HomeMy WebLinkAbout992 AndersenIn re: George R. Andersen
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
Before:
Daneen E. Reese, Chair
Austin M. Lee, Vice Chair
Roy W. Wilt
Allan M. Kluger
John R. Showers
Rev. Joseph G. Quinn
Boyd E. Wolff
File Docket: 91-017-C
Date Decided: 12/7/95
Date Mailed: 12/15/95
The Investigative Division of the State Ethics Commission
conducted an investigation regarding a possible violation of the
State Ethics Act, Act 170 of 1978, P.L. 883. Written notice of the
specific allegations was served at the commencement of the
investigation. A consent agreement was submitted by the parties to
the Commission for consideration which was subsequently approved.
This adjudication of the Commission is hereby issued which sets
forth the individual Allegations, Findings of Fact, Discussion,
Conclusions of Law and Order.
This adjudication is final and will be made available as a
public document fifteen days after issuance. However,
reconsideration may be requested which will defer public release of
this adjudication pending action on the request by the Commission.
A request for reconsideration does not affect the finality of this
adjudication. A reconsideration request must be received at this
Commission within fifteen days of issuance and must include a
detailed explanation of the reasons as to why reconsideration
should be granted in conformity with 51 Pa. Code §2.38.
The files in this case will remain confidential in accordance
with Section 8(a) of Act 170 of 1978. Any person who violates
confidentiality of the Ethics Law is guilty of a misdemeanor
subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not
more than one year, 65 P.S. §409(e). Confidentiality does not
preclude discussing this case with an attorney at law.
Andersen, 91 -017 -C
Page 2
I. ALLEGATION:
That George Andersen, former Deputy Executive Director of the
Pennsylvania Lottery, violated the following provisions of the
State Ethics Act (Act 170 of 1978), when he received gifts valued
in the aggregate of $200.00 or more in the form of meals and
beverages from Lewis, Gilman & Kynett (LG&K), British American Bank
Note Company (BARN) and Control Data Corporation (CDC), firms
having contracts with the Lottery, and when he failed to report
receipt of these gifts on Statements of Financial Interests filed
for the 1988 and 1989 calendar years:
Section 5. Statement of financial interests
(b) The statement shall include the
following information for the prior calendar
year with regard to the person required to
file the statement.
(6) The name and address of the source
and the amount of any gift or gifts valued in
the aggregate of $200 or more and the
circumstances of each gift. This paragraph
shall not apply to a gift or gifts received
from a spouse, parent, parent by marriage,
sibling, child, grandchild, other family
member or friend when the circumstances make
it clear that the motivation for the action
was a personal or family relationship.
However, for the purposes of this subsection,
the term "friend" shall not include a
registered lobbyist or an employee of a
registered lobbyist. This paragraph shall not
be applied retroactively.
II. FINDINGS:
1. George Andersen served as Deputy Executive Director of the
Pennsylvania Lottery (Lottery).
a. Andersen held this position in 1988 and 1989.
b. Andersen resigned in October, 1989, to accept other
employment.
2. One of Andersen's duties as Deputy Executive Director of the
Lottery required regular and frequent business meetings in
connection with services required by such contractors.
3. One of Andersen's duties as Deputy Executive Director of the
Lottery was to participate in the evaluation process of
Andersen, 91 -017 -C
Page 3
proposals submitted to the Lottery.
a. Proposals for Services were obtained through Requests
for Proposals (RFP's).
b. A committee within the Lottery Office reviewed proposed
contracts and formulated recommendations regarding the
proposals.
c. Andersen reviewed the recommendations and passed them
along to the Lottery Director, who in turn made a
recommendation to the Secretary of Revenue.
d. No meals or beverages were received during this committee
evaluation process.
4. The firm of Lewis, Gilman & Kynett (LG &K) of Philadelphia was
under contract with the Pennsylvania Lottery in 1988 to
provide certain advertising services.
a. This contract was in effect between July 1, 1988, and
June 30, 1991.
b. In exchange for its services, LG &K was to receive a sum
of $12.2 million dollars per year under the contract.
1. This sum is not a gross profit, rather it is the
amount provided to LG &K to effectuate various
advertising services.
5. The British American Bank Note Company (BABN) was under
contract with the Pennsylvania Lottery during 1988 and 1989.
a. BABN was contracted to provide the Lottery with instant
tickets.
6. Control Data Corporation (CDC) was under contract with the
Lottery during 1988 and 1989.
a. CDC was contracted to operate the Lottery's online
computer system.
7. Corporate Expense Reports indicated that employees of LG &K,
BABN and CDC provided Andersen with meals and beverages during
1988 and 1989 calendar years.
a. LG &K
b. BABN
1988 1989
$529.00 $336.00
$ 96.00 $179.00
Andersen, 91 -017 -C
Page 4
c .
a .
CDC $ 25.00 $395.00
8. Receiving meals and beverages from vendors in connection with
business meetings was a regular practice involving Lottery
officials.
Andersen and other lottery officials received meals from
LG&K, BABN and CDC.
9. Andersen did not demand meals from vendors but company
representatives offered and paid.
a. The meals provided were pursuant to business meetings or
discussions, and to accommodate the schedules of those
involved.
b. It was an industry standard for advertising companies to
take Lottery officials to dinner and /or lunch.
c. Andersen was authorized to incur business expenses and to
be reimbursed by the Commonwealth.
10. George Andersen filed a Statement of Financial Interests for
the 1988 calendar year on March 28, 1989.
a. The form bears the signature of George R. Andersen.
b. Line 12 of the Statement of Financial Interests titled
"Gifts" discloses "None."
11. Andersen did not report as gifts the meals and
received from LG&K in excess of $200.00 in calendar
on his Statement of Financial Interests filed on
1989.
beverages
year 1988
March 28,
12. George R. Andersen filed a Statement of Financial
for the 1989 calendar year on April 5, 1990.
a. The form bears the signature of George R. Andersen.
b. Line 12 of the Statement of Financial Interests titled
"Gifts" properly discloses the receipt of retirement
gifts from LG &K and CDC.
Interests
13. Andersen did not report as gifts in the form of meals and
beverages received from LG &K and CDC in excess of $200.00 in
calendar year 1989 on his Statement of Financial Interests
filed on April 5, 1990.
a. The above - listed failures to disclose were unintentional
on Andersen's part, as he was unaware that the aggregate
Andersen, 91 -017 -C
Page 5
III. DISCUSSION:
Since
effective
provisions
Ethics Act
value of the meals and beverages exceeded $200,00 as to
the companies and years in question.
In his former capacity as the Deputy Executive Director of the
Pennsylvania Lottery, George R. Andersen, hereinafter Andersen,
would be a public official /public employee as defined in the Ethics
Act, 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code §1.1. As such, his conduct would be
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act and the restrictions
therein would be applicable to him.
Initially, it is noted that Section 9 of Act 9 of June 26,
1989, P.L. 26, provides, in part, as follows:
This amendatory act shall not apply to
violations committed prior to the effective date of
this act, and causes of action initiated for such
violations shall be governed by the prior law,
which is continued in effect for that purpose as if
this act were not in force. For the purposes of
this section, a violation was committed prior to
the effective date of this act if any elements of
the violation occurred prior thereto.
the occurrences in this case transpired prior to
date of Act 9 (June 26, 1989), we must apply
of Act 170 of 1978, P.L. 883, to determine whether
was violated.
the
the
the
Section 5(b)(6) of Act 170 of 1978 requires that a public
official /employee list in his Statement of Financial Interests any
gift or gifts valued in the aggregate at $200.00 or more, except
for gifts received from the individual's spouse, parents, parents
by marriage, siblings, children or grandchildren.
Where disclosure of a gift or gifts is required, such
disclosure must include the name and address of the donor and the
value and the circumstances of each gift.
The issue before us is whether Andersen violated Section
5(b)(6) of Act 170 of 1978 regarding the allegation that he
received gifts valued in the aggregate at $200.00 or more in the
form of meals and beverages from Lewis, Gilman & Kynett(LG&K),
British American Bank Note Company (BABN), and Control Data
Corporation(CDC), firms having contracts with the Lottery, which
gifts he failed to report on his Statements of Financial Interests
filed for calendar years 1988 and 1989.
Factually, the parties have stipulated that receiving meals
and beverages from vendors in connection with business meetings was
dersen, 91 -017 -C
Page 6
a regular practice involving Lottery officials. Andersen as well
as other Lottery officials received meals from LG &K, BABN,'and CDC.
In 1988, LG &K was under contract with the Pennsylvania Lottery to
provide certain advertising services. During 1988 and 1989, BABN
was under contract with the Pennsylvania Lottery to provide
"instant tickets," while CDC was contracted to operate the
Lottery's on -line computer system. In both years, according to
corporate expense reports, employees of each of these three vendors
provided Andersen with meals and beverages.
The values of these gifts are detailed in Finding 7. The
meals and beverages provided to Andersen by BABN were less than
$200.00 for each year. The meals and beverages provided to
Andersen by CDC were under the $200.00 threshold in 1988 but they
exceeded the threshold in 1989. LG &K provided Andersen with meals
and beverages valued in excess of $200.00 in both years, 1988 and
1989.
It is noted that Andersen did not demand meals from the
vendors, but rather, the company representatives offered to provide
them. Furthermore, the meals provided were pursuant to business
meetings or discussions, to accommodate the schedules of those
involved. It is also significant that Andersen was authorized to
incur business expenses and to be reimbursed by the Commonwealth.
Finally, we would note that the facts before us reflect that no
meals or beverages were received during the committee evaluation
process of proposed contracts (Finding 3).
Andersen filed Statements of Financial Interests for calendar
years 1988 and 1989 which failed to disclose the aforesaid gifts.
Specifically, Andersen failed to disclose gifts in excess of
$200.00 in the form of meals and beverages received from LG &K in
both 1988 and 1989 and from CDC in 1989. The 1989 calendar year
Statement of Financial Interests did, however, properly disclose
the receipt of retirement gifts from LG &K and CDC.
In applying Section 5 (b) (6) of Act 170 of 1978 to the above
facts, we find technical violations as to Andersen's failure to
disclose the aforesaid gifts of meals and beverages from LG &K in
1988 and 1989 and from CDC in 1989. It is clear that these gifts
exceeded the $200.00 threshold and should have been disclosed. In
light of the fact that Andersen has voluntarily agreed to amend the
Statements of Financial Interests for the 1988 and 1989 calendar
years to include these gifts, we shall take no further action. We
approve the consent agreement which we believe to be the proper
disposition for this case given the totality of the facts and
circumstances. We specifically note the fact that Andersen's
failure to make the requisite disclosures was unintentional in that
he was unaware that the aggregate value of the meals and drinks
from these companies had exceeded $200.00 for the years in
question.
Andersen, 91 -017 -C
Page 7
IV. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1. In his former capacity as Deputy Executive Director of the
Pennsylvania Lottery, George R. Andersen would be a public
official /public employee subject to the provisions of Act 170
of 1978.
2. A technical violation of Section 5(b) (6) of Act 170 of
1978 occurred when Andersen received gifts valued in the
aggregate at $200.00 or more in the for of meals and
beverages from Lewis, Gilman & Rynett and failed to report
receipt of these gifts on his Statement of Financial Interests
filed for calendar year 1988.
3. A technical violation of Section 5(b)(6) of Act 170 of
1978 occurred when Andersen received gifts valued in the
aggregate at $200.00 or more in the for of meals and
beverages from Lewis, Gilman & Rynett and Control Data
Corporation and failed to report receipt of these gifts on his
Statement of Financial Interests filed for calendar year 1989.
4. No violation of Section 5(b)(6) of Act 170 of 1978
occurred as to gifts in the form of meals and beverages
received by Andersen from British American Bank Note Company
or Control Data Corporation in calendar year 1988 in that such
gifts were not valued in the aggregate at $200.00 or more.
5. No violation of Section 5(b)(6) of Act 170 of 1978
occurred as to gifts in the form of meals and beverages
received by Andersen from British American Bank Note Company
in calendar year 1989 in that such gifts were not valued in
the aggregate at $200.00 or more.
In re:
George R. Andersen File Docket:
. Date Decided:
Date Mailed:
91 -017 -C
12/7/95
12/15/95
ORDER NO. 992
1. A technical violation of Section 5(b) (6) of Act 170 of
1978 occurred when George R. Andersen, in his former capacity
as Deputy Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Lottery,
received gifts valued in the aggregate at $200.00 or more in
the form of meals and beverages from Lewis, Gilman & Kynett
and failed to report receipt of these gifts on his Statement
of Financial Interests filed for calendar year 1988.
2. A technical violation of Section 5(b) (6) of Act 170 of
1978 occurred when Andersen received gifts valued in the
aggregate at $200.00 or more in the form of meals and
beverages from Lewis, Gilman & Kynett and Control Data
Corporation and failed to report receipt of these gifts on his
Statement of Financial Interests filed for calendar year 1989.
3. No violation of Section 5(b)(6) of Act 170 of 1978
occurred as to gifts in the form of meals and beverages
received by Andersen from British American Bank Note Company
or Control Data Corporation in calendar year 1988 in that such
gifts were not valued in the aggregate at $200.00 or more.
4. No violation of Section 5(b)(6) of Act 170 of 1978
occurred as to gifts in the form of meals and beverages
received by Andersen from British American Bank Note Company
in calendar year 1989 in that such gifts were not valued in
the aggregate at $200.00 or more.
5. Andersen is directed within 30 days of issuance of this
Order to file amended Statements of Financial Interests for
calendar years 1988 and 1989 to reflect the acceptance of
meals and beverages in excess of $200.00 from Lewis, Gilman &
Kynett as to 1988 and 1989 and from Control Data Corporation
as to 1989.
a. Compliance with the above will result in
this case with no further action.
b. Failure to comply with the above will
institution of an order enforcement action.
the closing of
result in the
BY THLFOMMISSION,
Atio,vu
DANEEN E. REESE, CHAIR