Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout769 RosetiIn re: Sal Roseti STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG. PENNSYLVANIA 17120 : File Docket: . Date Decided: . Date Mailed: Before: Robert W. Brown, Vice G. Sieber Pancoast Dennis C. Harrington James M. Howley Daneen E. Reese 89 -043 -C October 4, 1990 Qctober 29. 1990 Chair The State Ethics Commission received a complaint regarding a possible violation of the State Ethics Act, No. 170 of 1978, 65 P.S. 401 et. seq. Written notice, of the specific allegation(s) was served at the commencement of the investigation. A Findings Report was issued and served, upon completion of the investigation, which constituted the Complaint by the Investigation Division. An Answer was filed and a hearing was waived. The record is complete. This adjudication of the Commission is hereby issued which sets forth the individual Allegations, Findings of Fact, Discussion, Conclusions of Law and Order. This adjudication is final and will be made available as a public document fifteen days after issuance. However, reconsideration may be requested which will defer public release of this adjudication pending action on the request by the Commission. A request for reconsideration, however, does not affect the finality of this adjudication. A reconsideration request must be received at this Commission within fifteen days of issuance and must include a detailed explanation of the reasons as to why reconsideration should be granted in conformity with 51 Pa. Code 52.38. The files in this case will remain confidential in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 P.S. 408(a) during the day period and no one unless the right to challenge this Order is waived, may violate confidentiality by releasing, discussing or circulating this Order. However, confidentiality does not preclude discussing this case with an attorney at law. Any person who violates confidentiality of the Ethics Act is guilty of a misdemeanor subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, 65 P.S. 409(e). ADJUDICATION I. Allegation: That you, a Councilperson for Mt. Pocono Borough, Monroe County, violated the following provisions of the State Ethics Act (Act 170 of 1978), when you failed to file Statements of Financial Interests for the 1988 calendar year with the borough by May 1, 1989: II. FINDINGS: Section 4. Statement of financial interests required to be filed. (a) Each public employee employed by the Commonwealth shall file a statement of financial interests for the preceding calendar year with the department, agency or bureau in which he is employed no later than May 1, of each year that he holds such a position and of the year after he leaves such a position. Any other public employee shall file a statement of financial interests with the governing authority of the political subdivision by which he is employed no later than May 1 of each year that he holds such a position and of the year after he leaves such a position. 65 P.S. §404(a). §4.4.Incumbent and former public officials. (b) Incumbent public officials in governmental bodies other than those specified in subsection (a) who are not candidates shall file their Statement of Financial Interests only with their governmental body. 51 Pa. Code 54.4(b). 1. You served as a Borough Councilman in Mount Pocono Borough, Monroe County, Pennsylvania. a. You served in that position from 1985 to December of 1989. 2. Records of Mount Pocono Borough indicate Statements of Financial Interest on file in the Borough Building for you as follows: a. Statement dated March 17, 1987 filed in your capacity as a Borough Councilman. b. Statement, undated, filed in your capacity as a Borough Councilman. c. Statement dated November 1, 1989 filed in your capacity as Borough Councilman. Mr. Sal Roseti Page 2 3. The undated statement that you filed is on a 1988 form. 4. You recall submitting a Statement of Financial Interest in 1988, but you are not sure of the exact date as the statement is not dated. 5. Your statement dated March 17, 1987 was timely filed. 6. The late filing on November 1, 1989 was the result of an oversight on your part. You depended on the borough secretary to hand out the forms, and when a new person took over that position, she failed to distribute the statements. III. Discussion: Sal Roseti as a Mount Pocono Borough Councilmember is a "public official" as that term is defined under the Ethics Act. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code 1.1. As such, his conduct is subject to the provisions of that law. Initially, it is noted that Section 5 of Act 9 of June 26, 1989 provides, in part, as follows: "This amendatory act shall not apply to violations committed prior to the effective date of this act, and causes of action initiated for such violations shall be governed by the prior law, which is continued in effect for that purpose as if this act were not in force. For the purposes of this section, a violation was committed prior to the effective date of this act if any elements of the violation occurred prior thereto." Since the occurrences in this case transpired prior to the effective date of Act 9 (June 26, 1989), we must apply the provisions of Act 170 of October 4, 1978, P.L. 883 to determine whether the Ethics Act was violated. Section 4(a) of the Ethics Act quoted above requires that each public employee and each public official (Kremer v. State Ethics Commission, 56 Pa. Commw. 160, 424 A.2d 968 (1981)) must file a Statements of Financial Interests for the preceding calendar year of the year in which he is employed or serves and for the year after he leaves such position. In the instant matter, the allegation concerns whether Sal Roseti as a Mount Pocono Borough Councilmember violated Section 4(a) of the Ethics Act by failing to timely file a Financial Interests Statement for the 1988 calendar year. A review of the Statements of Financial Interests on file with the Borough reflect that Roseti, who has served Mr. Sal Roseti Page 3 on Council from 1985 to December 1989, timely filed his Statement as a public official for the 1986 calendar year. A Statement dated March 17, 1987 was filed by Roseti as well as an undated statement on a 1988 form. The 1988 calendar year Financial Interests Statements was untimely filed but such action resulted because the borough secretary did not promptly distribute the forms. In light of the above, we find a technical violation of Section 4(a) of the Ethics Act but will take no further action since there is no evidence to indicate that the late filing was intentional or done in an attempt to conceal financial interests. IV. Conclusions of Law: 1. As a Mount Pocono Borough Councilmember, Sal Roseti is a public official subject to the restrictions and filing requirements of the Ethics Act. 2. There was a technical violation of Section 4(a) of the Ethics Law in that the 1988 calendar year Statement of Financial Interests was not timely filed. In re: Sal Roseti . File Docket: 89 -043 -C : Date Decided: October 4, 1990 : Date Mailed: October 29, 1990 ORDER No. 769 1. Sal Roseti, as a Mount Pocono Borough Councilmember is a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. 2. There was a technical violation of Section 4(a) of Ethics Law in that the 1988 calendar year Statement of Financial Interests was not timely filed. 3. In that the late filing was not intentional or occasioned by an effort to conceal any financial interests, no further action will be taken. BY THE COMMISSION, J / f f'4:"' ROBERT W. BROWN, VICE CHAIR