HomeMy WebLinkAbout052-S WhitfieldSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
IN RE: CONSTANCE A. WHITFIELD : File Docket: 92 -090 -P
: Date Decided: February 16, 1993
Respondent : Date Mailed: February 19, 1993
Before: James M. Howley, Chair
Daneen E. Reese, Vice Chair
Dennis C. Harrington
Roy W. Wilt
Austin M. Lee
Allan M. Kluger
Joseph W. Marshall, III
The State Ethics Commission received information regarding
possible violation(s) of Section 4 and /or Section 5 of the Public
Official and Employee Ethics Law ( "Ethics Law "), Act 9 of 1989, 65
P.S. S401 et seq. Written Notice was mailed to Respondent in
accordance with Section (7)(5) of the Ethics Law, as to which there
was no response. A Notice and Order to Show Cause was issued and
served upon Respondent. An Answer was not filed and a hearing was
deemed waived. The record is complete. This adjudication of the
Commission is hereby issued, which sets forth Findings of Fact,
Discussion, Conclusions of Law and Order.
This Adjudication is final and is a public document.
Reconsideration may be requested. A request for reconsideration,
however, does not affect the finality of this adjudication. A
reconsideration request must be received at this Commission within
fifteen days of issuance and must include a detailed explanation of
the reasons as to why reconsideration should be granted in
conformity with 51 Pa. Code § §2.38(b),(c).
Constance A. Whitfield
February 19, 1993
Page 2
I. FINDINGS:
1. Respondent Constance A. Whitfield is an adult individual who
resides or maintains a mailing address at 7901 Roosevelt
Boulevard #64, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19152 -3447.
2. Respondent is now and at all times relevant to these
proceedings has been a Member of the Philadelphia County Board
of Assistance.
(a) Respondent specifically held the aforesaid position in
1992.
3. Respondent did not file a Statement of Financial Interests for
calendar year 1991 with the State Ethics Commission and the
Governor's Office of Administration on or before May 1, 1992.
4. A Notice letter dated June 16 or June 17, 1992, and a final
Notice letter dated July 20, 1992, were served upon Respondent
by this Commission. The said Notice letters stated in detail
the specific allegations against Respondent concerning the
delinquency of Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests
for calendar year 1991 and the penalties for failure to file
or for filing a deficient Statement of Financial Interests.
Each of the said Notice letters provided Respondent an
opportunity to avoid the institution of these civil penalty
proceedings by filing an accurate and complete Statement of
Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 within twenty (20)
days of the date of the Notice letter.
5. Respondent did not file a Statement of Financial Interests
with the State Ethics Commission and the Governor's Office of
Administration for calendar year 1991 within twenty days of
the date of the said final Notice letter.
6. The records of the State Ethics Commission reflect that
Respondent has previously been served with two Notices of the
delinquency of Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests
for another calendar year, specifically calendar year 1989.
7. As a matter of public record, Respondent filed a Statement of
Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 after issuance of
the Order to Show Cause which Statement of Financial Interests
is dated November 20, 1992, and was received by this
Commission on November 30, 1992.
II. DISCUSSION:
Respondent is now and at all times relevant to these
proceedings has been a Member of the Philadelphia County Board of
Constance A. Whitfield
February 19, 1993
Page 3
Assistance. Respondent specifically held the aforesaid position in
1992.
As a Member of the Philadelphia County Board of Assistance,
Respondent is a "public official" as that term is defined under the
Public Official and Employee Ethics Law ( "Ethics Law "), 65 P.S.
§401, et seg., and as such, Respondent is subject to the provisions
of the Ethics Law.
Factually, Respondent failed to timely file a Statement of
Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with the State Ethics
Commission and the Governor's Office of Administration, which
constitutes a failure to comply with Sections 4 and 5 of the Ethics
Law. 65 P.S. S §404,405.
Section 9(f) of the Ethics Law provides as follows:
(f) In addition to any other civil remedy or
criminal penalty provided for in this act, the commission
may, after notice has been served in accordance with
section 7(5) and upon a majority vote of its members,
levy a civil penalty upon any person subject to this act
who fails to file a statement of financial interests in
a timely manner or who files a deficient statement of
financial interests, at a rate of not more than $25 for
each day such statement remains delinquent or deficient.
The maximum penalty payable under this paragraph is $250.
65 P.S. §409(f).
An application of Section 9(f) to this case establishes that
this Commission has the discretion to levy a maximum civil penalty
against the Respondent for the delinquent Statement of Financial
Interests for calendar year 1991. The prerequisite service of a
Notice letter in accordance with Section 7(5) was satisfied.
Respondent did not remedy the failure to file a Statement of
Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 although iven days from the date of the aforesaid final Notice letter newhichnto
do so. This Commission then instituted formal proceedings against
Respondent by issuing an Order to Show Cause, ordering Respondent
to show cause why a civil penalty should not be levied against
Respondent. Respondent did not file an answer to the Order to Show
Cause. There is nothing of record which would constitute a defense
or excuse for Respondent's failure to comply with the Ethics Law.
Respondent has failed to show cause why a civil penalty should not
be levied against Respondent in this matter.
We would further note that the public records of the State
Ethics Commission reflect that Respondent has
served with two Notices of the delinquency of reviousl
Respo dent's
Constance A. Whitfield
February 19, 1993
Page 4
Statement of Financial It In isreclearf othatnoas e a Member year, the
calendar year 1989. , Respondent
that she
Philadelphia County Board e afile know
of s Financial
is a public official required to
Interests pursuant to Sections 4 and 5 of the Ethics Law.
case, we
Based upon the totality of circumstances sdent t Constance A
hereby levy one civil penalty against ac per day, for
each d a y s n ent''s Sta eme t f Financial Interests for calendar
ye ah day Respond
year 1991 has remained delinquent. Interests has remained delinquenty
which the Statement of Financial
the resultant amount to be levied against Respondent is Two-Hundred
and Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
It is noted that following nnt of Financial
t e h In�erests o dated
Cause, Respondent filed a Statement
November 20, 1992 for calendar
aa year
by this Commission on November 30f
Financial Interests was received
1992.
III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
1, Respondent Constance r proceedings has is been and
all
of times the
relevant to these p and as such
Philadelphia County Board of Assistance,
Respondent is now and at all times relevant t o to h e r e
proceedings has been a "public official" subject
provisions of the Ethics Law, Act 9 of 1989.
2. Respondent failed t Law when Respondent failed to timely
4 and 5 of the Ethics imely
91
file a Statement of Financial s ion and the Governor as Office
with the State Ethics Commission
Administration.
3. Notice of the delinquency of Respondent's Statement
calendar year 1991 was previously
served upon R es of
Financial Interests Respondent with accordance Section 7(5) of the
s p
Ethics Law, 65 P.S. S407(5).
4. Based upon the totality of the circumstances in this case, a
maximum civil penalty is warranted.
IN RE: CONSTANCE A. WHITFIELD : File Docket: 92 -090 -P
Date Decided: February 16, 1993
Respondent : Date Mailed: February 19, 1993
ORDER NO. 052 -
1. Constance A. Whitfield, as a Member of the Philadelphia County
Board of Assistance, failed to comply with Sections 4 and 5 of
the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. SS404, 405, by failing to timely file
a Statement of Financial Interests for calendar year 1991 with
the State Ethics Commission and the Governor's Office of
Administration.
2. Based upon the circumstances of this case, this Commission
hereby levies one civil penalty against Respondent Constance
A. Whitfield at the rate of Twenty -Five Dollars ($25.00) per
day for each day Respondent's Statement of Financial Interests
for calendar year 1991 has remained delinquent, for the total
civil penalty of Two- Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
Respondent is ordered to pay the above civil penalty in the
total amount of Two- Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00) within
thirty days of the issuance of this Order, by forwarding a
check to this Commission payable to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for deposit in the State Treasury.
3. Failure to comply with any provision of this Order will result
in the initiation of an appropriate enforcement action.
BY THE COMMISSION,
James M. Howley