Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout119 LyterMr. Richard W. Lyter, Sr. 115 Second Street West Fairview, PA 17025 Re: #82 -49 -C (1 -2) Dear Mr. Lyter: PJS /jc STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 ORDER OF THE COMMISSION June 16, 1982 No. 119 The Ethics Commission has received a complaint alleging that you have violated the Ethics Act, Act 1978 -170. The nature of the alleged violation is as follows: 1. That as a Councilmembee in West Fairview Borough you participated in a meeting of November 18, 1982 or March 8, 1982 to appoint a person to a vacancy on Council which did not conform to the proper method of voting and which led to the appointment of a person who did not then properly file a Financial Interest Statement. Discussion The question of violation of any constitutionally mandated voting methods is not within the purview of the Ethics Act or this Commission. Even assuming that your appointee may not have properly filed a Financial Interest Statement, you cannot be said to have violated any provision of the Ethics Act because of someone else's alleged failure. , Conclusion: You have not violated any provision of the Ethics Act. Other items are not within the jurisdiction of the Commission under the Ethics Act. Our files in this case will remain confidential in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 P.S. 408(a). However, this Order is final and our file in this matter is closed. Sincerely, Paul mith Chair an