Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-029 ConfidentialI. Issue: III. Discussion: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 OPINION OF THE COMMISSION Before: Helena G. Hughes, Chair Robert W. Brown, Vice Chair G. Sieber Pancoast Dennis C. Harrington James M. Howley DATE DECIDED: October 26, 1989 DATE MAILED: Novemher R. 1989 89 - 029 Re: Conflict, Authority of Office, Voting, Painting Services, School Director, School Solicitor This confidential Opinion is issued in response to your request of September 15, 1989. Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law restricts the private employment for painting services of a school board member by the school solicitor. II. Factual Basis for Determination: You are a solicitor for the A Area School District. You require the services of a painter and you wish to hire Mr. B, a member of the Board of the A Area School District, as a painter for two personal painting projects. You state that Mr. B regularly undertakes such business projects within the community and would charge you the same rate for his services as in the ordinary course of business. The school board has considered proposals to replace you as the solicitor but such motions have failed. Mr. B has indicated that he supports your retention; however, the issue may be raised again at a future meeting which would require Mr. B to reconsider his position. You ask whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law imposes any restrictions upon Mr. B's as a school director or upon you as school solicitor. As a solicitor for the A Area School District you are public employee as that term is defined in the Ethics Law and as a member of the Board of the A Area School District Mr. B is a public official. Page 4 explanation setting forth the reasons why the Opinion requires reconsideration. By t.e Commissio .� 4=/ lena G. Hughes, hair