HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-635 RegishStephen Regish, Chairman
East Bethlehem Township
Municipal Authority
Box 136
Fredericktown, PA 15333
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
(717) 783 -1610
1- 800 - 932 -0936
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 8, 1999
99 -635
Re: Simultaneous Service; Municipal Authority Chairman; Municipal Authority
Manager; Township.
Dear Mr. Regish:
This responds to your letter of November 8, 1999, by which you requested
advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act ")
imposes any prohibition or restrictions upon a chairman of a township municipal
authority from simultaneously serving or being employed as a manager of the
authority.
Facts: As Chairman of the East Bethlehem Township Municipal Authority
( "Authority "), you request an advisory from the State Ethics Commission.
You ask whether you may simultaneously hold the positions of Chairman of the
Authority and Manager of the Authority.
Discussion: As Chairman of East Bethlehem Township Municipal Authority, you
are a "public official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act and hence you are
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. 65 Pa.C.S. §1102; 51 Pa. Code § 1 1.1.
Sections 1 103(a) and 1 103(j) of the Ethics Act provide:
Section 1 103. Restricted activities.
(a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
(j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the
following procedure shall be employed. Any public official
or public employee who in the discharge of his official
FAX: (717) 787 -0806 • Web Site: www.ethics.state.pa.us • e -mail: ethics @state.pa.us
Regish, 99 -635
December 8, 1999
Page 2
65 Pa. C: S. §1102.
duties would be required to vote on a matter that would
result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and,
prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and
disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a
written memorandum filed with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is
taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be
unable to take any action on a matter before it because the
number of members of the body required to abstain from
voting under the provisions of this section makes the
majority or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote
if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the
case of a three - member governing body of a political
subdivision, where one member has - abstained from voting
as a result of a conflict of interest, and the remaining two
members of the governing body have cast opposing votes,
the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote
to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise
provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. § §1103(a), (j).
The following terms that pertain to conflicts of interest under the Ethics Act are
defined as follows:
Section 1102. Definitions.
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public
official or public employee of the authority of his office or
employment or any confidential information received
through his holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his
immediate family or a business with which he or a member
of his immediate family is associated. The term does not
include an action having a de minimis economic impact or
which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an industry,
occupation or other group which includes the public official
or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The actual
power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary
to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to
a particular public office or position of public employment.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the question of
simultaneous service, it is initially noted that the General Assembly has the
constitutional power to declare by law which offices are incompatible. Pa. Const. Art.
6, §2. There does not appear to be any statutorily- declared incompatibility precluding
simultaneous service in the positions in question.
Regish, 99 -635
December 8, 1999
Page 3
Preliminarily, it is assumed that you will become an employee of the Authority
if you accept the position of Manager. Turning to the question of a conflict of interest,
the State Ethics Commission has held that Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would
not prohibit a municipal authority board member from simultaneously serving in a
compensated position of employment with the authority on which he serves.
Swick /Amari, Opinion No. 91 -006. However, pursuant to Section 1 103(a) of the
Ethics Act, the Authority Member /Authority employee would be prohibited from using
the authority of his public position or confidential information received by holding such
position for a prohibited private pecuniary benefit. Thus, for example, the authority
board member could not use the authority of office by participating in matters
concerning his own authority employment such as his actual appointment, salary
raises, his job performance, etc. L, Koslow, Order 458 -R, affirmed Koslow v. State
Ethics Commission, 540 A.2d. 1374 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988).
Where simultaneous service would place the public official /public employee in
a continual state of conflict, such as where in one position he would be accounting to
himself in another position on a continual basis, there would be an inherent conflict
(See, Johnson, Opinion 86 -004). Where an inherent conflict would exist, it would
appear to be impossible, as a practical matter, for the public official /public employee
to function in the conflicting positions without running afoul of Section 1 103(a).
Absent a statutorily - declared incompatibility or an inherent conflict under
Section 1 103(a), the Ethics Act would not preclude an individual from simultaneously
serving in more than one position, but in each instance of a conflict of interest, the
individual would be required to abstain and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of
Section 1 103(j) as set forth above.
In this case, based upon the facts which have been submitted, there does not
appear to be an inherent conflict that would preclude simultaneous service as a
Chairman of the Authority and a Manager employed by the Authority. Consequently,
such simultaneous service would be permitted within the parameters of Sections
1103(a) and 1103(j).
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As Chairman for the East Bethlehem Township Municipal Authority,
you are a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. You may,
consistent with Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, simultaneously serve as a Chairman
of the Authority and a Manager employed by the Authority, subject to the restrictions,
conditions and qualifications set forth above. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed
course of conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1 107(1 1), an Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason
to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission.
Regish, 99 -635
December 8, 1999
Page 4
A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a
formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received
at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice
pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the
Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or
by FAX transmission (717 -787- 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at
the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of
the appeal.
cerely,
Vincent J. opko
Chief Counsel