HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-597 LenoardDaniel D. Leonard, P.E.
8 Horizon Drive
Selinsgrove, PA 17870
Dear Mr. Leonard:
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
October 30, 2001
01 -597
Re: Former Public Employee; Section 1103(g); Manager, Incident Management
Section; Civil Engineer Manager; Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic
Engineering; PennDOT.
This responds to your letter of October 1, 2001, by which you requested advice
from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., presents any restrictions upon employment of the Manager of
PennDOT's Incident Management Section, classified as a Civil Engineer Manager,
following termination of service with PennDOT.
Facts: At the time of the submission of your advisory request, you were
eyed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation
( "PennDOT ") as the Manager of PennDOT's Incident Management Section, in which
position you were classified as a Civil Engineer Manager. You worked for the Bureau of
Highway Safety & Traffic Engineering in PennDOT's Central Office located in
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. You stated that you would be leaving Commonwealth
service effective October 12, 2001, in order to work with a private engineering
consulting firm.
You requested an advisory as to the restrictions of the Ethics Act that would
apply to you following termination of your employment with PennDOT. You further
inquired as to the period of applicability of such restrictions. You submitted copies of
your Commonwealth job description and organizational chart, which documents are
incorporated herein by reference.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11)
of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor
based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in
an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have
not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the
material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only
Leonard, 01 -597
October 30, 2001
Page 2
affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material
facts.
As the Manager of PennDOT's Incident Management Section, classified as a
Civil Engineer Manager and working within the Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic
Engineering, you would be considered a "public employee" subject to the Ethics Act and
the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa.Code §
11.1. This conclusion is based upon the job description, which when reviewed on an
objective basis, indicates clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official
action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to one or more of the following:
contracting; procurement; planning; inspecting; administering or monitoring grants;
leasing; regulating; auditing; or other activities where the economic impact is greater
than de minimis on the interests of another person.
Consequently, upon termination of public service, you would be considered a
"former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act.
While Section 1103(g) does not prohibit a former public official /public employee
from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official /public
employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before the governmental body with
which he has been associated ":
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee. - -No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the
governmental body with which he has been associated for
one year after he leaves that body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the
Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in
any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and
submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or
contain the name of a former public official or public
employee.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership,
committee, club or other organization or group of persons.
"Governmental body with which a public official
or public employee is or has been associated." The
governmental body within State government or a political
subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has
been employed or to which the public official or employee is
or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and
offices within that governmental body.
Leonard, 01 -597
October 30, 2001
Page 3
65 Pa. C. S. § 1102.
The term "Person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and
other businesses. It also includes the former public employee himself, Confidential
Opinion 93 -005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur, Opinion 95 -007.
The term "representation" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of
any person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal
appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence;
(3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of
the former public official /employee; (4) participating in any matters before the former
governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying. Popovich,
Opinion 89 -005.
Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a
proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental
body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section
1103(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public
official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former
governmental body, even though the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to
termination of public service, Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However, if such a pre - existing
contract does not involve the unit where the former public employee worked, the name
of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the
regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams/Webster,
Opinion 95 -011.
A former public official /public employee may assist in the preparation of any
documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the ublic
official /public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former
governmental body. The public official /public employee may also counsel any person
regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once again,
however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former governmental
body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general informational
inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is available to the
general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former
governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or
work for the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official /public employee with
regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public
official /public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or
entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official /public employee
is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or
other governmental body where the public official /employee had influence or control but
extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at
290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion No. 90 -006; Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R.
The governmental body with which you would be deemed to have been
associated upon termination of public service would be PennDOT in its entirety.
Therefore, for the first year after termination of your service with PennDOT, Section
1103) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict "representation" of "persons" before
PennDOT.
Based upon the facts which have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the
applicability of Section 1103(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no
use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a)
of the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the
Leonard, 01 -597
October 30, 2001
Page 4
Ethics Act provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee and no
public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon
the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public
official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions
of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but
merely to provide a complete response to the question presented.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other
code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the
applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct.
Conclusion: In your employment position with the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation ( "PennDOT ") as the Manager of
PennDOT's Incident Management Section, classified as a Civil Engineer Manager and
working within the Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic Engineering, you would be
considered a "public employee" subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act,
65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. ( "Ethics Act "). Upon termination of service with PennDOT,
you would be considered a 'former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the
Ethics Act. The former governmental body would be PennDOT in its entirety. The
restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the
proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Act would
require that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed by no later than May 1 of the year
after termination of service.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717 - 787 - 0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel