Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout058-S DipaoloIN RE: JAMES D. DIPAOLO, Respondent STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 File Docket: 93 -002 -P Date Decided: May 6, 1993 'Date Mailed: May 11, 1993 Before: James M. Howley, Chair Daneen E. Reese, Vice Chair Roy W. Wilt Austin M. Lee Allan M. Rluger The State Ethics Commission received information regarding possible violation(s) of Section 4 and /or Section 5 of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law ( "Ethics Law "), Act 9 of 1989, 65 P.S. 5401 et luta. Written Notice was mailed to Respondent in accordance with Section (7)(5) of the Ethics Law, as to which there was no response. A Notice and Order to Show Cause was issued and served upon Respondent. An Answer was not filed and a hearing was deemed waived. The record is complete. This adjudication of the Commission is hereby issued, which sets forth Findings of Fact, Discussion, Conclusions of Law and Order. This Adjudication is final and is a public document. Reconsideration may be requested. A request for reconsideration, however, does not affect the finality of this adjudication. A reconsideration request must be received at this Commission within fifteen days of issuance and must include a detailed explanation of the reasons as to why reconsideration should be granted in conformity with 51 Pa. Code SS2.38(b),(c). James D. DiPaolo May 7, 1993 . Page 2 I. FINDINGS: adult individual who resides at R.D. 1, Box 1355, Mt. 1. Respondent James D. DiPaolo is an or maintains a mailing address Bethel, Pennsylvania 18343. 2. At all times relevant to these been a Township Supervisor for Pennsylvania. (a) Respondent resigned the aforesaid position on or about January 6, 1992. 3. Respondent did not file a Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with Upper Mt. Bethel Township on or before May 1, 1992. 4. A first Notice letter dated October 21, 1992, and a final Notice letter dated December 1, 1992, were served upon Respondent by this Commission. The said Notice letters stated in detail the specific allegations against Respondent concerning the delinquency of Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 and the penalties for failure to file or for filing a deficient Statement of Financial Interests. The said Notice letters provided Respondent an opportunity to avoid the institution of these civil penalty proceedings by filing an accurate and complete Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 within twenty (20) days of the dates of the respective Notice letters. 5. Respondent did not file a Statement of Financial Interests with Upper Mt. Bethel Township for calendar year 1991 on or before the expiration of twenty days from the date of the said final Notice letter. proceedings, Respondent has Upper Mt. Bethel Township, II. DISCUSSION: Respondent has been a Township Supervisor for Upper Mt. Bethel Township, Pennsylvania at all times relevant to these proceedings. Respondent resigned the aforesaid position on or about January 6, 1992. As a Township Supervisor for Upper Mt. Bethel Township, Respondent has at all times relevant to these proceedings been a "public official" as that term is defined under the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law ( "Ethics Law "), 65 P.S. §401, et sect., and as such, Respondent has at all times relevant to these proceedings been subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. James D. DiPaolo May 7, 1993 Page 3 Pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Ethics Law, Respondent is required to file a Statement of Financial Interests for the preceding calendar year with Upper Mt. Bethel Township each year Respondent holds the above position and the year after Respondent leaves said position: (a) Each public official of the Commonwealth shall file a statement of financial interests for the preceding calendar year with the commission no later than May 1 of each year that he holds such a position and of the year after he leaves such a position. Each public employee and public official of the Commonwealth shall file a statement of financial interests for the preceding calendar year with the department, agency, body or bureau in which he is employed or to which he is appointed or elected no later than May 1 of each year that he holds such a position and of the year after he leaves such a position. Anv other public employee or public official shall file a statement of financial interests with the aoverninct authority of the political subdivision by which he is employed or within which he is appointed or elected no later than Mav 1 of each year that he holds such a position and of the _year after he leaves such a position. Persons who are full -time or part -time solicitors for political subdivisions are required to file under this section. 65 P.S. 5404(a) (Emphasis added). Factually, Respondent failed to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with Upper Mt. Bethel Township, which constitutes a failure to comply with Sections 4 and 5 of the Ethics Law. 65 P.S. 55404, 405. Section 9(f) of the Ethics Law provides as follows: (f) In addition to any other civil remedy or criminal penalty provided for in this act, the commission may, after notice has been served in accordance with section 7(5) and upon a majority vote of its members, levy a civil penalty upon any person subject to this act who fails to file a statement of financial interests in a timely manner or who files a deficient statement of financial interests, at a rate of not more than $25 for each day such statement remains delinquent or deficient. The maximum penalty payable under this paragraph is $250. 65 P.S. 5409(f). An application of Section 9(f) to this case establishes that James D. DiPaolo May 7, 1993 Page 4 this Commission has the discretion to levy a maximum civil penalty against the Respondent for each such delinquent or deficient Statement of Financial Interests. The prerequisite service of a Notice letter in accordance with Section 7(5) was satisfied. Furthermore, upon being notified of the above transgression, Respondent did not remedy Respondent's failure to comply with the Ethics Law, although he was given until the expiration of twenty days from the date of the final Notice letter in which to comply so as to avoid the institution of these formal proceedings. This Commission .then instituted formal proceedings against Respondent by issuing an Order to Show Cause, ordering Respondent to show cause why a civil penalty should not be levied against him. Respondent did not file an answer to the Order to Show Cause. There is nothing of record which could constitute a defense or excuse for Respondent's failure to comply with the Ethics Law. Respondent has failed to show cause why a civil penalty should not be levied against him in this matter. Based upon the totality of circumstances in this case, we hereby levy one civil penalty against Respondent James D. DiPaolo, at the rate of $25.00 per day, for each day Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 has remained delinquent. Given the number of days during which the said Statement of Financial Interests has remained delinquent, the resultant amount to be levied against Respondent is $250.00. Respondent shall be ordered to file a complete and accurate Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991. III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Respondent James D. DiPaolo was at all times relevant to these proceedings a Township Supervisor for Upper Mt. Bethel Township, Pennsylvania and as such Respondent was at all times relevant to these proceedings a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law, Act 9 of 1989. 2. Respondent failed to comply with Sections 4 and 5 of the Ethics Law when Respondent failed to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with Upper Mt. Bethel Township. 3. Notice of the delinquency of Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 was previously served upon Respondent in accordance with Section 7(5) of the Ethics Law, 65 P.S.`5407(5). 4. Based upon the totality of the circumstances in this case, a maximum civil penalty is warranted. IN RE: JAMES D. DIPAOLO, Respondent ORDER NO. 058 - State Ethics Commission 309 Finance Building P.O. Box 11470 Harrisburg, PA 17108 -1470 Attention: Legal Division File Docket: 93 -002 -P Date Decided: May 6, 1993 Date Mailed: Mav 11, 1993 1. James D. DiPaolo, a former Township Supervisor for Upper Mt. Bethel Township, Pennsylvania failed to comply with Sections 4 and 5 of the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. § §404, 405, by failing to timely file a Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with Upper Mt. Bethel Township. 2. Based upon the circumstances of this case, this Commission hereby levies one civil penalty against Respondent James D. DiPaolo, each at the rate of $25.00 per day for each day Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 has remained delinquent, for a total civil penalty of $250.00. 3. Respondent James D. DiPaolo is ordered to pay the above civil penalty in the total amount of $250.00 within thirty days of the issuance of this Order, by forwarding a check to this Commission payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for deposit in the State Treasury. 4. Respondent James D. DiPaolo is directed within 30 days of issuance of this Order to file a complete and accurate Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with Upper Mt. Bethel Township providing full financial disclosure as required by the Ethics Law, and to forward a copy of same to this Commission at the following address to evidence compliance: 5. Failure to comply with any provision of this Order will result in the initiation of an appropriate enforcement action. BY THE COMMISSION, wle C James M. Hoy,