland.
(a) Irons informed Bartholomew that those items were not
available from Computerland.
Bartholomew was satisfied that Irons attempted to
comply.
When DHS needed to purchase 23 computers, Irons went to Computerland.
(1) Irons was not satisfied with the performance of the computers at
Computerland.
(2) Irons obtained a quote from Dell which was about $500 less per
computer.
(a) Bartholomew's response was that they were standardizing with
one vendor, Computerland.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 49
(b) Irons was told by Bartholomew to stop rocking the boat" about
pricing.
k. DHS stopped buying computers from Computerland right at the time that
Flannery changed her employment to WNYCSI.
(1) DHS never purchased computer products from WNYCSI prior to
Flannery working for that company.
Irons believed that he had to buy computers from wherever Flannery was
working.
m. After Bartholomew left DHS, Irons has not purchased computers from
WNYCSI
n. Computerland was the only local vendor in the area.
o. If DHS had a problem with computers, Flannery would try to take care of it,
whether she was at Computerland or WNYCSI.
p. DHS had dissatisfaction with Computerland prior to Sherrie leaving the
company.
q.
The computer purchases made during the time when Bartholomew was
Director were necessary.
r. Irons was told by Bartholomew when he was in her office to buy computers
from Sherrie.
104. Irons was required by Bartholomew to make computer and related purchases
through Flannery when she was employed at Computerland and then at WNYCSI.
105. Bartholomew, for the relevant time period, engaged in a continuous course of
conduct to compel Leidecker and Irons to make purchases of computers and
related items from Computerland when Flannery was employed by that company
and then from WNYCSI when Flannery switched employment to that company.
106. Jason Bricker is a special investigator for the State Ethics Commission.
a. Bricker was the primary case agent as to the Bartholomew investigation.
b. Flannery received a 15% commission on the gross profit of her sales for
Computerland.
c. From July of 1994 through September of 1997, Bricker determined that
Flannery made $7,488 in commissions as to her sales from Computerland to
DHS.
d. From 1997 through 1998, Bricker determined that Flannery made $12, 829 in
commissions on sales from WNYCSI to DHS.
e. A review of the minutes of Forrest - Warren County does not reflect any
approval of a consulting contract with DHS by Flannery in 1993.
f. Some of the DHS FAPR's did not contain a signature of Bartholomew.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 50
g.
A review of the Financial Interests Statements (FIS's) filings reflect that there
were no filings for Bartholomew for the calendar years 1995, 1996, and
1998.
107. The Governing Board never received nor approved the engagement of Flannery to
provide computer training services at DHS.
108. Bartholomew failed to timely file FIS's for the calendar years 1995, 1996 and 1998.
109. Flannery is the daughter of Bartholomew.
a. While a college student, Flannery had summer jobs at DHS.
b. Flannery began working at Computerland in July of 1991.
(1) Shortly after Flannery began working, she contracted DHS which was
within her Pennsylvania sales territory.
(2) Flannery worked on commission which was 15% of the gross profit.
c. From 1991 to 1994 or 1995, Flannery had a relationship with Leidecker at
DHS regarding purchases of computer equipment.
d. Computerland was the only local value -added (computer) reseller in the area
of DHS.
(1) Computerland provided service to DHS.
e. Bartholomew knew that Flannery worked at Computerland and the two would
see each other at DHS.
f. Flannery was under contact to provide training to DHS personnel.
g. In November of 1997, Flannery switched jobs from Computerland to
WNYCSI.
(1) WNYCSI had no presence in the Warren area before Flannery
became employed by that company.
(2) Flannery informed her accounts, including DHS, that she switched
employments.
(3) WNYCSI would service what it sold.
(4) Flannery sold several hundred thousands of dollars of computer
equipment to DHS.
h. Flannery got the commissions on sales to DHS when her initials were on the
invoices.
Flannery was not privy to conversations between Bartholomew and
Leidecker or Irons about computers.
110. Bartholomew was the Director of DHS from 1991 until termination.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 51
a. Bartholomew received excellent evaluations in her position as DHS Director.
b. The Director of DHS plans, organizes, manages, directs, and administers the
work of the department.
c. The Director of DHS directs the operation of said service programs in the
two counties, ensures the provision of client mandated services, and
develops programs to meet the needs for treatment /quality of life for the area
population.
d. The Director is responsible for the preparation of annual service plans,
budget, and service coordination.
e. As DHS Director, Bartholomew reported to the Governing Board which was
comprised of six commissioners from the two counties.
f. Computerization became necessary at DHS due to the increase in state
requirements in areas of statistics, fiscal requirements, and documentation.
The contract between DHS and Flannery for training services was signed by
Bartholomew on behalf of DHS.
g.
h. Bartholomew states that Leidecker was interested in Flannery for a new DHS
position.
(1) Bartholomew states that she told Leidecker that Leidecker herself
would have to take the matter to the Governing Board.
Bartholomew believed that it was not a problem for Flannery to work part -
time for DHS.
J.
When Bartholomew first became Director, DHS bought its computers from
Computerland.
(1) Bartholomew testified that she told Leidecker to handle computer
purchases because Bartholomew wanted to distance herself given
Flannery's involvement in selling computers.
k. Bartholomew states that she never forced Leidecker or Irons to buy
computers from Computerland when Flannery was working there.
Bartholomew knew that Flannery was going to WNYCSI right about the time
that Flannery accepted the position.
(1) Leidecker had been complaining to Bartholomew about Computerland
for months before Flannery switched jobs.
m. Bartholomew was suspended as DHS Director in August of 1998.
n. Bartholomew testified that she believed she filed FIS's for every year in
which she was required.
o. The Governing Board delegated to Bartholomew as the Director of DHS the
responsibility for all contracting except that which would involve
extraordinary circumstances.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 52
p.
q.
It was the normal process to take matters of hiring relatives of DHS
employees to the Governing Board of Commissioners.
(1) The process included familial relationships such as parent and child.
Bartholomew states that she did not have to take the hiring of Flannery to do
the training of DHS employees to the Governing Board on the basis that it
was a contract rather than an employment situation.
r. On or about April 4, 1993, Governing Board Executive Session, the matter of
MIS assistance for the computer network expert was considered.
(1) Bartholomew did not mention Flannery's name relative to this position.
(2) Flannery was hired for the timeframe of April 1, 1993, to June 30,
1993.
(3) There was no approval by the Board but the contract with Flannery
was executed by Bartholomew.
s. Bartholomew concedes that her telling Irons to place an order with Flannery
was not consistent with the statement that she distanced herself with
computer purchases involving Flannery.
t. As to the hiring of Flannery, Bartholomew admits her involvement and the
failure to distance herself from the process.
u. Bartholomew admits that when she signed FAPR's for Computerland and the
WNYCSI, she knew Flannery was employed there on a sales commission
basis.
C. Documents
111. Exhibit ID -2, pp 3, 4, 6, and 10, are photocopies of some of the agreements
between Flannery and DHS to provide computer consulting and training at the rate
of $15 per hour.
a. The term of each agreement is for a fiscal year.
b. The agreement is signed by Bartholomew on behalf of DHS.
c. An addendum, ID2, p 8 (and 9), provides for travel and meals for the period
from January 1, 1997, to June 30, 1997.
112. Exhibit ID -3 are photocopies in part of DHS checks issued to Computerland,
Computerland invoices to DHS, DHS order request forms, DHS FAPR forms,
Computerland printout, and other miscellaneous documents.
113. Exhibit ID -4 are photocopies in part of DHS checks issued to WNYCSI, WNYCSI
invoices to DHS, DHS order request forms, DHS FAPR forms and other
miscellaneous forms.
114. Exhibit ID -6 are photocopies of W -2 statements prepared by WNYCSI for Flannery,
payroll statement for Flannery, sales summary sheet for Flannery for 1997,
"Attachment 1" reflecting Flannery's sales commission of 20% of gross profit from
Fiscal Year
Compensation for
Training Services
Performed in Fiscal Year
7/94 to 6/95
$1,005.00
7/95 to 6/96
2,062.50
7/96 to 6/97
1,860.00
7/97 forward
None
$4,927.50
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 53
sales. Sales listing to DHS for 1998 (pp 8 -19), sales history for services to DHS for
1998 (p 21), and balance due WNYCSI by DHS as of 10/31/98.
a. The gross profit made by WNYCSI as to sales by Flannery to DHS in 1997
was $10,635.32 ($62,883 - $52,247.68) (p 3).
(1) Flannery's 20% commission (p 7) for 1997 totaled $2,127.00.
b. The gross profit made by WNYCSI as to sales by Flannery to DHS in 1998
was $48,123.09 (pp 8 -19) computed as follows: $283,508.00 - $234,977.05
= $48,530.95 (gross profit). $48,530.95 — (gross profit from 2 credit card
purchases (p 10)) $43.80 — (gross profit as to two pending invoices, numbers
027130 and 027666 (pp 19, 20)) $364.06 = $48,123.09.
(1) Flannery's 20% commission for 1998 as to sales of computers and
related parts totaled $9,624.62.
c. ID -6, p 21, is a photocopy of the sales of service by WNYCSI to DHS in
1998.
(1) Excluding certain handwritten notation, there is no breakdown of
gross profit for WNYCSI as to the service sales.
115. Exhibit ID -8 are photocopies of the following:
a. An agenda for a 4/6/93 Executive Session of the Governing Board of DHS.
b. Executive Session Minutes of the Governing Board of DHS for 4/4/93.
1. Bartholomew references Leidecker's need for additional help.
116. Exhibit ID -11 are photocopies in part of documents relating to the training services
that Flannery provided to DHS.
a. From July of 1994 forward, Flannery received $4,927.50 in compensation
(excluding meals and mileage) from DHS for providing such training
services:
b. Flannery also received expenses relative to providing such training service.
117. Exhibit ID -13 are photocopies of an agenda and minutes of a Governing Board
Meeting for 1/18/94.
a. Item IV of the agenda was a "Request for New Position — Marlene
Leidecker ".
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 54
b. Bartholomew was present for the 1/19/94 meeting.
c. Leidecker requested consideration of hiring Flannery to a DHS position.
1. A motion carried in a 2 to 1 vote as follows: that after local
advertising, internal posting at DHS and completely following all Civil
Service procedures, interviewing of all qualified candidates, Marlene
could consider the hiring of Flannery if she were the best candidate
for the position.
118. Exhibit ID -14 is a photocopy of a Resolution of the Governing Board of DHS for
Bartholomew to execute on behalf of the Board "contracts for services as are
necessary in the ordinary course of business."
119. Exhibit R -2 is a copy of an FIS of Bartholomew which contains a date of 4/30/99 for
filing year 1998.
a. The document does not contain a filing date stamp.
120. Exhibit R -4 and R -6 are photocopies of performance evaluation reports for
Bartholomew.
a. With the exception of one blank in one report, Bartholomew received
"excellent" ratings.
121. Exhibit R -7 are photocopies in part of FIS's for Bartholomew.
122. Exhibits R -8 are copies of FIS's for Bartholomew for the 1995 and 1996 calendar
years containing dates of 11/16/01 for both forms.
a. Neither FIS contains a time stamp date.
III. DISCUSSION:
At all times relevant to this matter, the Respondent, Linda Bartholomew, hereinafter
Bartholomew, was a public employee subject to the provisions of the Public Official and
Employee Ethics Law, Act 9 of 1989, Pamphlet Law 26, 65 P.S. §401, et seq., as codified
by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, Act 93 of 1998, Chapter 11, 65 Pa.C.S.
§1101 et seq., which Acts are referred to herein as the "Ethics Act."
The allegations are that Bartholomew as Director of the Forest - Warren Counties
Department of Human Services (DHS), violated Sections 3(a)/1103(a) and 4(a)/1104(a) of
the Ethics Act when she directed and approved computer and related purchases from
businesses employing her daughter as a sales representative; when she selected her
daughter as a paid consultant for DHS; and when she failed to file Statements of Financial
Interests (FIS's) for the calendar years 1995, 1996, and 1998.
Pursuant to Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee
is prohibited from engaging in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest.
Section 4(a)/1104(a) of the Ethics Act requires that each public official /public
employee must file an FIS for the preceding calendar year by May 1 of each year that he
holds the position and of the year after he leaves such a position.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 55
facts.
Having noted the issues and applicable law, we shall now summarize the relevant
Bartholomew was employed as the Director of DHS of Forrest - Warren Counties
from 1991 until 1999. Prior to that time, Bartholomew held other positions with DHS. As
Director of DHS, Bartholomew had the duty and responsibility, inter alia, to plan, organize,
manage, direct, administer, hire, and contract for that agency.
During the 1990's, the Commonwealth imposed greater requirements upon DHS
which required the purchase of additional computers.
Marlene Leidecker, as the Information Systems Director for DHS, and then Mark
Irons, as the Distributor Network Specialist for DHS, purchased computers from various
vendors including a local vendor, Computerland.
Bartholomew, as DHS Director, was involved in the computer purchasing process.
Typically, Leidecker, Irons, an associate director, and Bartholomew as DHS Director,
determined whether there was a need to purchase a requested item. The ultimate arbiter
for purchasing an item rested with Bartholomew. If the need were established, a Fixed
Asset Purchase Request (FAPR) was prepared which Bartholomew as the DHS Director
would sign. A purchase order was then sent to the vendor which supplied the item along
with an invoice. The invoice was then signed by Bartholomew as an approval for payment.
This was the process that was used for the purchase of items of $100 or more.
In July of 1991, Sherrie Bartholomew - Flannery (Flannery), Bartholomew's daughter,
became employed by Computerland on a sales commission basis. DHS, being in the sales
territory of Flannery, became one of her customers. DHS had made purchases from
Computerland as well as other vendors prior to Flannery's employment.
Bartholomew had discussions with Leidecker or Irons about purchases of
computers, peripherals, and related equipment. Bartholomew informed Leidecker and
Irons that DHS would make all of its computer purchases from Computerland.
Bartholomew took such action under the guise of having all purchases standardized under
one local vendor which could service the computers and related equipment. On different
occasions, either Leidecker or Irons met with Bartholomew to advise that computers or
related equipment could be bought elsewhere at substantially lower prices. However,
Bartholomew rebuffed their efforts and dismissed their concerns by typically responding
that the decision to standardize under one local vendor had already been made. Both
Leidecker and Irons, two credible and disinterested witnesses, testified that they had to
purchase only from Computerland as per Bartholomew's direction.
This directive from Bartholomew to Leidecker and Irons to buy from Computerland
was continuous in nature. When Irons wanted to buy word processing software from
another vendor, he was instructed by Bartholomew to buy from Computerland because of
the standardization of purchases under one local vendor. On another occasion when Irons
sought to purchase software from another company, he was called into Bartholomew's
office and asked why he would not be purchasing from Computerland. After Irons informed
Bartholomew that Computerland did not carry the software, Irons then received the
approval from Bartholomew to purchase from the other company.
The sales commissions that Bartholomew's daughter received from the sales from
Computerland to DHS were of great concern to Bartholomew. Thus, when Irons made a
purchase from Computerland and another sales person got the commission because
Flannery was away, Irons was reprimanded by Bartholomew. Irons was told by
Bartholomew that purchases from Computerland must be done so that Flannery would
receive the commissions. Even though Leidecker and Irons knew that comparable
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 56
equipment could be purchased at $500 to $1,000 less per unit, and even though Leidecker
was very dissatisfied with the service at Computerland, DHS continued to purchase
computers from Computerland and utilized Computerland to service the equipment until
Flannery switched employment. From July 1, 1994, until Flannery left Computerland, DHS
made purchases in excess of $350,000 from that business.
When Flannery terminated employment with Computerland and became associated
with Western New York Computer Systems, Incorporated (WNYCSI), Bartholomew had a
discussion with Leidecker about whether Leidecker would have a problem with DHS now
making its computer purchases from WNYCSI. Because Leidecker knew she had no
choice in the matter, she did not pose any objection to Bartholomew. In the fall of 1997
after Flannery shifted employment from Computerland to WNYCSI, DHS no longer
purchased from Computerland and began purchasing from WNYCSI. Flannery worked for
WNYCSI on a sales commission basis and received 20% of the gross profit on all sales
that she made for WNYCSI. While at WNYCSI, Flannery also received commissions on
the sales of repair services by WNYCSI to its customers, including DHS.
DHS began buying computers and related equipment from WNYCSI from the fall of
1997 until August 27, 1998, when Bartholomew was suspended as DHS Director by the
Governing Board of Commissioners of Forrest and Warren Counties. Bartholomew was
terminated on February 16, 1999. From November of 1997 through August of 1998, DHS
made purchases from WNYCSI in excess of $360,000.
Separate and apart from computer and related purchases by DHS from businesses
that employed Bartholomew's daughter as a sales agent, there were two other matters
concerning Flannery as a paid consultant or a full -time employee at DHS.
The first matter regarding Flannery involved computer training services for DHS. At
a meeting of the Governing Board on April 4, 1993, Bartholomew noted that Leidecker was
in need of help. Bartholomew failed to mention to the Board that she entered into a
consulting contract with her daughter several days earlier to provide training services. The
term of the first contract was from April 1, 1993 to June 30, 1993. Thereafter, Bartholomew
entered into contracts at the beginning of each fiscal year so that the contracts ran from
July 1 to June 30 of the following year. Bartholomew ostensibly did not seek approval from
the Board on the theory that it was not an employment position but rather a contract for the
provision of services. Bartholomew entered into the yearly contracts with Flannery to
provide computer training services at $15 per hour. In subsequent years, mileage and
meal reimbursement provisions were added to the contracts.
The second matter occurred in 1994 when Bartholomew determined that Leidecker
needed an assistant. The matter was placed before the Governing Board in January of
1994 for the approval of a new position. Before the matter went before the Board,
Bartholomew had a discussion with Leidecker and indicated to her that she (Bartholomew)
would like Leidecker to give consideration to hiring Flannery as her assistant. Leidecker
construed Bartholomew's statement to mean that she (Leidecker) had no choice but to hire
Flannery. Bartholomew instructed Leidecker to present the matter to the Board because
Flannery was her daughter. When Leidecker made her presentation to the Board, it
approved the position but required Leidecker to locally advertise, internally post at DHS
following all civil service procedures, interview all qualified applicants, and then hire
Flannery only if she were the best candidate for the position. After following such
procedures, Leidecker hired Irons for the position.
Lastly, Bartholomew, as DHS Director, was required to file FIS's. However, a review
of records at DHS reflected that no FIS's were on file for the calendar years 1995, 1996,
and 1998.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 57
The parties have filed briefs.
The Investigative Division seeks violations of the Ethics Act arguing that:
Bartholomew used her position as DHS Director to direct Leidecker and Irons to purchase
computers and related equipment and materials from two businesses that employed
Bartholomew's daughter on a sales commission basis; Bartholomew used the authority of
her office to sign FAPR's and invoices from those two businesses as to such purchases
thereby generating sales commissions to Flannery; Bartholomew used public office to hire
Flannery as a paid consultant to DHS; and Bartholomew failed to file FIS's for the calendar
years 1995, 1996, and 1998 by May 1 of the following respective years. In addition, the
Investigative Division asserts that Bartholomew is not credible and that restitution of
$25,244.50 should be imposed as to the financial gain received by Flannery plus
$94,964.18 as to the financial gain received by the two businesses with which Flannery
was associated. Finally, the Investigative Division advocates for a referral of the case to
law enforcement authorities for review as to the institution of a criminal prosecution.
Bartholomew asserts that she did not violate the Ethics Act, arguing: the DHS
computers were purchased from businesses that provided the best prices and service in
the area; Computerland was a state approved vendor and purchases at WNYCSI were at
federal government prices; the hiring of Flannery for providing the training services in April
of 1994 was done prior to July of 1994 so as to be beyond the five year statute of
limitations of the Ethics Act; and FIS's were filed timely by Bartholomew for all calendar
years except 1995 and 1996. Bartholomew asserts that she did not knowingly violate the
Ethics Act and that she obtained the finest computer systems from DHS at no loss to the
state, so that only technical violations at most should be found with no penalty, given the
loss of her job as Director and other hardships.
Having summarized the above relevant facts and positions of the parties, we must
now determine whether the actions of Bartholomew violated Sections 3(a)/1103(a) and
4(a)/1104(a) of the Ethics Act.
There was an ongoing use of authority of office by Bartholomew as to directing
computer purchases and related equipment by DHS to businesses that employed her
daughter on a sales commission basis. Bartholomew was involved at DHS in the
purchasing process as summarized above. The Governing Board did not know and
consequently never approved of any computer or related purchases.
Such involvement by Bartholomew was absolute as to computer purchases and
related equipment. Bartholomew alone made the decision to purchase computers and
related equipment from a local standardized vendor, Computerland. Despite the
protestations of Leidecker and Irons on several occasions that better quality items could
be purchased elsewhere at lower prices, Bartholomew directed them to purchase from
Computerland where Bartholomew's daughter was employed as a sales agent.
Bartholomew was definitive in her direction that such purchases must be made from
Computerland. When Irons sought to purchase software at a better price from another
vendor, Bartholomew dictated that the purchase had to be made from Computerland,
ostensibly on the basis of the standardization under one vendor. When Irons informed
Bartholomew that computers could be obtained elsewhere at savings of $500 per unit for a
big multiple computer purchase, the response was standardization under one vendor.
Bartholomew on one occasion told Irons not to rock the boat. When Irons was informed by
Bartholomew that he could not buy software from another vendor, Bartholomew relented
only after Irons told her that Computerland did not carry the software.
The true reason behind Bartholomew's standardization for Computerland became
quite evident when Irons made a purchase from Computerland at a time when Flannery
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 58
was absent so that the commission was received by another sales person. Irons was
called to task by Bartholomew, who informed him that he must ensure that his purchases
from Computerland were done in a fashion so that her daughter would receive the sales
commission.
This conduct by Bartholomew continued until November of 1997 when Flannery
changed jobs from Computerland to Western New York Computing Systems, Inc.,
(WNYCSI). At that time, Bartholomew finally acknowledged the very poor service by
Computerland and then rhetorically asked Leidecker if Leidecker would have a problem if
DHS would begin making purchases of computers and related products from WNYCSI.
From that point, Leidecker and Irons, knowing that they were under Bartholomew's
direction to do so, made purchases from WNYCSI until Bartholomew was suspended in
August of 1998.
The above conduct of Bartholomew establishes continuing and ongoing uses of
office by her until the time of her suspension. Juliante, Order 809. The uses of authority
of office by Bartholomew resulted in private pecuniary benefits consisting of the sales
commissions that her daughter, Flannery, received both at Computerland and WNYCSI in
selling computers and related products to DHS. Flannery, as the daughter of
Bartholomew, is a member of her immediate family as that term is defined under the Ethics
Act. See, Section 402/1102 of the Ethics Act.
Private pecuniary benefits also inured to both Computerland and WNYCSI as to the
profits they made on the sales of the computers and related products to DHS. Those two
companies are businesses with which a member of Bartholomew's immediate family is
associated in that Flannery was employed as a sales agent on a commission basis with
those businesses. Accordingly, violations of Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act
occurred when Bartholomew, as DHS Director, used the authority of office for the
pecuniary benefit of her daughter and the businesses which employed her daughter by
directing computer and computer related purchases from those businesses which
generated sales commissions to her daughter and profits to the business which employed
her daughter.
As noted above, Bartholomew not only directed Leidecker and Irons to purchase
from Computerland and then WNYCSI, but Bartholomew participated in the process
leading up to the actual purchases. Bartholomew had to give her approval when any
individual or department wanted to make purchases over $100. Bartholomew had to sign
the FAPR's as DHS Director for such purchases. Bartholomew had to sign off on the
invoices when purchases were made in order for the vendors to receive payment. All such
actions by Bartholomew were uses of authority of office. Such approvals by Bartholomew
were integral and necessary steps resulting in Computerland and WNYCSI receiving
profits in the sales to DHS and Flannery receiving the sales commissions. Through such
approvals, private pecuniary benefits inured to Computerland, WNYCSI, and to Flannery.
Accordingly, Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used
the authority of office by approving purchases or signing documents in order for DHS to
buy computer and related equipment from Computerland and WNYCSI which generated
profits to both businesses and sales commissions to her daughter who was employed by
those businesses.
The culpability of Bartholomew in this case is in reality conceded by the following
statements in her brief:
Bartholomew does not dispute that DHS purchased
from companies that employed her daughter, nor does she
dispute that she knew (and approved) of these purchases.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 59
However, Bartholomew did not know it was a violation of the
Ethics laws to purchase from her daughter's companies.
Thus, while she [Bartholomew] does not believe she unfairly
(and illegally) pressured her employees to purchase only from
Computerland and WNY, she acknowledges that they could
have interpreted her actions as such pressure.
(Bartholomew's Brief at 20, 21).
Turning to the consulting services that Flannery performed for DHS on an annual
basis, Bartholomew used the authority of her office to retain Flannery to provide such
training services. Bartholomew did not seek approval of the Governing Board to retain
Flannery. Although Bartholomew asserts that the Governing Board approved the hiring of
Flannery in April of 1994, the Board did not give any such approval. To the contrary,
Bartholomew entered into contracts, the first being for the period from April 1, 1993, until
June 30, 1993, for Flannery to provide training services to DHS personnel at the rate of
$15 per hour. Thereafter on a fiscal year basis, July 1 to June 30 ", Bartholomew entered
into subsequent contracts with Flannery and signed on behalf of DHS as its Director. The
execution of each annual contract by Bartholomew with Flannery was a use of authority of
office. Bartholomew solely made the decision to retain Flannery and executed the
contracts by signing as DHS Director. Such uses of authority of office each year by
Bartholomew resulted in private pecuniary benefits consisting of the compensation that
Flannery received for providing those services. That private pecuniary benefit inured to
Flannery who is a member of Bartholomew's immediate family as noted above.
Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) when she used the authority of office to retain
her daughter on a yearly basis to provide training services for personnel at DHS for the
fiscal years July 1, 1994, to June 30, 1995, and thereafter.
Our decision conforms to prior Commission and judicial precedent. See, Holvey,
Order 1039, affirmed Holvey v. SEC, 815 C.D. 1997 (Pa. Commw. 1998), wherein we
found that a vo- technical school director violated the Ethics Act when he hired his spouse
to teach courses at the school.
The final allegation relates to the failure by Bartholomew to file FIS's for the
calendar years 1995, 1996, and 1998 on or before May 1 of the respective following
years. In that the record before us reflects that such filings were not made, we find that
Bartholomew violated Section 4(a)/1104(a) of the Ethics Act when she failed to file FIS's
for the calendar years 1995, 1996, and 1998 on or before May 1 of the respective
following years.
Bartholomew argues that she did not violate the Ethics Act because she acted
reasonably and for the best interest of DHS under the circumstances, with her daughter
incidentally benefiting as a result. This irrelevant argument of Bartholomew simply fails
based upon the facts of record. First, the facts reflect that DHS could have purchased
better computers at lower prices elsewhere, at a price reduction of $500 to $1,000 per unit.
Bartholomew, however, chose to purchase exclusively from the companies that were
employing Flannery at the time. The fact that Computerland was a state vendor and
WNYCSI's prices were at federal government levels are immaterial. Factually, computers
could have been purchased elsewhere at cheaper prices. Legally, buying through such
companies could not negate Ethics Act violations. The assertion that a local vendor would
give better service is not true. It is undisputed that the service by Computerland was very
bad. This was conveyed to Bartholomew by Leidecker and Irons but Bartholomew was not
concerned about the bad service until Flannery changed positions; only then was the bad
service used in a conversation by Bartholomew to Leidecker as a basis for changing to
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 60
WNYCSI. In short, Bartholomew's statement that her computer and related equipment
purchases were the best for DHS and only incidentally benefited her daughter is totally
erroneous. First, it was not best for DHS in that better computers at cheaper prices could
have been purchased elsewhere. Second, it did not incidentally benefit her daughter; to
the contrary, it directly benefited Flannery as a result of deliberative action by
Bartholomew.
Regarding the hiring of Flannery by Bartholomew to provide DHS training services,
Bartholomew argues that no violation could occur because the Governing Board approved
the hiring in April of 1994 which was beyond the five year statute of limitations.
Bartholomew is in error both factually and legally. The investigation in this case
commenced on May 20, 1999. Five years prior to that date was May 20, 1994. Flannery
was retained to provide services by Bartholomew without any approval by the Board. With
the exception of the first short period, the hiring was done each year by Bartholomew on a
July 1 to June 30 fiscal year basis. The Investigative Division is pursuing the case only as
to the contracts from July 1, 1994, forward, which are within the statute of limitations.
Bartholomew used the authority of office on July 1, 1994, and thereafter by entering into
contracts at those times and signing as DHS Director.
Finally, as to the argument by Bartholomew that she did not intend to violate the
Ethics Act, intent is not a prerequisite for finding a violation of the Ethics Act. See,
McCutchen v. SEC, 466 A.2d 283 (Pa. Commw. 1982).
Bartholomew's actions in this case and the consequences are indeed very
unfortunate. There is no question that Bartholomew was a hard working, intelligent
Director for DHS. Further, through Bartholomew's efforts, DHS was able to grow to meet
the increased demands from its clientele as well as from the Commonwealth in terms of its
additional requirements. Bartholomew's actions in running DHS were commendable as
reflected in the excellent performance evaluations that she received.
Unfortunately, Bartholomew as an adjunct to her position saw the opportunity to
benefit her daughter through the use of the authority of her office. Unfortunately, such
actions were not incidental to buying computers but were an integral part of her actions.
Unfortunately, her directions to subordinates Leidecker and Irons were motivated for one
purpose only, namely, that computer purchases and related equipment be made from
companies that employed her daughter so that her daughter would receive sales
commissions. Such actions by Bartholomew were violations of the Ethics Act and a
violation of the public trust. Bartholomew made the public interest yield to a private
interest, her daughter's business interests, which is contrary to both the letter and spirit of
the Ethics Act. See, Crisci, Opinion 89 -013.
Section 407(13)/1107(13) of the Ethics Act specifically empowers this Commission
to impose restitution plus interest in those cases where a public official /employee has
received a financial gain in violation of the Ethics Act.
Except for the 1998 year, (Fact Finding 64.a.) the Investigative Division in its
Investigative Complaint avers specified amounts for the compensation that Flannery
received for providing training services to DHS and for commissions that she received on
sales of computers and related equipment while an employee at Computerland as well as
for the commissions on the sales of such equipment and services while an employee at
WNYCSI. The sum proffered by the Investigative Division for 1998 was not finalized at the
conclusion of the investigation due to an outstanding balance by DHS as to some
purchases from WNYCSI which were not reflected in the total commissions that Flannery
eventually received for that year. See, Fact Findings 64, 67.
Bartholomew in her answer has admitted as to the accuracy of the amounts averred
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 61
by the Investigative Division but has denied that she has violated the Ethics Act.
With the exception of the 1998 year which will be discussed infra, the amounts of
fees received by Flannery are as follows: $4,927.50 for providing training services to DHS
employees; $7,486.00 in sales commissions for sales to DHS from Computerland; and
$2,127.00 for sales to DHS from WNYCSI in 1997.
The Investigative Division at hearing determined that Flannery received a total of
$10,702.00 in both sales and service commissions from WNYCSI to DHS. In that the
amount of commissions for 1998 has not been resolved through the pleadings of the
parties, it is incumbent upon us to make that determination. WNYCSI has provided a
computer printout of its sales to DHS in 1998. See Exhibit ID -6, pages 8 -19. In that
Flannery's 20% commission at WNYCSI is computed upon gross profit, that figure is
determined by subtracting the invoice price from the cost price as to every sale made by
WNYCSI to DHS.
For 1998, the total gross profit is $48,530.95 which we reduced by excluding two
groups of entries: the sales identified by Invoice Numbers 27130 and 27666 which at the
time were still not paid by DHS and two MasterCard purchases (Exhibit ID -6, page 10)
which are questionable. After excluding those two groupings, the gross profit by WNYCSI
on DHS sales by Flannery totaled $48,123.09. Applying the 20% commission to that
amount, Flannery received sales commissions totaling $9,624.62 in 1998.
Turning to the matter of the service commissions in 1998, Exhibit ID -6, page 21,
reflects the total amount of services performed by WNYCSI for DHS in 1998. The invoice
reflects a total charge of $22,889.50; however, we are unable to determine from the record
before us the amount of commissions Flannery received on such services from WNYCSI to
DHS. Although we are able to exclude the unpaid balance by DHS owing to WNYCSI from
Exhibit ID -6, page 20, we do not know the amount of gross profit that WNYCSI received on
the sale of such services to DHS. In this regard, we do note a handwritten notation on ID-
6, page 21, which contains a "65 %... cost..." which presumably indicates a gross profit of
35% on such sales of service. However, we believe that such notation does not provide a
basis for us to make a determination, based upon clear and convincing proof, of gross
profit as to the services and hence we make no finding as to Flannery's commission on
such services.
Accordingly, restitution will be based upon the sum of the above compensation
received by Flannery, excluding the commissions on services sold by WNYCSI to DHS in
1998. That amount is $24,165.12, determined as follows: $4,927.50 in consulting fees
received by Flannery in providing training at DHS; $7,486.00 in commissions Flannery
received as to sales from Computerland to DHS; $2,127.00 in commissions received by
Flannery as to sales by WNYCSI to DHS in 1997; and $9,624.62 in sales (but not
services) commissions received by Flannery from WNYCSI to DHS in 1998. As noted, the
parties agree to the accuracy of these figures (except WNYCSI in 1998) in their pleadings.
Accordingly Bartholomew is directed within 30 days from the date of this order to make
payment of $24,165.12 through this Commission to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Noncompliance will result in an order enforcement action.
IV. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1. Bartholomew, as Director of the Forest - Warren Counties Department of Human
Services, was a public employee subject to the provisions of Act 9 of 1989, as now
codified by Act 93 of 1998.
Bartholomew, 99- 018 -C2
Page 62
2. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to direct purchases by DHS from Computerland, a business
with which Bartholomew's daughter was associated as the sales representative.
3. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to approve or sign requisite documents as to purchases by
DHS from Computerland, a business with which Bartholomew's daughter was
associated as the sales representative.
4. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to direct purchases by DHS from Western New York
Computing Systems, Inc., a business with which Bartholomew's daughter was
associated as the sales representative.
5. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to approve or sign requisite documents as to purchases by
DHS from Western New York Computing Systems, Inc., a business with which
Bartholomew's daughter was associated as the sales representative.
6. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to hire her daughter to provide computer training services to
DHS personnel for the period from July 1, 1994, forward.
7 Bartholomew violated Section 4(a)/1104(a) of the Ethics Act when she failed to
timely file Statements of Financial Interests for the calendar years 1995, 1996 and
1998 .
In Re: Linda Bartholomew
File Docket: 99- 018 -C2
Date Decided: 5/15/01
Date Mailed: 5/30/01
ORDER NO. 1195
1 Bartholomew, as Director of the Forest - Warren Counties Department of Human
Services, violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to direct purchases by DHS from Computerland, a business
with which Bartholomew's daughter was associated as the sales representative.
2. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to approve or sign requisite documents as to purchases by
DHS from Computerland, a business with which Bartholomew's daughter was
associated as the sales representative.
3. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to direct purchases by DHS from Western New York
Computing Systems, Inc., a business with which Bartholomew's daughter was
associated as the sales representative.
4. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to approve or sign requisite documents as to purchases by
DHS from Western New York Computing Systems, Inc., a business with which
Bartholomew's daughter was associated as the sales representative.
5. Bartholomew violated Section 3(a)/1103(a) of the Ethics Act when she used the
authority of her office to hire her daughter to provide computer training services to
DHS personnel for the period from July 1, 1994, forward.
6. Bartholomew violated Section 4(a)/1104(a) of the Ethics Act when she failed to
timely file Statements of Financial Interests for the calendar years 1995, 1996 and
1998.
7 Bartholomew is directed within 30 days of the date of mailing of this order to make
payment of $24,165.12 through this Commission to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. Failure to comply will result in the institution of an order enforcement
action.
BY THE COMMISSION,
DANEEN E. REESE, CHAIR