The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About99-515 RochatJohn D. Rochat, Chief Millersville Borough Police Department 10 Colonial Ave. Millersville, PA 17551 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470 (717) 783 -1610 1- 800 - 932 -0936 ADVICE OF COUNSEL February 23, 1999 Re: Simultaneous Service, Chief of Police and Township Supervisor. Dear Mr. Rochat: 99 -515 This responds to your letter of February 4, 1999, by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act imposes any prohibition or restrictions upon a chief of police from simultaneously serving or being employed as a township supervisor. Facts: You are the Chief of Police for Millersville Borough in Lancaster County and have been approached by several community leaders to run for Supervisor in Conewago Township, Dauphin County, where you reside. You ask for an advisory from the State Ethics Commission as to whether you may simultaneously serve as Police Chief and a Township Supervisor. You presume that you may do so, as the two positions are in different localities and counties. Discussion: As a Chief of Police for Millersville Borough, you are a "public employee" as that term is defined in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ( "Ethics Act ") and hence you are subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. 65 Pa.C.S. §1102; 51 Pa. Code § 1 1.1. Sections 1 103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: Section 1103. Restricted activities. (a) Conflict of interest. - -No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j) Voting conflict. - -Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being FAX : (717) 787 -0806 • Web Site: www.ethics.state.ba.us • e -mail: sec@state.pa.us Rochat, 99 -515 February 23, 1999 Page 2 taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest, and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§1103(a), (j). The following terms that pertain to conflicts of interest under the Ethics Act are defined as follows: Section 1102. Definitions. 65 Pa.C.S. §1102. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the question of simultaneous service, it is initially noted that the General Assembly has the constitutional power to declare by law which offices are incompatible. Pa. Const. Art. 6, §2. There does not appear to be any statutorily - declared incompatibility precluding simultaneous service in the positions in question. Turning to the question of conflict of interest, pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official /public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official /public employee himself, a member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Rochat, 99 -515 February 23, 1999 Page 3 Where simultaneous service would place the public official /public employee in a continual state of conflict, such as where in one position he would be accounting to himself in another position on a continual basis, there would be an inherent conflict (See, Johnson, Opinion 86 -004). Where an inherent conflict would exist, it would appear to be impossible, as a practical matter, for the public official /public employee to function in the conflicting positions without running afoul of Section 1 103(a). Absent a statutorily - declared incompatibility or an inherent conflict under Section 1 103(a), the Ethics Act would not preclude an individual from simultaneously serving in more than one position, but in each instance of a conflict of interest, the individual would be required to abstain and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 1 103(j) as set forth above. In this case, based upon the facts which have been submitted, there does not appear to be an inherent conflict that would preclude simultaneous service as Chief of Police and Township Supervisor. Consequently, such simultaneous service would be permitted within the parameters of Sections 1 103(a) and 1 103(j). Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Conclusion: As a Chief of Police for Millersville Borough, you are a "public employee" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. You may, consistent with Section 1 103(a) of the Ethics Act, simultaneously serve in the positions of Chief of Police and Township Supervisor, subject to the restrictions, conditions and qualifications set forth above. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed course of conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §13.2(h ). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. i cerely, Vincent . Dop o Chief Counsel