HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-568 ColbyDale Colby
Mt. Lebanon Municipal Building
710 Washington Road
Pittsburgh, PA 15228
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 29, 2001
01 -568
Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; Municipality; Home Rule; Commissioner; Mt.
Lebanon Soccer Foundation; Youth Sports Alliance of Mt. Lebanon, Inc.; Mt.
Lebanon Soccer Association; Non - profit youth sports organizations; Request for
Rezoning; Zoning Amendment; Vote.
Dear Mr. Colby:
This responds to your letter of June 1, 2001, by which you requested advice from
the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa. .S. §1101 et seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a commissioner as to
participating in municipal commission actions involving proposed amendments to the
zoning ordinance when the commissioner has, in the past, served as a treasurer and a
member of the board of directors of a non - profit youth sports organization whose efforts
to develop property as a multipurpose recreational facility would be affected by the
proposed amendments.
Facts: You are a Commissioner in Mt. Lebanon, Allegheny County, having been
elected to office on April 4, 2000 and installed as a Commissioner on May 8, 2000. The
Commission is designated as the governing body pursuant to Mt. Lebanon's Home Rule
Charter.
Prior to your election as Commissioner, you served on several different
organizations. First, you served as Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors of
the Mt. Lebanon Soccer Foundation ( "MLSF "). Second, you served as President and a
member of the Board of Directors of the Youth Sports Alliance of Mt. Lebanon, Inc.
("YSA"). Third, you held various officer positions on the Mt. Lebanon Soccer Association
( "MLSA "). You state that the MLSF and YSA are both local non - profit youth sports
organizations.
After being elected Commissioner, you resigned from your positions on both the
MLSF and YSA. Since your resignations, however, the Mt. Lebanon Commission has
Colby, 01 -568
June 29, 2001
Page 2
appointed you as its liaison to YSA. Further, you have acted as a voluntary chairman for
a weekend workshop on good sportsmanship for coaches, parents and sports
organization leaders.
Since 1998, the MLSF has been active in efforts to develop a piece of property in
Mt. Lebanon as a multipurpose recreational facility for public use. The MLSF received
title to the property through a donation in December 1998. The property is currently
zoned R -1, Residential.
In May 2000, the MLSF requested that Mt. Lebanon rezone the property as P -2,
Diversified Park District. Upon review of MLSF's request, Mt. Lebanon's staff and
Planning Board recommended against the rezoning and instead recommended that the
Planning Commission consider a "text amendmenr to the zoning ordinance authorizing
the use of private parks for public use as a conditional use in the R -1 and R -2 residential
districts.
The proposed zoning ordinance text amendment is currently before the
Commission. Opponents of the amendment have submitted a document entitled,
"Petition for Recusal Raising Conflicts of Interest of Commissioner Dale Colby." The
Petition for Recusal requests that you voluntarily recuse yourself and abstain from
participating on the proposed amendments, any related matters such as zoning for parks,
athletic fields and the financing and operation of such parks, athletic fields in Mt. Lebanon
while you are a Commissioner. The stated reasons for the Petition for Recusal are your
former positions with MLSA, MLSF and YSA and your continuing interest in and support
for youth sports in Mt. Lebanon.
You state that should the Commission adopt the proposed amendments, neither
you nor any member of your immediate family would obtain any private pecuniary benefit.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § §1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based
upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon
the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As a Commissioner for Mt. Lebanon, you are a public official as that term is
defined in the Ethics Act, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that Act.
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
$1103. Restricted activities.
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of
interest.
65 Pa.C.S. §1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
$1102. Definitions.
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received through
Colby, 01 -568
June 29, 2001
Page 3
his holding public office or employment for the private
pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. The term does not include an
action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects
to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or
a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other
group which includes the public official or public employee, a
member of his immediate family or a business with which he
or a member of his immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to
the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public employment.
"Immediate family." A parent, spouse, child, brother
or sister.
"Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole
proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association,
organization, self - employed individual, holding company, joint
stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity
organized for profit.
"Business with which he is associated." Any
business in which the person or a member of the person's
immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has
a financial interest.
"Financial interest." Any financial interest in a legal
entity engaged in business for profit which comprises more
than 5% of the equity of the business or more than 5% of the
assets of the economic interest in indebtedness.
65 Pa.C.S. §1102.
In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that no
person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public
official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /employee
would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to
imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
$1103. Restricted activities.
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with
Colby, 01 -568
June 29, 2001
Page 4
the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted
to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein.
In the case of a three - member governing body of a political
subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as
a result of a conflict of interest, and the remaining two
members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the
member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to
break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided
herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §1103(j).
In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public official /employee
to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and
by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or
supervisor.
In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the governmental
body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the abstention(s) from
conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided the disclosure
requirements noted above are followed. See, Mlakar, Advice 91- 523 -S.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, pursuant to
Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from
using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official /public
employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
Having established the above principles, your specific inquiry shall now be
addressed.
MLSF, a non - profit youth sports organization, is a "business" as that term is
defined in the Ethics Act. First, the definition of the term "business" as set forth in the
Ethics Act is very broad. Novak, Opinion No. 91 -009. As an "organization," MLSF clearly
falls within that definition. econd, the fact that MLSF is a non - profit organization would
not disqualify it as a "business." The word "or" toward the end of the definition of
"business" is disjunctive, and the repeated use of the word "any" precludes any
interpretation that the final phrase "legal entity organized for profit" modifies the preceding
forms of entities in the list. See, Soltis-Sparano, Order No. 1045 at 31 (Citing,
Confidential Opinion, No. 89 -007; McConahy, Opinion No. 96 -006).
Although MLSF qualifies as a "business," it is not a business with which you or a
member of your immediate family is associated. This conclusion is based upon your
express factual statement that you have resigned as Treasurer and member of the Board
of Directors of MLSF. Thus, it is factually assumed for purposes of this Advice that
neither you nor a member of your immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee
of MSLF or has a financial interest in that organization.
In that MSLF is not a business with which you or a member of your immediate
family is associated, you would not have a conflict as to participating in matters pertaining
to MSLF's zoning request /proposed zoning ordinance amendment. As for future issues
Colby, 01 -568
June 29, 2001
Page 5
before the Commission involving parks and athletic fields in Mt. Lebanon, you would not
be prohibited from participating on such matters absent a use of authority of office that
would result in a private pecuniary benefit to you, an immediate family member or a
business with which you or a member of your immediate family is associated.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of
conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of
the respective municipal code.
Conclusion: As a Commissioner for Mt. Lebanon, you are a public official subject
to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S.
1101 et seq. Mt. Lebanon Soccer Foundation ( "MLSF "), a non - profit organization, is a
"business" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. However, in that neither you nor a
member of your immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee of MSLF or has
a financial interest in that organization, it is not a business with which you or a member of
your immediate family is associated. Hence, you would not have a conflict as to
participating in matters pertaining to MSLF's zoning request /proposed zoning ordinance
amendment. As for future issues before the Commission involving parks and athletic
fields in Mt. Lebanon, you would not be prohibited from participating on such matters
absent a use of authority of office that would result in a private pecuniary benefit to you,
an immediate family member or a business with which you or a member of your
immediate family is associated. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only
been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct
in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason
to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission.
A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a
formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received
at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice
pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §13.20. The appeal may be received at the
Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or
by FAX transmission (717 -787- 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at
the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of
the appeal.
Sincerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel