HomeMy WebLinkAbout576-R FellerMr. Marvin Feller
600 Valley Road
Warrington, PA 18976
Re: 83 -185 -C
Dear Mr. Feller:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
Order No. 576 -R
DATE DECIDED: October 14, 1987
DATE MAILED: October 20, 1987
The Ethics Commission has received a complaint regarding you and a
possible violation of Act 170 of 1978. The Commission has now completed its
investigation. The individual allegations, conclusions, and findings on
which those conclusions are based are as follows:
I. Allegation: That you, a former Township Manager in Upper Dublin Township,
Montgomery County, violated Section 3(a) and /or Section 3(b) of the Ethics
Act, 65 P.S. §403(a) and 403(b) respectively, by using your office or
confidential information from that office for financial gain, or by soliciting
or accepting something of value based on the understanding that your official
actions would be influenced when you accepted free gifts from Sale Service and
Chemicals Incorporated, Ultracom Cable TV and Fierstein Chevrolet, who had
contracts with the Township.
A. Findings:
1. You served as Upper Dublin Township Manager from 1973 to December 1981
when your term expired. You were not reappointed to this position.
2. Salt Service and Chemicals, Inc., Ultracom Cable TV and Firestein
Chevrolet had contracts with Upper Dublin Township.
3. Mr. Frank Kamor, Secretary /Treasurer, Salt Services and Chemicals,
Incorporated, advised that he had no knowledge of swimming pool chlorine being
accepted by you as a gift from this firm.
a. Kamor advised that pool chlorine is often used by his firm to develop
lines of friendship with customers.
Mr. Marvin Feller
Page 2
b. He was aware that owner Dick Ortlip, who was president of this firm
until his death in 1982 or 1983, was a personal friend of yours.
c. Kamor stated that if Mr. Ortlip did give pool chlorine to you,
company policy directed that records of such a gift would be
destroyed after a five (5) year lapse.
d. He was doubtful that records would have been retained under the above
circumstances because Mr. Ortlip often did not keep records of his
own activities.
e. Kamor denied that he had any knowledge of his firm using free pool
chlorine to obtain no -bid contracts from Upper Dublin Township.
4. Mr. Harold Etsell, Jr., former vice - president of Marketing Operations for
Ultracom Cable TV, related that he had no knowledge of any tickets to Phillies
baseball of Flyers hockey games being given to you by Ultracom.
a. Etsell stated he was aware that free tickets to Phillies and Flyers
games were available to Ultracom employees for their personal use
during 1983.
b. He related that he was uncertain as to whether employees were
required to record the actual user of such tickets. Etsell
disclaimed having knowledge of the location of any records pertaining
to the users of these tickets.
c. Etsell stated that he was aware that on some occasions tickets would
be wasted because no one wanted to use them.
5. Firestein Chevrolet Company, Dresher, Pennsylvania, a car dealership which
supplied many of the township's police cruisers and staff cars went out of
business during the early 1980's.
6. You admitted that you accepted pool chemicals from Mr. Dick Ortlip, the
owner of Salt Services Chemicals, Incorporated, as a result of your personal
friendship with him over a 20 year period.
a. You stated that you used the pool chemicals for your private swimming
pool.
b. You stated that you never afforded any favoritism to Mr. Ortlip as a
result of this acceptance when township interests were involved.
c. You stressed that Mr. Ortlip was never given a sole source contract
by the township.
Mr. Marvin Feller
Page 3
d. You emphasized that the township commissioners always had the
authority to make the final decision on who would get a contract with
regard to purchases of sewage cleaning machines and liquid chlorine
which were used by the township to clean sewers.
7. You stated that you did accept tickets for sporting events from Ultracom,
Incorporated, during the years you were township manager at Upper Dublin
Township.
a. You believed that PRISM was the actual distributor who provided the
tickets to Ultracom for distribution to prospective or current
clients.
b. You emphasized that someone from Ultracom would always initiate the
contact with you, and then offer the tickets for your use.
c. You acknowledge that during 1980, you, two township citizens and
three commissioners served on a committee for the review of cable
companies for the township. Ultracom was selected by the
Commissioners for the township's 15 -year cable television contract.
d. You stated that you periodically accepted tickets to the Phillies
baseball, Flyers hockey, and 76ers basketball sporting events over a
period of about 18 months during 1980 -1981. You stated that you
attended the events with your wife and occasionally with your son,
but never accepted the tickets and gave them to others for their use.
You emphasized that the tickets were offered after the cable
television contract was awarded by the township to Ultracom. You
stated that when the township committee to select the cable
television contractor visited Ultracom, they were offered fancy
blankets, flasks, and a set of vise grips as momentos. As to the
blankets, flasks, vise grips, you state that you did not accept them
for yourself but, in fact, turned the items over to the First Class
Township Commissioner's Association for door prizes at the annual
convention.
8. You stated that you accepted discounts from Firestein Chevrolet Company
which were afforded to all township officials.
a. You related that at that time, a nearby Polino Oldsmobile Dealership
was on Bethlehem Pike, but this firm was not interested in
attempting to obtain township business.
b. You acknowledged that over the years, you purchased two (2) cars from
Firestein Chevrolet Company but only one was purchased during your
tenure as Township Manager.
Mr. Marvin Feller
Page 4
c. You state that the car was purchased at $100 over invoice which price
was offered to everyone who came into the showroom.
d. You also stated, that you and other township officials or employees
the Firestein Chevrolet Company but that the only repair work you had
done was under warranty.
e. You denied that your acceptance of discounts from Firestein Chevrolet
Company affected your business dealings with them when township
interests were involved.
B. Discussion: As the Township Manager for Upper Dublin Township, you are a
"public employee" as that term is defined in the State Ethics Act.
Accordingly, your conduct must conform to the requirements of the Ethics Act
and the restrictions therein are applicable to you.
Section 3(a) provides:
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(a) No public official or public employee shall use his
public office or any confidential information received
through his holding public office to obtain financial gain
other than compensation provided by law for himself, a
member of his immediate family, or a business with which
he is associated. 65 P.S. §403(a).
It is further provided in Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act:
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(b) No person shall offer or give to a public official or
public employee or candidate for public office or a member
of his immediate family or a business with which he is
associated, and no public official or public employee or
candidate for public office shall solicit or accept,
anything of value, including a gift, loan, political
contribution, reward, or promise of future employment
based on any understanding that the vote, official action,
or judgment of the public official or public employee or
candidate for public office would be influenced thereby.
65 P.S. §403(b).
Factually, you did receive from Mr. Dick Ortlip, deceased, the former
owner of Salt Services Chemicals, Inc., free chlorine for your swimming pool.
You state that the chlorine was received as a result of your twenty years of
friendship with Mr. Ortlip and that it in no way resulted in favoritism on
Mr. Marvin Feller
Page 5
your part to Mr. Ortlip in your capacity as Township Manager. Based upon the
above facts, there is insufficient evidence to establish that you used your
public office or accepted anything of value to influence your official action
relative to_the receipt of the chlorine from Mr. Ortlip. This Commission
finds that the receipt of the chlorine by you does not constitute a violation
of either Section 3(a) or 3(b) of the Ethics Act.
Secondly, regarding the free tickets from Ultracom, you state that you
did periodically accept these tickets for your wife and family but only after
the contract was awarded. Since you did accept and use these tickets, this
Commission finds a technical violation of Section 3(a) but no violation of
Section 3(b). It is noted, in this regard, that the blankets, flasks and vise
grips which were also offered by Ultracom to you were turned over to the
Pennsylvania Association of First Class Township Commissioners.
As to the discount purchase and repair work at Firestone Chevrolet, there
is no violation of Section 3(a) or Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act because the
purchase price of $100 over invoice was offered to everyone and the repair
work was done under warranty.
C. Conclusion and Order:
1. You are a "public official" under the State Ethics Act and are subject to
the provisions set forth therein.
2. You did not violate either Section 3(a) or 3(b) of the Ethics Act by
accepting the free chlorine for your swimming pool.
3. You did not violate Section 3(a) or 3(b) of the Ethics Act as to the car
purchase and repair work since the offer to purchase at $100 over invoice was
available to everyone and the repair work was done under warranty.
4. The acceptance of the tickets by you was a technical violation of Section
3(a) but not a violation of Section 3(b).
5. You did not violate either Section 3(a) or 3(b) of the Ethics Act as to
the offer of blankets, vise grips and flasks from the cable company which were
turned over to Pennsylvania Association of First Class Township
Commissioners.
Mr. Marvin Feller
Page 6
That Order, a copy of which is attached hereto and this decision denying
reconsideration, shall be made available as public documents five business
days after the date of mailing of this Order.
Any person who violates the confidentiality of a Commission proceeding is
guilty of a misdemeanor acid shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned
for not more than one year or both, see 65 P.S. 409(e).
By the Commission,
G. Sieber Pancoast
Chairman