Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout392 McCaigueMr. Richard T. McCaigue P.O. Box 31 Coudersport, PA 16915 Re: 84 -52 -C Dear Mr. McCaigue: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 ORDER OF THE COMMISSION August 5, 1985 Order No. 392 The State Ethics Commission has received a complaint regarding you and a possible violation of Act 170 of 1978. The Commission has now completed its investigation. The individual allegations, conclusions, and findings on which those conclusions are based are as follows: I. Allegation: That you, Treasurer of Potter County, violated Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 P.S. 403(a), which prohibits a public official from using his public office or confidential information gained through that office to obtain financial gain other than the compensation provided by law for himself or a member of his immediate family and or Section 3(c), 65 P.S. 403(c), which requires an open and public process when a public official or member of his immediate family contracts with his governmental body in an amount of $500 or more. A. Findings: 1. You currently serve as elected Treasurer of Potter County, a county of the Eighth Class. You have served in that capacity since January, 1968. 2. You appointed your wife, Mary McCaigue, to the position of Deputy Treasurer following your election in 1968 and each subsequent re- election. She continues in the position of Deputy Treasurer. a. Power to appoint a Deputy Treasurer is cited in the County Code, Article VIII, Treasurer, Section 806, 16 P.S. §806. Section 806. Deputy Treasurer - The county treasurer is hereby authorized to appoint a deputy county treasurer who shall perform such duties as shall be prescribed by the county treasurer. 3. You have annually served on the Potter County Salary Board and admittedly have voted on salary increases for your wife. Mr. Richard T. McCaigue Page 2 August 5, 1985 a. You deny that your wife has received any special consideration not accorded to other county employees, but you admit that her salary may be higher by virtue of her appointed position of Deputy Treasurer. 4. County Salary Boards were created by the County Code, Article XVI, (b), Section 1622 to 1625 16 P.S. §1622 et seq., which states: Section_1622. Salary Boards Created - There is hereby in each county a salary board, which shall consist of the three individual members of the board of county commissioners and the county controller in counties where there is a controller, or the county treasurer in counties where there is no controller. The chairman of the board of county commissioners shall be chairman of the salary board. The board shall meet and organize on the first Monday of January of each year. Section 1623. Number and Compensation of Officers, Deputies, Assistants, Clerks and Employes. - The board, subject to limitations imposed by law, shall fix the compensation of all appointed county officers, and the number and compensation of all deputies, assistants, clerks and other persons whose compensation is paid out of the county treasurer (except employees of county officers who are paid by fees and not by salary), and of all court criers, tipstaves and other court employees, and of all officers, clerks, stenographers and employees appointed by the judges of any court and who are paid from the county treasury. Thereupon the number and compensation of all such officers, deputies, assistants, clerks and persons, whether fixed by statute or by any other method, are hereby repealed. In the event that any salary board shall fail to fix the number or compensation of any such officers, deputies, assistants, clerks or other employees as required by this section, the number and compensation shall continue, as fixed by or pursuant to law, on the effective date of this act, with like effect as though the same had been so fixed by the board, but the salary board shall have power to fix any such number or compensation at a later time and with like effect. Section 1624. Revisions of Salary Schedules. - At each annual meeting, the board shall revise the salary schedule so far as it shall deem such action necessary. From time to time between annual meetings, whenever required by any judge, county officer or executive head of any separate board, commission or division, the number or compensation Mr. Richard T. McCaigue August 5, 1985 Page 3 of those deputies, assistants, clerks and employees is sought to be fixed, the board shall meet and consider and shall fix and determine the same. All salaries fixed under the provisions of this act shall be paid out of the county treasury in the manner provided by law. Section 1625. Procedure and Action of Board (a) Except as herein otherwise provided, whenever the board shall consider the number or salaries of the deputies or other employees of any county officer or agency, such officer or the executive head of such agency shall sit as a member of the board, as long as any matter affecting his office or agency is under consideration and no longer. 5. Minutes of the Potter County Salary Board Meeting held on January 12, 1984 confirm the following: a. Participating were County Commissioners Thomas 0. Bowman, Carl Roberts and Susan Kefover and Treasurer Richard McCaigue. b. County employees - Motion by Roberts, second Kefover that the following salaries be adopted: ...Mary McCaigue - $11,950 /lump sum of $450. ...Roll call vote: Roberts, Kefover, McCaigue, and Bowman - yes. Motion carried. c. This motion also included the salary approval for 15 other county employees. d. Discussion: Chairman Bowman stated that from each year hereafter each employee will receive a $200 increase per year, except where noted. Roll call vote: Roberts, Bowman, Kefover, and McCaigue, all yes. Motion carried. Motion Roberts, second Kefover that the salary scale for 1985, 1986 and 1987 automatically increase $200 for each employee, except where noted. Roll call vote: Roberts, Bowman, Kefover, and McCaigue, all yes. Motion carried. 6. The Potter County Commissioners adopted a Personnel Policy by Resolution 1978 -4 dated April 3, 1978 Section IV, G. Nepotism states: G. Nepotism 1. No person shall be considered for employment by the County while he or any member of his immediate family, as defined below, is employed by the County Commissioners' Office, the Judiciary, or Row Offices, or while he is related to any elected official or appointed personnel. When four or six county joinder programs are involved, the Commissioners will make a determination on a case -by —case basis. Mr. Richard T. McCaigue Page 4 August 5, 1985 2. The immediate family is defined to include husband, wife, father, mother, brother, sister, son, daughter, mother -or father -in -law, brother- or sister -in -law, son- or daughter -in -law. 3. This section shall in no way jeopardize the job security of those presently employed by the County. 7. The State Ethics Commission issued an opinion No. 82 -005 on April 20, 1982 to John B. Leete, `Solicitor for Potter County, regarding elected officials in their capacity as salary board members, voting when the board sets salaries for their wives, who serve as top -level county employees. Section V. of that opinion concluded: V. Conclusion: The Potter County Sheriff, Register and Recorder, and the Treasurer are public officials subject to the Ethics Act. Their direct participation in future salary decisions that affect their wives respectively, in the latter's employment by the County, would present the appearance of or potential for conflict of interest. As a member of the Salary board, therefore, each official must hence- forth abstain from voting on decisions regarding his wife's individual salary. The abstention prevents the development of any conflict of interest, or any appearance thereof, and it furthers the principles of the Ethics Act. In addition, the concepts of Section 1 of the Ethics Act apply to the brother - sister question presented here. Thus, a County Commissioner may not vote following this Opinion, as a Salary Board member, to set the salary of her brother, the Director of a County Planning Agency, in order to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(i), this Opinion is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission and evidence of good faith conduct in any civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. 8. This opinion was requested by the county solicitor on behalf of various county officials, including the treasurer. a. You were the county treasurer at the time of this request and opinion. Mr. Richard T. McCaigue August 5, 1985 Page 5 b. The opinion issued by the State Ethics Commission and the restrictions set forth therein specifically related to your activites as the county treasurer and as a member of the Salary Board. 8. Discussion: As the treasurer of Potter County, you are a public official within the purview of the State Ethics Act. 65 P.S. §402; Leete, 82 -005; As such, your conduct and your activities must conform to the requirements thereof. The Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall use his public office or any confidential information received through his holding public office to obtain financial gain other than compensation provided by law for himself, a member of his immediate family, or a business with which he is associated. 65 P.S. 403(a). This Commission has, on a number of occasions, determined that within the above provision of law a public official may not vote or participate on matters directly relating to that official's spouse such as, an appointment or salary determination. See: Rockovich, 356 -R; Krier, 84 -002; Bruce, 247. Abstention would be required. These determinations have been founded upon the above provision of law, particularly when viewed in light of the paramount intent of the Ethics Act. The Act was primarily intended to ensure that the financial interests of public officials are not in conflict with, nor appear to be in conflict with the public trust. 65 P.S. §401. In the instant situation, you voted, as a member of the County Salary Board, (on which you sit by virtue of your postion as county treasurer), on the salary of your wife in 1984 and 1985. Your wife was then serving in the position of deputy treasurer, a position to which you had apppointed her following your election in 1968. We must note that not only did you participate in the salary determinations for your wife in the aforementioned position, you did so in a blatant disregard of our opinion in Leete, 82 -005. As noted in the findings of fact, that opinion was issued by the Commission on the specific activity outlined in this order. That opinion was issued at the request of the county solicitor and specifically dealt with, among others, your activity as county treasurer and as a member of the salary board. The evidence clearly indicates that you were on notice of this opinion. As such, your disregard of said opinion was obviously intentional. Mr. Richard T. McCaigue August 5, 1985 Page 6 Prior to reaching our conclusion in this matter, we feel compelled to address two issues raised by your counsel. Your counsel has ind that the county commissioners initi?ted a personnel policy on April 3, 1978. That policy, in part, deals with and prohibits "Nepotism" but also has, what your counsel calls a "grandfather clause ". That provision provides that "this section shall in no way jeopardize the job security of those presently employed by the County." This clause, however, deals with the appointment or continued employment of an official's relative. The Ethics Commission has not challenged the 1968 appointment of Mrs. McCaigue as such appointment predated the Ethics Act (1978). The Commission here is dealing not with this person's continued employment but rather with your participation in the determination of her salary. Nothing herein deals with the issue of job security and the "grandfather clause ", while purporting to allow such continued employment does not authorize your participation in the fixing of such compensation. In addition thereto, even if the Commission determined that such continued employment was in violation of the Ethics Act, the township personnel policy may and cannot take precedent over a state statute. See, Commonwealth v. Ashenfelder, 413 Pa. 517 (1964); Rosevelt Drive -In- Theater Inc. v. Middletown Township, 67 D & C 2d 561, (1974). Thus, the personnel policy could not allow that which is prohibited by state statute. See also 65 P.S. §412. With respect to the fact that your vote was not the deciding vote, the Commission does not agree with the contention that no violation of Section 3(a) could occur because your vote was not required to pass the motion. In a number of decisions, the Commission has ruled that public officials must refrain from voting and participating in a decision in which he or she has a private interest. Leete, 82 -005; Fields, 82 -006 and Conoway, 332. Your interests in and of itself creates a disqualification. Genkinger v. City of New Castle 308 PA 547. (1951) Finally, with respect to the proposition that the County Code, 16 P.S. §1625, permits Board members to set salaries of various office employees without exception, the Commission observes as it did in the Leete opinion that Section 12 of the Ethics Act gives the Act a pre - emptive capacity. If the provisions of the Act conflict with any other statute, the provisions of the Act shall control. 65 P.S. §412. In light of the foregoing, we believe that you violated Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act. Mr. Richard T. McCaigue August 5, 1985 Page 7 The Act provides as follows: Section 9. Penalties. (a) Any person who violates the provisions of Section 3(a) and (b) is guilty of a felony and shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or be both fined and imprisoned. 65 P.S. 409(a). In addition thereto the Commission has the power to: Section 7. Duties of the commission. (11) Make recommendations to law enforcement officials either for criminal prosecution or dismissal of charges arising out of violation of this act. 65 P.S. 407(11). C. Conclusion: You violated Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act when you voted to increase the salary of your wife who served in your office as deputy county treasurer. In accordance with the provisions of the Ethics Act, this matter will be referred to the appropriate law enforcement authority with the recommendation that you be prosecuted for violations of the State Ethics Act. Our files in this case will remain confidential in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 P.S. 408(a). However, this Order is final and will be made available as a public document 15 days after service (defined as mailing) unless you file documentation with the Commission which justifies reconsideration and /or challenges pertinent factual findings. See 51 Pa. Code 2.38. During this 15 -day period, no one, including the Respondent unless he waives his right to challenge this Order, may violate this confidentiality by releasing, discussing or circulating this Order. Any person who violates the confidentiality of a Commission proceeding is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year or both, see 65 P.S. 409(e). JJC /sfb By the Co missio erb: t B. Conner Cha rman