Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-010 ConfidentialSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 OPINION OF THE COMMISSION Before: James M. Howley, Chair Daneen E. Reese, Vice Chair Roy W. Wilt Austin M. Lee Allan M. Kluger John R. Showers DATE DECIDED: 12/15/94 DATE MAILED: 12/27/94 94 -010 Re: Former Public Official; Section 3(g); Executive -Level State Employee; Section 3(i); Secretary; A. This Opinion is issued in response to your confidential advisory request on November 21, 1994. I. ISSUE: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law presents any restrictions or prohibition upon employment of the Secretary of A following termination of service. II. FACTUAL BASIS FOR DETERMINATION: You seek a Confidential Opinion regarding the restrictions that would be placed upon you and the length of those restrictions as to your next area of employment. You are in the process of finalizing negotiations with several J firms that do J to A and to B. For the last eight years you have been Secretary of A and an ex officio member and Chairman of B as per an attached resume which is incorporated herein by reference. You are also a member of C by virtue of your position as Secretary of A. You have a representative who attends these meetings for you but consults with you in that role. You also have personally attended several meetings of that agency. Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 2 You serve on the following Boards and Commissions by personal attendance or through your representative: "D and E." You are also a F and were recently appointed to the G wherein you attended your first board meeting on November 2, 1994. In your role as Secretary of A you are a Member of the H and the I which is a coalition of J. Both of these organizations pass resolutions regarding various issues on national and regional levels. You conclude by requesting an expedited ruling since your new employment will begin in January, 1995. At the executive meeting, you appeared and inquired as to whether it would be permissible under the Ethics Law to have discussions with the K who have called you regarding your successor, to appear before other departments such as L or to work on Pennsylvania projects as to A contracts if you do not negotiate, lobby or enter into such contracts. III. DISCUSSION: As the Secretary for A you are a public official within the definition .of that term as set forth in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law in the Regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa Code §11.1. In addition, you are an executive -level state employee as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the requirements of Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, infra. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict or conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 3 is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class . consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Executive -level State employee." The Governor, Lieutenant Governor, cabinet members, deputy secretaries, the Governor's office staff, any State employee with discretionary powers which may affect the outcome of a State agency's decision in relation to a private corporation or business or any employee who by virtue of his job function could influence the outcome of such a decision. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. ,Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities (i) No former executive -level State employee may for a period of two years from the time that he terminates his State employment be employed by, receive compensation from, assist or act in a representative capacity for a business or corporation that he actively participates in Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 4 recruiting to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or that he actively participated in inducing to open a new plant, facility or branch in the Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to expand an existent plant or facility within the Commonwealth, provided that the above prohibition shall be invoked only when the recruitment or inducement is accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth to the business or corporation recruited or induced to expand. Under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law quoted above, a public official /employee may not use the authority of public office/ employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family, or business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. In applying Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law to the proffered facts, Section 3(a) would prohibit you from using the position or emoluments of your public position or confidential information to advance an opportunity of private employment with your new employer. Once again, it is not suggested that you have engaged in such conduct and the foregoing is provided to give a complete response to your inquiry. As to Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, you are subject to that provision of law since you are an executive -level state employee. However, Section 3(i) would not restrict you from the position of employment with your new employer provided you did not actively participate in recruiting or inducing your new employer to open a new facility or branch in the Commonwealth or participate in inducing your new employer to expand an existing plant or facility that was accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to your new employer. The facts do not indicate whether you actively participated in recruiting or inducing your new employer to open a new facility or branch or expand through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth. Conditioned upon the assumption that there has been no active participation by you in such recruitment or inducement of your new employer to open or expand a facility or branch through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, you would not be prohibited from accepting the position of employment with your new employer. Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 5 Upon termination of public service, you would become a "former public official" subject to Section 3(g) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. Section 3(g) of the Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted activities. (g) No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. Initially, to answer your request the governmental body with which you were associated while working with A must be identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions associated with the concept and term of "representation" must be reviewed. The term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" is defined under the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. In applying the above definition to the instant matter, we must conclude that the governmental body with which you are associated upon termination of public service would be A, H, C, D hereinafter collectively referred to as the Agencies. Your governmental body would not include E, H, I, F and G. The above is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the legislative intent (Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus, in Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006, we found that a former Division Director of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) was not merely restricted to the particular Division as was contended but was in fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year representation restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R, it was determined that a former legislative assistant to a state senator was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to the Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 6 entire Senate as his former governmental body. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service with A, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and restrict representation of persons or new employers vis -a -vis the Agencies. It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the definition of the term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so that it was not merely limited to the area where a public official /employee had influence or control but extended to the entire governmental body with which the public official /employee was associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the legislative debate relative to the amendatory language for the above term: We sought to make particularly clear that when we are prohibiting for 1 year that revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing not only with a particular subdivision of an agency or a local government but the entire unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291. Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa. C.S.A. §1901, it is clear that the governmental body with which you were associated is the Agencies. Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section 3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the former governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which a person may engage, following departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's public employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his association with his former governmental body. In respect to the one year restriction against such "representation," the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows: Section 2. Definitions. Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 7 "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. This Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law to prohibit: 1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations in general or as to contracts; 2. Attempts to influence; 3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official /employee; 4. Participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; 5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the former governmental body in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. This Commission has also held that listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. In Shay, Opinion 91 -012, we held that Section 3(g) would prohibit the inclusion of the name of a former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even though the invoices pertained to a contract which existed prior to termination of public service. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service, you should not engage in the type of activity outlined above. You may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to the Agencies. However, you may not be identified on documents submitted to the Agencies. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before the Agencies. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the Agencies. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude the making of general informational inquiries of the Agencies to secure information which is available to the general public. This must not be done in an effort to indirectly Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 8 influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the Ethics Law: Section 2. Definitions. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. In Confidential Opinion 93 -005, we held that Section 3(g) precludes a former public official /employee from providing consulting services to his former governmental body for a period of one year after termination of service in that the prohibition against representing a person includes the former public official /employee representing himself. In response to the specific inquires you pose, the Ethics Law would not prohibit any discussions with the K which is not your governmental body; furthermore, such discussions would not be for actual or promised consideration. Likewise, you would not be prohibited from appearing before other agencies such as L in that those agencies are not your governmental body. Lastly, as to any A contracts, the restrictions noted above and in particular, the Shay Opinion, supra, do apply. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct. IV. CONCLUSION: A cabinet secretary is a "public official" and an executive - level state employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Under Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, the secretary would not be prohibited from accepting a position of employment with a new employer based upon the assumption that he did not actively participate in inducing or recruiting said company to open or expand a facility or branch through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Upon termination of service with A, he would become a "former public official" subject to Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law. The former governmental body is the department and all boards Confidential Opinion, 94 -010 December 27, 1994 Page 9 and commissions noted above. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Law also requires that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed for the year following termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(10), the person who acts in good faith on this opinion issued to him shall not be subject to criminal or civil penalties for so acting provided the material facts are as stated in the request. such. This letter is a public record and will be made available as Finally, any person may request the Commission to reconsider its Opinion. The reconsideration request must be received at this Commission within fifteen days of the mailing date of this Opinion. The person requesting reconsideration should present a detailed explanation setting forth the reasons why the Opinion requires reconsideration. By the ommission, James M. How Chair