Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout197 DobuskiMr. Richard M. Dobuski 308 W. Hendrickson Avenue Morrisville, PA 19067 Re.: #83 -36 -C Dear Mr. Dobuski: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 ORDER OF THE COMMISSION May 23,1983 Order No. 197 The State Ethics Commission has received a complaint regarding you and a possible violation of Act 170 of 1978. The Commission has now completed its investigation. The individual allegations, conclusions, and findings on which those conclusions are based are as follows: I. Allegation: That you, a candidate for the position of school board director in the Borough of Morrisville School District, filed your nomination petitions on March 8, 1983 and the Financial Interest Statement with the school district secretary on March 10, 1983 in violation of Section 4(b) of the Ethics Act 65 P.S. 404(b) and Section 4.2(b) of the State Ethics Commission regulations 51 Pa. Code 4.2(b). A. Findings: 1. You filed your nomination petitions on March 8, 1983 and your Financial Interest Statement with the school district secretary on March 10, 1983. 2. You filed your Financial Interest Statement with the State Ethics Commission on March 14, 1983; the postmark on this mailing was March 10, 1983. B. Discussion: Section 4(b) of the Ethics Act states: Each candidate for public office shall file a statement of financial interests for the preceding calendar year with the commission prior to filing a petition to appear on the ballot for election as a public official. A petition to appear on the ballot shall not be accepted by an election official unless the petition includes an affidavit that the candidate has filed the required statement of financial interests with the commission. Richard M. Dobuski May 23, 1983 Page 2 The State Ethics Commission regulations pertaining to filing of Statements of Financial Interest read: Each candidate for local office shall file a Statement of Financial Interests with the Commission and shall file a copy of the Statement with the governing authority of that political subdivision for which he is a candidate prior to filing a petition to appear on the ballot. 51 Pa. Code 4.2(b) While it is clear that both the law and the regulations require filing of a Financial Interest Statement prior to filing nominating papers, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court interpretation of Section 4(b) of the Ethics Act provides for a reasonable application of these requirements especially where the public's right to view this information during the selection process has not been unduly impaired. See State Ethics Commission v. Boards of Election in Allegheny County, et. al., No. 1266 C.D. 1981 where candidates failing to file a Financial Interest Statement up through the primary election were removed from the general election ballot. See also State Ethics Commission v. Baldwin, Pa. , 445 A.2d 1208 (1982). In addition, previous Ethics Commission decisions have also recognized the need for judicious application of the law unless there is reason to believe that the delay in filing the Financial Interest Statement was caused by a conscious action of the public official or the public employee in an attempt to conceal or realize personal, financial gain or some other special advantage in being a candidate or officeholder. C. Conclusion: Although, you technically violated Section 4(b) of the Act and Section 4.2(b) of the State Ethics Commission regulations, the Financial Interest Statements are now available at the State Ethics Commission and the school district offices and were available in sufficient time for the public to exercise its right to review this information during the selection process of the 1983 primary election. The Commission will take no further action on this matter. Richard M. Dobuski May 23, 1983 Page 3 Our files in this case will remain confidential in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 P.S. 408(a). However, this Order is final and will be made available as a public document 15 days after service unless you file documentation with the Commission which justifies reconsideration and /or challenges pertinent factual findings. See 51 Pa. Code 2.38. During this 15 -day period, no one, including the Respondent unless he waives his right to challenge this Order, may violate this confidentiality by releasing, discussing or circulating this Order. Any person who violates the confidentiality of a Commission proceeding is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $1000 or imprisoned for not more than one year or both, see 65 P.S. 409(e). PJS /jc By the Commission, Paul . Smith Chair n