Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout57 EdelmanPaul H. Edelman, Esq. Edelman, O'Pake, Malsnee & Orwig Attorneys -at -Law General Battery Building 645 Penn Street, P. 0. Box 636 Reading, PA 19603 Dear Mr. Edelman: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 ORDER OF THE COMMISSION July 21, 1981 No. 57 #81 -53 -C (1 -5) On June 17, 1981, you were notified that the State Ethics Conunission had received a complaint regarding you and a possible violation of Act 170 of 1978. The Commission has completed its investigation into these allegations and finds there was a violation of the Act when you failed to report all required sources of income. The allegations and findings on which our conclusion is based follow: Allegation: That you failed to report sources of income on Line 15 of your Financial Interest Statement. Conclusion: Section 5(b) of the Ethics Act requires the reporting of direct or indirect sources of income to- taling in the aggregate of $500 or more. After a discussion with the Commission Counsel clarifying those reporting requirements, you submitted a letter dated July 6, I'981 listing more specific information on sources of unearned income yielding in excess of $500 annually. While the failure to list these sources is a violation of the Act, you corrected your Statement as soon as the requirements were clarified and the Commission accepts your revised Statement. A copy of your letter will be sent to the Borough of Wyomissing to be attached to your original Financial Interest Statement. The Commission will take no further action on this matter. Paul H. Edelman, Esq. July 21, 1981 Page -2- All files in this case will remain confidential. However, this Order is final and will become available as a public document within 15 days unless you file documentation with the Commission which justifies reconsideration and /or challenges pertinent factual findings made. Until this 15 -day period has expired, NO ONE, including the Respondent- addressee, may violate the confidentiality of these proceedings by releasing, discussing or circulating this Order. Any person who violates the confidentiality of a Commission proceeding is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $1000. or imprisoned for not more than one year or both, see 65 P.S. 409(e). PJS /jc Sincerely yours, 1 Paul J.' Smith Chairman