HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-554 FullerErnest Fuller
1427 Kearney Hill Road
Six Mile Run, PA 16679
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
(717) 783 -1610
1 -800- 932 -0936
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
March 28, 2000
Re: Conflict; Public Official /Employee; Member; County; Planning Commission;
Township; Secretary/Treasurer; CDBG Funds.
Dear Mr. Fuller:
This responds to your letter of February 16, 2000 by which you requested
advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65
Pa.C.S. §1101 e, seq., presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a member of a
county planning commission as to participating in deliberations and recommendations
regarding community development block grant project funding to a township where the
planning commission member is also a resident of the township and the township
secretary /treasurer.
Facts: You are a Member of the Bedford County Planning Commission ( "Planning
Commission "). You state that your position is an unpaid advisory position. You are
also a resident of Broad Top Township ( "Township "), Bedford County, and the
Township's Secretary/Treasurer.
The basic responsibility of the Planning Commission is to develop a County Plan
which is then subject to the final approval by the County Commissioners_ The staff
of the Planning Commission works directly for the County Commissioners in
performing many planning and grant management activities. The staff reports on its
activities to the Planning Commission Board at monthly meetings and receives general
guidance from the Board Members. The Board also provides advice to many other
entities in addition to the County Commissioners. You state that there currently are
no County land use or zoning ordinances in Bedford County which the Planning
Commission administers.
Every year, the Planning Commission proposes a budget to the County
Commissioners for its activities which is subject to the approval of the County
Commissioners. Funds are transferred from the Commissioners' bank accounts to
Planning Commission bank accounts on an as needed basis and the Commission Board
approves the payment of bills from those accounts at its monthly meetings.
FAX: (717) 787 - 0806 • Web Site: www.ethics.state.pa.us • e - mail: ethics @state_pa.us
00 -554
Fuller, 00 -554
March 28, 2000
Page 2
Bedford County receives Community Development Block Grant ( "CDBG ") funds
every year which it then allocates to specific projects which fall within State
guidelines. You state that the Planning Commission staff handles the project
submission process from eligible local entities. The Planning Commission Members
then prioritize the projects that are submitted and make a recommendation to the
County Commissioners as to how the County should allocate the CDBG funds. The
County Commissioners make the final decision as to the manner in which the funds
will be used. You state that the County Commissioners have often made changes to
the Planning Commission's recommendations.
The Township is eligible for CDBG funds_ Over the next several years, the
Township intends to make requests to the County for the use of such funds for eligible
Township projects. You maintain that none of the CDBG funds will be used for a
project that would provide you with a personal benefit.
Given the above facts, you ask whether you would have a conflict as to
participating in the Planning Commission's deliberations on CDBG project funding to
the Township including the setting of priorities and the making of specific
recommendations to the County Commissioners.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and
1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the
requestor based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the
advisory based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission
does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as
to facts which have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully
disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§1107(10), (11).
An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed
all of the material facts.
The facts which you have submitted do not clearly indicate whether the Bedford
County Planning Commission ( "Planning Commission ") on which you serve is a purely
advisory body. Although you have stated that you are in "an unpaid advisory
position," the factual submission is insufficient as to the status of the Planning
Commission. Under the Ethics Act and Regulations, members of planning
commissions that are purely advisory are not public officials under the Ethics Act but
they are subject to Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) which apply to everyone. Assuming
the Planning Commission is not a purely advisory body, as a Member, you are a "public
official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act, and hence you are subject to the
provisions of that Act.
Section 1 103(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
Section 1103. Restricted activities.
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
65 Pa.C.S. §1103(a).
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows:
Section 1102. Definitions.
Fuller, 00 -554
March 28, 2000
Page 3
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received
through his holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his
immediate family or a business with which he or a member
of his immediate family is associated. The term does not
include an action having a de minimis economic impact or
which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry,
occupation or other group which includes the public official
or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary
to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to
a particular public office or position of public employment.
65 Pa.C.S. §1102.
In addition, Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics Act provide in part that
no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no
public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon
the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public
official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions
of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but
merely to provide a complete response to the question presented.
Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provides as follows:
Section 1103. Restricted activities.
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the
following procedure shall be employed. Any public official
or public employee who in the discharge of his official
duties would be required to vote on a matter that would
result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and,
prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and
disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a
written memorandum filed with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is
taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be
unable to take any action on a matter before it because the
number of members of the body required to abstain from
voting under the provisions of this section makes the
majority or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote
if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the
case of a three - member governing body of a political
subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting
as a result of a conflict of interest, and the remaining two
Fuller, 00 -554
March 28, 2000
Page 4
members of the governing body have cast opposing votes,
the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote
to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise
provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §1103(j).
In each instance of a conflict, Section 1103(j) requires the public
official /employee to. abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for
same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person
recording the minutes or supervisor.
In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the
governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the
abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Act, then voting is permissible provided
the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Mlakar, Advice 91- 523 -S.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter,
pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or
a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated.
Having established the above principles, your specific inquiry shall now be
addressed.
Conditioned upon the assumption that the Planning Commission is not a purely
advisory body, as a Planning Commission Member, you would not have a conflict as
to participating in deliberations on CDBG project funding to the Township including the
setting of priorities and the making of specific recommendations to the County
Commissioners. This conclusion is based upon your specific factual representation
that your participation in such matter will not result in a financial benefit to yourself.
Absent the element of a financial gain, a transgression of Section 1 103(a) of the Ethics
Act would not exist.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code
of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the
applicability of the respective municipal code.
Conclusion: Assuming the Bedford County Planning Commission is not a purely
advisory body, as a Member, you are a public official subject to the provisions of the
Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act "), 65 Pa.C.S. §1101 et seq. You
would not have a conflict as to participating in deliberations on CDBG project funding
to Broad Top Township including the setting of priorities and the making of specific
recommendations to the County Commissioners based upon your specific factual
representation that your participation would not result in a financial benefit to yourself.
Absent the element of a financial gain, a transgression of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics
Act would not exist. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
Fuller, 00 -554
March 28, 2000
Page 5
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A
personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a
formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received
at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice
pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §13.2(h ). The appeal may be received at the
Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by
FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the
Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the
appeal.
cent !I opko
Chief Counsel