HomeMy WebLinkAbout1145 RichardsIn Re: Wilfred Richards
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
File Docket:
X -ref:
Date Decided:
Date Mailed:
Before: Daneen E. Reese, Chair
Austin M. Lee, Vice Chair
Julius Uehlein
Louis W. Fryman
John J. Bolger
Frank M. Brown
Susan Mosites Bicket
98- 073 -C2
Order No. 1145
1/31/2000
2/11/2000
This is a final adjudication of the State Ethics Commission.
Procedurally, the Investigative Division of the State Ethics Commission
conducted an investigation regarding a possible violation of the Public Official and
Employee Ethics Law, Act 9 of 1989, P.L. 26, 65 P.S. §401 et seq., by the above -
named Respondent. At the commencement of its investigation, the Investigative
Division served upon Respondent written notice of the specific allegation(s). Upon
completion of its investigation, the Investigative Division issued and served upon
Respondent a Findings Report identified as an Investigative Complaint. An Answer was
filed and a hearing was waived. The record is complete. A Consent Agreement was
submitted by the parties to the Commission for consideration which was subsequently
approved.
Effective December 15, 1998, Act 9 of 1989 was replaced by the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), Act 93 of 1998, Chapter 11, 65
Pa.C.S. §1 101 et seq., which essentially repeats Act 9 of 1989 and provides for the
completion of pending matters under that Act.
This adjudication of the State Ethics Commission is issued under Act 93 of
1998 and will be made available as a public document thirty days after the mailing
date noted above. However, reconsideration may be requested. Any reconsideration
request must be received at this Commission within thirty days of the mailing date and
must include a detailed explanation of the reasons as to why reconsideration should
be granted in conformity with 51 Pa. Code §21.29(b). A request for reconsideration
will not affect the finality of this adjudication but will defer its public release pending
action on the request by the Commission.
The files in this case will remain confidential in accordance with the Ethics Act.
Any person who violates confidentiality of the Ethics Act is guilty of a misdemeanor
subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year.
Confidentiality does not preclude discussing this case with an attorney at law.
Richards, 98-073 -C2
ag�e2
I. ALLEGATION:
Wilfred Richards, a public official, in his capacity as a Supervisor for West
Abington Township, Lackawanna County, violated Sections 1103(a) and 1 103(f) of
the State Ethics Act (Act 9 of 1989) when he used the authority of his office for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself and /or a member of his immediate family when he
participated in actions of the board to hire members of his immediate family for
employment with the township; and when the contracts were entered into with
members of his immediate family in excess of $500.00 without an open and public
process.
II. FINDINGS:
1. The Investigative Division of the State Ethics Commission received a signed,
sworn complaint alleging that Wilfred Richards violated provisions of the
State Ethics Act (Act 93 of 1998).
2. Upon review of the complaint the Investigative Division initiated a preliminary
inquiry on December 3, 1998.
3. The preliminary inquiry was completed within sixty days.
4. On January 29, 1999, a letter was forwarded to Wilfred Richards, by the
Executive Director of the State Ethics Commission informing him that a
complaint against him was received by the Investigative Division and that a
full investigation was being commenced.
a. Said letter was forwarded by certified mail no. Z 015 323 505.
b. The domestic return receipt bore the signature of J. J. Richards, with a
delivery date of February 1, 1999.
5. On May 17, 1999, the Executive Director of the State Ethics Commission
filed an application for a ninety -day extension of time to complete the
Investigation.
6. The Commission issued an Order on June 1, 1999, granting the 90 -day
extension.
7. Periodic notice letters were forwarded to Wilfred Richards in accordance with
the provision of the Ethics Law advising him of the general status of the
investigation.
8. The Investigative Complaint was mailed to the Respondent on October 25,
1999.
9. Wilfred Richards served as a West Abington Township Supervisor,
Lackawanna County, from 1975 to 1998.
a. Richards was the Vice Chairman in 1995 and 1996.
b. Richards resigned his position as supervisor in June 1998.
10. Professionally, Mr. Richards owns a farm and produce business.
a. Richards is also owner of Richards School Bus Service and contracts
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 3
with the Lackawanna School District.
11. West Abington Township maintains approximately five and a half (5.5) miles
of road.
a. West Abington Township owns a commercial grader, stone rake and
two pickup trucks for road work.
12. West Abington Township does not employ any full -time laborers or staff.
13. West Abington Township supervisors performed work on township roads as
needed.
a. No supervisor was officially designated the Roadmaster at the
reorganization meetings each January.
14. West Abington Township does not have an official township building,
storage or maintenance facility.
15. The township has garage and storage space provided by Richards for storage
of supplies and maintenance of township vehicles.
a. Prior to 1994 Richards was not compensated for providing garage and
storage space.
16. Wilfred Richards rented a 15' x 30' garage and miscellaneous tools to West
Abington Township in 1994.
a. The garage space and tools are personally owned by Wilfred Richards
and used on his farm and for business.
b. West Abington Township repaired township vehicles with Wilfred
Richards' tools and stored calcium for the township's roads in the
garage.
17. Beginning in 1994 Richards was compensated by the township for use of
garage space and tools.
a. The rental fee was discussed and agreed by Richards and the other
two members of the board of supervisors.
18. Richards charged the township $150.00 in 1994 for rental of the 15' x 30'
garage and miscellaneous tools.
a. Richards did not bill the township in 1995 for garage space or tools.
19. Wilfred Richards rented a 15' x 30' (450 sq. foot) garage and 12' x 10' (120
sq. foot) office to West Abington Township from 1996 to 1998.
a. Wilfred Richards charged West Abington Township a flat rental fee of
$300.00 per year from 1996 to 1998 for the use of the garage and
office.
b. West Abington Township stored calcium and township equipment in
the garage and used the office space to conduct monthly Board of
Supervisor's meetings.
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 4
20. The rental of the garage and office space was not competitively bid in an
open and public process by West Abington Township.
a. Supervisors including Richards discussed the rental and agreed upon a
$300.00 per year fee.
21. Wilfred Richards also billed the township $162.00 in 1995 for labor and
parts to repair township equipment.
a. Wilfred Richards repaired township vehicles using his personal tools
and parts.
b. The repairs were made at Wilfred Richards' farm.
22. All funds paid to Wilfred Richards were from West Abington Township's
general funds account.
23. Payments issued to Wilfred Richards were included as part of the
supervisor's monthly bill lists.
a. Bill lists are voted on in their entirety by a single motion.
24. Wilfred Richards voted during official township supervisor's meetings to
approve the payments to himself for the garage /office rentals and his labor
and parts to repair township equipment.
25. Wilfred Richards signed the front of each check payable to himself.
26. The following is a list of payments to Wilfred Richards for garage /office
rentals and labor from 1994 to 1998.
Check No. Date Amount Pavee
2565 03/01/94 $150.00 Garage /Tool Rental
1994 Total $150.00
Check No. Date Amount Pavee
2677 03/07/95 .$162.00 Labor /Parts
1995 Total $162.00
Check No. Date Amount Payee
2826 07/02/96 $300.00 Garage Rental
1996 Total $300.00
Check No.
2876
Date Amount Pavee
01/06/97 $ 20.00 Labor
Richards, 98- 073-C2
Page 5
2934 06/03/97 $300.00 Office Rental
1997 Total $ 320.00
Check No. Date Amount Payee
3047 04/07/98 $300.00 Office Rental
1998 Total $ 300.00
27. Supervisor Richards participated in official actions to approve the following
payments to himself:
Check Check Meeting Official
No. Amount Payee Date Action
Vote
2565 $150.00 J. W. Richards 03/01/94 Approved Bills Yes
2677 $162.00 J. W. Richards 03/07/95 Approved Bills Yes
2826 $300.00 J. W. Richards 07/02/96 Approved Bills Yes
2876 $ 17.91 J. W. Richards 01/02/97 Approved Bills Yes
2934 $300.00 Wilfred Richards 06/03/97 Approved Bills Yes
3047 $300.00 Wilfred Richards 04/07/98 Approved Bills Yes
28. Since at least 1994 Richards and other board members have sold gasoline to
the township for use in township equipment.
29. Wilfred Richards sold petroleum products and automotive fluids including:
gasoline, diesel fuel, oil, antifreeze, transmission fluid and steering fluid to
West Abington Township from 1994 to 1998.
a. Wilfred Richards billed these products to West Abington Township in
his wife's name, L. R. Richards.
30. Richards billed the township in his wife's name after being advised during a
seminar that he could not contract with the township, due to his elected
position.
a. Richards was under the belief that family members could conduct
business with the township.
b. Richard's wife did not have a role in the sale of gas products to the
township.
c. This information was provided to Supervisors Cours and Schirg who
billed the township for their services in their wives' names.
31. The petroleum and automotive fluids were not competitively bid in an open
and public process by West Abington Township.
a. The purchasing of fuel and related products from Richards was not
approved by the board during a public meeting.
b. All board members were aware of Richards selling fuel to the
township.
Date Fuel
Sold to
the Twp.
Fuel Type
Total
Gallons
twp.
Purchased
Unit price
twp.
paid per
gallon
Total fuel
cost to
twp.
Unit price
Richards
paid per
gallon
Total fuel
cost to
Richards
Richards'
profit from
the sales
02/04/95
Regular
14.0
1.25
17.50
1.23
17.22
+ .28
02/05/95
Regular
20.0
1.25
25.00
1.23
24.60
+ .40
02/05/95
Regular
20.0
1.25
25.00
1.23
24.60
+ .40
02/06/95
Regular
14.7
1.25
18.38
1.23
18.08
+ .39
02/26/95
Regular
18.0
1.16
20.88
1.17
21.06
+ .18
03/09/95
Regular
22.0
1.16
25.52
1.17
25.74
+ .22
03/21/95
Regular
19.0
1.16
22.04
1.15
21.85
+ .19
04/07/95
Regular
9.0
1.16
10.44
1.15
10.35
+ .09
04/20/95
Diesel
23.0
1.07
24.61
1.13
25.99
-1.38
12/05/96
Regular
14.0
1.21
16.94
1.20
16.80
+ .14
12/09/96
Regular
13.0
1.21
15.73
1.20
15.60
+ .13
12/17/96
Regular
20.0
1.21
24.20
1.20
24.00
+ .20
12/20/96
Regular
14.0
1.21
16.94
1.20
16.80
+ .14
03/07/97
Regular
10.0
1.21
12.10
1.20
12.00
+ .10
03/21/97
Regular
8.0
1.20
9.60
1.20
9.60
0.0
03/31/97
Regular
5.0
1.20
6.00
1.20
6.00
0.0
03/31/97
Regular
24.0
1.20
28.80
1.20
28.80
0.0
04/18/97
Regular
8.0
1.20
9.60
1.20
9.60
0.0
Total
Profits
to
Richards
+$1.59
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 6
1. Board members Cours and Schirg also billed the township for
gasoline.
32. Gasoline was provided by Richards for township vehicles from private
supplies he utilized for his school bus business.
a. Gasoline was provided on an as needed basis.
33. Wilfred Richards sold the petroleum products and automotive fluids to West
Abington Township at his cost.
34. Between 1995 and 1997 Richards provided fuel to the township as follows:
35. Payments made by the township to L. R. Richards for the petroleum and
automotive fluids were from West Abington Township's general funds
account.
36. Payments issued to L. R. Richards were included as part of the supervisors'
monthly bill lists.
a. Wilfred Richards' voted during official township supervisors' meetings
to approve the payments to his wife, Lila R. Richards, for the sale of
petroleum products and automotive fluids to West Abington Township
37. Wilfred Richards signed the front of each check payable to L. R. Richards.
38. The following is a list of payments to L. R. Richards for petroleum and
miscellaneous automotive fluid sales to West Abington Township from at
least 1994 through 1998.
Check No. Date
2539 02/01/94
2560 03/01/94
Amount Purpose
$373.68 Gas, Oil, Muffler Clamps
$233.33 Gas, Oil ($32.54 Reimbursement)
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Pam
2577
2590
2598
2626
2645
1994 Total
Check No.
2660
2685
2697
2751
1995 Total
Check No. Date
2789
2808
2875
1996 Total
04/05/94
05/03/94
06/07/94
10/04/94
01/03/95
Check No. Date
2884
2904
2925
2949
2965
2994
2995
1997 Total
Check No. Date
3027
3054
1998 Total
Check Check
No. Amount
2539 $373.68
2560 $233.33
2577 $157.43
2590 $ 30.58
$157.43
$ 30.58
$122.00
$103.42
$ 55.51
$1,043.41
Date Amount
02/07/95
04/04/95
05/02/95
01/02/96
03/05/96
05/07/96
01/06/97
02/04/97
03/04/97
05/06/97
08/05/97
11/06/97
01/05/98
01/05/98
03/03/98 $201.78
05/05/98 $ 78.03
39. Supervisor Richards participated in official actions to approve the following
payments to L. R. Richards:
Payee
$251.38
$ 68.44
$ 37.55
$607.01
$964.38
Amount
$111.42
$ 81.29
$102.89
$295.60
Amount
$ 99.27
$ 57.60
$ 68.50
$ 64.48
$ 29.04
$ 53.80
$100.32
$473.01
Amount
$279.81
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
Gas, Oil, Misc. Parts
Gas & Oil
Gas, OiI, Misc. Parts
Gas
Gas
Purpose
Gas
Gas
Gas & OiI
Gas & Oil
Purpose
Gas & OiI
Gas
Gas
Purpose
Gas, Misc. Fluids
Gas
Gas
Gas & Oil
Gas
Gas
Gas
Purpose
Gas & Oil
Gas
Meeting
Date
02/01/94
03/01/94
04/05/94
05/03/94
Official
Action
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Vote
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 8
2598 $122.00
2626 $103.42
2645 $ 55.51
2660 $251.38
2685 $ 68.44
2697 $ 37.55
2751 $607.01
2789 $111.42
2875 $102.89
2884 $ 99.27
2904 $ 57.60
2925 $ 68.50
2949 $ 64.48
2965 $ 29.04
2994 $ 53.80
2995 $100.32
3027 $201.78
3054 $ 78.03
Check No. Check Amt. Payee
Year
1994
Total
1995
Total
1996
Total
1997
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
L. R. Richards
Amount
$ 150.00
$1,043.41
$1,193.41
$ 964.38
$ 162.00
$1,126.38
06/01/94
10/04/94
01/03/95
02/07/95
04/04/95
05/02/95
01/02/96
03/05/96
01/02/97
02/04/97
03/04/97
05/06/97
08/05/97
11/06/97
01/05/98
01/05/98
03/03/98
05/05/98
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
Approved Bills
40. Wilfred Richards was not present at the May 2, 1996, Supervisors' Meeting when
the following check to L. R. Richards was officially approved.
2808 $ 81.29 L. R. Richards
Meeting Date
41. Wilfred Richards submitted an invoice to West Abington Township on February 6,
1996, for fuel and oil sales in the amount of $196.79.
a. Wilfred Richards did not receive a payment for the $196.79 bill.
42. Richards used the authority of his office to approve payments and sign checks
issued to him by the township for rental space, repairs and gasoline:
Type of Purchase
Garage Rental
Gasoline, etc.
Gasoline, Oil
Labor, Parts
$ 300.00 Garage Rental
$ 295.60 Gasoline
$ 595.60
$ 300.00 Garage Rental
$ 20.00 Labor
05/02/96
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 9
Total
1998
Total
$ 473.01
$ 793.01
$ 300.00
$ 279.81
$ 579.81
Gasoline
Garage Rental
Gasoline
III. DISCUSSION:
At all times relevant to this matter, the Respondent, Wilfred Richards,
hereinafter Richards, has been a public official subject to the provisions of the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), Act 9 of 1989, as codified by Act 93
of 1998, Chapter 11, 65 Pa.C.S. §1 101, et seq.
The issue is whether Richards violated Sections 1103(a) and 1103(f) of the
Ethics Act regarding his alleged participation in actions of the board to hire members
of his immediate family for employment with the township and as to contracts with
members of his immediate family in excess of $500.00 without an open and public
process.
Section 1103. Restricted activities.
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. §1103(a).
The term "conflict of interest" is defined under the Ethics Act as follows:
Section 1102. Definitions.
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received
through his holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his
immediate family or a business with which he or a member
of his immediate family is associated. The term does not
include an action having a de minimis economic impact or
which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry,
occupation or other group which includes the public official
or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated.
65 Pa.C.S. §1102.
Section 1 103(a) of the Ethics Act prohibits a public official /public employee
from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information
received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 10
public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act imposes certain restrictions as to contracting.
Section 1 103. Restricted activities.
(f) Contract. - -No public official or public employee or
his spouse or child or any business in which the person or
his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any
contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental
body with which the public official or public employee is
associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with
any person who has been awarded a contract with the
governmental body with which the public official or public
employee is associated, unless the contract has been
awarded through an open and public process, including prior
public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all
proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a
case, the public official or public employee shall not have
any supervisory or overall responsibility for the
implementation or administration of the contract. Any
contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection
shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the
suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the
contract or subcontract.
65 Pa.C.S. §1 103(f).
In addition, Section 1103(f) specifically provides in part that no public
official /public employee or spouse or child or business with which he or the spouse or
child is associated may enter into a contract with his governmental body valued at five
hundred dollars or more or any subcontract valued at five hundred dollars or more with
any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which
the public official /public employee is associated unless the contract is awarded through
an open and public process including prior public notice and subsequent public
disclosure.
Having noted the issues and applicable law, we shall now summarize the
relevant facts.
Richards served as a West Abington Township Supervisor from 1975 until his
resignation in June 1998. In a private capacity Richards owns a farm, a produce
business and a school bus service.
Since the Township does not employ any full -time laborers or staff, the
Supervisors work on Township roads. The Township owns certain road equipment
and pick -up trucks in order to maintain its roads. Since the Township does not have
an official Township building or any storage or maintenance facility, Richards supplied
the Township with the use of his garage for storage of supplies and maintenance of
Township vehicles. The building is a 15x30 -foot garage which stores Richards' tools
for the repair of Township vehicles and calcium for Township roads. Richards
originally provided his building to the Township for its use at no charge. In 1994,
Richards charged the Township $150 for the rental of his building and miscellaneous
tools. In 1995, Richards did not bill the Township. From 1996 to 1998, Richards
charged the Township a flat rental fee of $300 per year for the use of the garage and
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Page 11
office. The building rental was not competitively bid but was based upon a yearly
rental fee agreed between Richards and the Supervisors.
In addition to renting his garage and tools to the Township, Richards also
repaired Township vehicles. In 1995, Richards billed the Township $162 for labor and
parts to repair Township equipment. Payments to Richards were made from the
Township general fund following approval of the monthly bills list which was voted on
in its entirety by the Board. Fact - Findings 26 and 27 delineate the list of payments to
Richards for his garage rentals and labor from 1994 to 1998, his participation in the
process and official Board actions to approve payments to himself.
From at least 1994 Richards, as well as other Board members, sold gasoline to
the Township for use in its equipment. Since there was a perception that an official
could not contract with the Township, Richards billed the Township in his spouse's
name for the sale of petroleum products. Parenthetically, the other two Supervisors
also billed the Township for such services in their spouses' names. Richards supplied
the Township with gasoline on an as needed basis between 1995 and 1997. The
details of such sales are delineated in Fact Finding 34. The list of payments to
Richards for the petroleum and miscellaneous fluid sales to the Township are set forth
in Fact Finding 38. Richards participated in official actions to approve payments to
himself as set forth in Fact Finding 39. Finally, Fact Finding 42 summarizes on a
yearly basis the types of services provided by Richards to the Township as well as the
amounts that he received.
Having summarized the above relevant facts, we must now determine whether
the actions of Richards violated Sections 1103(a) and 1103(f) of the Ethics Act.
The parties have submitted a Consent Agreement together with a Stipulation of
Findings wherein it is proposed to resolve the case by finding a violation of Section
1103(a) of the Ethics Act when Richards participated in votes of the West
Abington Township Board to approve payments to himself for the rental of garage
and office space to the Township; no violation of the Ethics Act when Richards
entered into annual contracts with the Township to provide office and garage space
without an open and public process because the amounts involved were less than
$500 per year; and no violation of the Ethics Act when Richards provided gasoline and
petroleum products to the Township because the products were provided at cost,
resulting in no private pecuniary benefit to Richards.
In the Consent Agreement, the Investigative Division has chosen not to further
proceed as to the allegations in this case regarding participation by Richards to hire
members of his immediate family and as to Township contracts with immediate family
members. Recognizing that the Investigative Division has prosecutorial discretion, we
will accordingly defer to such discretion and make our disposition based upon the
allegations as delineated by the parties in the Consent Agreement. See, Ferraro, Order
1099.
Regarding the provision of services as to the garage /office rental, there were
uses of authority of office on the part of Richards under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act. Richards participated in the bill approval process and signed some of the
Township checks, as a Supervisor, which were payable to himself for providing the
services to the Township. Such actions were uses of authority of office. See
Juliante, Order 809. The uses of authority of office on the part of Richards resulted
in pecuniary benefits to him consisting of the financial gain that he realized by
providing the services to the Township. The pecuniary benefits were private because
there is no provision in the Second Class Township Code which allows a Supervisor
to participate as to the approval of payments to himself for providing private services
Richards, 98- 073 -C2
Pam
to the Township. See, Hessinger, Order 931, affirmed in part, R.H. and T.W. v. State
Ethics Commission, 673 A.2d 1004 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). Lastly, the private
pecuniary benefits inured to Richards himself. Accordingly, Richards violated Section
1103(a) of the Ethics Act when he used the authority of office to obtain a private
pecuniary benefit for himself when he participated in the approval of payments to
himself regarding the rental of a garage and office space to the Township.
As to the sale of gasoline and various petroleum products to the Township we
find no violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act. In this regard, we note that the
parties have stipulated that Richards received no profit from the sale of such petroleum
products. In that there was no profit, there could be no pecuniary benefit. Hence,
Richards did not violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act regarding the sale of
gasoline and petroleum products to the Township in that he did not receive a private
pecuniary benefit for such sales which were made without profit.
Turning to Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, a review of the Stipulated Findings
by the parties reflects that all such contracts for the garage /office rental were under
$500 per year. Accordingly, since the contracting threshold of the Ethics Act was not
exceeded, Section 1103(f) was not implicated. Therefore, as to all such contracts,
Richards did not violate Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act in that such contracts were
less than $500.
Lastly, as to the Stipulation of Findings and Consent Agreement, we believe
that the Consent Agreement is the proper disposition for this case based upon our
review as reflected in the above analysis and the totality of the facts and
circumstances.
We shall take no further action in this case which is closed.
IV. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1. Wilfred Richards, as a Supervisor in West Abington Township, was a
public official subject to the provisions of Act 9 of 1989 as codified by
Act 93 of 1998.
2. Richards violated Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act when he
participated in votes of the West Abington Township Supervisors to
approve payments to himself for the rental of garage and office space
to the Township.
3. Richards did not violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act regarding the
sale of petroleum products to the Township in that he did not receive a
private pecuniary benefit from such sales which were made without
profit.
4. No violation of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act occurred when Richards
entered into contracts with the Township to provide office and garage
space without an open and public process where such amounts were Tess
than $500 per year.
In Re: Wilfred Richards
File Docket: 98- 073 -C2
Date Decided: 1/31/2000
Date Mailed: 2/11/2000
ORDER NO. 1145
1. Wilfred Richards, as a Supervisor in West Abington Township, violated Section
1103(a) of the Ethics Act when he participated in votes of the West
Abington Township Supervisors to approve payments to himself for the
rental of garage and office space to the Township.
2. Richards did not violate Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act regarding the sale of
petroleum products to the Township in that he did not receive a private
pecuniary benefit from such sales which were made without profit.
3. No violation of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act occurred when Richards
entered into contracts with the Township to provide office and garage space
without an open and public process where such amounts were less than $500
per year.
BY THE COMMISSION,
t 6 emu-
DANEEN E. REESE, CHAIR